My program follows a iterative map/reduce approach. And it needs to stop if certain conditions are met. Is there anyway i can set a global variable that can be distributed across all map/reduce tasks and check if the global variable reaches the condition for completion.
Something like this.
While(Condition != true){
Configuration conf = getConf();
Job job = new Job(conf, "Dijkstra Graph Search");
job.setJarByClass(GraphSearch.class);
job.setMapperClass(DijkstraMap.class);
job.setReducerClass(DijkstraReduce.class);
job.setOutputKeyClass(IntWritable.class);
job.setOutputValueClass(Text.class);
}
Where condition is a global variable that is modified during/after each map/reduce execution.
Each time you run a map-reduce job, you can examine the state of the output, the values contained in the counters, etc, and make a decision at the node that is controlling the iteration on whether you want one more iteration or not. I guess I don't understand where the need for a global state comes from in your scenario.
More generally -- there are two main ways state is shared between executing nodes (although it should be noted that sharing state is best avoided since it limits scalability).
Write a file to HDFS that other nodes can read (make sure the file gets cleaned up when the job exits, and that speculative execution won't cause weird failures).
Use ZooKeeper to store some data in dedicated ZK tree nodes.
You can use Configuration.set(String name, String value) to set a value you will be able to access in your Mappers/Reducers/etc:
In your driver:
conf.set("my.dijkstra.parameter", "value");
And e.g. in your mapper:
public void configure(JobConf job) {
myParam = job.get("my.dijkstra.parameter");
}
But this will not likely help you to look on the output of previous jobs to decide whether to start one more iteration. I.e. this value will not be pushed back after job execution.
You can also use Hadoop's DistributedCache to store files that will be distributed among all nodes. This is a bit better than simply store something on HDFS if a value you are going to pass this way is something small.
Of course counters can also be used for this purpose. But they don't look too reliable for purposes of making decisions in the algorithm. Looks like in some cases they can be incremented twice (if some task was executed more then once, e.g. in case of failure or speculative execution) - I am not sure.
This is how it works in Hadoop 2.0
In your driver:
conf.set("my.dijkstra.parameter", "value");
And in your Mapper:
protected void setup(Context context) throws IOException,
InterruptedException {
Configuration conf = context.getConfiguration();
strProp = conf.get("my.dijkstra.parameter");
// and then you can use it
}
You can use Cascading to organize multiple Hadoop jobs. Specify a HDFS path where you want to keep the global state variable and initialize with dummy contents. On each iteration, read the current contents of this HDFS path, delete those contents, perform any number of map/reduce steps, and finally perform a global reduce that updates the global state variable. Depending on the nature of your task, you may need to disable speculative execution and allow for many retries.
Related
I'm having a huge data set and I need to perform different functions for the same data.
I would like to have four output files. Since four operations are different, can I use four partitioners and four reducers to implement the same ? Is it possible or should I need to write four jobs to perform this ? Please help me !
First Approach
I think you should implement the code in a unique reduce method, and emit n keys depending the process performed. For example: You implement A,B,C and D techiniques, then, in your mapper you could implement this (pseudo-code):
dataA = ProcessA(key,value)
context.write("A", dataA)
dataB = ProcessB(key,value)
context.write("B", dataB)
dataC = ProcessC(key,value)
context.write("C", dataC)
dataD = ProcessD(key,value)
context.write("D", dataD)
You should be careful about data types of output. Also, the output key could be more complex.
Second Approach
You could generate N MapReduce applications in the same java project, and then you re-use the Map, and develop N reducers.
In job.setReducerClass in each main class you set each Reducer. The Map will be the same.
You just need to specify number of reducers in your MapReduce
job config. The default partitioner will distribute data to reducers based on hash of key modulus number of specified reducers.
To override behavior of default partitioner, you can implement your own custom partitioner specifying how your data should get across to the reducers.
---Edit to answer questions in the comments section---
How can i specify more than one reducer class in the Map-reduce driver
To set number of reducers, in job conf you can set it like below -
int numReducers = /*number of reducers you want*/;
job.setNumReduceTasks(numReducers);
Whether I should write four different Jobs for this. Or can I do this with a single Job
Hadoop MR jobs are I/O intensive, in your MR job design you should work on minimizing the I/O and parallel processing as much possible.
If your reducers need same input for generating all 4 outputs, it will be better to keep single job, but another consideration can be skewness of data for either output.
For example output1 has more processing time + most of incoming data is likely to be processed for output1.
If you have scenerio like time taken to process output1 is much higher then total time taken to process output2 + output3 + output4, then you should considering splitting processing of output1 in multiple steps.
However if we consider all 4 outouts have more or less equal processing times and consumes same data throughout,
It will be better to have some conditional processing logic in the reducer and let your custom partioner decide which data goes to which reducer.
Your custom partioner can have some check like this incoming data qualifies to be contributing to "GC content" so let it got to Reducer 3.
But if your incoming data needs to be processed for more then one output/distribution use conditional processing and to write multiple output files from same reducer use "MultipleOutputs".
You can google it up and find usage examples, it lets you write output to multiple folders/files at the same time from within a Mapper or Reducer.
Hadoop let's you specify the number of reducer tasks from the job driver job.setNumReduceTasks(num_reducers);. Since you want four outputs, you would specify int num_reducers = 4; Here's an example driver class.
public class run {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Configuration conf = new Configuration();
Job job = new Job(conf, "Run NB Count");
job.setJarByClass(NB_train_hadoop.class);
// set mappers, reducers, other stuff
job.setNumReduceTasks(num_reducers);
FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path(args[0]));
FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(job, new Path(args[1]));
System.exit(job.waitForCompletion(true) ? 0 : 1);
}
}
While this is handy, you have to understand that there is an optimal number of reducers you can choose which is dependent on the number of nodes in your cluster.
For example, running 4 Amazon m3.xlarge instances (1 master, 3 slaves, and 4 cores an instance), has the following relationship between wall time and number of reducer tasks used in the MapReduce job. You can see that more isn't necessarily better and if you use too many, well then you might as well crunch your data with your mother's hair curler because it would be faster that way.
Hope this is helpful!!
For a certain Hadoop MapReduce mapper task, I have already had the mapper task's complete execution time. In general, a mapper has three steps: (1)read input from HDFS or other source like Amazon S3; (2)process input data; (3)write intermediate result to local disk. Now, I am wondering if it's possible to know the time spent by each step.
My purpose is to get the result of (1) how long does it take for mappers to read input from HDFS or S3. The result just indicate how fast a mapper could read. It's more like a I/O performance for a mapper; (2) how long does it take for the mapper to process these data, it's more like the computing capability of the task.
Anyone has any idea for how to acquire these results?
Thanks.
Just implement a read-only mapper that does not emit anything. This will then give an indication of how long it takes for each split to be read (but not processed).
You can as a further step define a variable passed to the job at runtime (via the job properties) which allows you to do just one of the following (by e.g. parsing the variable against an Enum object and then switching on the values):
just read
just read and process (but not write/emit anything)
do it all
This of course assumes that you have access to the mapper code.
I want to run one task (mapper) per node on my Hadoop cluster, but I cannot modify the configuration with which the tasktracker runs (i'm just a user).
For this reason, I need to be able to push the option through the job configuration. I tried to set the mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=1 at hadoop jar command, but the tasktracker ignores it as it has a different setting in its configuration file.
By the way, the cluster uses the Capacity Scheduler.
Is there any way I can force 1 task per node?
Edited:
Why? I have a memory-bound task, so I want each task to use all the memory available to the node.
when you set the no of mappers, either through the configuration files or by some other means, it's just a hint to the framework. it doesn't guarantee that you'll get only the specified no of mappers. the creation of mappers is actually governed by the no of Splits. and the split creation is carried out by the logic which your InputFormat holds. if you really want to have just one mapper to process the entire file, set "issplittable" to true in the InputFormat class you are using. but why would you do that?the power of hadoop actually lies in distributed parallel processing.
Is there any way to set a parameter in job configuration from Mapper and is accessible from Reducer.
I tried the below code
In Mapper: map(..) : context.getConfiguration().set("Sum","100");
In reducer: reduce(..) : context.getConfiguration().get("Sum");
But in reducer value is returned as null.
Is there any way to implement this or any thing missed out from my side?
As far as I know, this is not possible. The job configuration is serialized to XML at run-time by the jobtracker, and is copied out to all task nodes. Any changes to the Configuration object will only affect that object, which is local to the specific task JVM; it will not change the XML at every node.
In general, you should try to avoid any "global" state. It is against the MapReduce paradigm and will generally prevent parallelism. If you absolutely must pass information between the Map and Reduce phase, and you cannot do it via the usual Shuffle/Sort step, then you could try writing to the Distributed Cache, or directly to HDFS.
If you are using the new API your code should ideally work. Have you created this "Sum" property at the start of the job creation? For example like this
Configuration conf = new Configuration();
conf.set("Sum", "0");
Job job = new Job(conf);
If not you better use
context.getConfiguration().setIfUnset("Sum","100");
In your mapper class to fix the issue. This is the only thing I can see.
I wrote a relatively simple map-reduce program in Hadoop platform (cloudera distribution). Each Map & Reduce write some diagnostic information to standard ouput besides the regular map-reduce tasks.
However when I'm looking at these log files, I found that Map tasks are relatively evenly distributed among the nodes (I have 8 nodes). But the reduce task standard output log can only be found in one single machine.
I guess, that means all the reduce tasks ended up executing in a single machine and that's problematic and confusing.
Does anybody have any idea what's happening here ? Is it configuration problem ?
How can I make the reduce jobs also distribute evenly ?
If the output from your mappers all have the same key they will be put into a single reducer.
If your job has multiple reducers, but they all queue up on a single machine, then you have a configuration issue.
Use the web interface (http://MACHINE_NAME:50030) to monitor the job and see the reducers it has as well as what machines are running them. There is other information that can be drilled into that will provide information that should be helpful in figuring out the issue.
Couple questions about your configuration:
How many reducers are running for the job?
How many reducers are available on each node?
Is the node running the reducer better
hardware than the other nodes?
Hadoop decides which Reducer will process which output keys by the use of a Partitioner
If you are only outputting a few keys and want an even distribution across your reducers, you may be better off implementing a custom Partitioner for your output data. eg
public class MyCustomPartitioner extends Partitioner<KEY, VALUE>
{
public int getPartition(KEY key, VALUE value, int numPartitions) {
// do something based on the key or value to determine which
// partition we want it to go to.
}
}
You can then set this custom partitioner in the job configuration with
Job job = new Job(conf, "My Job Name");
job.setPartitionerClass(MyCustomPartitioner.class);
You can also implement the Configurable interface in your custom Partitioner if you want to do any further configuration based on job settings.
Also, check that you haven't set the number of reduce tasks to 1 anywhere in the configuration (look for "mapred.reduce.tasks"), or in code, eg
job.setNumReduceTasks(1);