I set up a CockroachDB cluster for a school project. The only thing I have done is created 1 database with 1 table with 1 instance of 6 rows, but when I look at the dashboard I have already used 500K RUs. This seems like a huge amount to me, but I'm new to cloud databases so I don't know if this is normal behavior or not. I'm just worried I will run out of RUs without doing anything on the database. In this image the graph of the RU usage can be seen when there are no connections and when the hub wasn't opened. Can anyone maybe clarify this for me?
I think this explanation is more likely to be the reason:
https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/cockroachcloud/serverless-faqs.html#my-cluster-doesnt-have-any-current-co[…]ing-rus-when-there-are-no-connections
To summarize, the monitoring console uses up some RUs. So if you have a browser tab open with the console, it will use RUs even if you don't have any connections open.
As that FAQ says, this can use ~8 RUs per second. Over 19 hours, that is about ~540,000 RUs total. The solution is to not leave the console open.
On the stats point, note that auto-stats collection is only triggered when data in the table changes.
I believe what you're seeing is the Automatic Metric collection. You can read more about it on this FAQ.
I need to aggregate data coming from DynamoDB to AWS Redshift, and I need to be accurate and in-sync. For the ETL I'm planning to use DynamoDB Streams, Lambda transform, Kinesis Firehorse to, finally, Redshift.
How would be the process for updated data? I find it's all fine-tuned just for ETL. Which should be the best option to maintain both (Dynamo and Redshift) in sync?
These are my current options:
Trigger an "UPDATE" command direct from Lambda to Redshift (blocking).
Aggregate all update/delete records and process them on an hourly basis "somehow".
Any experience with this? Maybe is Redshift not the best solution? I need to extract aggregated data for reporting / dashboarding on 2 TB of data.
Redshift COPY command supports using a DyanmoDB table as a data source. This may or may not be a possible solution in your case as there are some limitations to this process. Data types and table naming differences can trip you up. Also this isn't a great option for incremental updates but can be done if the amount of data is small and you can design the updating SQL.
Another route to look at DynamoDB Stream. This will route data updates through Kinesis and this can be used to update Redshift at a reasonable rate. This can help keep data synced between these databases. This will likely make the data available for Redshift as quickly as possible.
Remember that you are not going to get Redshift to match on a moment by moment bases. Is this what you mean by "in-sync"? These are very different databases with very different use cases and architectures to support these use cases. Redshift works in big chunks of data changing slower than what typically happens in DynamoDB. There will be updating of Redshift in "chunks" which happen a more infrequent rate than on DynamoDB. I've made systems to bring this down to 5min intervals but 10-15min update intervals is where most end up when trying to keep a warehouse in sync.
The other option is to update Redshift infrequently (hourly?) and use federated queries to combine "recent" data with "older data" stored in Redshift. This is a more complicated solution and will likely mean changes to your data model to support but doable. So only go here if you really need to query very recent data right along side with older and bigger data.
The best-suited answer is to use a Staging table with an UPSERT operation (or a Redshift interpretation of it).
I found the answer valid on my use case when:
Keep Redshift as up to date as possible without causing blocking.
Be able to work with complex DynamoDB schemas so they can't be used as a source directly and data has to be transformed to adapt to Redshift DDL.
This is the architecture:
So we constantly load from Kinesis using the same COPY mechanism, but instead of loading directly to the final table, we use a staging one. Once the batch is loaded into staging we seek for duplicates between the two tables. Those duplicates on the final table will be DELETED before an INSERT is performed.
After trying this I've found that all DELETE operations on the same batch perform better if enclosed within a unique transaction. Also, a VACUUM operation is needed in order to re-balance the new load.
For further detail on the UPSERT operation, I've found this source very useful.
We are using D365 on-prem, in our business process we are supposed to log 4000 cases and around 2000 contacts in CRM. Along with this, the entries in POA table are keep growing and they are now around 17 millions. Now from last 3 to 4 days we are facing slow CRM response in browser as well as in Unified Service Desk (USD).
Any idea how can I increase the performance in such environment?
You can cleanup the POA table for orphaned records. Based on your security need you might have designed the concepts of ownership/assignment/sharing which leads to POA table growth.
A good post to start: Lessons Learned Deleting 312 Million Records From CRM’s PrincipalObjectAccess Table
Next thing is running SQL profiler & finding the missing index. Adding this index will definitely improve the search performance. Don’t forget that over-indexing will impact the create/update operations.
I have an Elasticsearch server with logs data, right now I have 3 year data (50 GB). I have checked that, data older than 1 year is rarely required.
If I change all the queries to fetch the data only for last 1 year, how it impact the performance? Or should I store data older than 1 year on another server?
I Did some digging but could not find the exact answer.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/hardware.html
We are building an iOS app with Parse.com, but still can't figure out the right way to backup data efficiently.
As a premise, we have and will have a LOT of data store rows.
Say we have a class with 1million rows, assume we have it backed up, then want to bring it back to Parse, after a hazardous situation (like data loss on production).
The few solutions we have considered are the following:
1) Use external server for backup
BackUp:
- use the REST API to constantly back up data to a remote MySQL server (we chose MySQL for customized analytics purpose, since it's way faster and easier to handle data with MySQL for us)
ImportBack:
a) - recreate JSON objects from MySQL backup and use the REST API to send back to Parse.
Say we use the batch operation which permits 50 simultaneous objects to be created with 1 query, and assume it takes 1 sec for every query, 1million data sets will take 5.5hours to transfer to Parse.
b) - recreate one JSON file from MySQL backup and use the Dashboard to import data manually.
We just tried with 700,000 records file with this method: it took about 2 hours for the loading indicator to stop and show the number of rows in the left pane, but now it never opens in the right pane (it says "operation time out") and it's over 6hours since the upload started.
So we can't rely on 1.b, and 1.a seems to take too long to recover from a disaster (if we have 10 million records, it'll be like 55 hours = 2.2 days).
Now we are thinking about the following:
2) Constantly replicate data to another app
Create the following in Parse:
- Production App: A
- Replication App: B
So while A is in production, every single query will be duplicated to B (using background job constantly).
The downside is of course that it'll eat up the burst limit of A as it'll simply double the amount of query. So not ideal thinking of scaling up.
What we want is something like AWS RDS which gives an option to automatically backup daily.
I wonder how this could be difficult for Parse since it's based on AWS infra.
Please let me know if you have any idea on this, will be happy to share know-hows.
P.S.:
We’ve noticed an important flaw in the above 2) idea.
If we replicate using REST API, all the objectIds of all Classes will be changed, so every 1to1 or 1toMany relations will be broken.
So we think about putting a uuid for every object class.
Is there any problem about this method?
One thing we want to achieve is
query.include(“ObjectName”)
( or in Obj-C “includeKey”),
but I suppose that won’t be possible if we don’t base our app logic on objectId.
Looking for a work around for this issue;
but will uuid-based management be functional under Parse’s Datastore logic?
Parse has never lost production data. While we don't currently offer automated backups, you can request one any time you like, and we're working on making all of this even nicer. Additionally, it's easier in most cases to import the JSON export file through the data browser rather than using the REST batch.
I can confirm that today, Parse did lost my data. Or at least it appeared to be so.
After several errors where detected on multiple apps (agreed by Parse Status twitter account), we could not retrieve data for an app, without any error.
It was because an entire column of one of our class (type pointer) disappeared and data was not present anymore in the dashboard.
We are using this pointer column to filter / retrieve data, so the returned queries and collections were empty.
So we decided to recreate the column manually. By chance, recreating the column, with the same name and type, solved the issue and the data was still there... I can't explain it but I really thought, and the app reacted as if, data were lost.
So an automated backup and restore option is mandatory, it is not an option.
On December 2015 parse.com released a new dashboard with an improved export feature.
Just select your app, click on "App Settings" -> "General" -> "Export app data". Parse generates a json-file for every class in your app and sends an email to you, if the export-progress is done.
UPDATE:
Sad but true, parse.com is winding down: http://blog.parse.com/announcements/moving-on/
I had the same issue of backing up parse server data. As parse server is using mongodb that is why backing up data is not an issue I have just done a simple thing. downloaded the mongodb backup from the server. And then restored it using
mongorestore /path-to-mongodump (extracted files)
As parse has been turned to open source.Therefore we can adopt this technique.
For accidental deletes, writing a cloud function 'beforedelete' to backup the current row to another class would work.
For regular backups, manual export of changed records (use filter) will be useful. For recovery this requires you to write scripts / use import option (not so sure) in data browser. You could also write a cloud function replicate data on your backup server (haven't tried this yet).
However there are some limitations to cloud code that you should consider before venturing into it:
https://parse.com/docs/cloud_code_guide#functions-resource