When I'm debugging something in Delphi and there's a system library in the stack trace, I've got the name of the library and the function that's being called into. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to apply to any other external DLLs. I've got one that was compiled in Visual C++ 2005, and any time it gives me any sort of trouble, I have to attach the VS debugger and start tracing through the code from the original entrance point, because Delphi gives me no clue what's actually happening.
This DLL was built with VS's debug information compiled into it, but apparently Delphi has no way of reading it. Is there some way to fiddle with the debug options to change that, so I can get meaningful function names in my stack trace the same as I can with system libraries?
Delphi and Microsoft each use their own kind of debug information, and neither can use the other's kind.
These two pages might get you going into conversion:
Debugging symbols/tools using Delphi
Debugging Format Interoperability
But I'd just fire up Visual C++ 2005 and debug the C++ portion there. That is: the opposite of the solution in Stack Overflow question How to debug a DLL file in Delphi.
Related
How to debug mingw built binaries to detect heap errors? I see there are several questions on the topic, but they are general and it's hard to find the tool that would work well with MinGW. I spent much time on finding the solution, I hope the combined topic will be helpful.
Such a tool becomes necessary when for example someone reports a bug in your library while running it under Visual Studio debugger, which stops with a "Heap Error".
There is a tool provided by Microsoft called Application Verifier. It is a gui tool that changes system settings to run selected applications in a controlled environment. This makes it possible to crash your program if it causes detectable memory errors. This is a controlled crash that can be debugged.
Fortunately it is obtainable from Microsoft as a separate download. Another way to get it is to have Windows SDK installed with checked Application Verifier checkbox. SDK offers also an option Application Verifier redistributable.
After you configure Application Verifier to have an eye for your app, you need to debug it. Debugging under MinGW is a more common subject, already explained on stackoverflow. [mingw] [debugging] query on stackoverflow gives interesting articles. One of them is How do I use the MinGW gdb debugger to debug a C++ program in Windows?. Gdb is the one I used.
The general questions How to debug heap corruption errors? and Heap corruption detection tool for C++ were helpful to find this tool, but I wasn't sure if it is compatible with MinGW. It is.
After Google the issue i found that it was reported already but nothing useful yet from MS. I wonder if any one found a work around it?
Another option is to use windbg. You'll have to do a lot of commands by hand, but it's the best debugger out there. It handles mixed mode without any major issues. It has a bit of a learning curve, but it's very versatile.
Visual Studio's debugger is really not reliable when debugging mixed mode applications. Taken from my answer here #5965771:
If you're trying to debug a piece of native code try to use a native project as the debugger start-up application. Under the project settings, "Debugging" tab set the "Debugger Type" to "Mixed", for us this helped sometimes (the native project can be a DLL for example, simply set your main Exe as debugging target in the project settings);
OR, as already mentioned in another answer: Use WinDbg! With it you can debug both managed/unmanaged mixed code applications much more reliably.
use a different debugger, or don't use the debugger at all, just trace to a file or insert breakpoints in the code with inline assembly language.
I'm in an Assembly class focusing on the intel 8086 architecture (all compiling / linking / execution comes from running DOS on win7 via DOS-Box).
I've finished programming the latest assignment, but as I have yet to program any program successfully the first time through, I am now stuck trying to debug my code.
I have visual studio 2010 and was wondering if there was some built in feature that would help me debug my assembly code, specifically, I'm looking to track the value of a variable.
Failing that, instructions pointing to a DOS-Box debugger (and instructions!) would be much appreciated. (I think I've been able to run codeview debug, but I couldn't figure out how to do what I was looking for).
You are generating 16-bit code, you have to break into a museum to find better tooling. Try Borland's, maybe the debugger included with Turbo C.
Yes, indeed, you can use the debugger in VS to examine pretty much everything. Irvine's site has a section specifically on using the debugger here. You can examine registers, use the watch window, etc. He also has a guide for highlighting asm keywords if you need that.
Edit: as Hans pointed out, if you are using 16-bit instead of 32-bit protected, you'll need different tools. There are several choices, listed here.
Borland's tools for DOS were called tasm, tlink, and tdebug.
I've just gotten an application to compile and run by telling my VS 2008 project to ignore libc.lib in the linker->input section off the project properties menu. Before I did this VS gave me the old "fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'LIBC.lib'" message.
I'm not sure how this app compiles if I'm ignoring the crt, but that's obviously my ignorance speaking.
I checked the C/C++ project settings and the runtime library setting reads multithreaded debug dll (/MDd flag)-- so I must be linking to a VC80*.dll somewhere.
I'm not sure how though. I've always been confused about the crt settings in visual studio, static or debug, multithreaded or not. From reading this site and google I have a rough improvement in my understanding now-- if you use the dlls you don't have as much code bloat, things link when the program needs them, crt updates can be applied by overwriting the dll. The usual reasons for using a dll in other words.
But what's with the multi-vs-single threaded versions? If I happen to link with a static version I can't use win threads or pthreads, is that what that means?
One other thing which I've heard about but never quite followed-- there are problems in allocating an object in one dll and deallocating it from another, or something like that, to do with cross-allocation. I'm not explaining that well (because I don't understand it) but I hope you get my point and can explain what's going on there. Does it mean that in my program I can't call new ObjectX() on a class that lives in a dll? Can't mean that, can it?
Thanks everyone!
But what's with the multi-vs-single threaded versions? If I happen to link with a static version I can't use win threads or pthreads, is that what that means?
There is no (native) pthreads in Windows - so it's more Windows Threading, but that's the basic idea. However, VS 2008 doesn't support the single-threaded versions - they have been dropped, so if you're using VC++ 2008, you'll always use the multi-threaded VC++ runtime libraries.
One other thing which I've heard about but never quite followed-- there are problems in allocating an object in one dll and deallocating it from another, or something like that, to do with cross-allocation. I'm not explaining that well (because I don't understand it) but I hope you get my point and can explain what's going on there. Does it mean that in my program I can't call new ObjectX() on a class that lives in a dll? Can't mean that, can it?
This is more of an issue with allocating objects in a DLL which was compiled with a different VC++ runtime than the calling project. If you compile a DLL with VS2005, then try to do "new MyClass();" within a VC 2008 project, you can run into problems.
This is due to changes that are made between VC++ runtime versions. Different versions are free to manage memory allocations and deallocations in their own way. Trying to allocate or delete across a "runtime library" boundary tends to cause bad things to happen - quite often, you get crashes.
I've been doing some MSIL work and have come across references to these three debuggers.
What's the difference between them?
Is one of them better than the others wrt. functionality?
Are there others that I have missed?
I'm assuming you meant DbgClr not Clt and mdbg not mdbug?
DbgClr uses the VS shell so you get a nice GUI.
mdbg is the command line managed debugger.
cordbg was an old sample that sorta shipped, but now it's just a wrapper for mdbg. http://blogs.msdn.com/jmstall/archive/2005/11/07/views_on_cordbg_and_mdbg.aspx
Visual Studio is one you missed, but DbgClr should have the same functionality. http://blogs.msdn.com/andypennell/archive/2005/02/21/377621.aspx.
You can also use windbg with SOS extensions to do managed debugging from Windows debugger. SOS is also helpful when using VS since it lets you inspect memory and so on.
To see source level MSIL debugging, try using ilasm with the /debug option. Last time I checked, VS will let you step through the .il source just like C# or any other language.
MSDN blogs have a ton of content about debugging .NET apps -- I suggest you search further there.