I am trying to make U9 telit modem send SMS messages. I think I handle protocol correctly, at least, I manage to send them, but only under these circumstances: the native application was executed beforehand, and killed by task manager (without giving it a chance to initialize things).
It looks like the supplied application is good at doing certain initialization/deinitialization which is critical. I also see the difference between the two states in output of AT+CIND command. When I am trying to do things on my own, it returns zeroes (including signal quality), but when I run the same command after killing the native application, the output looks reasonable.
I am out nearly of ideas. I have tried many things, including attempts to spy at modem's COM ports (didn't work). Haven't tried setting windows hooks to see what the application is trying to get thru.
Perhaps you have encountered a similar situation?
Agg's "Advanced Serial Port Monitor" actually helped a lot. Sometimes it caused blue screen, but it helped uncover secret commands which seem to help. AT+PCFULL is not described anywhere on the net, for example. The real trigger of non-operatio was AT+CFUN, the power disable/standby feature.
Also, it appeared that we have more issues. At first, the modem appears on the bus only as disk drive. It doesn't want to appear as any other devices before the drivers are installed. So, the U9 Telit software sends an IOCTL to disk driver to tell the modem to reappear as more devices (modem, 3 serial ports, another disk drive).
Related
I'm interfacing to a hardware serial device using QT, I've based my application roughly around the Terminal example, but as the communication needs to be very synchronous the serial handler is living in another thread. The connection is via a 2xRS232 to USB adaptor with an FTDI chipset.
The serial comms are fine, I can connect, send commands, etc. However, when I quit and reload the application the serial port seems to be blocked.
Let COM1 be the connected device, COM2 is unconnected.
If I run the program, do a bit of talking to the hardware and quit, I can no longer connect to COM1 the next time I run the program (the data leds don't flash on the adaptor) unless I attempt to connect to COM2 first. Once I've tried this I can then connect back to COM1 as usual. This behaviour is not seen in the reference utility for the hardware and so must be down to some way I'm handling the port.
My close code is:
void mydevice::closeSerialPort()
{
this->stop();
serial->close();
emit serialClosed();
emit log("Serial port closed.");
}
serial is a QTSerialPort. First a stop command is sent to turn off the hardware (not relevant to the problem, it's just a convenience) and then I send a close command to the serial.
I have a subclassed QWidget for my main window, which calls this command on exit:
/* In the constructor */
connect(this, SIGNAL(WindowClosed()), mydevice, SLOT(closeSerialPort()));
void mainwindow::closeEvent(QCloseEvent *event)
{
emit WindowClosed();
event->accept();
}
Is there any reason for this behaviour? I assume I'm blocking the port open somehow, but surely it would complain that it's already open.
Another odd issue is that say the device is on COM1 and I open it in my application, COM1 is unresponsive in the other utility and the device appears on COM2. However, when I switch back to my program and fiddle a bit, the device appears on COM1 again (though always in COM2 in the other application).
So there seems to be a fairly simple solution, though I don't understand exactly what was causing the problem.
I have two threads, each controlling a different serial device. The serial configuration is accessed through a dialog which I stole from a QT example (the terminal). Each thread has an instance of this settings dialog. It seems that something goes wrong when selecting the port - for instance all the selections in the dialog actually point to the same COM port if checked in a debugger.
Anyway, I chalked this up to non-thread-safe code and changed the program to just ask for the serial port name as the data rates, stop bits, parity, etc are fixed by the hardware and aren't going to change. This has fixed the problem.
There are two possible answers, I think:
Your process doesn't terminate in spite of you closing the main window. How have you verified that the process is, in fact, terminated?
Your use of qt's serialport module exposes a bug in FTDI's driver. That's not unthinkable, but I'd call it a remote possibility at the moment.
Personally I don't see any use for the serial port emulation of the FTDI driver, it's adding an extra layer for no good reason. The D2XX interface is the way to do it, if you don't want to use something like libftdi. On Windows, I've found D2XX and libftdi to be the only viable alternatives, with libftdi working much better than D2XX on virtual machines.
Don't know if this could be useful.
I have a similar issue (but not the same) with a prolific pl2303.
In my case when i close the port (or even at startup, before opening it!), data is received anyway somehow and presented immediately when i open the port.
This happens only with an usb-rs232 adapter, if I use the ttyS0 (physical serial port) the problem does not appear.
The solution for me was forcing QSerialPort::clear() to clear buffers just after QSerialPort::open(). This avoids signal readyRead to be emitted and thus unwanted data to be received.
I have an application in windows, that opens a com port. It attempts to call a comport, then fails and prompts me with an error.
The issue is this is very legacy software that we no longer have the source code for. I'm wondering if anyone knows of a way that can trace, or follow a program calling a com port to find out what com port its attempting to allocate.
Appearantly you can use Process Explorer (as called out in this post) to search for processes using serial ports. It sounds like you should be able to use the same searching concept called out the other post to find what you need.
I actually gave up on this solution and re-wrote the entire program in a week, it had to be done due to binary compatibility issues with the PCI cards.
I'm rather unexperienced on the field of microcontrollers, I come from a Java background so the question might seem a bit noob but I didn't find much information on this.
So is it possible to debug an STM32F4 board via bluetooth (using eclipse or some othe IDE)? And if so could you send me some links that might help? We're building a robotic car controlled by a discovery board and debugging using an USB cable is not really an option if we don't want to disassemble the whole stuff every time something goes wrong. Hence this would really come in handy. So any help is appreciated
For doing this you would need to find a "Bluetooth Enabled" Debugger. I have never seen any and not sure whether there exists such thing or not.
I would suggest you one thing:
Assuming you have bluetooth connectivity between your board and your Machine,
Insert Debug strings: Send some strings from your board to your PC via Bluetooth. These strings will give you what's going on in Circuit.
For example, After Initialization, send "Init Completed" and like that. You can see these strings and see what's wrong.
I usually do this for my Wireless Device.
What you're wanting to do is really not practical; you're coming at this from way too high a level and trying to imagine the system as if it were running an operating system from the word go.
When you get the STM32 it as empty shell; you need to program it to do what you need to do and the only [sensible] way to get register-level debugging is to use a JTAG interface.
If, and this is a big if, you get it working reliably, but just want to give some debug information back while it is running, you could write a load of routines within the code to send out debugging messages when it enters certain parts of the program - and send it out over Bluetooth - but this is nothing like what you're used to single stepping through your Java code with Eclipse. If you want to do that kind of thing, you are going to have to put a little connector on that allows you to connect your JTAG or two-wire debugger cable to the processor. Even then, when you do that, you will be completely resetting your program and not simply single stepping through from where it went wrong.
You could insert a monitor program within your program to send out register values, program status etc over Bluetooth, but you still have to write the inital code and the only way to do this with out a ridiculous amount of trail and error is via your JTAG or two-wire interface.
Would this product work? It's a "IOGEAR Bluetooth Serial Adapter, GBC232A" for connecting to a serial port over bluetooth. I'm interested in wireless debugging too because my surface-clone dev computer only has one usb and this seems like it could be convenient over a tangle of usb cords and a usb hub. I have zero experience with any of this, so maybe you could validate or invalidate it as an option. I figure it just needs a proper serial connector wired up on the board and power from on-board?
Got a customer request but no idea can it be done. So need your opinions on this. This might be a utterly stupid thing to ask but yet need some facts so can work out best solution.
Scenario,
My Customer is an OEM Manufacturer. They make an automated system with a embedded touch screen (Windows XPe) this system got a button panel with some LED indicators (apart from keyboard) and 7 USB Ports. These button panels and USB ports are checked before sending to QC process. Currently a USB thumb drive with standalone executable with all indicators and controls flags is inserted to one of the USBs and then will run the exe. This exe capture user inputs from button panel and indicate which button is pressed so that it can be verify as working. And from program user can set LED indicators to different states (flashing, steady and off) so they can be verified as well. Once this is done then USB thumb drive will be inserted to each port and will verify it recognise. But after each verify step it needs to safely remove the drive from task bar. Once each test is finish user required to fill up the sheet with all pass and fail states for the entire button panel, indicators and USB ports. This is a quite length process when its come to mass production.
Apart from this embedded system all other components which suppose to connect to one of above embedded systems are tested via a program which I make and records all test outputs as they are tested. This program installed and components are connected to a testing embedded system.
Requirement,
What customer asks, can my program test completed embedded system with our host system (testing embedded system, may be via USB to USB) Its more like Testing a PC from another PC. Any ideas ?
Additional Info.
Apart from USBs there is one Network Port.
Thanks for looking, Feel Free to ask any questions. Any opinion is appreciated.
I'm not an expert on this topic, but it seems like this would be problematic because USB is an assymetrical protocol. There are hosts and there are devices. Hosts make the requests, and devices fulfill the requests. The problem is that PCs are USB hosts, not USB devices, so you would have two hosts trying to get the guy on the other side to do what he wants. Testing with a USB thumb drive worked because the thumb drive is a device.
It sounds like the unit to be tested doesn't have an ethernet port, which is a shame, because that would be the easiest way to go. If it has a serial port you could do it that way, but that is both slow and a hassle.
When a volume is attached to file system, on Windows,
the Window explorer detects the volume and refreshes automatically.
I wonder the technique.
How do an program(include device driver) get the notification?
-Of course, it doesn’t mean a polling. I want to get an event(or a message).
I would like to get the notification when a network volume(like SMB) is attached.
Thanks in advance.
You're going to have to do some research, but basically you just need to register with the Windows IO Manager so that when the device is connected, some part of your code is called. RegisterDeviceNotification() is probably a good place to get started. When the device is connected, the IO Manager will send you a message, so you should make sure you have a proper callback setup for the message.
It would not hurt to read up on Windows Devices Services from the Windows System API. Depending on what you are doing, you may or may not need a driver as the generic driver provided by Microsoft is often good enough. For drivers, check out the Windows Driver Kit, it contains an excellent collection of sample drivers, as well as Win32 code for interfacing with drivers and working with hardware.
Good luck!