I noticed that an ajax request was taking too long, and apparently, after a while Chrome decided to execute the request again. So I ended with two duplicated ajax requests (and thus two database entries).
I googled about this Chrome behaviour and someone said that it was possible to tell Chrome not to retry ajax requests after timeout with a "do not retry" flag.
Questions:
Is it possible in angular to setup the $http with this flag?
Any other solution? The first time I had this problem I thought it was a "double click" problem, but now I'm pretty sure it is not. (In fact I always disable buttons while the request is working)
I feel like I don't have enough information, so don't downvote me if this is wrong. But when you say, a "do not retry" flag, do you mean a custom header? If so, you can attach custom headers in your config like this, which will attach the header to any and all http requests throughout your application (I personally have used this for including the X-Requested-With header:
.config(["$httpProvider", function($httpProvider) {
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.common['do-not-retry'] = 'true';
}])
I have a web application that crashes on ajax requests with google chrome (it works with every other web browser it was tested it). After debugging I found that the error is caused by response.responseText being undefined. The xhr object looks like this:
argument: undefined
isAbort: false
isTimeout: undefined
status: 0
statusText: "communication failure"
tId: 3
In debugger in the 'network' tab I get "(failed)", however all the headers are there and I can even copy into clipboard the response body (which is a valid JSON).
My question is - how can I debug this problem? Where to find additional information, what causes this request to fail?
I finally found the solution to my problem : AdBlocks, when it blocks an ajax request, it just says "communication failure".
The first thing I would double-check is that the data coming back from the response is valid JSON. Just pass it through a JSON validator like this online JSONLint: http://jsonlint.com/
I assume that you are using something like jQuery to make your AJAX requests. If so, then make sure that you are using the development version of that library. Now that you are using the development version (uncompressed) of the script, find the particular function that you are using (eg. $.ajax) and then, within the Chrome inspector, insert a breakpoint in the code where the AJAX response is first handled (eg. https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/master/src/ajax.js#L579). Then proceed to step through the code, inspecting various return-values to see exactly what is going wrong.
If you are not using something like jQuery to make AJAX calls, then I'd recommend using a framework to avoid possible cross-browser compatibility issues like you might be experiencing right now.
There are several topics about the problem with cross-domain AJAX. I've been looking at these and the conclusion seems to be this:
Apart from using somthing like JSONP, or a proxy sollution, you should not be able to do a basic jquery $.post() to another domain
My test code looks something like this (running on "http://myTestdomain.tld/path/file.html")
var myData = {datum1 : "datum", datum2: "datum"}
$.post("http://External-Ip:port", myData,function(return){alert(return);});
When I tried this (the reason I started looking), chrome-console told me:
XMLHttpRequest cannot load
http://External-IP:port/page.php. Origin
http://myTestdomain.tld is not allowed
by Access-Control-Allow-Origin.
Now this is, as far as I can tell, expected. I should not be able to do this. The problem is that the POST actually DOES come trough. I've got a simple script running that saves the $_POST to a file, and it is clear the post gets trough. Any real data I return is not delivered to my calling script, which again seems expected because of the Access-control issue. But the fact that the post actually arrived at the server got me confused.
Is it correct that I assume that above code running on "myTestdomain" should not be able to do a simple $.post() to the other domain (External-IP)?
Is it expected that the request would actually arrive at the external-ip's script, even though output is not received? or is this a bug. (I'm using Chrome 11.0.696.60 )
I posted a ticket about this on the WebKit bugtracker earlier, since I thought it was weird behaviour and possibly a security risk.
Since security-related tickets aren't publicly viewable, I'll quote the reply from Justin Schuh here:
This is implemented exactly as required by the spec. For simple cross-origin requests http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/#simple-method> there is no pre-flight check; the request is made and the response cannot be read if the appropriate headers do not authorize the requesting origin. Functionally, this is no different than creating a form and using script to make an off-origin POST (which has always been possible).
So: you're allowed to do the POST since you could have done that anyway by embedding a form and triggering the submit button with javascript, but you can't see the result. Because you wouldn't be able to do that in the form scenario.
A solution would be to add a header to the script running on the target server, e.g.
<?php
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://your_source_domain");
....
?>
Haven't tested that, but according to the spec, that should work.
Firefox 3.6 seems to handle it differently, by first doing an OPTIONS to see whether or not it can do the actual POST. Firefox 4 does the same thing Chrome does, or at least it did in my quick experiment. More about that is on https://developer.mozilla.org/en/http_access_control
The important thing to note about the JavaScript same-origin policy restriction is that it is something built into modern browsers for security - it is not a limitation of the technology or something enforced by servers.
To answer your question, neither of these are bugs.
Requests are not stopped from reaching the server - this gives the server the option to allow these cross-domain requests by setting the appropriate headers1.
The response is also received back by the browser. Before the use of the access control headers 1, responses to cross-domain requests would be stopped dead in their tracks by a security conscious browser - the browser would receive the response but it would not hand it off to the script. With the access control headers, the server has the option of setting the appropriate headers indicating to a compliant browser that it would like to allow certain origin URLs to make cross domain requests.
The exact behaviour on response might differ between browsers - I can't recall for sure now but I think Chrome calls the success callback function when using jQuery's ajax() but the response is empty. IIRC, Firefox will not invoke the success function.
I get the same thing happening for me. You are able to post across domains but are not able to receive a response. This is what I expected to be able to do and happens for me in Firefox, Chrome, and IE.
One way to kind of get around this caveat is having a local php file with will call the data via curl and respond the response to your javascript. (Kind of restated what you said you knew already.)
Yes, it's correct and you won't be able to do that unless you use any proxy.
No, request won't go to the external IP as soon as there is such limitation.
I'm getting some js errors only for some users, and only every once in a while on a page that uses quite a bit of ASP.NET AJAX.
The page also does some intense SQL querying and some string manipulation to highlight text found in the search results.
Could this be a result of performance? Is it always safe to use ASP.NET AJAX in demanding situations or should I be looking to other AJAX techniques?
(By the way the errors I sometime see are):
Message: Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManagerServerErrorException: An unknown error occurred while processing the request on the server. The status code returned from the server was: 12031
Message: Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManagerParserErrorException: The message received from the server could not be parsed. Common causes for this error are when the response is modified by calls to Response.Write(), response filters, HttpModules, or server trace is enabled.
Details: Error parsing near ' '.
ASP.NET AJAX has been known to not be the most performance intensive approach, but that's what you got i suppose in exchange for how simple it is to implement.
I do know you aren't allowed to do any Response.Writes within an update panel. That will cause your second error.
This particular exception is very
common and can be caused by any one of
the following:
1. Calls to Response.Write():
By calling Response.Write() directly you are bypassing the normal
rendering mechanism of ASP.NET
controls. The bits you write are going
straight out to the client without
further processing (well, mostly...).
This means that UpdatePanel can't
encode the data in its special format.
2. Response filters:
Similar to Response.Write(), response filters can change the
rendering in such a way that the
UpdatePanel won't know.
3. HttpModules:
Again, the same deal as Response.Write() and response filters.
4. Server trace is enabled:
If I were going to implement trace again, I'd do it differently.
Trace is effectively written out using
Response.Write(), and as such messes
up the special format that we use for
UpdatePanel.
5. Calls to Server.Transfer():
Unfortunately, there's no way to detect that Server.Transfer() was
called. This means that UpdatePanel
can't do anything intelligent when
someone calls Server.Transfer(). The
response sent back to the client is
the HTML markup from the page to which
you transferred. Since its HTML and
not the special format, it can't be
parsed, and you get the error.
Complete Post : ASP.NET AJAX and Sys.Webforms.PageRequestManagerServerErrorException
You can grab the code which causes the error by using Visual Studio Debug feature. I don't know much but maybe it can help and also Firebug will help you to see server response and data you submit to the server.
Here is a video where you can see how to use Firebug to debug Ajax.
See how I used Firebug to learn jQuery
But I don't think Asp.NET Ajax should be avoided in heavy loaded pages. That is actually what Ajax stands for right ? I mean it also relieves servers to send small pieces of pages instead of requesting the whole page again.
For some reason, while using AJAX (with my dashcode developed application) the browser just stops uploading and returns status codes of 0. Why does this happen?
Another case:
It could be possible to get a status code of 0 if you have sent an AJAX call and a refresh of the browser was triggered before getting the AJAX response. The AJAX call will be cancelled and you will get this status.
In my experience, you'll see a status of 0 when:
doing cross-site scripting (where access is denied)
requesting a URL that is unreachable (typo, DNS issues, etc)
the request is otherwise intercepted (check your ad blocker)
as above, if the request is interrupted (browser navigates away from the page)
Same problem here when using <button onclick="">submit</button>. Then solved by using <input type="button" onclick="">
Status code 0 means the requested url is not reachable. By changing http://something/something to https://something/something worked for me. IE throwns an error saying "permission denied" when the status code is 0, other browsers dont.
It is important to note, that ajax calls can fail even within a session which is defined by a cookie with a certain domain prefixed with www. When you then call your php script e.g. without the www. prefix in the url, the call will fail and viceversa, too.
Because this shows up when you google ajax status 0 I wanted to leave some tip that just took me hours of wasted time... I was using ajax to call a PHP service which happened to be Phil's REST_Controller for Codeigniter (not sure if this has anything to do with it or not) and kept getting status 0, readystate 0 and it was driving me nuts. I was debugging it and noticed when I would echo and return instead of exit the message I'd get a success. Finally I turned debugging off and tried and it worked. Seems the xDebug debugger with PHP was somehow modifying the response. If your using a PHP debugger try turning it off to see if that helps.
I found another case where jquery gives you status code 0 -- if for some reason XMLHttpRequest is not defined, you'll get this error.
Obviously this won't normally happen on the web, but a bug in a nightly firefox build caused this to crop up in an add-on I was writing. :)
This article helped me. I was submitting form via AJAX and forgotten to use return false (after my ajax request) which led to classic form submission but strangely it was not completed.
"Accidental" form submission was exactly the problem I was having. I just removed the FORM tags altogether and that seems to fix the problem. Thank you, everybody!
I had the same problem, and it was related to XSS (cross site scripting) block by the browser. I managed to make it work using a server.
Take a look at: http://www.daniweb.com/web-development/javascript-dhtml-ajax/threads/282972/why-am-i-getting-xmlhttprequest.status0
We had similar problem - status code 0 on jquery ajax call - and it took us whole day to diagnose it. Since no one had mentioned this reason yet, I thought I'll share.
In our case the problem was HTTP server crash. Some bug in PHP was blowing Apache, so on client end it looked like this:
mirek#toccata:~$ telnet our.server.com 80
Trying 180.153.xxx.xxx...
Connected to our.server.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET /test.php HTTP/1.0
Host: our.server.com
Connection closed by foreign host.
mirek#toccata:~$
where test.php contained the crashing code.
No data returned from the server (not even headers) => ajax call was aborted with status 0.
In my case, it was caused by running my django server under http://127.0.0.1:8000/ but sending the ajax call to http://localhost:8000/. Even though you would expect them to map to the same address, they don't so make sure you're not sending your requests to localhost.
In our case, the page link was changed from https to http. Even though the users were logged in, they were prevented from loading with AJAX.
In my case, setting url: '' in ajax settings would result in a status code 0 in ie8.. It seems ie just doesn't tolerate such a setting.
For me, the problem was caused by the hosting company (Godaddy) treating POST operations which had substantial response data (anything more than tens of kilobytes) as some sort of security threat. If more than 6 of these occurred in one minute, the host refused to execute the PHP code that responded to the POST request during the next minute. I'm not entirely sure what the host did instead, but I did see, with tcpdump, a TCP reset packet coming as the response to a POST request from the browser. This caused the http status code returned in a jqXHR object to be 0.
Changing the operations from POST to GET fixed the problem. It's not clear why Godaddy impose this limit, but changing the code was easier than changing the host.
I think I know what may cause this error.
In google chrome there is an in-built feature to prevent ddos attacks for google chrome extensions.
When ajax requests continuously return 500+ status errors, it starts to throttle the requests.
Hence it is possible to receive status 0 on following requests.
In an attempt to win the prize for most dumbest reason for the problem described.
Forgetting to call
xmlhttp.send(); //yes, you need this pivotal line!
Yes, I was still getting status returns of zero from the 'open' call.
In my case, I was getting this but only on Safari Mobile. The problem is that I was using the full URL (http://example.com/whatever.php) instead of the relative one (whatever.php). This doesn't make any sense though, it can't be a XSS issue because my site is hosted at http://example.com. I guess Safari looks at the http part and automatically flags it as an insecure request without inspecting the rest of the URL.
In my troubleshooting, I found this AJAX xmlhttpRequest.status == 0 could mean the client call had NOT reached the server yet, but failed due to issue on the client side. If the response was from server, then the status must be either those 1xx/2xx/3xx/4xx/5xx HTTP Response code. Henceforth, the troubleshooting shall focus on the CLIENT issue, and could be internet network connection down or one of those described by #Langdon above.
In my case, I was making a Firefox Add-on and forgot to add the permission for the url/domain I was trying to ajax, hope this saves someone a lot of time.
Observe the browser Console while making the request, if you are seeing "The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at http ajax..... reason: cors header ‘access-control-allow-origin’ missing" then you need to add "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" in response header. exa: in java you can set this like response.setHeader("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*") where response is HttpServletResponse.