We're currently doing some Word automation, and want to be able to insert a Style Separator into a Range object. We've found how to do it with the Selection object (InsertStyleSeparator) but can't seem to figure out how to do that with Range objects. Does anyone know how to make that work?
Relevant links I've found so far:
Style Separator in Selection
Range members (which doesn't include the above method)
VBA documentation says that InsertStyleSeparator is a member of the Selection object.
That means you need a Selection object. Luckily you can do:
SomeRangeObject.Select
Selection.InsertStyleSeparator
Related
Do you think that it's possible to take a value into an ODI IKM Option (for example) from a flexfield?
Example:
You define a flex field on the target table and then pass the value in the IKM.
Then, reading the variable, it's possible to pass it to an option from the IKM?
Thanks,
After searching I found that it's not possible to do it. Conditional Expression can take predefined values. You can find in the next all the combinations:
Condition Expression – It allows you to set the required condition for
the selected option. Double-click the field for editing the condition
expression for the selected option. Click the browse icon Browse icon,
to launch the Edit Expression Editor, which enables you to create or
edit the existing groovy script that determines whether a knowledge
module should be enabled, disabled, displayed or hidden.
Examples are:
return
options.getValue("Cache").equals("true")?"show=true,enable=true":"show=false,enable=false";
This looks at the value of another KM Option called "Cache". If its
value is "false," then the KM Option is hidden, because it's not
relevant.
return
(isStreaming)?"show=false,enable=false":"show=true,enable=true";
This looks at the Mapping isStreaming property. If it's true, then
this option is hidden.
source
It is very easy to do.
You may use odiRef.getTable(java.lang.String pProperty) in the code of your IKM. One of possible values for pProperty is the code of your FlexField.
If you like to pass if through the option just pas <?…?>-substitution as a value of the option. (Probable you should play with %- or ?-substitutions, which is working.)
Refer to «Substitution API Reference» on Oracle site. Many functions like getTable, getIndex, getAK, getContext and others can obtain flexField value of an object of the corresponding type.
Additionally there is the odiRef.getFlexFieldValue() method. It gets the value of any object of any type, but it is required to pass internal IDs as an argument. So it is not convenient.
I am attempting to capture all the list items in the WebList elements throughout the entire application, however, while below code works on the WebLists, it does not work on this WebEdit.
When you click on the WebEdit, a long list of values appear (similar to a WebList) and as you type for your value, the list becomes shorter. That is how the WebEdit was set up.
But now, how do I get the values in this list?
Here is the code I have for the WebLists:
Code
Set WebLink = Browser("browser").Page("page")
listval = WebLink.WebElement("xpath:= ((//*[contains(text(), 'Name')]))[1]/following::SELECT[1]").GetROProperty("all items")
listvalues = split(listval,";")
For j = LBound(listvalues,1) To UBound(listvalues,1)
'Print listvalues(j)
writeToTextFile(listvalues(j))
Next
ExitTest
The short answer is: it depends on the implementation.
The long one:
There is no universal widget for comboboxes (Like there is for edit fields or lists / selects, radiobuttons etc) => there is no universal solution but only guidelines.
You need to spy on those objects that appear in the combobox, see their XPath and / or other properties (the css classname they belong to, for example) and then execute a second query that selects all such items. Afterwards you have to extract the value of the selected elements; which might be as simple as getting the innertext Property or you may need to dig even deeper in the HTML hierarchies.
You would need to pay careful attention for synchronisation(Waiting until all search result elements appear), Filtering (using the XPath, Description Objects and ChildObjects method on your WebPage) and then extraction( getting the property /element that contains the actual value of that WebElement)
So again: These combobox solutions are not universal therefore without seeing their code the best what one can provide to you is universal guidelines which should work in most of the situations. (You would need some familiarity with Web Programming and the UFT Framework / Robot)
Either I am not using d3's selection.filter correctly, or it is buggy. I can distill the issue to a few lines. I'm in the Chrome debugger with d3 loaded. Let's start with an empty selection
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").empty()
> true
and bind some data to it.
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4])
> [Array[4]]
Good, so it has size four. Let's check with selection.size:
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).size()
> 0
Hmm, I guess that's because there are no DOM elements yet the update selection is empty since there were no previous elements. So let's make access the enter selection.
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).enter()
> [Array[4]]
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).enter().size()
> TypeError: undefined is not a function
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).enter().append("p").size()
> 4
Not sure why the enter selection causes an error, (UPDATE: Fixed in v3.4.12) but anyway, if we try filtering using the example function in the docs,
function odds(d, i) { return i & 1; }
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).filter(odds);
> [Array[0]]
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).enter().filter(odds);
> []
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).enter().append("p").filter(odds)
> [Array[2]]
Why is it silently filtering out all elements when there are no DOM elements bound? It does seem to be working when I already have DOM elements. But that feels pretty useless, since I don't want to create elements for data I'm discarding. Maybe if I put the filter earlier?
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).filter(odds).enter().append("p").size()
> TypeError: undefined is not a function
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4]).enter().filter(odds).append("p").size()
> TypeError: undefined is not a function
Nope. It seems the way to go is with JS's native filter on arrays:
d3.selectAll("nonexistant").data([1,2,3,4].filter(odds)).enter().append("p").size()
> 2
The d3 docs do not seem to differentiate between selections that have DOM elements bound and those that do not. It seems that I should be able to stick filter anywhere in my method chain (and call size on any selection), and get the correct result without a type error. Granted, filter also supports CSS selectors that will require DOM elements, but I'm not using them here.
What I want to know: There is a mismatch between what d3 is doing and what I expect. To what extent am I harboring misconceptions about selections and what operations are valid on them? To what extent is the documentation unclear? Does any of this behavior qualify as a bug?
From the documentation of the .enter() method:
... the entering selection only defines append, insert, select and call operators; you must use these operators to instantiate the entering nodes before modifying any content. (Enter selections also support empty to check if they are empty.)
Calling anything else doesn't produce useful results. Whether or not that's a bug, a side-effect or a feature is perhaps debatable. In almost all cases, it doesn't create any barriers, except maybe if you need to know this selection's size() to find out how many datums from the array you pass to data() didn't already have elements created.
Once you call append() on the entering selection though, it behaves well, like any normal selection. In fact, append() is returning a new selection, so it !== the return value of enter().
That's when you can also check the size() of this selection, so really it only counts as an issue if you needed to know the size PRIOR to calling append().
You're correct that using the native array filter is the solution IF you don't need to even append elements where odds(d) == false.
Filter is useful when you've already created the DOM nodes (e.g. <p>s) that are bound to [1,2,3,4], and (e.g. in an event handler, when user clicks a "highlight all odds" button ) you call
d3.selectAll('p').filter(odds).css('color', 'red')
BTW, that was a really well written question.
I have a list of objects that are returned as a sequence, I would like to retrieve the keys of each object so as to be able to display the object correctly. At the moment I try data?first?keys which seems to get something like the queries that return the objects (Not sure how to explain that last sentence either but img below shows what I'm trying to explain).
The objects amount of objects returned are correct (7) but displaying the keys for each object is my aim. The macro that attempts this is here (from the apache ofbiz development book chapter 8).
Seems like it my sequence is a list of hashes and as explained by Daniel Dekany this post:
The original problem is that, someHash[key] expects a
string as key. Because, the hash type of FTL, by definition, maps
string keys to arbitrary values. It's not the same as Java's Map.
(Note that to further complicate the matters, in FTL
someSequenceOrString[index] expects an integer index. So, the [] thing
is used for that too.) Now someBeanWrappedMap(key) has technically
nothing to do with all the []-s, it's just a method call, so it
accepts all kind of keys. If you have a Map with non-string keys, you
must use that.
Thanks D Dekany if you're on stack, this ended my half day frustration with the ftl template.
I've been hacking away at this one for hours and I just can't figure it out. Using XPath to find text values is tricky and this problem has too many moving parts.
I have a webpage with a large table and a section in this table contains a list of users (assignees) that are assigned to a particular unit. There is nearly always multiple users assigned to a unit and I need to make sure a particular user is assigned to any of the units on the table. I've used XPath for nearly all of my selectors and I'm half way there on this one. I just can't seem to figure out how to use contains with text() in this context.
Here's what I have so far:
//td[#id='unit']/span [text()='asdfasdfasdfasdfasdf (Primary); asdfasdfasdfasdfasdf, asdfasdfasdfasdf; 456, 3456'; testuser]
The XPath Query above captures all text in the particular section I am looking at, which is great. However, I only need to know if testuser is in that section.
text() gets you a set of text nodes. I tend to use it more in a context of //span//text() or something.
If you are trying to check if the text inside an element contains something you should use contains on the element rather than the result of text() like this:
span[contains(., 'testuser')]
XPath is pretty good with context. If you know exactly what text a node should have you can do:
span[.='full text in this span']
But if you want to do something like regular expressions (using exslt for example) you'll need to use the string() function:
span[regexp:test(string(.), 'testuser')]