I've got a few layered windows in my app that use UpdateLayeredWindow() to handle their visual representation. According to the MSDN article on layered windows, "when using UpdateLayeredWindow() the application doesn't need to respond to WM_PAINT or other painting messages." They shared some of the same message handlers as non-layered windows, so I figured I would just return early from WM_PAINT handling if the target is a layered window.
Of course, this caused one major issue: if one of the layered windows did get a WM_PAINT message, the input queue would end up flooded with an unending stream of WM_PAINT messages. This end-result makes sense, since the window would never be validated and so it will keep thinking it needs to paint (I shouldn't be returning from the handler without validating or BeginPaint()ing, etc.), but what doesn't make sense is why it received the message in the first place, since it has no effect on a window that was using UpdateLayeredWindow().
It wouldn't even happen reliably -- just every now and then, and not every time the window's pixels needed redrawing. Sanity was restored by falling back to DefWindowProc() when a layered window got a WM_PAINT message, but I feel like something is going on that I don't understand. And considering how seldom this problem manifested itself, I'm worried this might just be hiding an even subtler problem. Is it expected behavior for a window using UpdateLayeredWindow() to still get the occasional WM_PAINT message? Does it matter, as long as I handle it correctly?
Additional info, if needed: the window is calling UpdateLayeredWindow() immediately after being created, and then it's left on its own (it doesn't call it again, since it doesn't change). Using C++ and win32 API, no MFC.
I had run into similar issues before, although my memory may be a bit rusty by now.
First off, keep the DefWindowProc. When the docs say you don't have to respond, I would take that to mean to ignore the message entirely, rather than prevent default handling.
I personally experienced this from two different causes. One was a window which was actually sending WM_PAINT messages (evil! beware!). The other (IIRC) resulted from certain RedrawWindow calls. In both cases, I chalked the problem up to poorly written code, outside of my control, and never had any situations arise from simply passing it down to DefWindowProc.
Hopefully you will have the same experience!
Good luck. I found layered windows to be poorly documented and full of interesting caveats and gotchas, but very pleasing once you get all the kinks worked out.
Related
I have a fairly simple windows program that created a listview control that should exactly fill the client area. That works at start up, and I think will work if the window is resized --- except the windows NEVER receives any WM_SIZE messages (after the initial one sent on window creation.) I verified this using Spy++x64 as an administrator to ensure I was capturing everything. Spy++ showed the window receiving WM_SIZING, WM_WINPOSCHANGED, WM_NCCALCSIZE, and WM_WINPOSCHANGING (this list isn't in any particular order) but NEVER a WM_SIZE.
This is a 64-bit program, but I don't know why that should matter.
So, is there something I could have done that allows the window to be completely resizable, but prevent Windows from ever generating WM_SIZE messages when that happens? If not, is there something I need to do (that was never needed in the past 30 years) to let Windows know I need to see those WM_SIZE events?
It turns out that the default window procedure generates the WM_SIZE when it processed WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED and, since I was handling WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, no size messages were created. So I forwarded the position changed message to the default handler and the messages are back.
This follows documented behavior. There's a remark in the documentation for the WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED documentation:
By default, the DefWindowProc function sends the WM_SIZE and WM_MOVE messages to the window. The WM_SIZE and WM_MOVE messages are not sent if an application handles the WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED message without calling DefWindowProc. It is more efficient to perform any move or size change processing during the WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED message without calling DefWindowProc.
Yup, I'm sorry to admit that I failed to read the documentation for all of the Window messages that I was NOT having problems with when I needed to find out about WM_SIZE. Silly me for not assuming the documentation I needed about WM_SIZE was only to be found under some other message! All it says about the message generation in the WM_SIZE documentation is:
Sent to a window after its size has changed.
There is no mention AT ALL of any dependency on the default processing for a DIFFERENT message to be found. Ergo, the behavior is effectively undocumented, especially since it may be critical information, as it was for me.
Oh well, I give up, this place has become far too much of just smacking people down for asking questions some people think are too easily answered. Try to remember that not everyone has an eidetic memory and access to all of the documentation you have all memorized. Some of us look up the thing we're working on and expect to find the important details about it. THEY ARE NOT PRESENT. Bye!
I'm dealing a lot with drawing. Currently I'm using WM_TIMER to schedule painting using InvalidateRect. For some reason WM_PAINT is then very often called with region (0,0,0,0), so basically an empty rectangle. I tried to interpret this as "the whole window", but then it seemed to cause quite some performance decrease. Why is Windows sending it then?
Your question is quite well answered in the standard documentation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd145213%28v=vs.85%29.aspx.
Basically, the system sends WM_PAINT messages when the message queue is empty and by default it does so on occasion regardless of whether there is anything to paint or not. Many older applications depended on WM_PAINT (for example to do idle time processing) and keeping this behaviour ensures compatibility.
No, you must not assume it means the whole screen. If the region is empty you should avoid calling BeginPaint/EndPaint and just pass it through to the default window procedure.
From the MSDN documentation:
The BeginPaint function validates the entire client area.
The ValidateRect function should not be called if a portion of the
update region must be validated before the next WM_PAINT message is
generated.1
I've been programming with Win32 API for years, and I've never thought to call the ValidateRect function. A co-worker of mine today pointed that we were missing a call to ValidateRect, which fixed a bug we were having doing some high-speed animation using GDI (I know, an oxymoron)
Can someone tell me whether or not a call to ValidateRect is necessary after a BeginPaint/EndPaint pair? I have seen no documentation at MSDN that sheds light on this, and what documentation and examples I do see suggest that calling ValidateRect is not necessary.
It's not necessary. BeginPaint is used when you are validating the area because you handled it (painted it) in WM_PAINT.
ValidateRect is more to "cancel invalidation", usually after painting directly on the window without WM_PAINT or because something changed and you no longer want to be issued a pending WM_PAINT.
The fact that it fixed a bug likely means there's something else going on, and this accidentally fixed it (maybe by reducing the number of WM_PAINT messages?), or wrong observations (for example you changed 2 things but this one got the attention instead of the other which is the actual fix).
This could very well be another silly question, but I can't seem to find the answer (or any for that matter), so here goes.
I have a command line program that uses SIGWINCH on Linux to detect the window size change, and I apparently have a user who is using the program on Windows. The problem, is that the program uses SIGWINCH to detect changes in the window size and this signal is unsupported on Windows. I've tried Googling for every combination of search terms I can think of, but due to the relationship between SIGWINCH and changes in the size of the window, I'm having trouble finding any useful results. I'm looking for a Windows equivalent, or the method most often used to detect changes in the window size on Windows computers.
How do you detect changes in window size on Windows?
Since I don't think you can subclass console windows (and thus catch WM_SIZE messages), you may just have to poll GetConsoleScreenBufferInfo.
EDIT: Upon further investigation (not tested!), it might also be doable without polling using ReadConsoleInput. Summary: Call SetConsoleMode to turn on window input events. From a different thread, wait for the console input handle to become signaled using WaitForSingleObject or a similar function. Read all pending console events; the presence of window buffer size events means something's resized your console window.
Base question: TStatusBar flickers when calling Update procedure. Ways to painlessly fix this
The executed code is in the questions first posts first part ( you can see light grey separating line ) ...
But - problem is that while this code is executed, form does not automatically activate and focus on the top of all other applications.
I have read these articles:
http://www.installationexcellence.com/articles/VistaWithDelphi/Original/Index.html
http://delphi.about.com/od/formsdialogs/l/aa073101b.htm
but according to them it should be working no matter what. I tried all the TApplicationEvents and TForm events with Show; Visible: Repaint; Refresh; BringToFront; ... nothing works.
So - I think I have two options - multithreading or trapping WM_SYSCOMMAND message and in the SC_ACTIVE event simply repaint form. Could this scenario become successful?
None of your linked articles deal with the problem you are having. What you see is the behaviour of a program that does not process Windows messages, so consequently it will not redraw parts that become invalid, and it will not react to keyboard or mouse input (for example moving or resizing with the mouse, or app activation using the taskbar button).
In your code you call StatusBar1.Update, so at least the status bar text is redrawn, but apart from coming to the foreground your application is probably also ignoring move or resize requests.
You need to process Windows messages in a timely manner, so any execution path that takes more than say 200 or 300 milliseconds needs to make sure that messages are handled, otherwise the application will appear unresponsive or hung.
You have basically three options:
Keep the long running code, and insert calls to Application.ProcessMessages - this will allow Windows messages to be processed. Make sure that you keep the code from being entered again, for instance by disabling all the controls that are used to start the operation.
Rework your code in a way that it appears as a sequence of steps, each taking no more than a few 10 milliseconds. Put calls to the code in a timer event handler, or call it from the Application.OnIdle handler.
Call your code in a worker thread, and post messages to the main GUI thread to update your UI.
All these options have their own pros and cons, and for multithreading especially there is a lot of questions and answers already here on SO. It is the most difficult but best option overall when you are working on anything more than a toy program.