is it possible to inject a service reference into custom type converter?
my situation is quite typical in fact, I have a combo, which binds to collection of entities. On submit I get only an ID of selected entity and have to refetch the real object in my action. I was thinking about more elegant way to do this, and it seems like making an ID-to-entity custom converter which would perform fetching - would be a good idea.
But I failed trying to map a converter to Spring bean in the same fashion like actions...
Interesting question. Are you using the spring plugin ?.
It is supposed to take care of service-objects creation, (and wiring with other services) for Struts2, and this should be able to include Type Converters. From here:
By using the struts2-spring-plugin in conjunction with type conversion, developers easily can use dependency injection to provide a converter with services
But I have not used that feature.
Related
I have been working with Spring Data JPA repository in my project for some time and I know the below points:
In the repository interfaces, we can add the methods like findByCustomerNameAndPhone() (assuming customerName and phone are fields in the domain object).
Then, Spring provides the implementation by implementing the above repository interface methods at runtime (during the application run).
I am interested on how this has been coded and I have looked at the Spring JPA source code & APIs, but I could not find answers to the questions below:
How is the repository implementation class generated at runtime & methods being implemented and injected?
Does Spring Data JPA use CGlib or any bytecode manipulation libraries to implement the methods and inject dynamically?
Could you please help with the above queries and also provide any supported documentation ?
First of all, there's no code generation going on, which means: no CGLib, no byte-code generation at all. The fundamental approach is that a JDK proxy instance is created programmatically using Spring's ProxyFactory API to back the interface and a MethodInterceptor intercepts all calls to the instance and routes the method into the appropriate places:
If the repository has been initialized with a custom implementation part (see that part of the reference documentation for details), and the method invoked is implemented in that class, the call is routed there.
If the method is a query method (see DefaultRepositoryInformation for how that is determined), the store specific query execution mechanism kicks in and executes the query determined to be executed for that method at startup. For that a resolution mechanism is in place that tries to identify explicitly declared queries in various places (using #Query on the method, JPA named queries) eventually falling back to query derivation from the method name. For the query mechanism detection, see JpaQueryLookupStrategy. The parsing logic for the query derivation can be found in PartTree. The store specific translation into an actual query can be seen e.g. in JpaQueryCreator.
If none of the above apply the method executed has to be one implemented by a store-specific repository base class (SimpleJpaRepository in case of JPA) and the call is routed into an instance of that.
The method interceptor implementing that routing logic is QueryExecutorMethodInterceptor, the high level routing logic can be found here.
The creation of those proxies is encapsulated into a standard Java based Factory pattern implementation. The high-level proxy creation can be found in RepositoryFactorySupport. The store-specific implementations then add the necessary infrastructure components so that for JPA you can go ahead and just write code like this:
EntityManager em = … // obtain an EntityManager
JpaRepositoryFactory factory = new JpaRepositoryFactory(em);
UserRepository repository = factory.getRepository(UserRepository.class);
The reason I mention that explicitly is that it should become clear that, in its core, nothing of that code requires a Spring container to run in the first place. It needs Spring as a library on the classpath (because we prefer to not reinvent the wheel), but is container agnostic in general.
To ease the integration with DI containers we've of course then built integration with Spring Java configuration, an XML namespace, but also a CDI extension, so that Spring Data can be used in plain CDI scenarios.
Can we use JSON Schema Validation in the place of Java Bean Validation JSR303 for Spring Boot Rest APIs for Enterprise Applications? Which one is more efficient to validate request Payload to Spring Boot Rest APIs?
(i.e. performance wise, cross-validation wise and RegEx pattern based validation)
It is a good question and there are no definitive answers for it as, perhaps, it is dependent on the application domain and remains subjective to that. At the base level (which usually covers 90%) of all use cases of validating user input to the REST service, both have the equivalent facility to validate data adequately. Both support constraints which can be used to achieve the same result.
However, on one front Bean Validation stands out is its ability to define custom validators, which can be used to validate very specific domain/application dependent constraints. For example, if there is case where a class which has 3 attributes (say, A,B and C) and a constraint is required that is either A occurs or B & C occurs but not both, then it is not really possible to put a constraint in JSON schema directly, it has to be handled through design of the schema (similarly in XML, actually it is more complicated with XML).
On the other hand in Bean Validation a custom validator can be written to handle this situation quite easily.
However, these kind of cases are few and far between.
Another point to consider is the integration of the Bean Validation in the underlying framework e.g. Spring, Jersey, RESTEasy etc., JSON schema validation is not yet integrated in the frameworks.
Therefore, given the support for the tech, it is perhaps better to stick with Bean Validation 2.0 and leverage the underlying frameworks capability to validation (this is, however, purely my view).
From an application development prospect, Java bean validator is sufficient for the business needs. From a system integration point, JSON schema externalizes the business rules and provides a platform independent interface control. So if your system involves many subsystems, JSON schema gives a better way to verify message payload.
I prefer OpenAPI Specification, which can be regarded roughly as a JSON Schema dialect, to bean validation 2.0 (JSR380).
OpenAPI is the de-facto (correct me) standard to describe RESTful API today. There are tools for validation accroding to OpenAPI spec is available, an incomplete collection can be found at here. And of course it works well with Java/Spring.
OpenAPI validates JSON string rather than a POJO, thus it can handle the following case naturally while bean validation in Java cannot: say i want to validate the object in the request body of a PATCH request, and the object must have a property named A, while the value of A is can be null;
And there are more than validation you can do with an OpenAPI spec in your hand. Because an OpenAPI schema does not only define what the data model of RESTful API looks like, it also describes other aspects (endponts, parameters and status code etc.) of the API in the same file. Out there are a bunch of code generators to auto-generate server-side or client-side code to serve requests or retrive response in whatever language.
Currently we have a number of classes that extend TemplateMethodModelEx which we construct using Spring and then inject into the Freemarker Configuration as shared variables so they are available as functions to all of our templates.
However, it would be nicer to have more fine grained control and make these methods available on demand in individual templates. One can instantiate them using the ?new built in, but internally that uses the general Java reflection mechanism for instantiating the class, and these models need to be constructed via Spring to get their dependencies.
In a perfect world, I'd like to make it so that the ?new built in use Spring to construct the class. It looks like to do that I would need to find a way to overload BeansWrapper.newInstance(Class, List) to use Spring, but I'm unclear on the best way to accomplish that.
Note that we are currently using Freemarker 2.3.23
I've gotten the basics of Spring more or less down (I think) and I'm trying out new things. Currently, I'm trying to figure out a way not to have explicitly write a service class for each entity/repository if that service is just going to be extending a generic service class.
What I'd like to be able to do is, after the Entity and Repository beans are loaded, loop through them, check to see if a bean named [Model Name]Service exists and, if it does not, create a new instance of my generic service class, pass in the Repository object, and then register this service in the applicationContext.
Is this possible and if so, what is the best way to do it? I've been trying to figure out the PostProcessors, but the one that I think would actual work (BeanPostProcessor) doesn't seem like the appropriate place to do this.
Thanks for your time
Can anyone shed some light on the advantages and disadvantages of using a custom ActionInvoker like so to perform dependency injection on custom ActionFilters as opposed to using a custom FilterProvider as demonstrated here?
In both cases you are going to still want to avoid constructor injection on your ActionFilters, and to me it seems that all the custom FilterProvider does in this case is adds additional overhead of having to register your ActionFilters and the provider in your container.
The big advantage of filter providers is that it allows constructor injection if done right. The example you linked does not demonstrate this correctly. To use constructor injection you can not use filter attributes. Instead you have to separate the two things the declaration that you want to apply a filter (e.g. using an attribute) and the filter implementation.
I'm not sure if there is a good implementation for Unity. See on http://www.planetgeek.ch/2010/11/13/official-ninject-mvc-extension-gets-support-for-mvc3/ how it could feel like. But this is a Ninject example. Probably you can take its implementation on github and port it to Unity.