I've been looking through related LINQ questions here trying to figure this one out, but I'm having some trouble converting a SQL query of mine to the equivalent LINQ to Entities version.
select companies.CommpanyName,
job.Position,
count(offers.jobID) As Offered,
job.Openings,
job.Filled
from jobs
left outer join offers on jobs.ID = offers.JobID
join membership.dbo.individuals on jobs.UserID = individuals.ID
join membership.dbo.companies on individuals.CompanyID = companies.ID
where jobs.Hidden = 0
group by offers.JobID,
companies.CommpanyName,
job.Position,
job.Openings,
job.Filled
I've done left outer joins in LINQ before similar to this example but I'm not sure how to combine the count and group statements with this to get the desired result:
CompanyName Position Offered Openings Filled
1 Exmaple Co. Job X 0 2 0
2 Example Co. Job Y 4 6 3
3 Test Co. Job Z 1 1 1
The query is further complicated by the fact that it needs to utilize two separate data contexts. I apologize for the lack of example code, but I'm really not sure how to start this, my LINQ-fu is still weak.
Update:
This is the solution I arrived at with Craig's help, had to use LINQ to Objects because of the unfortunate multiple context setup, JobWithOfferCounts is not an entity object:
IEnumerable<Job> t = context1.JobSet.Include("Offers").Include("Contacts").Where(j => j.Hidden == false);
IEnumerable <JobWithOfferCounts> r = (from j in t
join i in context2.IndividualSet on j.UserID equals i.ID
join c in context2.CompanySet on i.CompanyID equals c.ID
select new JobWithOfferCounts()
{
JobObject = j,
CompanyID = Convert.ToInt32(c.ID),
CompanyName = c.HostName,
OfferCount = j.offers.Count(o => o.Rejected == false),
FilledCount = j.offers.Count(o => o.Accepted == true),
PendingCount = j.offers.Count(o => o.Accepted == false && o.Rejected == false)
});
return r;
I can't see why you have individuals in your query, or why you group by offers.JobID when it (unlike jobs.JobId) could be null, but here's a first stab:
var q = from c in Context.Companies
from i in c.Individuals
from j in i.Jobs
where j.Hidden == 0
select new
{
CompanyName = c.CompanyName,
Position = j.Position,
Offered = j.Offers.Count(),
Openings = j.Openings,
Filled = j.Filled
};
It's rarely correct to use join in LINQ to Entities or LINQ to SQL.
Related
I'm trying to convert my SQL statement to a Linq statement and I'm not sure how to add the second COUNT to it. This is my SQL statement
SELECT l.Campus_Name, Labs = COUNT(*), LabsWithSubnets = COUNT(s.Lab_Space_Id)
FROM vw_Lab_Space l
LEFT JOIN vw_Subnet s on l.Lab_Space_Id = s.Lab_Space_Id
GROUP BY l.Campus_Name
ORDER BY 1
and this is my LINQ statement so far:
from l in Vw_Lab_Space
from s in Vw_Subnet
.Where(s => s.Lab_Space_Id == l.Lab_Space_Id)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // <=- triggers the LEFT JOIN
group l by new { l.Campus_Name } into g
orderby g.Key.Campus_Name
select new {
Campus_Name = g.Key.Campus_Name,
Labs = g.Count()
}
So I have everything but the LabsWithSubnets part in there. I'm just not sure how to add that in as I can't just do an s.Lab_Space_id.Count() in the select statement.
If you need table structure and sample data please see Need help creating an OUTER JOIN to count spaces.
Using your query as a basis, you need the groups to include s so you can count when non-null (I also removed the unnecessary anonymous object around the grouping key):
from l in Vw_Lab_Space
from s in Vw_Subnet
.Where(s => s.Lab_Space_Id == l.Lab_Space_Id)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // <=- triggers the LEFT JOIN
group new { l, s } by l.Campus_Name into g
orderby g.Key
select new {
Campus_Name = g.Key,
Labs = g.Count(),
LabsWithSubnets = g.Count(ls => ls.s != null)
}
However, rather than translate the SQL, I would probably take advantage of LINQ's group join to handle the query slightly differently:
var ans = from l in Vw_Lab_Space
join s in Vw_Subnet on l.Lab_Space_Id equals s.Lab_Space_Id into sj
group new { l, sj } by ls.Campus_Name into lsjg
select new {
Campus_Name = lsjg.Key,
NumLabs = lsjg.Count(),
LabsWithSubnets = lsjg.Sum(lsj => lsj.sj.Count())
};
PS Even in your query, I would use join...from...DefaultIfEmpty rather than from...from...where but depending on your database engine, may not matter.
I'm having trouble getting my Linq statemnt to work when doing an outer join and a group by. Here's a SQL version of what I'm trying to accomplish:
select p.PRIMARY_KEY, min(p.EFFECTIVE_DATE), sum(IsNull(c.PAID_INDEMNITY, 0))
from PRMPOLCY p
left outer join CLMMAST c on p.PRIMARY_KEY = c.POLICY_NO
where p.UNDERWRITER_UID = 93
GROUP BY p.PRIMARY_KEY
Here's what I have in Linq (which doesn't work):
var result = from p in context.PRMPOLCies
join c in context.CLMMASTs on p.PRIMARY_KEY equals c.POLICY_NO into polClm
where (p.UNDERWRITER_UID == underwriter)
from grp in polClm.DefaultIfEmpty()
group grp by p.PRIMARY_KEY into g
select new PolicySummation()
{
PolicyNo = g.Key,
Incurred = g.Sum(grp => grp.PAID_INDEMNITY ),
EffDate = g.Min(grp => grp.PRMPOLCY.EFFECTIVE_DATE
};
Beating my head against the wall trying to figurwe this out!
Assuming you have a navigation property set up between PRMPOLCY and CLMMAST, you shouldn't need to specify the join explicitly. It's much easier to express most queries in linq without explicit joins, but rather treating your structures as a hierarchy. I don't know the specifics of your model property names, but I'd take a guess that something like this would work.
var result =
from p in context.PRMPOLCies
where (p.UNDERWRITER_UID == underwriter)
select new PolicySummation {
PolicyNo = p.PRIMARY_KEY,
Incurred = p.CLMASTs.Select(c => c.PAID_INDEMNITY).DefaultIfEmpty().Sum(),
EffDate = p.EFFECTIVE_DATE,
};
You need to include both your tables in the group clause like this:
group new { p, grp } by p.PRIMARY_KEY into g
Then in your Sum / Min
g.Sum(grp => grp.grp == null ? 0 : grp.grp.PAID_INDEMNITY )
g.Min(grp => grp.p.PRMPOLCY.EFFECTIVE_DATE)
var abc1 = from dlist in db.DebtorTransactions.ToList()
join war in db.Warranties on dlist.ProductID equals war.Id
join ag in db.Agents on war.fldAgentID equals ag.pkfAgentID
join sr in db.SalesReps on war.fldSrId equals sr.pkfSrID
where dlist.TransTypeID == 1
select new
{
dlist.Amount,
dlist.TransTypeID,
name = ag.Name,
ag.pkfAgentID,
sr.pkfSrID,
salesnam = sr.Name
} into objabc
group objabc by new
{
objabc.TransTypeID,
objabc.name,
objabc.salesnam,
objabc.Amount
};
var amt1 = abc1.Sum(x => x.Key.Amount);
var abc2 = from dlist in db.DebtorTransactions.ToList()
join cjt in db.CarJackaTrackas on dlist.ProductID equals cjt.pkfCjtID
join ag in db.Agents on cjt.AgentID equals ag.pkfAgentID
join sr in db.SalesReps on cjt.SalesRepId equals sr.pkfSrID
where dlist.TransTypeID == 0
select new
{
dlist.Amount,
dlist.TransTypeID,
name = ag.Name,
ag.pkfAgentID,
sr.pkfSrID,
enter code here` salesnam = sr.Name
} into objabc
group objabc by new
{
objabc.TransTypeID,
objabc.name,
objabc.salesnam,
objabc.Amount
};
var amt2 = abc1.Sum(x => x.Key.Amount);
//var result1=
return View();
i am new to linq, this query is working but i need to get the sum of Amount where dlist.TransTypeID == 0 and where dlist.TransTypeID == 1 by just single query. may anybody help me? thanks in advance
Here's a trimmed down example of how you can do it. You can add the joins if they are necessary, but I'm not clear on why you need some of the extra join values.
var transTypeAmountSums = (from dlist in db.DebtorTransactions
group dlist by dlist.TransTypeId into g
where g.Key == 0 || g.Key == 1
select new
{
TransTypeId = g.Key,
AmountSum = g.Sum(d => d.Amount)
}).ToDictionary(k => k.TransTypeId, v => v.AmountSum);
int transTypeZeroSum = transTypeAmountSums[0];
int transTypeOneSum = transTypeAmountSums[1];
A couple of things to note:
I removed ToList(). Unless you want to bring ALL DebtorTransactions into memory then run a Linq operation on those results, you'll want to leave that out and let SQL take care of the aggregation (it's much better at it than C#).
I grouped by dlist.TransTypeId only. You can still group by more fields if you need that, but it was unclear in the example why they were needed so I just made a simplified example.
I'm having a bit trouble with a query in Linq to Entities which I hope someone can shed a light on :-) What I'm trying to do is to create a query that joins three tables.
So far it works, but since the last table I'm trying to join is empty, the result of the query doesn't contain any records. When I remove the last join, it gives me the right results.
My query looks like this:
var query = from p in db.QuizParticipants
join points in db.ParticipantPoints on p.id
equals points.participantId into participantsGroup
from po in participantsGroup
join winners in db.Winners on p.id
equals winners.participantId into winnersGroup
from w in winnersGroup
where p.hasAttended == 1 && p.weeknumber == weeknumber
select new
{
ParticipantId = p.id,
HasAttended = p.hasAttended,
Weeknumber = p.weeknumber,
UmbracoMemberId = p.umbMemberId,
Points = po.points,
HasWonFirstPrize = w.hasWonFirstPrize,
HasWonVoucher = w.hasWonVoucher
};
What I would like is to get some records even if the Winners table is empty or there is no match in it.
Any help/hint on this is greatly appreciated! :-)
Thanks a lot in advance.
/ Bo
If you set these up as related entities instead of doing joins, I think it will be easier to do what you're trying to do.
var query = from p in db.QuizParticipants
where p.hasAttended == 1 && p.weeknumber == weeknumber
select new
{
ParticipantId = p.id,
HasAttended = p.hasAttended,
Weeknumber = p.weeknumber,
UmbracoMemberId = p.umbMemberId,
Points = p.ParticipantPoints.Sum(pts => pts.points),
HasWonFirstPrize = p.Winners.Any(w => w.hasWonFirstPrize),
HasWonVoucher = p.Winners.Any(w => w.hasWonVoucher)
};
This is assuming hasWonFirstPrize and hasWonVoucher are boolean fields, but you can use any aggregate function to get the results you need, such as p.Winners.Any(w => w.hasWonFirstPrize == 1)
I don't use query syntax a lot but I believe you need to change from w in winnersGroup to from w in winnersGroup.DefaultIfEmpty()
I am trying to figure out how to go about writing a linq query to perform an aggregate like the sql query below:
select d.ID, d.FIRST_NAME, d.LAST_NAME, count(s.id) as design_count
from tbldesigner d inner join
TBLDESIGN s on d.ID = s.DESIGNER_ID
where s.COMPLETED = 1 and d.ACTIVE = 1
group by d.ID, d.FIRST_NAME, d.LAST_NAME
Having COUNT(s.id) > 0
If this is even possible with a linq query could somebody please provide me with an example.
Thanks in Advance,
Billy
A more direct translation of your original SQL query would look like this:
var q =
// Join tables TblDesign with TblDesigner and filter them
from d in db.TblDesigner
join s in db.TblDesign on d.ID equals s.DesignerID
where s.Completed && d.Active
// Key and values used for grouping (note, you don't really need the
// value here, because you only need Count of the values in a group, but
// in case you needed anything from 's' or 'd' in 'select', you'd write this
let value = new { s, d }
let key = new { d.ID, d.FirstName, d.LastName }
group value by key into g
// Now, filter the created groups (return only non-empty) and select
// information for every group
where g.Count() > 0
select { ID = g.Key.ID, FirstName = g.Key.FirstName,
LastName = g.Key.LastName, Count = g.Count() };
The HAVING clause is translated to an ordinary where that is applied after grouping values using group ... by. The result of grouping is a collection of groups (another collections), so you can use where to filter groups. In the select clause, you can then return information from the key (used for grouping) and aggregate of values (using g.Count())
EDIT: As mmcteam points out (see comments), the where g.Count() > 0 clause is not necessary, because this is already guranteed by the join. I'll leave it there, because it shows how to translate HAVING clause in general, so it may be helpful in other cases.
Here's how I'd do it. Please note that I'm accustomed to linqtosql and am unaware if there are differences for the query in linqtoentities.
var query =
from d in myObjectContext.tbldesigner
where d.ACTIVE == 1
let manys =
from s in d.tbldesign
where s.COMPLETED == 1
select s
where manys.Count() > 0
select new
{
d.ID, d.FIRST_NAME, d.LAST_NAME,
DesignCount = manys.Count()
};
Ignoring the s.id which is confusing me (see my comment on the question), this is a simple query which would generate a having clause. Of course, in this case it's a worthless example since the count will always be more than 0 in this case.
Anyways, if you are using SQL to Entities, you should use the entity mapping to access the foreign key relationships instead of manually doing a join or a subquery.
var results = from d in db.tbldesigner
where d.TBLDESIGN.COMPLETED && d.ACTIVE
group d by new {d.ID, d.FIRST_NAME, d.LAST_NAME} into g
where g.Count() >= 0
select new {
d.ID, d.FIRST_NAME, d.LAST_NAME,
Count = g.Count()
};
NOTE: This is untested (and uncompiled) so there might be some issues, but this is where I would start.