Using the Oracle VPD facility(aka RLS, aka FGAC), suppose that I use the predicate
(WHERE) id = 'XXXX'
on TableA and then I use the predicate
(WHERE) col in (SELECT col From TableA)
on TableB.
Will TableA be filtered or not? Is filtering is done only outside of predicate definitions, when you query the tables?
Will I need to make predicate on TableB like this?:
(WHERE) col in (SELECT col From TableA where id ='XXXX')
Yes, TableA will be automatically filtered using the predicate you specified (id = 'XXXX').
Oracle automatically applies the filters wherever you use (select from, in this case) the table, even in sub-queries, if the filter criteria is met (see sec_relevant_cols).
Related
I am using Toad for oracle 12c. I need to copy a table and data (40M) from one shcema to another (prod to test). However there is an unique key(not the PK for this table) called record_Id col which has something data like this 3.000*******19E15. About 2M rows has same numbers(I believe its because very large number) which are unique in prod. When I try to copy it violets the unique key of that col. I am using toad "export data to another schema" function to copy the data.
when I execute query in prod
select count(*) from table_name
OR
select count(distinct(record_id) from table_name
Both query gives the exact same numbers of data.
I don't have DBA permission. How do I copy all data without violating unique key of the table.
Thanks in advance!
You can use UPSERT for decisional INSERT or UPDATE or you may write small procedure for this.
you may consider to use NOT EXISTS, but your data is big and it might not be resource efficient.
insert into prod_tab
select * from other_tab t1 where NOT exists (
select 1 from prod_tab t2 where t1.id = t2.id
);
In Oracle you can use a MERGE query for that.
The following query proceeds as follows for each data row :
if the source record_id does not yet exist in the target table, a new record is inserted
else, the existing record is updated with source values
For the sake of the example, I assumed that there are two other columns in the table : column1 and column2.
MERGE INTO target_table t1
USING (SELECT * from source_table t2)
ON (t1.record_id = t2.record_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET
t1.column1 = t2.column1,
t1.column2 = t2.column2
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT
(record_id, column1, column2) VALUES (t2.record_id, t2.column1, t2.column2)
Given the syntax:
CREATE [OR REPLACE] FUNCTION [Owner.]FunctionName
[(arguments [IN|OUT|IN OUT][NOCOPY] DataType [DEFAULT expr][,...])]
RETURN DataType [InvokerRightsClause] [DETERMINISTIC]
{IS|AS}
I think my query is syntactically correct, but for some reason, I get these errors during compilation:
Error(6,5): PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
Error(8,34): PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
CREATE or replace FUNCTION aCombinationMismatches(p_column1 IN VARCHAR2)
RETURN Number
IS
duplicate_count NUMBER(4,0);
BEGIN
select count(*) into duplicate_count
from schema1.tableA a
inner join schema1.tableB b
on a.b_id = b.id and a.column1 = p_column1
group by a.b_id, a.column1, a.column2, b.column1, b.column2, b.column3;
return duplicate_count;
END;
Anyone see anything wrong with my query above?
Also I'd like to how to set this UDF up to be used to create a CHECK constraint. How exactly do I specify the param: p_param1 to the function assuming this is the value of a field column1 in a row that a user is trying to insert? I just don't want the user to insert a record into tableA that consists of duplicate combinations of fields across tables: tableA and tableB.
Note: The tables tableA and tableB do exist - a select query like below indicates it. So the error above is rather confusing to me, I must add. (All table and column names in the two queries were found/replaced with dummy values.)
select count(*)
from schema1.tableA a
inner join schema1.tableB b
on a.b_id = b.id
group by a.b_id, a.column1, a.column2, b.column1, b.column2, b.column3;
Output:
Count(*)
OK, you already know that you have problem with priviliges. I wanted to add that you won't be able to create CHECK constraint basing on your function. According to documentation:
The condition of a check constraint can refer to any column in the table, but it cannot refer to columns of other tables.
Conditions of check constraints cannot contain the following constructs:
Subqueries and scalar subquery expressions
Calls to the functions that are not deterministic (CURRENT_DATE, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, DBTIMEZONE, LOCALTIMESTAMP, SESSIONTIMEZONE, SYSDATE, SYSTIMESTAMP, UID, USER, and USERENV)
Calls to user-defined functions
So to achieve what you want, you would have to define some triggers, or make use of some combination of MATERIALIZED VIEW and CHECK constraint. See for example this discussion on Ask Tom
You probably have access to TableA and TableB through a Role. This means that you can query the table, but you cannot create a procedure that reads or writes that table. In order to compile your procedure you should at least grant select on the table to your user.
In the link below you'll find more info
https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1065832643319
I have a table like this :
How can I sort it out in the form below :
Each set of records has been marked by a FlagID at end
Each set of records has been marked by a FlagID at end
I assume this means that each record is implicitly associated with the first non-null FlagID value that occurs at or after its position along the ID primary key. Thus, we can use a correlated subquery to project this implicit FlagID value for each record, sort by it, then sort by your Row column as tiebreaker for each set.
SELECT *
FROM YourTable T1
ORDER BY
(
SELECT TOP 1 T2.FlagID
FROM YourTable T2
WHERE T2.ID <= T1.ID
AND T2.FlagID IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY T2.ID DESC
),
T1.Row
However, if you're able to alter the database content, I would recommend you to explicitly populate all the FlagID fields, as this would make your life easier. If you do so, then the query becomes:
SELECT *
FROM YourTable T1
ORDER BY T1.FlagID,
T1.Row
I am new to Oracle, so kindly bear with me if the question sounds really naive.
So, I have two tables TableA and TableB which have say just two columns id, name for simplicity.
I now want to now get the id value for a particular value of name in TableA. If this would be the only requirement, this query would suffice -
SELECT id from TableA WHERE name = 'some_name';
Now, what I want to do is take this id and delete all the rows in TableB that match this id-
DELETE FROM TableB WHERE id = <id obtained from the above query>;
What is the composite query in oracle that would perform this function?
Thanks!
If you know that only a single id value is going to be returned for a particular name value, you'd just do
DELETE FROM tableB b
WHERE b.id = (SELECT a.id
FROM tableA a
WHERE a.name = 'some_name')
Note that the aliases are optional. However, adding aliases generally makes things clearer so no one has to guess which id or which name you're referring to at any point.
If there might be multiple id values in tableA for a given name, you'd just use an IN rather than an =
DELETE FROM tableB b
WHERE b.id IN (SELECT a.id
FROM tableA a
WHERE a.name = 'some_name')
This would also work if you knew that the query against tableA was only going to return one row. I'd prefer the equality query if you're sure that only one row would be returned, though. I'd generally rather get an error if my expectations were violated rather than potentially having unexpected rows get deleted.
I have specifiec requirement .Actually this is my query. here amount is a column in my table.but i did not mention the amount column in select statement.here can i use this column in oreder by clause.
SELECT stud_name, stud_roll, stud_prg
FROM programcl
ORDER BY 3, amount, 1;
Yes, you can mix both positional and named assignments in your ORDER BY clause.
The positional assignments must appear in your SELECT list. The named assignments do not have to.
can i use this column in oreder by clause.
Yes of course you can use a different column in order by clause that wasn't selected from your select statement.
For example
select col1 from tab1
order by col2;
by this way you get results from col1 which will be displayed on order of col2.
Its Worth trying