Related
Having two arrays of different sizes, I'd like to get the longer array as keys and the shorter one as values. However, I don't want any keys to remain empty, so that is why I need to keep iterating on the shorter array until all keys have a value.
EDIT: I want to keep array longer intact, but without empty values, that means keep iterating on shorter until all keys have a value.
longer = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
shorter = ['a', 'b', 'c']
Hash[longer.zip(shorter)]
#=> {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>nil, 5=>nil, 6=>nil, 7=>nil}
Expected Result
#=> {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>"a", 5=>"b", 6=>"c", 7=>"a"}
Here's an elegant one. You can "loop" the short array
longer = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
shorter = ['a', 'b', 'c']
longer.zip(shorter.cycle).to_h # => {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>"a", 5=>"b", 6=>"c", 7=>"a"}
A crude way until you find something more elegant:
Slice the longer array as per length of shorter one, and iterate over it to re-map the values.
mapped = longer.each_slice(shorter.length).to_a.map do |slice|
Hash[slice.zip(shorter)]
end
=> [{1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c"}, {4=>"a", 5=>"b", 6=>"c"}, {7=>"a"}]
Merge all hashes withing the mapped array into a single hash
final = mapped.reduce Hash.new, :merge
=> {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>"a", 5=>"b", 6=>"c", 7=>"a"}
Here's a fun answer.
longer = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
shorter = ['a', 'b', 'c']
h = Hash.new do |h,k|
idx = longer.index(k)
idx ? shorter[idx % shorter.size] : nil
end
#=> {}
h[1] #=> a
h[2] #=> b
h[3] #=> c
h[4] #=> a
h[5] #=> b
h[6] #=> c
h[7] #=> a
h[8] #=> nil
h #=> {}
h.values_at(3,5) #=> ["c", "b"]
If this is not good enough (e.g., if you wish to use Hash methods such as keys, key?, merge, to_a and so on), you could create the associated hash quite easily:
longer.each { |n| h[n] = h[n] }
h #=> {1=>"a", 2=>"b", 3=>"c", 4=>"a", 5=>"b", 6=>"c", 7=>"a"}
I have the following array:
["--",1,2,3,4]
How can I remove elements from the array by element type, ie. remove all non-integer values from the array?
I'd do :-
ary = ["--",1,2,3,4]
ary = ary.grep(Integer)
ary # => [1, 2, 3, 4]
Note :- If you don't want to mutate the original array use new_ary instead of ary. Like
new_ary = ary.grep(Integer)
You can use delete_if to remove items from the list, however this modifies the list.
a = ["--", 1, 2, 3, 4]
a.delete_if { |n| !n.kind_of?(Fixnum) }
p a
You can select items out of the list maintaining the original list by using select
a = ["--", 1, 2, 3, 4]
b = a.select { |n| n.kind_of?(Fixnum) }
p b
p a
This solution addresses the title, rather than the example, and permits the selection of elements by class, as well as the rejection of elements by class.
Code
good_classes and bad_classes are arrays of classes.
def filter_select(arr, *good_classes)
arr.select { |e| good_classes.include? e.class }
end
def filter_reject(arr, *bad_classes)
arr.reject { |e| bad_classes.include? e.class }
end
Examples
arr = [1, :a, {b: 3}, "cat", [4,5], true, 3..4, false]
filter_select(arr, Fixnum, Hash, TrueClass, Range)
#=> [1, {:b=>3}, true, 3..4]
filter_reject(arr, Fixnum, Hash, String, Array)
#=> [:a, true, 3..4, false]
I'd do
new_array = ary.reject {|x| x.is_a?(String)}
Even coming from javascript this looks atrocious to me:
irb
>> a = ['a', 'b', 'c']
=> ["a", "b", "c"]
>> a.unshift(a.delete('c'))
=> ["c", "a", "b"]
Is there a more legible way placing an element to the front of an array?
Edit my actual code:
if #admin_users.include?(current_user)
#admin_users.unshift(#admin_users.delete(current_user))
end
Maybe this looks better to you:
a.insert(0, a.delete('c'))
Maybe Array#rotate would work for you:
['a', 'b', 'c'].rotate(-1)
#=> ["c", "a", "b"]
This is a trickier problem than it seems. I defined the following tests:
describe Array do
describe '.promote' do
subject(:array) { [1, 2, 3] }
it { expect(array.promote(2)).to eq [2, 1, 3] }
it { expect(array.promote(3)).to eq [3, 1, 2] }
it { expect(array.promote(4)).to eq [1, 2, 3] }
it { expect((array + array).promote(2)).to eq [2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3] }
end
end
sort_by proposed by #Duopixel is elegant but produces [3, 2, 1] for the second test.
class Array
def promote(promoted_element)
sort_by { |element| element == promoted_element ? 0 : 1 }
end
end
#tadman uses delete, but this deletes all matching elements, so the output of the fourth test is [2, 1, 3, 1, 3].
class Array
def promote(promoted_element)
if (found = delete(promoted_element))
unshift(found)
end
self
end
end
I tried using:
class Array
def promote(promoted_element)
return self unless (found = delete_at(find_index(promoted_element)))
unshift(found)
end
end
But that failed the third test because delete_at can't handle nil. Finally, I settled on:
class Array
def promote(promoted_element)
return self unless (found_index = find_index(promoted_element))
unshift(delete_at(found_index))
end
end
Who knew a simple idea like promote could be so tricky?
Adding my two cents:
array.select{ |item| <condition> } | array
Pros:
Can move multiple items to front of array
Cons:
This will remove all duplicates unless it's the desired outcome.
Example - Move all odd numbers to the front (and make array unique):
data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 5, 1]
data.select{ |item| item.odd? } | data
# Short version:
data.select(&:odd?) | data
Result:
[1, 3, 5, 2, 4]
Another way:
a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
b = 3
[b] + (a - [b])
=> [3, 1, 2, 4]
If by "elegant" you mean more readable even at the expense of being non-standard, you could always write your own method that enhances Array:
class Array
def promote(value)
if (found = delete(value))
unshift(found)
end
self
end
end
a = %w[ a b c ]
a.promote('c')
# => ["c", "a", "b"]
a.promote('x')
# => ["c", "a", "b"]
Keep in mind this would only reposition a single instance of a value. If there are several in the array, subsequent ones would probably not be moved until the first is removed.
In the end I considered this the most readable alternative to moving an element to the front:
if #admin_users.include?(current_user)
#admin_users.sort_by{|admin| admin == current_user ? 0 : 1}
end
If all the elements in the array are unique you can use array arithmetic:
> a = ['a', 'b', 'c']
=> ["a", "b", "c"]
> a -= "c"
=> ["a", "b"]
> a = ["c"] + a
=> ["c", "a", "b"]
Building on above:
class Array
def promote(*promoted)
self - (tail = self - promoted) + tail
end
end
[1,2,3,4].promote(5)
=> [1, 2, 3, 4]
[1,2,3,4].promote(4)
=> [4, 1, 2, 3]
[1,2,3,4].promote(2,4)
=> [2, 4, 1, 3]
I'm trying to build a hash with:
hash = {}
strings = ["one", "two", "three"]
array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
so that I end up with:
hash = { "one" => [1, 2] ,
"two" => [3, 4] ,
"three" => [5, 6] }
I have tried:
strings.each do |string|
array.each_slice(2) do |numbers|
hash[string] = [numbers[0], numbers[1]]
end
end
But that yields:
hash = { "one" => [5,6] , "two" => [5,6], "three" => [5,6] }
I know why it does this (nested loops) but I don't know how to achieve what I'm looking for.
If you want a one-liner:
hash = Hash[strings.zip(array.each_slice(2))]
For example:
>> strings = ["one", "two", "three"]
>> array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
>> hash = Hash[strings.zip(array.each_slice(2))]
=> {"one"=>[1, 2], "two"=>[3, 4], "three"=>[5, 6]}
hash = {}
strings.each { |string| hash[string] = array.slice!(0..1) }
This is a solution using methods and techniques you seem familiar with. It is not a 'one liner' solution but if you are new might be more understandable for you. The first answer is very elegant though.
As Mu says, Zip method is the best choose:
Converts any arguments to arrays, then merges elements of self with corresponding elements from each argument. This generates a sequence of self.size n-element arrays, where n is one more that the count of arguments. If the size of any argument is less than enumObj.size, nil values are supplied. If a block is given, it is invoked for each output array, otherwise an array of arrays is returned.
I have an array:
int_array = [11,12]
I need to convert it into
str_array = ['11','12']
I'm new to this technology
str_array = int_array.map(&:to_s)
str_array = int_array.collect{|i| i.to_s}
array.map(&:to_s) => array of integers into an array of strings
array.map(&:to_i) => array of strings into an array of integers
map and collect functions will work the same here.
int_array = [1, 2, 3]
str_array = int_array.map { |i| i.to_s }
=> str_array = ['1', '2', '3']
You can acheive this with one line:
array = [1, 2, 3]
array.map! { |i| i.to_s }
and you can use a really cool shortcut for proc: (https://stackoverflow.com/a/1961118/2257912)
array = [1, 2, 3]
array.map!(&:to_s)
Start up irb
irb(main):001:0> int_array = [11,12]
=> [11, 12]
irb(main):002:0> str_array = int_array.collect{|i| i.to_s}
=> ["11", "12"]
Your problem is probably somewhere else. Perhaps a scope confusion?
the shortest option:
int_array.map!(&:to_s)
Returns Int
x = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] # => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Returns String
y = 1,2,3,4,5 # => ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5"]