I have this Birt report that I inherited from another developer, consisting of a child table inside a master table. For each row in the master table, the child table lists items belonging to the current master row item.
The two tables are fed from different data sets, the child table dataset taking a parameter indicating the master item whose child items to fetch.
Now, what I need to do is add a SUM aggregate to the bottom of the master table, showing the total (for all master items) of a certain field in the child table.
Consider, for example, the following data:
MasterItem1
ChildItem1 SomeValue
ChildItem2 SomeValue
ChildItem3 SomeValue
MasterItem2
ChildItem1 SomeValue
ChildItem2 SomeValue
ChildItem3 SomeValue
--------------------------------
Total
(Why wasn't this done with grouping instead? Short answer: There are in fact two child tables to each master row, containing different numers and types of fields, so the previous developer probably didn't figure out a way to accomplish this with grouping.)
At first I thought I could simply add another child table inside the Total field, with an aggregate summing up the values from the child dataset. That didn't work, however, since the child dataset requires a parameter indicating the master item whose children to fetch, so there is no way to get ALL values from the child dataset at once.
I'm thinking there might be a way to create an expression that references the SomeValue fields in the child table directly, instead of going through the child data set.
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
It should be possible to declare a global variable at the start of the report, then add each of the child values to it in one of the child table row events and output it at the end of the reports - if you're comfortable writing Javascript, this is probably the quickest solution.
If you're not comfortable writing Javascript (I'm not) or if the above technique doesn't work out, you could try either:
creating a third dataset, combining the master data items from the main report with the child data items from the subreport and outputting the total in a new data table, or
combining the two existing child data value tables via a union (so that if the master table is A, the main child table is B and the subreport table is C, you have AB union AC), replacing the subreport table and the existing detail rows with new detail rows conditional on child row type, and a total at the end of the report based on the AC values.
Obviously, the latter of these approaches is more complicated - but I think it should be easier to understand and maintain.
The Global Variable is the way to go. For each row in the child table, add the required value to the global variable and then access it for display at the bottom of the table. There is not any hard JavaScript:
var Sum = reportContext.getPersistentGlobalVariable( "RunningAggregate" );
Sum = Sum + row["column Name"];
reportContext.setPersistentGlobalVariable( "RunningAggregate", Sum );
You can then access the Global Variable in the footer of your table via a Dynamic Text item.
Good Luck!
Thanks Mark and Mystik, both your answers led me on the right path!
My final solution is as follows:
1) Declare the sum-variable in the initialize method for the report:
var total = 0;
2) Add each row's value to the sum-variable in the onReder method of the data field containing the values:
total += parseInt(this.getValue());
3) Use the sum-variable as expression in the total-field.
Works like a charm.
Update:
Found a bug in my solution: the last line was left out of the sum. I think the value of the total-cell in the table footer is being defined before the last line has been rendered.
Fix:
Moved summing code from onRender method to onCreate
Added the following code to the total-cell's onRender method:
this.setDisplayValue(total);
Related
My first task is to add two new columns to a table, first column stores the values of M and X fields values in a single column(as a single unit with a pipe separator) and second column stores O and Z fields values in a single column(as a single unit with a pipe separator).
second task selecting agency and external letter rating(shown in image) from drop down and after saving the form the value from fields M and X should move to N and Y and this values should be stored in table column that are created from task one, Now if we save the form the values should move to O and Z fields in forms and this should continue.
Can any one help me how to proceed with this and I don't know how to separate a column value into pieces and display on form.
Better if you propose any new method that does the same work.
Adding columns:
That's a bad idea. Concatenating values is easy; storing them into a column as well. But, then - in the next step - you have to split those values into two values (columns? rows?) to be joined to another value and produce result. Can you do it? Sure. Should you? No.
What to do? If you want to store 4 values, then add 4 columns to a table.
Alternatively, see if you can create a master-detail relationship between two tables so you'd actually create a new table (with a foreign key to existing table) with two additional columns:
one that says is value stored related to M or Y
value itself
It looks like more job to do, but - should pay off in the future.
Layout:
That really looks like a tabular form, which only supports what I previously said. You can't "dynamically" add rows (or, even if you could, that's really something you should avoid because you'd have to add (actually, display) separate items (not rows that share the same item name).
I have two tables in PowerBI. One called 'Fact_WorstInstance' contains rows of (Index,Instance). For example:
1,2
2,1
3,2
One called 'Fact_AllInstances' contains rows of (Index,Instance,Value). For example:
1,1,'Red'
1,2,'Green'
2,1,'Amber'
2,2,'Red'
2,3,'Brown'
3,1,'Green'
3,2,'Blue'
The first table is essentially a pointer to the worst entry in the second table for the given index (as categorised by some external system).
There is a slicer on which Indexes are visible to the user.
What I want to do is find the worst instance value for the highest visible Index in the 'Fact_WorstInstance' table, and then get all the Index and Value rows from the 'Fact_AllInstances' table for that Instance.
For example, if the slicer isnt filtering then (3,2) should be the active row from from the 'Fact_WorstInstance' table and this should be used to get Instance 2 from the 'Fact_AllInstances' table
1,2,'Green'
2,2,'Red'
3,2,'Blue'
from the 'Fact_AllInstances' table.
I tried to do this in many different ways, by creating a measure on the 'Fact_WorstInstance' which gives the highest visible row. And then use this measure to create a calculated column on the 'Fact_AllInstances', with 1 for worst and 0 for not worst. And then use this calculated column as a filter in PowerBI.
The measure itself gives the expected value. The problem I have is when the measure is used to create the calculated column, I cannot find a way to stop the Index being filtered based on the row of calculated column - and therefore the measure outcome changes for each row.
My measure:
Worst Entry = CALCULATE(FIRSTNONBLANK(Fact_WorstInstance[Instance],1),filter(ALLSELECTED(Fact_WorstInstance),Fact_WorstInstance[Index]=MAX(Fact_WorstInstance[Index])))
My column:
WorstColumn = if(Fact_AllInstances[Instance]=[Worst Entry],1,0)
So instead of getting the output above, I get
1,2,'Green'
2,1,'Amber' --> because for Index 2, the measure gives index 1 as worst
3,2,'Blue'
This is a possible solution you might want to implement.
First of all, calculated columns are not affected by slicers/page filters, you will need to create a measure for that, so the way your are appraching the problem won't work.
Create an additional calculated table that holds unique instances values. In Power BI, Modeling tab there is a icon for creating a New Table, where you can use an expression to produce the table.
Use this expression:
IsntancesCalcTable = VALUES(Fact_WorstInstance[Instance])
Now you have a table called InstancesCalcTable in your model.
Drag the Instance column in the InstancesCalcTable and drop it in the Instance column of the Fact_WorstInstance, this will create a relationship between InstancesCalcTable and Fact_WorstInstance via Instance. A line between both tables will be drawn in the Relationships view, double click that line and you will see the Edit Relationship window.
Make sure it looks like this:
Then do the same for creating the relationship between InstancesCalcTable and Fact_AllInstances.
You will end with a model like this:
Then you can use Index column in the Fact_WorstInstance table, in a slicer and it will filter the Fact_AllInstances table to get only the instances selected.
However if you don't have any filter all rows in Fact_AllInstances will be shown.
I have two select lists
1. The first one P4_country_id_B contains countries names
select country_name as d, country_id as r
from countries
2. The second one P4_CITY_ID_B contains cities of a country based on selected value in P4_CITY_ID_B.
select city_name as d, city_id as r
from cities
where country_id = :P4_country_id_B
Everything goes OK without any problem.
BUT
I use Execute PL/SQL Code Dynamic Action to change selected values of those lists like this (for example):
:P4_country_id_B:=country_returned_value;
:P4_CITY_ID_B:=city_returned_value;
Where
country_returned_value : is a one value of countries list values for example (USA)
city_returned_value : is a one value of cities list values for example (NewYourk).
The first selected list value changes but the second list never changes.
Notes:
I used P4_country_id_B,P4_CITY_ID_B as Page Items to Submit for the dynamic action.
I don't whan to submit the page instead of dynamic action
How can I change list values in this case please?.
Thanks in advance.
Cascading select lists are refreshed through ajax.
Change select list 1, select list 2 will be refreshed.
You execute plsql, which in turn will set the value of the items involved. Both are select lists, and one is dependent on the other.
So while both will be set, the change of the first one will cause the second to be refreshed.
In other words, you're doing it too fast. And while there is a solution, the proper way is a bit complex and I wouldn't build it in DA's personally.
You haven't specified how or when you call the code which sets the values for the items. So here I'll just assume a DA with an action of type "Execute JavaScript" (for example)
// perform a call to the ajax callback process to get the country and city id
// there are several ways to provide values to the process if necessary.
// for example through x01, which can be used in the proces like
// apex_application.g_x01
apex.server.process('GET_COUNTRY_DEFAULTS', {x01:""}).done(function(data){
// process returns JSON which contains 2 properties: country_id and city_id
// data.country_id
// data.city_id
// bind a ONE-TIME handler to the after refresh event of the city
// cascading LOVs fire the before and after refresh events like any other
// refreshable element in apex
// a one time handler since the values are different each time this code will
// execute
apex.jQuery("#Px_CITY_ID").one("apexafterrefresh",function(){
// after refresh of the list, attempt to set the value of the list to the
// value retrieved earlier
apex.item(this).setValue(data.city_id);
});
// finally, set the value of the country. Doing this will also trigger the
// refresh of dependent elements
apex.item('Px_CITY_ID').setValue(data.country_id);
// since a handler has been bound, the refresh will occur, the after refresh
// triggers, and the value will be set properly
});
Finally, create a new process on the page under "AJAX Callback", and name it GET_COUNTRY_DEFAULTS
DECLARE
l_country_id NUMBER;
l_city_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
l_country_id := 8;
l_city_id := 789;
htp.p('{"country_id":'||l_country_id||',"city_id":'||l_city_id||'}');
EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
-- returning an error while using apex.server.process will prompt the user
-- with the error and halt further processing
htp.p('{"error":"'||sqlerrm||'"}');
END;
That should tie everything together.
I think there is some confusion here. My answer below, assumes, according to your question, the first list name is P4_country_id_B, and the second list name is Cities_LOV. If that is not the case, please clarify.
Your first list called P4_country_id_B, and you assign it to itself through the following statement:
:P4_country_id_B:=country_returned_value;
So basically, nothing has changed, the value of P4_country_id_B is the returned value of your list P4_country_id_B without any need for this assignment. Note, it is not clear to me, what is country_returned_value, because P4_country_id_B holds the returned value.
Secondly, you have a list called Cities_LOV, and you assign the returned value to P4_CITY_ID_B page item, through the following statement:
:P4_CITY_ID_B:=returned_city_value;
Again, I am not sure what is returned_city_value, because Cities_LOV holds the returned value of that list.
I am not sure what you are trying to achieve here. But I assume, you want to allow the user to select the Country first, and then based on that, you want to refresh the Cities list to display the cities in that particular country. If that is the case, then use a dynamic action on P4_country_id_B value change, to refresh the value of Cities_LOV. You only need to pass P4_country_id_B to that dynamic action.
UPDATE
After you corrected the wording of the question, the answer would be like this:
In your child list P4_CITY_ID_B make sure you set the option Cascading LOV parent item(s) to the parent list P4_country_id_B. You do not need the dynamic action. The child list, should refresh upon the change of the parent list. The answer here, goes in details about how to implement cascading list
I have a flat file that I'm trying to transform into X12_00401_820. When I use the table looping and table extractor, the loop never happens.
Below is my map:
Below is the output. The invoice numbers are looping right, but I'm only getting the first amount, not the amount for each invoice.
The first input parameter to this functoid must be a scoping link, and
the second represents the number of columns in the data grid.
The first parameter of your functoid is the scope, you have to set your scope to SellersInvoiceNumber (don't link it graphically just write in input[0] SellersInvoiceNumber )
The second parameter of your functoid is the number of columns, you have to put 2 there as you will have two columns in your grid
So the third and fourth parameters will be your SellersInvoiceNumber and Invoice amount field (link it graphically as you already did)
Don't forget to configure your columns in the Table Looping Grid but i guess you've already done that
This should work
I have built an MVC 5 application, using EF 6 to query the database. One page show a cross table of two dimensions: substances against properties of these substances. It is rendered as an html table.Many cells do not have a value. This is what it looks like:
sub 1 sub 2 sub 3
prop A 1.0
prop B 1.5 X
prop C 0.6 Y
The cell values are actually more complex, including tool tips, footnotes, etc.
I implemented the generation of the html table, by the following steps:
create a list of unique properties;
create a list of unique substances;
loop through the properties;
render a row for each;
loop through the substances;
See if there is a value for the combination of property and substances;
render the cell's value or an empty one.
Using the ANTS performance profiler, I found out that step 6 has a huge performance issue with increasing numbers of substances and properties, the hit count exploding to hundreds of millions, with a few hundred substances and a few tens of properties (the largest selection the user can make). The execution time is many minutes. It seems to scale N(substances)^2 * N(properties)^2.
The code looks like:
Value currentValue =
values.Where(val => val.substance.Id == currentSubstanceId
&& val.property.Id == currentPropertyId).SingleOrDefault();
where values is a List and Value is an entity, which I read from to render the cells. values had been pre-loaded from the database and no queries are shown by the SQL Server Profiler.
Since not all cells have a value, I thought it best to loop through the row and columns and see if there is a value. I cannot just loop through the list of values.
What could I try to improve this? I thought about:
Create some sort of C# object, using the substance.Id and property.Id as a compound key and fill it from the List object. Which would be fastest?
Create some Linq query which returns an object which already contains the empty cells, like (substance cross join properties) left join values. I could do this in SQL easily, but could this be done with Linq? Could the object which stores the result have the Value as a member field, so I can still use it to render the cells?
Stop pre-loading and just run a database query for the value of each combination, possibly benefiting from database indexes.
I am considering restricting the number of substances and properties the user may select, but I would rather not do that.
Addtional info
As requested by C.Zonnenberg, some more info about the query.
The query to fill the list of values is basically as follows:
I create an IQueryable to which I add filters for requested substances and properties. I then include the substances, property and value details, found in related entities. I then execute query.ToList(). The actual SQL query, as seen by the SQL Profiler looks complex, involving SubstanceId IN () and PropertyId IN (), but it takes far less then a second to execute.
It returns a list of proxies, like: {System.Data.Entity.DynamicProxies.SubstancePropertyValue_078F758A4FF9831024D2690C4B546F07240FAC82A1E9D95D3826A834DCD91D1E}
I think your best bet is your first option. But to do that efficiently I would also modify the source data (values) and turn it into a dictionary, so you have a structure that's optimized for indexed lookup:
var dict = values.ToDictionary(e =>
Tuple.Create(e.substance.id, e.propertyid),
e => e.Value);
Then for each cell:
Value currentValue ;
dict.TryGetValue(Tuple.Create(currentSubstanceId, currentPropertyId),
out currentValue );
Further, you may benefit from parallelization by fetching the cell values in a Parallel.ForEach looping through all substances, for instance.