What are your favorite Grails debugging tricks? [closed] - debugging

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
Grails can be a bit of a bear to debug with its long stack dumps. Getting to the source of the problem can be tricky. I've gotten burned a few times in the BootStrap.groovy doing "def foo = new Foo(a: a, b: b).save()", for example. What are your favorite tricks for debugging Grails apps?

Some general tips:
Clear stacktrace.log, do grails run-app, then open stacktrace.log in a viewer (I prefer less stacktrace.log on linux)... once in your viewer, search for .groovy and .gsp... that generally brings you to what you actually care about.
When a stacktrace refers to a line number in a GSP file, you should open that view in a browser with ?showSource in the query string, i.e. http://localhost:8080/myProject/myController/myAction?showSource... this shows the compiled GSP source, and all GSP line numbers in the stacktrace refer to the compiled GSP, not the actual GSP source
Always, always, always surround your saves with at least some minimal error handling.
Example:
try {
if(!someDomainObject.save()) {
throw new Exception ("Save failed")
}
} catch(Exception e) {
println e.toString()
// This will at least tell you what is wrong with
// the instance you are trying to save
someDomainObject.errors.allErrors.each {error ->
println error.toString()
}
}
Beyond that, a lot of it just comes down to recognizing stacktraces and error messages... a lot of the time, Grails is incredibly unhelpful in the error messages it gives you, but you can learn to recognize patterns, like the following:
Some of the hardest errors to make sense of are because you didn't run grails clean or grails upgrade... to avoid these problems, I always use the following on the command line to run grails: grails clean; yes | grails upgrade; grails run-app
If the error has to do with duplicate definitions of a class, make sure that you declare the package the class belongs to at the top of the class's file
If the error has to do with schema metadata, connection, socket, or anything like that, make sure your database connector is in lib/, make sure your permissions are correct both in DataSource.groovy and in the database for username, password, and host, and make sure that you know the ins and outs of your connector's version (i.e. mysql connector version 5.1.X has a weird issue with aliases that may require you to set useOldAliasMetadataBehavior=true on the url in DataSource.groovy)
And so on. There are a lot of patterns to learn to recognize.

To add to Chris King's suggestion on save, I wrote a reusable closure:
Closure saveClosure = { domainObj ->
if(domainObj.save())
println "Domain Object $domainObj Saved"
else
{
println "Errors Found During Save of $domainObj!"
println domainObj.errors.allErrors.each {
println it.defaultMessage
}
}
}
Then you can just use it everywhere and it will take care of error reporting:
def book = new Book(authorName:"Mark Twain")
saveClosure(book)
Additionally, I use the debug plugin - it allows extra logging, and I added tag to the bottom of my main - that gives me a view of all the variables in session / request.
Runtime Logging plugin allows to enable logging at runtime.
While writing this answer, P6SPY plugin also seems like it could be useful - it logs all statements your app makes against the database by acting as a proxy.
Grails Console is also useful. I use it to interactively poke around and experiment with some code, which also comes in handy during debugging.
And of course, being able to step through Debugger is sweet. I switched to IntelliJ IDEA since it has the best Grails / Groovy support.

I once asked an experienced groovy developer about how he effectively debugged his applications. His answer:
I write tests!
And he has a very good point: If your code has sufficient unit and integration tests, you will hardly ever need to debug anything. Plus you get to say smug things like that to your fellow developers...
For Grails:
Unit Testing
Functional Testing
Really excellent grails app testing developerWorks article

To log exceptions with GrailsUtil.
try{
...
}catch (Exception e){
log.error("some message", GrailsUtil.sanitize(e))
...
}
More info about sanitize.

I'm not sure if this can be done out-of-the-box, but in webapps I find it useful to have a "who am I?" facility in the various view files.
The idea is to emit a message into the rendered HTML, to identify the fragment. This is especially true when I am encountering an app for the first time.
In Grails, I do this with a custom tag. For example, consider list.gsp for a Student:
<g:debug msg="student list" />
Here is the code:
class MiscTagLib {
def debug = { map ->
if (grailsApplication.config.grails.views.debug.mode == true) {
def msg = map['msg']
out << "<h2>${msg}</h2><br/>"
}
}
}
The key is that you can leave those tags in there, if desired, as they only appear in when the mode is enabled in Config.groovy:
grails.views.debug.mode=true

adding this code To the Bootsrap.groovy:init will overwrite the save method and execute some other code as well, printing out error messages in this case.
class BootStrap {
def grailsApplication
def init = {servletContext ->
grailsApplication.domainClasses.each { clazz ->
clazz.clazz.get(-1)
def gormSave = clazz.metaClass.getMetaMethod('save')
clazz.metaClass.save = {->
def savedInstance = gormSave.invoke(delegate)
if (!savedInstance) {
delegate.errors.each {
println it
}
}
savedInstance
}
def gormSaveMap = clazz.metaClass.getMetaMethod('save', Map)
clazz.metaClass.save = { Map m ->
def savedInstance = gormSaveMap.invoke(delegate, m)
if (!savedInstance) {
delegate.errors.each {
println it
}
}
savedInstance
}
def gormSaveBoolean = clazz.metaClass.getMetaMethod('save', Boolean)
clazz.metaClass.save = { Boolean b ->
def savedInstance = gormSaveBoolean.invoke(delegate, b)
if (!savedInstance) {
delegate.errors.each {
println it
}
}
savedInstance
}
}
...
}
hope that helps someone :)
(i know its not really DRY)
ref: http://grails.1312388.n4.nabble.com/How-to-override-save-method-on-domain-class-td3021424.html

Looking at the source code! This has saved me so many times now! And now that the code is hosted at GitHub it's easier than ever. Just press "t" and start typing to find the class that you're looking for!
http://github.com/grails/grails-core

Here's some tricks collected by #groovymag from Grails people in twitter:
http://blog.groovymag.com/2009/02/groovygrails-debugging/

For simple applications I use println statement.It is very very easy trick.For complex applications use debug mode in intellij idea.

Related

Why does Sonarqube mark try as a critical issue?

I'm currently facing an issue with some SonarQube's analysis being performed over some Kotlin code I wrote.
I'm trying to implement a method that connects to the database and returns accordingly to the query's result. I'm not sure how related this can be, but I added the following maven dependencies to my project:
Quarkus
Arrow
Ktorm
The code is the following:
#ApplicationScoped
class Repository(private val database: Database) {
override fun get(name: String): Either<Error, Brand> =
try {
database.brands.find { it.name eq name }.rightIfNotNull {
MissingBrandError("Missing brand")
}
} catch (e: Exception) {
Either.Left(DatabaseError(e.message))
}
}
class Error(val message: String)
class MissingUserError(val message: String) : Error(message)
class DatabaseError(val message: String? = null) : Error(message ?: "Some database error")
NOTE: Database object is of type org.ktorm.database.Database and brands is of type org.ktorm.entity.EntitySequence
The code is working and I also wrote unit tests for it that pass and give enough coverage (accordingly to the code coverage analysis tool), but at some point in my pipeline SonarQube marks the try as a critical issue with the following message:
Possible null pointer dereference in (...)Repository(String) due to return value of called method
I checked it online and I could find some related questions, but none of the provided answers worked for me. Amongst the many attempts these are the ones I can remember I tried without any success:
Not inlining any code (pretty much using Java style code)
Extracting the query result to a variable
Check with if/else statements for nullability instead (both with inlined try and without)
I'd also like to highlight that all I can see on Sonar is the generated report and CLI for the running build. I don't have access to any of its configuration or intended to change them (unless of course it comes down to that). The line I mentioned seems to be the only one affected by this problem according to Sonar's report, that's why this is the solo class I provided.
I hope I provided enough info and that any of you can help me with this. Thanks in advance.

Tips on solving 'DevTools was disconnected from the page' and Electron Helper dies

I've a problem with Electron where the app goes blank. i.e. It becomes a white screen. If I open the dev tools it displays the following message.
In ActivityMonitor I can see the number of Electron Helper processes drops from 3 to 2 when this happens. Plus it seems I'm not the only person to come across it. e.g.
Facing "Devtools was disconnected from the page. Once page is reloaded, Devtools will automatically reconnect."
Electron dying without any information, what now?
But I've yet to find an answer that helps. In scenarios where Electron crashes are there any good approaches to identifying the problem?
For context I'm loading an sdk into Electron. Originally I was using browserify to package it which worked fine. But I want to move to the SDKs npm release. This version seems to have introduced the problem (though the code should be the same).
A good bit of time has passed since I originally posted this question. I'll answer it myself in case my mistake can assist anyone.
I never got a "solution" to the original problem. At a much later date I switched across to the npm release of the sdk and it worked.
But before that time I'd hit this issue again. Luckily, by then, I'd added a logger that also wrote console to file. With it I noticed that a JavaScript syntax error caused the crash. e.g. Missing closing bracket, etc.
I suspect that's what caused my original problem. But the Chrome dev tools do the worst thing by blanking the console rather than preserve it when the tools crash.
Code I used to setup a logger
/*global window */
const winston = require('winston');
const prettyMs = require('pretty-ms');
/**
* Proxy the standard 'console' object and redirect it toward a logger.
*/
class Logger {
constructor() {
// Retain a reference to the original console
this.originalConsole = window.console;
this.timers = new Map([]);
// Configure a logger
this.logger = winston.createLogger({
level: 'info',
format: winston.format.combine(
winston.format.timestamp(),
winston.format.printf(({ level, message, timestamp }) => {
return `${timestamp} ${level}: ${message}`;
})
),
transports: [
new winston.transports.File(
{
filename: `${require('electron').remote.app.getPath('userData')}/logs/downloader.log`, // Note: require('electron').remote is undefined when I include it in the normal imports
handleExceptions: true, // Log unhandled exceptions
maxsize: 1048576, // 10 MB
maxFiles: 10
}
)
]
});
const _this = this;
// Switch out the console with a proxied version
window.console = new Proxy(this.originalConsole, {
// Override the console functions
get(target, property) {
// Leverage the identical logger functions
if (['debug', 'info', 'warn', 'error'].includes(property)) return (...parameters) => {
_this.logger[property](parameters);
// Simple approach to logging to console. Initially considered
// using a custom logger. But this is much easier to implement.
// Downside is that the format differs but I can live with that
_this.originalConsole[property](...parameters);
}
// The log function differs in logger so map it to info
if ('log' === property) return (...parameters) => {
_this.logger.info(parameters);
_this.originalConsole.info(...parameters);
}
// Re-implement the time and timeEnd functions
if ('time' === property) return (label) => _this.timers.set(label, window.performance.now());
if ('timeEnd' === property) return (label) => {
const now = window.performance.now();
if (!_this.timers.has(label)) {
_this.logger.warn(`console.timeEnd('${label}') called without preceding console.time('${label}')! Or console.timeEnd('${label}') has been called more than once.`)
}
const timeTaken = prettyMs(now - _this.timers.get(label));
_this.timers.delete(label);
const message = `${label} ${timeTaken}`;
_this.logger.info(message);
_this.originalConsole.info(message);
}
// Any non-overriden functions are passed to console
return target[property];
}
});
}
}
/**
* Calling this function switches the window.console for a proxied version.
* The proxy allows us to redirect the call to a logger.
*/
function switchConsoleToLogger() { new Logger(); } // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
Then in index.html I load this script first
<script src="js/logger.js"></script>
<script>switchConsoleToLogger()</script>
I had installed Google Chrome version 79.0.3945.130 (64 bit). My app was going to crash every time when I was in debug mode. I try all the solutions I found on the web but no one was useful. I downgrade to all the previous version:
78.x Crashed
77.x Crashed
75.x Not Crashed
I had to re-install the version 75.0.3770.80 (64 bit). Problem has been solved. It can be a new versions of Chrome problem. I sent feedback to Chrome assistence.
My problem was that I was not loading a page such as index.html. Once I loaded problem went away.
parentWindow = new BrowserWindow({
title: 'parent'
});
parentWindow.loadURL(`file://${__dirname}/index.html`);
parentWindow.webContents.openDevTools();
The trick to debugging a crash like this, is to enable logging, which is apparently disabled by default. This is done by setting the environment variable ELECTRON_ENABLE_LOGGING=1, as mentioned in this GitHub issue.
With that enabled, you should see something along the lines of this in the console:
You can download Google Chrome Canary. I was facing this problem on Google Chrome where DevTools was crashing every time on the same spot. On Chrome Canary the debugger doesn't crash.
I also faced the exact same problem
I was trying to require sqlite3 module from renderer side
which was causing a problem but once i removed the request it was working just fine
const {app , BrowserWindow , ipcMain, ipcRenderer } = require('electron')
const { event } = require('jquery')
const sqlite3 = require('sqlite3').verbose(); // <<== problem
I think the best way to solve this (if your code is really really small) just try to remove functions and run it over and over again eventually you can narrow it down to the core problem
It is a really tedious , dumb and not a smart way of doing it , but hey it worked
I encountered this issue, and couldn't figure out why the the DevTool was constantly disconnecting. So on a whim I launched Firefox Developer edition and identified the cause as an undefined variable with a string length property.
if ( args.length > 1 ) {
$( this ).find( "option" ).each(function () {
$( $( this ).attr( "s-group" ) ).hide();
});
$( args ).show();
}
TL;DR Firefox Developer edition can identify these kinds of problems when Chrome's DevTool fails.
After reading the comments above it is clear to me that there is a problem at least in Chrome that consists of not showing any indication of what the fault comes from. In Firefox, the program works but with a long delay.
But, as Shane Gannon said, the origin of the problem is certainly not in a browser but it is in the code: in my case, I had opened a while loop without adding the corresponding incremental, which made the loop infinite. As in the example below:
var a = 0;
while (a < 10) {
...
a ++ // this is the part I was missing;
}
Once this was corrected, the problem disappeared.
I found that upgrading to
react 17.0.2
react-dom 17.0.2
react-scripts 4.0.3
but also as react-scripts start is being used to run electron maybe its just react scripts that needs updating.
Well I nearly went crazy but with electron the main problem I realized I commented out the code to fetch (index.html)
// and load the index.html of the app.
mainWindow.loadFile('index.html');
check this side and make sure you have included it. without this the page will go black or wont load. so check your index.js to see if there's something to load your index.html file :) feel free to mail : profnird#gmail.com if you need additional help
Downgrade from Electron 11 to Electron 8.2 worked for me in Angular 11 - Electron - Typeorm -sqlite3 app.
It is not a solution as such, but it is an assumption of why the problem.
In the angular 'ngOnInit' lifecycle I put too many 'for' and 'while' loops, one inside the other, after cleaning the code and making it more compact, the problem disappeared, I think maybe because it didn't finish the processes within a time limit I hope someone finds this comment helpful. :)
I have stumbled upon the similar problem, My approach is comment out some line that I just added to see if it works. And if that is the case, those problem is at those lines of code.
for(var i = 0;i<objLen; i+3 ){
input_data.push(jsonObj[i].reading2);
input_label.push(jsonObj[i].dateTime);
}
The console works fine after i change the code to like this.
for(var i = 0;i<objLen; i=i+space ){
input_data.push(jsonObj[i].reading2);
input_label.push(jsonObj[i].dateTime);
}
Open your google dev console (Ctrl + shift + i). Then press (fn + F1) or just F1, then scroll down and click on the Restore defaults and reload.

How to focus on multiple windows

I am currently working on selenium using ruby.
Is there any way to focus on a new window from an application?
Thanks!
I'm not aware of Ruby, but this what you can do in JAVA. See if you can implement similar logic in RUBY.
String parentHandle= driver.getWindowHandle();//Return parent window handle
for (String handle : driver.getWindowHandles()) {
driver.switchTo().window(handle);
}
driver.close(); // close newly opened window
driver.switchTo().window(parentHandle); // switch back to the parent window
Unfortunately, I cannot leave comments, or else I would point you to both of these websites:
API examples: http://docs.seleniumhq.org/docs/03_webdriver.jsp -> ruby option
API docs: http://seleniumhq.github.io/selenium/docs/api/rb/Selenium/WebDriver/Window.html
http://seleniumhq.github.io/selenium/docs/api/rb/Selenium/WebDriver/Driver.html
Here is a direct translation of the code by abhijeet in case you are wondering how it may look like in ruby.
parent_handle = driver.window_handle
driver.window_handles.each do |handle|
driver.switch_to.window handle
end
driver.close
driver.switch_to.window(parent_handle)

Turn off FireFox driver refresh POST warning

I have inherited some GEB tests that are testing logging into a site (and various error cases/validation warnings).
The test runs through some validation failures and then it attempts to re-navigate to the same page (just to refresh the page/dom) and attempts a valid login. Using GEB's to() method, it detects that you are attempting to navigate to the page you are on, it just calls refresh - the problem here is that attempts to refresh the last POST request, and the driver displays the
"To display this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (such as a search or order confirmation) that was performed earlier"
message - as the test is not expecting this popup, it hangs and the tests timeout.
Is there a way to turn off these warnings in Firefox webdriver? or to auto-ignore/accept them via Selenium or GEB?
GEB Version: 0.9.2,
Selenium Version: 2.39.0
(Also tried with minor version above: 0.9.3 & 2.40.0)
Caveats:
I know about the POST/Re-direct/GET pattern - but am not at liberty to change the application code in this case
The warning message only causes an issue intermittently (maybe 1 in 5 times) - I have put this down to speed/race conditions whereby the test completes the next actions before the message appears - I know a possible solution is to update tests to wait for message to appear and then accept, but my question is, is there a global setting that can just avoid these being triggered/displayed?
That refresh() is there to work around an issue with IE driver which ignores calls to driver.get() with the same url as the current one.
Instead of monkey patching Browser class (which might bite you somewhere down the line or might not) I would change the url of your login page class. You might for example add an insignificant query string - I think that simply a ? at the end should suffice. The driver.currentUrl == newUrl condition will evaluate to false and you will not see that popup anymore.
If I understand you issue properly this might help. In Groovy you can modify a class on the fly.
We use Spock with Geb and I placed this in a Super class which all Spock Spec inherit from. Eg: QSpec extends GebSpec.
It is the original method slightly modified with the original code commented out so you know what has been changed. I use this technique in several required places to alter Geb behaviour.
static {
Browser.metaClass.go = { Map params, String url ->
def newUrl = calculateUri(url, params)
// if (driver.currentUrl == newUrl) {
// driver.navigate().refresh()
// } else {
// driver.get(newUrl)
// }
driver.get(newUrl)
if (!page) {
page(Page)
}
}
}

Is there a way to prevent Visual Studio from breaking on exceptions in a specific method?

I know I can control the way Visual Studio handles exceptions according to their type and to the fact that they're eventually caught using the "Exception" dialog.
However, I've got a library that's internally throwing (and catching) an ArgumentOutOfRange exception when I'm calling a specific method. The exception is thrown (and caught by the library) maybe 1% of the time, but I'm calling this method a lot. The editor says it's by design (and indeed, the design they've chosen makes sense).
The thing is that I don't want Visual Studio to break each time the exception is thrown.
I don't want to stop breaking on ArgumentOutOfRange exceptions, as I may have some in my code and want to break on those.
I don't want to enable "just my code" debugging because I'm concerned about the exceptions thrown outside of my code (notably for performance reasons)
Is there a way to achieve this? I've been looking into attributes (such as DebuggerStepThrough), but haven't find something adequate yet.
Any hints on how to do this ?
I don't want to enable "just my code" debugging
Yeah, stop there right now. That is exactly the feature you need to not get the unwanted debugger breaks. If you don't want to know about somebody else's crappy code then flip that checkbox back on.
This invariably goes off the rails when programmers use exceptions for flow control. A very common crime. It takes two of them to turn that into a mess that turns a debugging session into a very tedious click nightmare. When you need the debugger feature that breaks on the first-chance exception then you basically lost if somebody else needed that as well.
Everybody hopes that they can magically use the [DebuggerNonUserCode] or [DebuggerHidden] or [DebuggerStepThrough] attributes to make that problem disappear. It doesn't. The other programmer did not think his code was unimportant enough to deserve those attributes. And, well, it wasn't because there's always a bug hidden in code that uses try/catch-em-all code. Pokémon code.
So Microsoft had to find another way to help programmers deal with crappy library code. They did. Tick that checkbox, bam, solved. Nothing you can do about that crappy code anyway, other than sending a nasty-gram to the author. Don't let us or Microsoft slow you down doing that as well, y'all have to get along to create a product that people like to use.
I think it's not possible in visual studio but it certainly is in WinDbg.
See for example http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alejacma/archive/2009/08/24/managed-debugging-with-windbg-breaking-on-an-exception-part-1.aspx
On a side note it seems that starting with visual studio 2010 you can load and use WinDbg extension DLLs directly providing aditional functionality (including possibly the one that you need) but I haven't tried this yet - see for example http://www.dotnetcurry.com/ShowArticle.aspx?ID=648
What you can do is use Concord, the debug engine that ships with Visual Studio (starting with version 2012). It's quite extensible through a nice managed API (and deployable using vsix technology), but it's not fully documented.
Concord has the concept of debug monitors, that we can hook using the IDkmDebugMonitorExceptionNotification Interface
The cool thing is this interface can monitor all exceptions thrown. It can also "suppress" any detected exception event, which is exactly what we need.
What I suggest is to start with the Hello World sample: . Download it, and make sure it runs as expected for you.
Now, just modify HelloWorld.vsdconfigxml like this:
<!--TODO: If you copy the sample, ensure to regenerate the GUID in this file -->
<!-- 1. change component level to something higher than 40500 -->
<ManagedComponent
ComponentId="51736b11-9fb4-4b6d-8aca-a10a2b7ae768"
ComponentLevel="40501"
AssemblyName="HelloWorld">
<!-- 2. change class full name to HelloWorld.ExceptionHandler, for example -->
<Class Name="HelloWorld.ExceptionHandler">
<Implements>
<InterfaceGroup>
<NoFilter/>
<!-- 3. change supported interface -->
<Interface Name="IDkmDebugMonitorExceptionNotification"/>
</InterfaceGroup>
</Implements>
</Class>
</ManagedComponent>
Then, just create an ExceptionHandler.cs class and put something like this in there:
public class ExceptionHandler : IDkmDebugMonitorExceptionNotification
{
private bool _unhandledDetected;
// we're being called!
public void OnDebugMonitorException(DkmExceptionInformation exception, DkmWorkList workList, DkmEventDescriptorS eventDescriptor)
{
if (_unhandledDetected)
{
// this will cause the program to terminate
eventDescriptor.Suppress();
return;
}
if (exception.ProcessingStage.HasFlag(DkmExceptionProcessingStage.Unhandled))
{
_unhandledDetected = true;
}
else if (exception.ProcessingStage.HasFlag(DkmExceptionProcessingStage.Thrown))
{
if (SuppressException(exception))
{
eventDescriptor.Suppress();
}
}
}
// should we suppress a thrown (1st chance) exception?
private bool SuppressException(DkmExceptionInformation exception)
{
// implement any custom logic in here, for example use the exception's name
if (exception.Name == typeof(ArgumentOutOfRangeException).FullName)
{
// for example, use the module (assembly) name
var clrAddress = (DkmClrInstructionAddress)exception.InstructionAddress;
var clrModule = clrAddress.ModuleInstance;
if (clrModule.Name == "TheUglyOne.dll")
return true; // we don't want this one!
}
return false;
}
}
When you run the project, you should see all exceptions being monitored (regardless of your 'just my code' and/or exception triggers settings), so what you just need to do is implement some logic to suppress the ones you really don't want to see. I've not checked but I suppose you could build your logic using custom attributes as the Dkm classes provide quite a lot of .NET metadata information.
Note: as you can see, there is some trickery to make sure the program will terminate normally.

Resources