How do i check if a sheet exists in a excel using interop. I tried the following but it throws an COMException if not there.. Is there a better way of finding out than actually looking at the exception
Worksheet sheet = null;
Sheets worksheets = some;
sheet = (Worksheet)worksheets.get_Item("sheetName");
if(sheet!=null)
{
//do something
}
Edit:
Thanks for the input guys.
i wrote a function
private Dictionary<string, Worksheet> GetSheetsMap(Sheets worksheets)
{
if (worksheets == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("worksheets");
Dictionary<string, Worksheet> map = new Dictionary<string, Worksheet>(StringComparer.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
foreach (Worksheet s in worksheets)
{
map.Add(s.Name, s);
}
return map;
}
And i use it as below
Dictionary<string, Worksheet> sheetMap = GetSheetsMap(worksheets);
Worksheet sheet = null;
if (sheetMap.TryGetValue(ExtendedTemplateManager.BasicUserTemplate, out sheet))
{
//found it.
}
else
{
// not
}
Do you have a Workbook object? If so, you can iterate over the Workbook.Sheets array and check the Name property of each Sheet.
foreach (Sheet sheet in workbook.Sheets)
{
if (sheet.Name.equals("sheetName"))
{
//do something
}
}
First consider if an exception isn't actually appropriate. You expect a sheet with a certain name to be there. If it isn't, can you still meaningful continue running your program?
If you can, you can avoid the exception by iterating the sheets collection and look for a match on the Name property.
Here's a LINQ way to do it (and this method returns null if the sheet doesn't exist):
workbook.Worksheets.Cast<Worksheet>().FirstOrDefault(worksheet => worksheet.Name == worksheetName);
If you have worksheet and workbook objects them you can do parent check
if (sheet.Parent == workbook)
Related
Very frustrated here ...
I can usually find an answer of some kind to complex issues in .Net somewhere on the net, but this one eludes me.
I'm in a scenario where I have to convert the result of a LINQ to Entity query into a DataSet so the data can then be processed by existing business logic, and I can't find a single working solution out ther for this.
I've tried basic approaches like the EntityCommand generating a reader, but this one does not work because DataTable.Load() thorws an excpetion (the reader generated by EntityCommand does not support GetSchemaTable() ).
I've also tried more [supposedly] friendly approaches like Entity to IDataReader(http://l2edatareaderadapter.codeplex.com/), but this one throws exceptions, has very little docs, and hasn't been touched since 2008.
Another approach I found is here (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alexj/archive/2007/11/27/hydrating-an-entitydatareader-into-a-datatable-part-1.aspx), but does not have a working copy of the code; only snippets.
I find it hard to believe that first of all MS would not have offered this backwards-compatibility item out of the box, and second, that it would not have been created by the community either.
I'm willing to look at commercial solutions as well if any are available.
Thx!
You can convert the result into a list and use the following to convert the list to a datatable.
public DataTable ConvertToDataTable<T>(IList<T> data)
{
PropertyDescriptorCollection properties =
TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(typeof(T));
DataTable table = new DataTable();
foreach (PropertyDescriptor prop in properties)
table.Columns.Add(prop.Name, Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(prop.PropertyType) ?? prop.PropertyType);
foreach (T item in data)
{
DataRow row = table.NewRow();
foreach (PropertyDescriptor prop in properties)
row[prop.Name] = prop.GetValue(item) ?? DBNull.Value;
table.Rows.Add(row);
}
return table;
}
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/br/csharpgeneral/thread/6ffcb247-77fb-40b4-bcba-08ba377ab9db
Hope this helps
Preetam
This might not be the greatest solution, but if your scenario have only one or two table that you need to add to the DataSet, why not build them directly manually.
var result = db.YourTable; // get your Linq To Entities result.
DataSet ds = new DataSet();
DataTable tbl = new DataTable();
tbl.Columns.Add("col1", typeof(string));
tbl.Columns.Add("col2", typeof(int));
foreach (var r in result)
{
var row = tbl.NewRow();
row[0] = r.Col1;
row[1] = r.Col2;
tbl.Rows.Add(r);
}
ds.Tables.Add(tbl);
The Col1 and Col2 comes from your Linq To Entity objects, you can create all the table you need like this and return your DataSet.
This is a flexible code and should handle most of your needs:
public DataTable LINQToDataTable<T>(IEnumerable<T> varlist)
{
DataTable dtReturn = new DataTable();
// column names
PropertyInfo[] oProps = null;
if (varlist == null) return dtReturn;
foreach (T rec in varlist)
{
// Use reflection to get property names, to create table, Only first time, others will follow
if (oProps == null)
{
oProps = ((Type)rec.GetType()).GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo pi in oProps)
{
Type colType = pi.PropertyType;
if ((colType.IsGenericType) && (colType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Nullable<>)))
{
colType = colType.GetGenericArguments()[0];
}
dtReturn.Columns.Add(new DataColumn(pi.Name, colType));
}
}
DataRow dr = dtReturn.NewRow();
foreach (PropertyInfo pi in oProps)
{
dr[pi.Name] = pi.GetValue(rec, null) == null ? DBNull.Value : pi.GetValue
(rec, null);
}
dtReturn.Rows.Add(dr);
}
return dtReturn;
}
I've currently got the following foreach loop:
List<SearchResult> searchResults = new List<SearchResult>();
foreach (Transmission trans in Results)
{
searchResults.Add(new SearchResult(trans));
}
return searchResults;
And I'd like to convert this to a Linq expression, I've tried the following which looks like it achieve the same thing in linq to me:
return Results.Select(x => new SearchResult(x)).ToList();
However when executed I get the following error:
System.InvalidCastException: Object must implement IConvertible.
I think I understand the gist of that error but the issue I have is that I'm not actually trying to convert the Transmission Objects in the Results collection to SearchResult objects but instead to return a list of SearchResult objects, a SearchResult object being intialized like so:
Transmission transmission = new Transmission(...);
SearchResult result = new SearchResult(trans);
Any help on this would be great, I've been tearing my hair out!
EDIT: As per comments here is the full method stub:
public IQueryable<Transmission> Results
{
get;
set;
}
public virtual IEnumerable<SearchResult> ResultsNetwork
{
get
{
List<SearchResult> searchResults = new List<SearchResult>();
foreach (Transmission trans in Results)
{
searchResults.Add(new SearchResult(trans));
}
return searchResults;
}
}
I get the impression that Results is a collection of object, so Select is defining x as object, but you want it to be Transmission.
Try either of these options:
return Results.Cast<Transmission>().Select(x => new SearchResult(x)).ToList();
return Results.OfType<Transmission>().Select(x => new SearchResult(x)).ToList();
Cheers.
Its hard to guess what you are trying to cast (you need to show your method signature, as well as a blurb showing how you convert Transmissions to SearchResult)
However and easier way to do it:
return Results.ConvertAll(x=> new SearchResult(x));
I have IQueryable object and I need to take the data inside the IQueryable to put it into Textboxs controls. Is this possible?
I try something like:
public void setdata (IQueryable mydata)
{
textbox1.text = mydata.????
}
Update:
I'm doing this:
public IQueryable getData(String tableName, Hashtable myparams)
{
decimal id = 0;
if (myparams.ContainsKey("id") == true)
id = (decimal)myparams["id"];
Type myType= Type.GetType("ORM_Linq." + tableName + ", ORM_Linq");
return this.GetTable(tableName , "select * from Articu where id_tipo_p = '" + id + "'");
}
public IQueryable<T> GetTable<T>(System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate) where T : class
{
return _datacontext.GetTable<T>().Where(predicate);
}
This returns a {System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider+OneTimeEnumerable1[ORM_Linq.Articu]}`
I don't see any method like you tell me. I see Cast<>, Expression, ToString...
EDIT: Updated based on additional info from your other posts...
Your getData method is returning IQueryable instead of a strongly typed result, which is why you end up casting it. Try changing it to:
public IQueryable<ORM_Linq.Articu> getData(...)
Are you trying to query for "Articu" from different tables?
With the above change in place, your code can be rewritten as follows:
ORM_Linq.Articu result = mydata.SingleOrDefault();
if (result != null)
{
TextBoxCode.Text = result.id.ToString();
TextBoxName.Text = result.descrip;
}
If you have a single result use SingleOrDefault which will return a default value if no results are returned:
var result = mydata.SingleOrDefault();
if (result != null)
{
textbox1.text = result.ProductName; // use the column name
}
else
{
// do something
}
If you have multiple results then loop over them:
foreach (var item in mydata)
{
string name = item.ProductName;
int id = item.ProductId;
// etc..
}
First, you should be using a strongly-typed version of IQueryable. Say that your objects are of type MyObject and that MyObject has a property called Name of type string. Then, first change the parameter mydata to be of type IQueryable<MyObject>:
public void setdata (IQueryable<MyObject> mydata)
Then we can write a body like so to actually get some data out of. Let's say that we just want the first result from the query:
public void setdata (IQueryable<MyObject> mydata) {
MyObject first = mydata.FirstOrDefault();
if(first != null) {
textbox1.Text = first.Name;
}
}
Or, if you want to concatenate all the names:
public void setdata(IQueryable<MyObject> mydata) {
string text = String.Join(", ", mydata.Select(x => x.Name).ToArray());
textbo1.Text = text;
}
Well, as the name suggests, an object implementing IQueryable is... Queryable! You'll need to write a linq query to get at the internal details of your IQueryable object. In your linq query you'll be able to pull out its data and assign bits of it where ever you'd like - like your text box.
Here's a great starting place for learning Linq.
I think you find the same mental struggle when coming from FoxPro and from DataSet. Really nice, powerful string-based capabilities(sql for query, access to tables and columns name) in these worlds are not available, but replaced with a compiled, strongly-typed set of capabilities.
This is very nice if you are statically defining the UI for search and results display against a data source known at compile time. Not so nice if you are trying to build a system which attaches to existing data sources known only at runtime and defined by configuration data.
If you expect only one value just call FirstOrDefault() method.
public void setdata (IQueryable mydata)
{
textbox1.text = mydata.FirstOrDefault().PropertyName;
}
I have a variable size array of strings, and I am trying to programatically loop through the array and match all the rows in a table where the column "Tags" contains at least one of the strings in the array. Here is some pseudo code:
IQueryable<Songs> allSongMatches = musicDb.Songs; // all rows in the table
I can easily query this table filtering on a fixed set of strings, like this:
allSongMatches=allSongMatches.Where(SongsVar => SongsVar.Tags.Contains("foo1") || SongsVar.Tags.Contains("foo2") || SongsVar.Tags.Contains("foo3"));
However, this does not work (I get the following error: "A lambda expression with a statement body cannot be converted to an expression tree")
allSongMatches = allSongMatches.Where(SongsVar =>
{
bool retVal = false;
foreach(string str in strArray)
{
retVal = retVal || SongsVar.Tags.Contains(str);
}
return retVal;
});
Can anybody show me the correct strategy to accomplish this? I am still new to the world of LINQ :-)
You can use the PredicateBuilder class:
var searchPredicate = PredicateBuilder.False<Songs>();
foreach(string str in strArray)
{
var closureVariable = str; // See the link below for the reason
searchPredicate =
searchPredicate.Or(SongsVar => SongsVar.Tags.Contains(closureVariable));
}
var allSongMatches = db.Songs.Where(searchPredicate);
LinqToSql strange behaviour
I recently created an extension method for creating string searches that also allows for OR searches. Blogged about here
I also created it as a nuget package that you can install:
http://www.nuget.org/packages/NinjaNye.SearchExtensions/
Once installed you will be able to do the following
var result = db.Songs.Search(s => s.Tags, strArray);
If you want to create your own version to allow the above, you will need to do the following:
public static class QueryableExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> Search<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, Expression<Func<T, string>> stringProperty, params string[] searchTerms)
{
if (!searchTerms.Any())
{
return source;
}
Expression orExpression = null;
foreach (var searchTerm in searchTerms)
{
//Create expression to represent x.[property].Contains(searchTerm)
var searchTermExpression = Expression.Constant(searchTerm);
var containsExpression = BuildContainsExpression(stringProperty, searchTermExpression);
orExpression = BuildOrExpression(orExpression, containsExpression);
}
var completeExpression = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(orExpression, stringProperty.Parameters);
return source.Where(completeExpression);
}
private static Expression BuildOrExpression(Expression existingExpression, Expression expressionToAdd)
{
if (existingExpression == null)
{
return expressionToAdd;
}
//Build 'OR' expression for each property
return Expression.OrElse(existingExpression, expressionToAdd);
}
}
Alternatively, take a look at the github project for NinjaNye.SearchExtensions as this has other options and has been refactored somewhat to allow other combinations
There is another, somewhat easier method that will accomplish this. ScottGu's blog details a dynamic linq library that I've found very helpful in the past. Essentially, it generates the query from a string you pass in. Here's a sample of the code you'd write:
Dim Northwind As New NorthwindDataContext
Dim query = Northwind.Products _
.Where("CategoryID=2 AND UnitPrice>3") _
.OrderBy("SupplierId")
Gridview1.DataSource = query
Gridview1.DataBind()
More info can be found at scottgu's blog here.
Either build an Expression<T> yourself, or look at a different route.
Assuming possibleTags is a collection of tags, you can make use of a closure and a join to find matches. This should find any songs with at least one tag in possibleTags:
allSongMatches = allSongMatches.Where(s => (select t from s.Tags
join tt from possibleTags
on t == tt
select t).Count() > 0)
I have a couple of tables with similar relationship structure to the standard Order, OrderLine tables.
When creating a data context, it gives the Order class an OrderLines property that should be populated with OrderLine objects for that particular Order object.
Sure, by default it will delay load the stuff in the OrderLine property but that should be fairly transparent right?
Ok, here is the problem I have: I'm getting an empty list when I go MyOrder.OrderLines but when I go myDataContext.OrderLines.Where(line => line.OrderId == 1) I get the right list.
public void B()
{
var dbContext = new Adis.CA.Repository.Database.CaDataContext(
"<connectionString>");
dbContext.Connection.Open();
dbContext.Transaction = dbContext.Connection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
//!!!Edit: Imortant to note that the order with orderID=1 already exists
//!!!in the database
//just add some new order lines to make sure there are some
var NewOrderLines = new List<OrderLines>()
{
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=300 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=301 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=302 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=303 }
};
dbContext.OrderLines.InsertAllOnSubmit(NewOrderLines);
dbContext.SubmitChanges();
//this will give me the 4 rows I just inserted
var orderLinesDirect = dbContext.OrderLines
.Where(orderLine => orderLine.OrderID == 1);
var order = dbContext.Orders.Where(order => order.OrderID == 1);
//this will be an empty list
var orderLinesThroughOrder = order.OrderLines;
}
catch (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException e)
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
throw;
}
finally
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
dbContext.Dispose();
dbContext = null;
}
}
So as far as I can see, I'm not doing anything particularly strange but I would think that orderLinesDirect and orderLinesThroughOrder would give me the same result set.
Can anyone tell me why it doesn't?
You're just adding OrderLines; not any actual Orders. So the Where on dbContext.Orders returns an empty list.
How you can still find the property OrderLines on order I don't understand, so I may be goofing up here.
[Edit]
Could you update the example to show actual types, especially of the order variable? Imo, it shoud be an IQueryable<Order>, but it's strange that you can .OrderLines into that. Try adding a First() or FirstOrDefault() after the Where.