i have made a C language executable file...
now i want to make it installable...
i want to made my program installable which will install in specified drive location...
please... any one help me...
i will be thankful to you for this...
You didn't mention the target platform but assuming its Windows you could create an MSI package to deploy your executable. An easy to use freeware program is MAKEMSI.
There are many ways to do this. You need to be more specific, what OS? Are you installing over a network, off a CD, etc? Does your executable need anything put into the registry, or require a specific path structure to run?
In Windows, using Visual Studio you can create an install project. I've also had good experiences with the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System
There are a number of tools available to make an installation package, on Windows I've been pleased with NSIS. I also recommend HM NIS Edit, an editor for creating NSIS scripts. It has some wizards so you can very quickly make something workable, and if you need to tweak something you can then worry about editing the script. It's a very powerful system.
Related
I have a quite complicated build process involving different directories (for plugins) ; currently using NSIS on Windows and PackageMaker on OSX but have issues improving them as my install / uninstall process is getting more complex with time.
The more I look into it, the more I feel like I should code my own cross platform installer with a cross platform GUI like wxWidgets (I've used it before) and copy myself the right files in the right directories because I cannot find any good cross platform software installer OR even programmatically customizable software installers for both platforms.
Has anyone gone down that path ? Does anyone know what are the hardest things to achieve, blocking everyone to produce good softwares installers and why doesn't this exists right now ?
Thanks in advance!
Does anyone know what are the hardest things to achieve
The hard part about installers is not wizard GUI, it’s OS integration. That integration is dramatically different across OSes.
On Windows, you need to use MSI. NSIS doesn’t do particularly good job, MSI enables repair/modify functionality, by default MSI can upgrade stuff even when old version is still running (and it continues running while being replaced), some MS libraries ship as *.MSM merge modules… BTW, I usually use WIX for that.
Similarly, on Debian and Ubuntu Linux you need to create .deb packages. Even if you’re making a GUI installer. They also support repair & upgrades, versioning, dependencies, but they do it in completely different way than MSI.
I don’t have much experience with OSX but I think it has some other installer infrastructure implemented by the OS.
I enjoy developing in Haskell, but am presently confronted with a challenge. At my place of education, I don't have administrative rights on my account. I want to debug/test while there. I need a way to run Haskell code without installing haskell-platform or ghci or anything else requiring of an administrative level of privilege. For instance, a web site which will run haskell code (abeit limited to not include file access of course) or a java utility (or standalone .app, though java is preferred due to the nature of the "parental controls"), or something else I haven't thought of. Source or compiled Java, Flash, and source code in Ruby or Python are preferred to native code. This is on Mac OS X 10.6, for reference.
You can install GHC without admin privileges, but you'll have to build from source. Check out the Building on MacOS X for more details.
Essentially, like any other open-source project, you can compile code and install it, generally, anywhere on your filesystem like into a folder in your home folder (I often use the ~/.local folder for that purpose).
As the linked page mentions, you can also use MacPorts and install it to any place you can write to. Once MacPorts is installed you can install GHC.
EDIT
As pointed out by Carl in the comments below, you don't need to build from source. Just grab the binary tarball from http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_7_4_1#binaries.
In addition to all the other ideas, several companies will rent you virtual (cloud) linux servers for a few cents an hour. You have root on those and can install whatever you want, then freeze the image until you need it again.
Normally this might not be advantageous over a local solution if you can make one work, but a possible extra benefit would be that your work can stay on a single "computer" which you could access while sitting in front of any variety of modern PC that might be available to you on a given day.
An alternative not only for Haskell is http://ideone.com/
For the website option, TryHaskell will hardly cut it, it's way to limited.
codepad, OTOH, is more liberal, and should be of more use.
But honestly the bindist option is the best one, clearly!
If you truly can't install anything, then there's
http://tryhaskell.org/ -- like GHCi, but you can't load modules, which means not only that you can't use many standard functions (say, the functions in Data.List), but also that you can't use certain language features (like user-defined algebraic data types).
I also remember a hpaste-style site which executes its code -- and allows you to have private pastes -- but I can't remember it at the moment. Edit: I was thinking of http://codepad.org/ -- thanks #Mog
Try http://hiji.tinyrocket.se/ It is a haskell interpreter written using javascript.
http://ghc.io/ GHC.IO is a version of the Haskell interactive interpreter, ghci, that runs online in a web browser.
You just need to install homebrew, which you can do without root rights if you do so in your home directory. You can then brew install cabal-install
which will automatically install cabal and ghc, or brew install stack to install stack.
There is a web-based interpreter for Haskell at http://tryhaskell.org/. However, it may not provide enough functionality for your requirements.
Does anyone know any good software packager other than InstallShield?
What software did MS use to create the Visual Studio 2005/2008 installers?
Also, does it make sense to just use a "general purpose" language like C# to create an installer rather than using software packagers?
Thanks!
Advanced Installer.
I have been using it for ages, and it works very well
I try much tools and programs to create a windows installer package and i concluded that
Advanced Installer is easiest ad intuitive to use!
I use it from several years and i've found few problems.
Another factor in his favor is a fast and efficient technical support.
I hope this help
NSIS has a front end app, which is now been distributed for free, called venis http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Venis_IX. venis abstracted the details of nsis.
Have a look at the nullsoft installer http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main%5FPage , which is free.
It does not use the Microsoft MSI system which may (if you ask me) or may not be a good thing.
I use Inno setup , very nice.
and there is a GUI tool ISTool to help you write inno setup script.
I'm using NSIS or Inno Setup.
I wrote wpkg, that you can find here http://windowspackager.org/ (it is GPL) and is a clone of dpkg + APT both together. So it packages and then manages any number of packages in repositories that you can update + upgrade in an automated way. As long as you can install your project files (i.e. make install type of thing) then you'll be able to generate packages in no time.
If you know / use Linux and line their way of handling their software installations (dpkg + apt-get or rpm + yum) then you'll like wpkg since it is a duplicate of that sort of functionality.
The software version is still 0.x.x but it is already in production (very stable as I have strong unit tests to prove that a very large set of functions are working as expected.)
Note that wpkg not only works under Microsoft Windows to package binary objects, it also works under Linux, MacOS/X, and compiles + runs under a few other Unices.
The wpkg implementation includes full support for batch scripts (shell scripts for Unices) to automatically initialize or finalize package installations. This includes the ability (for example) to start a server automatically once the server binaries where installed.
We are also working on a graphical tool, pkg-explorer, that can be used to ease the management of an installation target (you can have as many installation targets on a single computer, as long as you don't install software that require the use of uniquely available resources such as a DVD writer or port 80 on your network.)
The project comes with different tools. One allows you to transform your list of projects in a graph representing the dependency tree of your repository. Another creates a list of HTML files so you can list in an easy to access all the packages that you have available in your repository.
I want to create an installer for my project, primarily to handle the external dependencies which are starting to grow in number.
The problem is most of these components seem to be distributed in different manners, so I need an installer that can cope with all the following. Ive looked at various things around, however many dont seem to cover all the things I need (like how to install directX using a Visual Studio setup project...), or dont even create a proper windows installer (eg .msi).
Copy all my apps files to the target directory
Create start menu and desktop shortcuts
Install direct x (ie call dxsetup.exe /silent)
Install the VC9 CRT redist (seems to be a "merge module" looking at msdn whatever that is...)
Only requires administrative rights if one of the following is true
DirectX and/or the VC9 CRT is not already present, or needs updating
Installing for all users
Installing to a directory the user doesnt have write permission for
Can roll back everything if installation is aborted before completion
Generates an uninstaller as well as an installer
Ensures the user accepts all required EULA's (my one, VC9 Redist, DirectX, etc)
For example I got the VS2008 Setp Project working for my app files and the VC9 CRT, however I dont see anyway to tell it to just run dxsetup.exe with the /silent argument and NOT extract it and all the other dx installer to the app directory or something...
EDIT:
Also it would be really nice if I could have a unified installer for x86 and x86-64, which installers the correct components (eg myapp_x86.exe or myapp_x64.exe) depending on if the OS is 64bit or not.
EDIT2:
Forgot to mention but either a free or low cost solution would be welcome as well, since I need a solution for some of my smaller personal stuff as well.
WiX is what you want. You'll want to read through the v3 documentation and examples, as it is not a simple thing to use. Once you get going, you'll have follow-up questions which you should post as new questions.
See also the WiX tutorial, but keep in mind it refers to v2, and a lot of it is out-of-date or obsolete in v3.
If you can afford it, Installshield does all this very well and professionally. It will include the merge file and seamlessly install as well. Installshield has its quirks, but it is incredibly easy to use and robust. Once you write your app, you don't want to think a lot about the installer.
Some nice features I liked
Creates patch installs by diff'ing the source so you can distribute patches with a small size.
Create upgrades that update the registry and version number of your app. Prevents older versions from being installed.
Creates an nice uninstaller.
It's Easy to add merge modules.
Scriptible if you need it to be, GUI if not (most of the time you don't need to script a thing).
If you can't afford that, go with NSIS. It is very powerful and well used, but prepared to write code in a text editor.
Follow these STeps
I want to create a Windows Installer, the 1st step I want it to call another installer (will install dependent components of my application), and the 2nd step I want to install my own application. I want to do all tasks in one installation process, and I have the dependent component installation package at hand (an exe file).
Any good tools or samples to refer to? I prefer to use VSTS or Microsoft or open source easy to use tools. :-)
thanks in advance,
George
You might want to take a look at the Microsoft Bootstrapper, assuming the dependent components are libraries such as .NET or similar then it's fairly straightforward.
If you want to create a Windows Installer (MSI) package then take a look at Windows Installer XML (WiX). But you'll want to get your head around how MSI works first. WiX is really simple once you understand Windows Installer, but trying to learn both at once can be rather confusing.
For a basic, copy some files, extract/run some stuff, type installer then NSIS is fairly straightforward scripting and you can pick that up in a day or so.
Nsis with this modification.
Update: It seems that nesting MSI installation is somewhat possible. However it requires some tweaking using tools from the Windows Installer SDK and has a number of drawbacks.
The following article has the details:
How to create a nested .msi package
Microsoft recommends not to use this feature (see this related answer and point 20 in this list).
However, you might also want to look at different install systems such as NSIS or create a bootstrapper that installs the dependencies prior to setup.
You could look at Inno Setup. It creates exe installers, as opposed to MSIs. It has a pascal-based scripting language, so is pretty flexible.
It's free and pretty easy to use.
If your existing installer doesn't use the MSI technology, you could use WiX to create an MSI and launch the existing installer via a custom action. I've done this in the past.
WiX is open source.
yes it would be very easy if you do it using Inno Setup, but with a slight difference..
You will have to perform step 2 first and then step 1.
Try using AutoHotkey(scripting) for checking the existence of any process in the background that verifies the installation of a particular software.
Check out iexpress on windows systems. In just a few minutes you can create an installer that can call as many installers as you like.