I have written test cases. Initially I have used junit 4 but now I shifted to junit 5.
I have added and removed ralevant dependency but it not working properly.
My contract test work with junit 4 #Test annotation but same test case not working with Junit 5 #Tesy annotation
I have change relevant part as well.
Because of security I'm not able to share my code.
Related
I'm making some Integration Tests for my app and I'm encountering this problem I can't see how to solve.
I'm using Spring Boot 2.4.13 + Spring Data Neo4J 6.1.9
FYI, I deleted the Application default test that comes bundled when you create a project through Spring Initializr, and under /src/test/resources I have a .yml file named application.yml
My IT class looks like this:
#SpringBootTest
public class ClientIT {
#Autowired
private ClientServiceImpl service;
#Autowired
private ClientRepository repository;
#Test
void someTest() {
//Given
//When
//Then
}
}
But when I run this test I get the following Exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to load ApplicationContext
And this is the cause:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The provided database selection provider differs from the ReactiveNeo4jClient's one.
The thing is I don't use SDN's Reactive features at all in my project. I don't even understand why Spring tries to load it. I've created an Issue under the Spring Data Neo4j GitHub repository (https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-neo4j/issues/2488) but they could only tell me that ReactiveNeo4jDataAutoConfiguration gets automatically included if there's a Driver or Flux class in the classpath which I don't have.
I've been debugging the Spring internals while booting up the Application after JUnit Jupiter methods to no success.
What I could see is that at some point after JUnit Jupiter tests preparation/initialization, "reactiveNeo4jTemplate" gets injected into DefaultListableBeanFactory's beanDefinitionNames variable.
I've tried many combinations of different annotations intended to be used when making Integration Tests but the one time it worked was after I explicitly excluded ReactiveNeo4jDataAutoConfiguration class through
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude=ReactiveNeo4jDataAutoConfiguration.class)
What I've always seen in some blogposts is that by using #SpringBootTest I shouldn't worry about this kind of problem but it looks like I need to add that annotation every time I want to make a new IT test.
My Integration Tests basically consist of bootstrapping the application + web server (tomcat) along with an embedded Neo4J instance and after that, making requests to check everything works as it should. Do I really need to worry about all of this just to make these simple tests?
Thank you
References:
How do I set up a Spring Data Neo4j integration test with JUnit 5 (in Kotlin)?
SprintBootTest - create only necessary beans
Answering my own question after finding what is causing this error:
In the linked Github Issue, one of the developers says having Flux.class in the classpath forces SDN to instantiate Neo4jReactiveDataAutoConfiguration which is what is causing the other reactive beans to instantiate.
Apparently, neo4j-harness brings io.projectreactor (where Flux.class belongs) as an indirect dependency through neo4j-fabric which is the root of our problems.
The Spring Data Neo4j will be fixing this issue in a patch later this week.
I have a JUnit 5 based test class with many unit tests. Each one was individually tested, but when I executed all the tests in the class - 2 tests failed
I removed one of the failed test to see if they are conflicting, but the other one fails when the whole suite is run.
The spring container/context is created at the start of the test
Individually, the test runs fine...green
Test has the annotations
#Test
#Transactional
Class level annotations
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = WebEnvironment.NONE)
#ActiveProfiles("test")
Does this mean, there is a bug in the code? As it passes when run individually I'm not sure I get to know the issue if I run test in debug mode.
Please can someone help - why it can happen
I want to enable cucumber tests with #EnableIf annotation, but it is not working even if i add #EnabledIf("false")
here is the code that i use :
#EnabledIf("false")
#SpringBootTest(classes = Application.class, webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.DEFINED_PORT)
#CucumberContextConfiguration
public class CucumberRoot {
private int port = 8080;
protected String DEFAULT_URL = "http://localhost:" + port + "/";
#Autowired
protected TestRestTemplate template;
}
for other integration tests beside cucumber i am able to use #EnableIf annotation.
Is there any way to achieve that ?
No.
https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/
1.1. What is JUnit 5?
Unlike previous versions of JUnit, JUnit 5 is composed of several different modules from three different sub-projects.
JUnit 5 = JUnit Platform + JUnit Jupiter + JUnit Vintage
The JUnit Platform serves as a foundation for launching testing frameworks on the JVM. It also defines the TestEngine API for developing a testing framework that runs on the platform. Furthermore, the platform provides a Console Launcher to launch the platform from the command line and a JUnit 4 based Runner for running any TestEngine on the platform in a JUnit 4 based environment. First-class support for the JUnit Platform also exists in popular IDEs (see IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, NetBeans, and Visual Studio Code) and build tools (see Gradle, Maven, and Ant).
JUnit Jupiter is the combination of the new programming model and extension model for writing tests and extensions in JUnit 5. The Jupiter sub-project provides a TestEngine for running Jupiter based tests on the platform.
JUnit Vintage provides a TestEngine for running JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 based tests on the platform.
And like JUnit Jupiter and JUnit Vintage, Cucumber is a test engine on the JUnit Platform. The annotation you are using is JUnit Jupiter annotation and can only be understood by JUnit Jupiter. Neither JUnit Vintage nor Cucumber can understand it.
However Cucumber does support OpenTest4Js TestAbortedException. So you can use a before hook to stop a scenario before any step are executed. Either by throwing the exception directly or using Assumptions from JUnit Jupiter.
#Before
public void before() {
boolean condition = // decide if tests should abort
if (condition)
throw new TestAbortedException()
}
#Before
public void before() {
boolean condition = // decide if tests should abort
Assumptions.assumeTrue(condition, "Condition not met");
}
I am developing a spring boot application and write some junit test.
But I find when I run any tests, tomcat is also started up, It makes those tests very slow and waste many times.
When I develop a SpringMvc application, junit test can run without start tomcat, It saves many times.
So, I want to ask it there anyway to run springboot test with out start tomcat?
Running a test with #SpringBootTest does not start an embedded server by default.
By default, it runs in the MOCK environment.
By default, #SpringBootTest will not start a server. You can use the
webEnvironment attribute of #SpringBootTest to further refine how your
tests run:
MOCK(Default) : Loads a web ApplicationContext and provides a mock web
environment. Embedded servers are not started when using this
annotation. If a web environment is not available on your classpath,
this mode transparently falls back to creating a regular non-web
ApplicationContext. It can be used in conjunction with
#AutoConfigureMockMvc or #AutoConfigureWebTestClient for mock-based
testing of your web application.
Documentation link: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/boot-features-testing.html#boot-features-testing-spring-boot-applications
I guess what you wanted to achieve could be achieved by Slice Test concept. In general, you don't need a full-fledged mock environment or environment with an embedded server with all the configured beans in the spring container when you are performing unit tests.
For e.g. you have to unit test your Controller then you have #WebMvcTest annotation in place that will configure only web related beans and ignore the rest of the beans.
To test whether Spring MVC controllers are working as expected, use
the #WebMvcTest annotation. #WebMvcTest auto-configures the Spring MVC
infrastructure and limits scanned beans to #Controller,
#ControllerAdvice, #JsonComponent, Converter, GenericConverter,
Filter, WebMvcConfigurer, and HandlerMethodArgumentResolver. Regular
#Component beans are not scanned when using this annotation.
Documentation link: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/boot-features-testing.html#boot-features-testing-spring-boot-applications-testing-autoconfigured-mvc-tests
Similarly, for the database layer, there is #DataJpaTest
Documentation link: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/boot-features-testing.html#boot-features-testing-spring-boot-applications-testing-autoconfigured-jpa-test
Long story short: when you intend to do unit testing with Spring framework, slice test is the one you should use in most of the cases.
If you are placing the following annotations, this will start the embedded container...
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
Because, if you see the SpringBootTestContextBootstrapper.class class , this has been invoked the container which is invoked by #BootstrapWith(SpringBootTestContextBootstrapper.class) when we specify #SpringBootTest
You can remove those and can do as follows:
import org.junit.Test;
public class HellotomApplicationTests {
#Test
public void contextLoads() {
}
}
R-Click and RunAs Junit
O/P
I have a problem getting Spring Boot 2.0.5 to work nicely with Kotlintest 3.1.10.
I made a test project illustrating the problem I have.
The project is a Spring Boot 2 application
with two entities, ShoppingOrder and OrderLine (to be totally unimaginative).
There is also a test case ShoppingOrderSpec which just tests the mapping by storing and retrieving the Order.
The testcase is configured like this:
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension::class)
#Transactional
#SpringBootTest
class ShoppingOrderSpec : WordSpec() {
override fun listeners() = listOf(SpringListener)
The test case is using the SpringExtension
by Spring to hook into the JUnit 5 engine. It also uses the SpringListener and Wordspec from Kotlintest to structure the tests
and do the assertions.
The SpringListener correctly autowires the dependencies, but somehow the transaction is not being created.
Running the testcase gives the following stack-trace:
2018-10-12 10:54:14.329 INFO 59374 --- [intest-engine-0] com.example.demo.ShoppingOrderSpec : Started ShoppingOrderSpec in 4.478 seconds (JVM running for 7.421)
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: failed to lazily initialize a collection of role: com.example.demo.ShoppingOrder.lines, could not initialize proxy - no Session
at org.hibernate.collection.internal.AbstractPersistentCollection.throwLazyInitializationException(AbstractPersistentCollection.java:582)
...
at com.example.demo.ShoppingOrderSpec$1$1.invoke(ShoppingOrderSpec.kt:35)
at com.example.demo.ShoppingOrderSpec$1$1.invoke(ShoppingOrderSpec.kt:19)
So, somehow the org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional annotation does not seem to work,
as removing the annotation, just gives the same response.
Anyone any ideas how to get the #Transactional being applied and respected?
You can't use JUnit Jupiter extensions with KotlinTest as they are different engines. Junit Jupiter is an implementation on top of Junit Platform, like KotlinTest is, but anything written specifically for Jupiter won't work with KotlinTest. Anything written for Junit Platform should work however.
Unfortunately, the naming choices by the JUnit team are poor imo, and so people think JUnit Jupiter is the same thing as JUnit Platform.
Anyway, those
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension::class)
#Transactional
#SpringBootTest
extensions are not going to mean anything to KotlinTest, anymore than they would for Spek or whatever. ExtendWith is a Jupiter specific annotation that tells it to use the SpringExtension class. The KotlinTest equivilent is SpringListener which you've already wired in.
I'm not sure if #SpringBootTest will be picked up or not by Spring. Support may need to be added for that depending on what it does.
Finally #Transactional works by creating proxies on the methods, but since in more advanced testing frameworks like KotlinTest, the test containers are not methods, but just arbitrary functions, it won't be able to intercept.
I think in this case, you might need to create a proper method and annotate that, or try using the AnnotationSpec rather than StringSpec or whatever other spec base class you are using, which uses actual methods that you could annotate.