Excel 2007 question about random numbers - random

In cell A1:A50 i have random numbers geberated by formula ( from 0 to 20), now what ever i do these numbers keeps on changing all the time, so i want to know the formula which will shuffle these random numbers automaticallly till the series whcich have got 5-12-19 in a row will appear. I would really appriciate if some one can help me out of this problem...Thanks


I think you're going to need a VBA function returning an array. That VBA function will have to continually generate sequences of numbers until it gets what you want (why you want this is another matter!).
Sorry - I'm not a VBA whizz, so I can't put this together easily for you.

Related

Create a Dynamic Array formula (Excel) to combine multiple results columns into one column that is filtered & sorted using multiple criteria?

The sample data in the image below is collected from a round robin tournament.
There is a Round column,Home team & Away team columns listing who is playing who. A team could be either Home or Away.
For each match in a round (including any "Bye" match) the number of games won for the Home and Away team are recorded in separate columns respectively.
"Ff" = forfeit and has a value of 0. "Bye" result is left blank (at this stage).
Output columns are "Won, Lost, Round".
Required output (shown in the image) is, for any selected team, the top n most-games-won matches (from both Home & Away) sorted in descending order and then the corresponding games lost but sorted in ascending order where the games won are equal. Finally show the rounds where those scores occurred.
These are the challenges I've faced in going from data to output in one step using dynamic array formula:
Collating/Combining the the Win results into 1 column. Likewise the Losses.
Getting the array to ignore blanks or convert "Ff" to 0 without getting #NUM or #VALUE errors.
Ensuring that if I used separate single column arrays the corresponding Loss and Round matched the Win result
Although "Round, Won, Lost" would be acceptable. But I wasn't able to get the Dynamic Array capability to give the required output with this order.
SUMPRODUCT, INDEX(MATCH), SORT(FILTER) functions all hint at a possible one step formula solution.
The solutions are numerous for sorting & filtering where the existing values are already in one column. There was one solution that dealt with 2 columns of values which was somewhat useful How to get the highest values from 2 columns in excel - Stackoverflow 2013
Many other responses are around the use of concatenation, combining/merging array sets, aggregation etc.
My work around solution is to use a Helper Sheet to combine the Wins from the separate results columns and convert blanks & "Ff" to -1. Likewise for Losses. Using the formula for each line
=IF($C5=L$2,IF($F5="",-1,IF($F5="Ff",0,$F5)),IF($D5=L$2,IF($G5="",-1,IF($G5="Ff",0,$G5)),-1))
Example Helper Sheet
To get the final output the Dynamic Array formula was used on the Helper Sheet data
=SORT(FILTER(L$26:N$40,L$26:L$40>=LARGE(L$26:L$40,$J$3),""),{1,2},{-1,1},FALSE)
I'm trying to avoid using pivottable, VBA solutions. Powerquery possible but not preferred.
Apologies for the screenshots but I couldn't work out how to attach the sample spreadsheet file. (Unfortunately Stackoverflow Help didn't help me to/not to do this.)

Based on the comments I changed my answer with a different approach:
=LET(data,A5:F19,
round,INDEX(data,,1),
ha,CHOOSECOLS(data,3,4),
HAwonR,CHOOSECOLS(data,5,6,1),
w,BYROW(ha,LAMBDA(h,IFERROR(XMATCH(L2,h),0))),
clm,CHOOSE(w,{1,2},{2,1}),
srtwon,DROP(REDUCE(0,SEQUENCE(ROWS(data)),LAMBDA(y,z,VSTACK(y,INDEX(HAwonR,z,HSTACK(INDEX(clm,z,),3))))),1),
res,FILTER(srtwon,w),
TAKE(SORT(res,{1,2},{-1,1}),J3))
Old answer:
=LET(data,A5:F19,
round,INDEX(data,,1),
home,INDEX(data,,3),
away,INDEX(data,,4),
HAwonR,CHOOSECOLS(data,5,6,1),
w,MAP(home,away,LAMBDA(h,a,OR(h=L2,a=L2))),
won,FILTER(HAwonR,w),
TAKE(SORT(won,{1,2},{-1,1}),J3))
In your example you selected round 3 for the third result, but that wasn't won, so I guess that was by mistake.
As you can see making use of LET avoids helpers. Let allows you to create names (helpers) that are stored and because you can name them, you can make complex formulas be more readable.
Basically what it does is filter the columns Home, Away and Round (in that order) for either Home or Away equal the team in cell L2. That's sorted column 1 descending and column 2 ascending. Than the number of rows mentioned in cell J3 are displayed from that sorted array.

Here is my solution based on the excellent contribution by #P.b. Thank you much appreciated.
The wins (likewise losses) required mapping the presence, of the team in question, as hT (home team) to the games it won (hG) and adding to that a 2nd mapping of the games it won (aG) when it was the away team (aT). Essentially what was being done on the Helper Sheet. Result was a 1 column array for game wins and a 1 column array for game losses.
In the process I was able to convert the "Ff" text to 0. I attempted without the conversion and it threw an error.
Instead of CHOOSECOLS used HSTACK to create the new array (wins, losses & round) for the FILTER, SORT, TAKE to work on.
If it could be made conciser(?) that is the next challenge. Overall (not just my solution), this exercise has provided greater flexibility and solved the problems stated. I'm happy!
=LET(data,A5:G19,
round,INDEX(data,,1),
hT,INDEX(data,,3),
aT,INDEX(data,,4),
hG,INDEX(data,,6),
aG,INDEX(data,,7),
wins,MAP(hG,
MAP(hT,LAMBDA(h,h=L2)),
LAMBDA(w,t,IF(w="Ff",0,w)*IF(t=TRUE,1,0))) +
MAP(aG,
MAP(aT,LAMBDA(a,a=L2)),
LAMBDA(w,t,IF(w="Ff",0,w)*IF(t=TRUE,1,0))),
losses,MAP(aG,
MAP(hT,LAMBDA(h,h=L2)),
LAMBDA(w,t,IF(w="Ff",0,w)*IF(t=TRUE,1,0))) +
MAP(hG,
MAP(aT,LAMBDA(a,a=L2)),
LAMBDA(w,t,IF(w="Ff",0,w)*IF(t=TRUE,1,0))),
HAwonR,HSTACK(wins,losses,round),
w,MAP(home,away,LAMBDA(h,a,OR(h=L2,a=L2))),
won,FILTER(HAwonR,w),
TAKE(SORT(won,{1,2},{-1,1}),J3))

SPSS: generate 'fake' survey data using rv.uniform without losing value labels

I have a pretty straightforward survey dataset. Each row is a respondent, and each column is a question. Responses have a value that is a whole number, and each number has a label.
Now, I need to replace all of those values with fake data to use in a training. I need something that looks and feels like the original dataset, but isn't actually client data.
I started by replacing my variables with random number values:
COMPUTE Q1=RV.UNIFORM(1,2).
EXECUTE.
COMPUTE Q2=RV.UNIFORM(1,36).
EXECUTE.
COMPUTE Q3=RV.NORMAL(50, 13).
EXECUTE.
(rv.normal/rv.uniform depending on what kind of data I'm trying to fake - age versus multiple-choice question, for example).
This works, but then when I try and generate crosstabs, export the dataset w value labels, etc., the labels aren't applied to the columns with fake data. As far as I can tell, my fake numbers are in the exact same format they were in before - numeric, no decimals, width of 2, nominal. The labels still appear in the variable view, but they aren't actually being applied.
I'd really prefer not to have to manually re-label every one of these columns, because there's quite a few of them. Any ideas for how to get around this issue? Or is there a smarter way to generate fake data?

Your problem is the RV.UNIFORM and the RV.NORMAL functions do not generate integers - they generate decimal numbers. You may have your display hide the decimal numbers by having 0 decimals in the variable view, but they are still there (you can check this by adding decimals in the variable view).
So you neen another step of turning your decimals into integers. For example, the following are two ways to get a random 1 or 2 (integers):
COMPUTE Q1=rnd(RV.UNIFORM(1,2)).
or
COMPUTE Q1=trunc(RV.UNIFORM(1,3)).
Once the numbers generated are integers corresponding to the value labels definition, you should be able to see the labels in the output.

Randomization in Tableau

I am trying to generate random numbers in Tableau between 1 and 15. Currently, I am using the Random() function. However, this returns random numbers in the [0,1] interval. Does anyone know how to get whole integer values instead?
I am using this feature to try to both randomize and anonymize the names of 15 people.
Thanks!

Actually random is the function you should look for, even thought it returns numbe from 0 to 1.
According to the integer number you are trying to get, why don't you multiply the result by 10/100/1000/etc and then use the round function in order to get rid of the rest?

Large foreseeable Sudoku, with 81 integers

I am in the making of a simple Sudoku for my exams at school. I have decided to have only one sudoku. This ones numbers are then shuffled around to make it look like a new one every time. The problem here is that I need to handle 81 integers. Some of them have to be visible, and some not. I can not myself see an easy way to handle these ints with ease, except with arrays, but that didn't go very well.
If you have any suggestions let me know :)

int[][]
Make it a 9x9 array like the visual sudoku.
Any non-visible number can be negated e.g. -5 instead of 5.
To validate the grid as having a solution check the Math.abs(value) (or whatever the absolute function is in your language of choice). Iterate from 1 to 9 in each 'square' and then for each row and column.
This will only let you know that you have a starting arrangement in which you can fill in numbers in a valid way it won't tell you that you can use logically to find that answer exclusively (e.g. an empty grid is valid but has thousands of solutions).

Yahtzee 3 of a Kind

Here is my situation, i am currently creating a Yahtzee game using Turbo Pascal Language in Lazarus IDE and i am up to the scoring side of the developement, i have already completed the Lower section of scoring and i have started the Higher section but i need some help writting a procedure to check for a three of a kind, my initial thought was to use an array and load the random numbers for the dice values and then use a loop function to check for 3 equal numbers but i'm not very confident in this area. Could i get some help ? I'm not asking for code, although it would be helpful, just a push in the right direction.
My dice integer value variables are, "Dice1" , "Dice2" , "Dice3" , "Dice4" , "Dice5" , "Dice6"

I think the conceptually simplest approach is to have an array of six counters - one for each possible value - that you initialize to zero and then loop over your dice array and increment the counters with each die's value.
You can then check if any of the counts becomes 3 (or more).

Or sort and then iterate to see if you have 3 same values in a row. The sorted array with dice values is also usable for the other detections like street, Carré (four of a kind), Yathzee etc.

Resources