What's a more concise way of finding text in a set of files? - bash

Question

I currently use the following command, but it's a little unwieldy to type. What's a shorter alternative?
find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep 'sometext' '{}' \; -print
Here are my requirements:
limit to a file extension (I use SVN and don't want to be searching through all those .svn directories)
can default to the current directory, but it's nice to be able to specify a different directory
must be recursive
UPDATE: Here's my best solution so far:
grep -r 'sometext' * --include='*.txt'
UPDATE #2: After using grep for a bit, I realized that I like the output of my first method better. So, I followed the suggestions of several responders and simply made a shell script and now I call that with two parameters (extension and text to find).

Answer 1

grep has -r (recursive) and --include (to search only in files and directories matching a pattern).

Answer 2

If its too unweildy, write a script that does it and put it in your personal bin directory. I have a 'fif' script which searches source files for text, basically just doing a single find like you have here:
#!/bin/bash
set -f # disable pathname expansion
pattern="-iname *.[chsyl] -o -iname *.[ch]pp -o -iname *.hh -o -iname *.cc
-o -iname *.java -o -iname *.inl"
prune=""
moreargs=true
while $moreargs && [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
case $1 in
-h)
pattern="-iname *.h -o -iname *.hpp -o -iname *.hh"
shift
;;
-prune)
prune="-name $2 -prune -false -o $prune"
shift
shift
;;
*)
moreargs=false;
;;
esac
done
find . $prune $pattern | sed 's/ /\\ /g' | xargs grep "$#"
it started life as a single-line script and got features added over the years as I needed them.

Answer 3

This is much more efficient since it invokes grep many fewer times, though it's hard to say it's more succinct:
find . -name '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -0 grep 'sometext' /dev/null
Notes:
/find -print0 and xargs -0 makes pathnames with embedded blanks work correctly.
The /dev/null argument makes sure grep always prepends a filename.

Answer 4

Install ack and use
ack -aG'\.txt$' 'sometext'

Answer 5

I second ephemient's suggestion of ack. I'm writing this post to highlight a particular issue.
In response to jgormley (in the comments): ack is available as a single file which will work wherever the right Perl version is installed (which is everywhere).
Given that on non-Linux platforms grep regularly does not accept -R, arguably using ack is more portable.

Answer 6

I use zsh, which has recursive globbing. If you needed to look at specific filetypes, the following would be equivalent to your example:
grep 'sometext' **/*.txt
If you don't care about the filetype, the -r option will be better:
grep -r 'sometext' *
Although, A minor tweak to your original example will give you exactly what you want:
find . -name '*.txt' \! -wholename '*/.svn/*' -exec grep 'sometext' '{}' \; -print
If this is something you do frequently, make it a function (put this in your shell config):
function grep_no_svn {
find . -name "${2:-*}" \! -wholename '*/.svn/*' -exec grep "$1" '{}' \; -print
}
Where the first argument to the function is the text you're searching for. So:
$ grep_here_no_svn "sometext"
Or:
$ grep_here_no_svn "sometext" "*.txt"

Answer 7

You could write a script (in bash or whatever -- I have one in Groovy) and place it on the path. E.g.
$ myFind.sh txt targetString
where myFind.sh is:
find . -name "*.$1" -exec grep $2 {} \; -print

Answer 8

I usualy avoid the "man find" by using grep $(find . -name "*,txt")

Answer 9

You say that you like the output of your method (using find) better. The only difference I can see between them is that grepping multiple files will put the filename on the front.
You can always (in GNU grep, but you must be using that or -r and --include wouldn't work) turn the filename off by using -h (--no-filename). The opposite, for anyone who does want filenames but has to use find for some other reason, is -H (--with-filename).