I'm looking to have windows recognize that certain folders are associated to my application - maybe by naming the folder 'folder.myExt'.
Can this be done via the registry?
A bit more info
- This is for a x-platform app ( that's why I suggested the folder with an extension - mac can handle that )
- The RAD I'm using doesn't read write binary data efficiently enough as the size of this 'folder' will be upwards of 2000 files and 500Mb
Folders in Windows aren't subject to the name.extension rules at all, there's only 1 entry in the registry's file type handling for "folder" types. (If you try to change it you're going to have very, very rough times ahead)
The only simple way to get the effect you're after would be to do what OpenOffice, MS Office 2007, and large video games have been doing for some time, use a ZIP file for a container. (It doesn't have to be a "ZIP" exactly, but some type of readily available container file type is better than writing your own) Like OO.org and Office 2K7 you can just use a custom extension and designate your app as the handler. This will also work on Macs, so it can be cross-platform. It may not be fast however. Using low or no compression may help with that.
You can have an "extension" on your folder, but as far as I know, windows just treats it all as the folder name and opens the folder like normal when you click on it.
The few times I messed with opening a .app on my windows system, it acted like it was a normal folder.
Related
I have a big collection of folders for projects I'm working on. I've been trying to find a better way to sort them all for a long time and I want to write an app that creates groups based on whatever criteria I say, such as "folders from 2011" or "folders containing a x type of file" etc.
This is fairly straightforward, and wouldn't present much of a problem to code using its own UI in winForms or WPF or something. But I think it would be far better if I could make these folders appear to be part of the filesystem, so other apps (like existing file explorers) can see them.
Is this possible? Would it cause problems I haven't considered? How do I go about doing it if it is possible?
One way I thought of doing it would be to have the app monitor the filesystem and create folder shortcuts every time there's a change, but I'm curious about whether its possible to actually present a fake filesystem to explorer through a 'gateway' folder
EDIT: Ok it's obviously possible since http://www.virtualfolder.net/ can do it, and now that I think of it so can TrueCrypt, although it would be nice if it didn't have to appear as a separate drive. So the question becomes, how do I implement it?
You can create a Shell Namespace Extension that gathers the file information you want and displays it within Windows Explorer any way you wish. You can choose where your extension is located, whether as its own top-level node, a child of another system virtual folder/extension, or as a child of a file system folder.
Writing a SNE is not trivial, but it is a lot easier then writing a lower-level file system driver, and it does not require special driver-oriented compilers. Any compiler that supports developing COM objects will work.
This is accomplished using filesystem drivers or filesystem filter drivers. First let you create a virtual filesystem and mount it to a drive letter and also to a folder on NTFS drive (folder must exist but its contents are "replaced" with a virtual filesystem directory tree). Filesystem filter drivers let you introduce virtual files and folders in existing folders without replacing them.
VirtualFolder uses filesystem driver as it creates a drive letter.
Both types of drivers are written in C and work in kernel-mode. Writing them requires deep knowledge of Windows internals and experience with driver development (since filesystem drivers are one of the most complicated driver types).
We offer several products related to virtual storage. One of them, Callback File System, is a filesystem driver. It calls your user-mode code to perform actual filesystem functions. Another product, CallbackFilter, is an FS filter driver (and it also calls your user-mode code). However, current version of CallbackFilter doesn't let you introduce virtual files and folders (this would be implemented in the next release).
There's also Pismo File Mount product available, they use filter driver techniques. You can check with them if what you need can be accomplished.
From what I gather you are looking for a way to present the results of predefined file queries to appear as though they are located at a specific location in the file system. If that is correct you may want to look into Hard Links and Junctions. There are limits on what you can do with these file system services. However it is really straight forward to implement.
I want to put some sort of "hook" into windows (only has to work on Windows Server 2008 R2 and above) which when I ask for a file on disk and it's not there it then requests it from a web server and caches it locally.
The files are immutable and have unique file names.
The application which is trying to open these files is written in C and just opens a file using the operating system in the normal way. Say it calls OpenFile asking for c:\scripts\1234.12.script, and that is there then it will just open it normally. If then it asks for c:\scripts\1234.13.script and it isn't then my hook in the operating system will then go and ask my web service for the file, download it and then return that file as it it were there all the time.
I'd prefer to write this as a usermode process (I've never written a windows driver), it should only fire when files are not found in a specific folder, and I'd prefer if possible to write it in a managed language (C# would be perfect). The files are small (< 50kB) and the web service is fast and the internet connection blinding so I'm not expecting it to take more than a second to download the file.
My question is - where do I start looking for information about this kind of thing? And if anyone has done anything similar - do you know what options I have (eg can it be done in C#?)?
You would need to create a kernel-mode filesystem filter driver which would intercept requests for opening such files and would "fake" those files. I should say that this is a very complicated task even for driver development. Our CallbackFilter product would be able to solve your problem however mechanism for "faking" files is not yet ready (we plan this feature for CallbackFilter 3). Until then I don't know any user-mode solutions (frankly speaking, no kernel-mode solutions as well) that would solve your problem.
If you can change the folder the application is accessing, then you can create a virtual file system and map it to the drive letter or a folder on NTFS drive. From the virtual file system you can direct most requests to/from real disk and if the file doesn't exist, you can download the file and cache it. Our other product, Callback File System, lets you do what I described in user-mode. If you have a one-time task you need to accomplish, and don't have a budget for it, please contact us anyway and maybe we can find some solution. There also exists an open-source solution with similar (but not so comprehensive) functionality named Dokan, yet I will refrain from commenting on its quality.
You can also try Dokan , it open source and you can check its discussion group for question and guides.
I am in the middle of writing a tool that finds lost files of an iTunes library, for both Mac and Windows. On the Mac, I can quickly find files by naming using the wonderful "CatalogSearch" function.
On Windows, however, there seems to be no OS API for searching by file name (or is there?).
After some googling, I learned that there are tools (like TFind, Everything) that read the NTFS directory directly and scan it to find files by name.
I would like to do the same, but without having to start from scratch (although I've written quite a few disk tools in the past, I've never had the energy to dig into NTFS).
I wonder if there are ready-made libs around, possibly as a .dll, that would give me this search feature: Pass in a file name, get back its path.
Alternatively, what about the Windows indexing service? At least when I tried this on a recently installed XP Home system, the Search operation under the Start menu would actually scan all directories, which suggests that it has no complete database. As I'm not a Windows user at all, I wonder why this isn't working.
In the end, the complete solution I need is: I have a list of file names to find, and I need code that searches the entire disk (or uses a DB for it) to get me all results in one go. E.g, the search should not start a new full scan for every file I'm looking up. That's why I think the MFT way would be optimal, as it could quickly iterate over all names, comparing each to my list.
The best way to solve your problem seems to be by using the Windows Change Journal.
Problem: If it is not enabled for a volume or the volume is a non-NTFS you need a fallback (or enable the Change Journal if it is NTFS). You need administrator rights as well to access the Change Journal.
You get the files by using the FSCTL_ENUM_USN_DATA and DeviceIOControll with LowUsn=0. This directly accesses the MFT and writes all filenames into the supplied buffer. Because it sequentially acesses the MFT it is faster than the FindFirstFile API.
I am in the middle of writing a tool that finds lost files of an iTunes library, for both Mac and Windows. On the Mac, I can quickly find files by naming using the wonderful "CatalogSearch" function.
On Windows, however, there seems to be no OS API for searching by file name (or is there?).
After some googling, I learned that there are tools (like TFind, Everything) that read the NTFS directory directly and scan it to find files by name.
I would like to do the same, but without having to start from scratch (although I've written quite a few disk tools in the past, I've never had the energy to dig into NTFS).
I wonder if there are ready-made libs around, possibly as a .dll, that would give me this search feature: Pass in a file name, get back its path.
Alternatively, what about the Windows indexing service? At least when I tried this on a recently installed XP Home system, the Search operation under the Start menu would actually scan all directories, which suggests that it has no complete database. As I'm not a Windows user at all, I wonder why this isn't working.
In the end, the complete solution I need is: I have a list of file names to find, and I need code that searches the entire disk (or uses a DB for it) to get me all results in one go. E.g, the search should not start a new full scan for every file I'm looking up. That's why I think the MFT way would be optimal, as it could quickly iterate over all names, comparing each to my list.
The best way to solve your problem seems to be by using the Windows Change Journal.
Problem: If it is not enabled for a volume or the volume is a non-NTFS you need a fallback (or enable the Change Journal if it is NTFS). You need administrator rights as well to access the Change Journal.
You get the files by using the FSCTL_ENUM_USN_DATA and DeviceIOControll with LowUsn=0. This directly accesses the MFT and writes all filenames into the supplied buffer. Because it sequentially acesses the MFT it is faster than the FindFirstFile API.
I am trying to copy C source files from a vms alpha to a windows machine to allow easier editing of the code. (VMS editor is just a text editor and it would be nice to have syntax highlighting etc)
I can copy this across using Exceed FTP and this handles the issue of duplicate filenames with version suffix that vms has:
File.c;1
File.c;2
Flle.c;3
But when I open a file I've transferred, all the line breaks have been lost and the entire file is just one line.
Can anyone recommend a solution to this or offer any hints?
Thanks in advance
ps. I need to be able to copy the files back to vms and still maintain format.
It may be off interest by now, but in case you still wonder about "one-line" text files after FTP transfer.
The short answer: force the FTP transfer mode to ASCII (or text) in your FTP client. This will make sure that the C-files you transferring (in fac all files) are treated as text, otherwise they're assumed to be binary, so you get a byte-stream.
Long answer: There're 2 FTP transfer modes: ASCII/text and binary/image. The default is sometimes clent or server-specific.
Many clients have Auto-mode that interprets the file extension to set the proper transfer mode (.TXT,.CSV etc..)
When you access the VMS server via FTP client, too often the [Win-based] client is not VMS friendy, so it does not parse the file-list properly. Thus it gets confused by version number appended to the "usual" file-name:
filename.ext;ver ==> file.c;1
So instead of seeing .C (and assuming text), it sees .C;1 and thinks it's binary.
I use Filezilla FTP client to/from VMS and so far it does it properly (though version-support is not as I'd sometimes like).
Copying a file to and from your windows desktop every time you want to edit gets old very quickly.
You may be able to implement a much nicer alternative. There is some software under VMS that permits a VMS directory tree to be treated as a "network disk" under windows. Once you've set it up, and set up your windows to recognize the network disk, you can just open the file with a windows text editor without moving it from VMS to windows. You can also browse the directory tree, which appears like a tree of folders.
When you issue a save from your text editor, the saved copy supercedes the previous version over in VMS land. And it mediates correctly between RMS format and embedded newline format. It's a whole lot more convenient than FTP, for this purpose.
After doing a quick Google search, I think the name of the VMS software is PATHWORKS. But I'm not sure.
A few points I have on this
PATHWORKS is fairly old and (as far as I recall - I dont use it) doesnt work well with recent windows versions, such as supporting Active Directory. Within the last few years HP have ported SAMBA to VMS and this is the way to go if you want to make areas of disk visible to windows machines. Should be easyt to find on HP web site.
If you want to try the FTP/SFTP route I would try SFTP and go for VMS version of at least 8.2. TheTCPIP suite was rewritten (or reported from a Unix version) at this point.
VMS supports a number of formats for text files. As well as the complex record structure described above, there is STREAM_LF which is the same as a unix file and STREAM_CRLF
I found some interesting information about OpenVMS text file structure. That corresponds with a vague memory I have of how VMS handles text files; they're not stored as streams of bytes like Windows and Unix systems, but as a sequence of records (each record is a text line). Records can be either fixed width or variable width. Whatever reads the file is responsible for the "paper control", what we normally call newlines these days.
You might check the options in Exceed FTP to make sure that you're transferring the file in an appropriate ASCII mode. There might be special options you need to set on the FTP server to read and write the files in the appropriate mode too.
I'm no expert - let's get that out and in the open ;)
I have been having similar problems in FTPing files from OVMS Alphaserver to Win7 desktop so I can migrate to SQL.
FTP [Attachmate & WIn CLI] workled fine under WinNT.
I suspect Win7 does not like the name.ext;version format of the OVMS file.
Filezilla - doesn't work.
PuTTY - doesn't work
Window CLI FTP - doesn't work [partial file transfer; times out & truncates file].
Using Attachmate's "Reflections for the Web 2011" to emulate Vax terminal - works fine.
Think I'll have to go back to Attachmate for assistance but partially hamstrung by our [Australian Fed Govt] IT services which has the final say
Some editors, such as BBEdit on the Mac, support directly opening/saving files via FTP/SFTP/etc. (BBEdit also supports various different line endings as used on different platforms, which would help with your other problem). I expect there must be a Windows editor with similar functionality - my Windows-using colleagues all rave about something called CodeWrite (or CodeWright ?) so I guess I would take a look at something like that.