What would be the appropriate way for selecting a particular row in a paginated view.
For example, while trying to select a particular row in Yahoo Inbox you can use the pointer to select the check box and if you try to click beyond the check box, no action is taken.
But while trying to select a particular row in GMail Inbox you can use the pointer to select it or if you navigate away from the checkbox it changes into a thumbnail but allows you to select the row.
Which method is preferable from a usability perspective and how to implement the thumbnail based selection as done by GMail
Both methods are appropriate, and both can be very usable.
I think the main difference is that row selection (the system used by Gmail) is more like a desktop application and a little less web-like. With links (like in the Yahoo inbox or StackOverflow), it's completely obvious that you're supposed to click on them. With rows, you sort of have to figure that out that you can click them, but I doubt it takes people long.
One thing to keep in mind is that, if you go with row selection, it's probably a good idea to bunch together any other clickable control (like checkboxes, links, or "favorite" stars). This way, you can click anywhere on the row. If you intersperse controls along the row, you increase the likelihood users will make clicking errors (aiming for the row but accidentally clicking some other control), and it will make it harder for users to recognize that the row itself is a clickable region.
So, both are perfectly acceptable user interfaces. You'll have to decide which one is a better match for your particular situation. I think, in general, links are a little bit more versatile, but with clickable rows, you know you can click anywhere and it will work.
Related
I'm working on redesigning a web interface to provide the same functionality it has currently but with easier use via good UX design. Currently, here is what the design looks like:
I'm less worried about the tofu look and feel, that can come later, I want to nail the UX functionality first. The idea here in this tab is the user can select the items via a checkbox and perform the actions in the "I Want To" drop down (which opens different modal dialogs depending on the action). The 3 dot ellipsis on the right of the items in the list allow the user to perform the same actions via another drop down control, with the idea that they use the top drop down to perform the actions on multiple items, the ellipsis three dot menu for one item.
The obnoxious part of this control is that the list could contain hundreds of items, and the check box takes too much precision to check quickly. The user would select which items they would like to perform the actions on sequentially, then have to scroll up to the top of the page to select the action. This could be 5 seconds of scrolling, which I find obnoxious. I want to develop a good UX pattern to provide the same functionality in less clicks, scrolling, and frustration.
My inital idea was to provide a floating action button. The user could then * somehow * (I haven't thought of an idea yet, at minimum at least a bigger check box) select multiple items then pick what they want to do via the floating action button which is always within the bounds of the screen instead of the horrible scroll back to the top (I don't think a "scroll to top" button is a good solution for this either).
So I need some recommendations on a UX pattern or some general suggestions on how to make this process less frustrating for users. I'm a fan of material design right now, but I'm open to any suggestions, material design guides don't seem to have any paradigms for something like this.
I think the UX steps are in a good track: first select them, then set the action.
Instead of it being only a checkbox to click, the whole top part of each line could be clickable to select the item. This would make it much easier for the user, and less frustrating not being able to hit the checkbox.
Fixing the header on top would be usefull for adding a "Select/Unselect all" option and having the actions always available. Adding a searchbox to filter could be as well a good option if you are thinking of long lists. Combining the search box and the "Select all" option should help the user in their tasks.
If that is the most important action to be done in that screen, making the "What to do" button stand out a bit more would be a good idea to differenciate the primary from the secondary options for the user to do.
I see two simple things you can do to make this more usable with very little effort.
Remove the checkbox and make the entire row tappable, highlighting those selected. Each row would essentially become the checkbox's label, and the checkbox itself would be hidden from view.
Fix the header to the top of the browser window when the user scrolls down.
I am looking for a control many of us probably know, but I don't know it's name and don't have a real screenshot by hand, just this sketch:
In the left box one can select an operation or whatever, which then is moved to the right side. With the up/down arrows on the right, one can move this operation (or whatever kind of meaning the entry has) up or down in the order of execution.
How is this kind of control called? Or is it normally build by developers out of single controls? Is this control available in JavaFX 2? If not, I don't need exactly this control, but a control with the following features:
User can select multiple operations (duplicates allowed) out of all available operations
The user can arrange their order of execution
Thanks for any hint :-)
You need to use multiple controls to build up your interface. Use two ListViews with a MultipleSelectionModel for each (or at least the left one) and add a couple of buttons, that copy selected items from one list to the other and another couple of buttons which modify the position of selected items in the right list view by modifying the view's underlying item list.
listView.getSelectionModel().setSelectionMode(SelectionMode.MULTIPLE);
I need to implement a threaded view of sorts in an old VB6 app. It should look similar to this:
So, it's like a TreeView of sorts but there are buttons on the right (for each row) that could be pressed. The view does not need to collapse - it always stays in the expanded mode. The users should be able to respond to each node (via the comment button on the far right). And, of course, users should be able to scroll through the entries.
What are some of the ways I could implement this? I am open to 3rd party controls, paid or not.
VSFlexGrid has an outline mode. You can set the indent per row via the RowOutlineLevel property. It supports word wrap, images, etc within its cells/columns so you should be able to get pretty close to what you want. It also supports owner-drawn which lets you fully customize the cell painting (for example, to get those rounded corners).
I'm sure there are other controls out there as well...
I'm trying to have a feature to allow users choose two different methods of cost calculation: either they can enter a yearly cost breakdown on a datasheet (2010: $10,000, 2011: $12,000, etc) or they can enter a flat yearly cost multiplied by the number of years they select.
If I were developing another kind of web application, I'd have radio buttons to select two different options. One option would display the datasheet, and the other option would display two text fields to enter values into. However, I understand that you can't have radio buttons in Access 2010 web databases. Also, is it possible to make elements appear and disappear based on a combo box selection?
If not, perhaps I could have two different combo box options: "enter yearly cost breakdown"
or "enter flat yearly cost," which open the correct respective forms as pop-ups.
So, 1) can I have Ajax-like appearing and disappearing elements as triggered by a combo box (or ideally, radio buttons), and 2) if not, can anyone think of another clever way of doing it?
Sure, you get a nice effect by using a tab control. You can place controls and even a sub form on that tab control.
So, you build a screen like this:
Then, simple set the visible property of the second tab = No. This will hide the tab (don't change this until you built the page since it will hide it! (use property sheet to hide/un-hide during development).
Now, add some code to the after update event of the list box. Like this:
In the above, I have named the tabs PYear and PFlat.
The result is this (this is a animated gif I inserted):
Of course, you really probably could just dump the whole "list box" selection, and use a screen like this with the tabs (tabs are good UI, and users tend to grasp them quick):
So, you can hide a "set" of controls, and it really far less work and hassle then writing a bunch of JaveScript anyway. As noted, the "set" of controls you drop into each of the tabs can be sub forms, and also that of continues forms. So, the "hiding" as a set does work well in this case. I did have some format issues and found that I had to "start out" with the 2nd tab dispaled first (the first one being hidden). As noted, the listbox selecting is nice, but one could likly just go with using tabs in the first place.
I need a user interface that allows users to sort a table according to multiple columns (e.g. sort by color and then price within color, or alternatively price and then color within price). The only such interface I'm familiar with is the dialogue box found in Excel under data > sort, but this is rather clunky and does not yield itself to quick switching between views. I would much prefer an iTunes-style interface that allows quick sorting by clicking on column headers. However, such interfaces typically only allow sorting by one column (an exception is iTunes itself which has a very limited, apparently hard-coded ability to sort by "Album by Artist" and "Album by Year" by clicking on the Album header).
I can envision an interface where each column header has some numbers, such that clicking on 1 makes the column the primary sort key, clicking on 2 the secondary key, and so on. Alternatively, clicking (or right-clicking) on a column header could bring a drop-down menu with "primary sort", "secondary sort" etc. However, I've never seen such an interface implemented, and I don't have a good intuition of usability issues that may arise.
Are there applications that allow sorting by multiple columns using the column headers? Would you be able to point me to these? Are there any useful usability results regarding such interfaces -- which work better, which less so?
Also, while I am mostly interested in the specification of the interface, any hints to pass on to the people implementing it would be appreciated, e.g. publicly available libraries that provide parts of a solution (especially Java).
Edit: Two people have suggested using an Excel-style dialogue box. This is not going to work. For my application, users need to find the "best match" among existing table entries (which is often not a perfect match). The table is too big to keep in your head, so you need to keep scanning the relevant parts, and it's useful to repeatedly sort the table in order to get multiple views. Having to go through a dialogue box with multiple options for each change of view is just too slow; by the time you're done with the box, you've forgotten the results from the previous view.
I think Outlook supported sorting by multiple columns. After you clicked a columnheader, you would then shift-click additional column headers. I no longer use Outlook so I can't verify this. Hopefully it will be a starting point for you.
I've seen the shift-click interface that caparcode mentioned in a few applications, however I can't name any right now. Here's a nice web-based example though.
I would suggest using a Ctrl-Click (or Shift-click or whatever-click) approach to let the user select multiple columns. Clicking without Ctrl will just sort by the selected column, but holding the Ctrl-key adds the column to the sorter. Clicking again changes the direction. And give a feedback about the current sorter(s) similar as in these pictures. Most of the time the users will only use the single column sorter anyway, only advanced users will want to sort by multiple columns. But you should have the behavior documented somehow in the manual and in the "did you know" thingy.
But since users don't read, there is the risk that nobody will find the feature. But for this maybe you could have a feature like Windows when first started wanting you to click the start-button once to ensure you found the button. When you see the user not using the sorter at all, show him that clicking the column header will sort. Later, when you see he's not using the multi sort feature show him once that the feature exists.
Do it the way Excel does, or rather the way real people use Excel, which almost never involves that clunky dialogue box which you rightly wish to avoid. Basically, Excel preserves your current sort order as much as it can - so if you currently have it sorted in descending order by price, and now you sort by color (using the A-to-Z button on the toolbar*, NOT the dialogue box), the prices within a color will remain in descending order.
This approach does require a bit of reverse thinking from the user, because you sort first by the least important column, but it is very intuitive once you get it. (Yeah, I know, that sounds self-contradictory, but I don't know how else to describe it.)
To implement it, you'd have to store the user's sorting history somewhere; but as far as the interface is concerned, all you'd need is an up arrow and a down arrow in each column. Or, if you only want to allow A-to-Z sorting, just make the column headings themselves into links or buttons or whatever.
* Yes, I know the default Excel toolbars don't have A-Z and Z-A as separate buttons anymore, but one of the first things you do with a new installation of Excel is customize the toolbars to add these as well as Paste Values, right? Right?
How about the following? A single droplist labeled “Sort” in top margin of the table. The dropdown lists all fields to sort. Each field appears twice, once for ascending and once for descending sorts. Beside the dropdown is a button labeled “More” or perhaps simply “+”. The user chooses the field for the primary sort key from the dropdown. The sort is instantly applied (no “Sort” command button). If a secondary sort key is desired, the user clicks the More button and another dropdown list is inserted and opened for the user to select the second key. Additional lower order keys may be added with successive clicks of the More button. Dropdowns each include a “Clear” item to delete a key.
This makes a compact, simple, and uncluttered UI for the simplest and most common case of a single sort key (unlike Excel’s Sort Dialog or having numbers to the column headers), while also supporting the sorting an indefinite number of keys (again unlike Excel’s Sort Dialog). The user can see the sort order at a glance (unlike Excel and more easily than with numbers in the columns). It avoids the clunkinest of a dialog box.
Clickable column headers is a de facto standard that is also a good idea to include along with the above. It’s good practice to do what Outlook and Windows Explorer do and make lower order keys out of former sort orders. So, for example, if the table is sorted by date and the user sorts by category, then the table is sorted first by category and then by date. A user can thus do multi-ordered sorting by picking the lowest order sort field first and working up. However, this has poor discoverability and user may find that working “backwards” is counter-intuitive, so it should be supplemented with something like the dropdowns and More button. Relying on shift-clicking or ctrl-clicking likewise has discoverability issues.
Have you taken a look at Excel? That's a perfect example on how to sort on multiple columns.
Also, I use a detailed listview sometimes, and let the user hold the Ctrl key while selecting one or more columns to sort the info. (Clicking twice on a column does a descending sort.)
Seriously, what you want, Excel does. Why not use an interface people already know how to drive. I would suggest that. Or else you're going to either have to buy from a third party, or roll your own.
Development with Office is facilitated by VSTO (Visual Studio .NET tools for Office). It's up to you how much you want to automate Excel within an inch of its life :). It can be done.
In fact that is what I had to do. I had to read spreadsheets, extract data, convert to objects, then persist to Access (don't ask). Each sheet represents one record, and each directory represents a location, you get the idea. All done using the Office PIA Interop assemblies.
Just a thought.