We are a small hardware manufacturer. Most of our products use USB for programming the controllers used.
The current situation is that programming the hardware (part of the assembly processor) is rather labour intensive.
Each time a new USB device gets plugged in Windows prompts for a driver install. This means that for each new product we have to go through a process of "no, don't go to internet" --> "yes, search automatically" --> "done". We even have to do this twice for each product.
I have been experimenting with the Windows preinstaller (DPInst), but this seems to only facilitate a succesful "yes, search automatically" part.
Is there a way to have the drivers installed fully automatically after plugging in the USB device?
Kind Regards,
Ronald
I take it your devices have a unique USB serial number, and hence each one is detected as a new device that hasn't been seen before.
If so, then the solution is this, from http://www.lvr.com/usbfaq.htm:
During device testing, we attach many
devices that are identical except for
the serial numbers. How can I prevent
Windows from asking to install a new
driver every time a device is
attached?
The method described below causes
Windows 2000 and XP to ignore a
device's serial number. It's
recommended for test environments
only.
This registry key controls whether
Windows uses or ignores device serial
numbers:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\UsbFlags]
It's possible to ignore all serial
numbers, though this approach is NOT
recommended. To ignore all serial
numbers, in the above key, change this
value to zero:
GlobalDisableSerNumGen = 1
To ignore the serial number for an
individual device, create an entry
under the above ...\UsbFlags key. The
name must start with "IgnoreHWSerNum"
followed by the vendor and product ID
of the device. A value of 1 = "disable
the serial number."
Example (Vendor ID = 0925h, Product ID
= 016Ah):
IgnoreHWSerNum0925016A= 1
An alternative hardware/firmware solution is to disable the device USB serial number during production (e.g. with a link, possibly one made by a test fixture). Without a USB serial number, Windows will assign a pseudo serial-number to the device, based on its position in the connection tree. That wouldn't be likely to change during a production run, so all devices would then be treated as identical and Windows wouldn't bother with the new driver stuff.
I had the same problem 5 years ago.
The main problem is that the installation of USB drivers after Plug&Play of the coresponding device works under the LocalSystem account. To have no security problems Microsoft allows silent installation of drivers only signed by Microsoft. Starting with Windows Server 2003 there are documented way (see http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/install/authenticode.mspx).
If you have a managed corporate environment (you can prepare computers which will use your Plug&Play devices), then there are a workaround which solves the problem on Windows XP. I suggested it 5 years ago for one of my customer. It works perfect since about 5 years in environment with some of 10000 Windows XP computers.
The idea for the solution is very easy: your drivers (for example the CAT file) must be signed with the signature which
has both 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3 ("Code Signing") and 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.10.3.6 ("Windows System Component Verification") OIDs as Enhanced key usage (EKU) extension
the certificate or it's parent certificate must be installed in the Machine's Root (Trusted Root Certification) or AuthRoot (Third-Party Root Certification Authorities) certificate store
If you do this on a Windows XP computer, the operating system will interpret your driver like Microsoft signed driver.
Morver you shoud insert in the registry the path to the source of the driver.
Related
I wonder if anyone can help at all, a bit of a specialist problem this.
I have an application that needs to read and analyse a number of USB devices (not simultaneously, they are each run in seperate tests and could in theory be run on different machines).
Each of the USB devices is based on the USB HID class, and are manufactured by different companies, none of these USB devices are designed to be run on PC, but are meant for a different platform, however for the purposes of testing the devices the client has requested that the test application is run from a PC.
Some of the devices will start up, be recognised by windows which will initialise and start them correctly using the generic HID class driver built into windows, the devices will then start sending correct data packets of the data to be tested.
Some of the devices will start up, be recognised by windows which will try to start them but fail to fully to initialise them leaving them in a half initialised state. This is fine, as I can use my beagle protocol analyser to capture the initialisation packets from the genuine platform and then use the LibUSBDotNet library to replicate the remaining packets in the initialisation sequence and get them to start sending the packets correctly.
The problem I have is with one particular device (though there are some more I haven't tested yet so it's quite possible one of those may also exhibit the same problem). The issue is the the Windows HID class driver recognises the device and trys to initialise and start it, this works after a fashion and the device starts sending data.
The problem is that the data being sent is different to that which is sent to the genuine platform (containing only a subset of the full data). It's as though windows has initialised the device into a different mode.
When I capture the initialisation packets from both the PC and the genuine platform using my USB protocol analyser I see that Windows is sending some slightly different initialisation packets. Using LibUSBDotNet to resend the correct packets once Windows has already started the device seems to have no effect.
My problem is that I need to stop windows from trying to initialise the device using the standard HID class driver, I've tried removing the driver in Device Manager but it still initialises it (and the driver is magically reassigned in device manager). I've done some investigation and there are possible alternatives:
Create a specific driver which windows will assign to the particular VID/PID of the device but that does nothing, then I can use LibUSBDotNet to send the correct initialisation sequence to the device from within my own code.
Use something like WinUSB to create a proper driver for the device (or possibly to create a "dead" driver like 1.
Will a driver with a specific VID/PID defined be used by windows in preference to it's inbuilt USB HID class driver? If not then I would be wasting my time going down this route?
Note, my mac initialises the problem device correctly, and I've asked the question of the client whether the application can be developed for Mac and their answer was frustrating Windows only.
I've no experience in writing proper Windows drivers, though I have experience in talking to USB at a relatively low level (so that part doesn't worry too much). Can anyone suggest a good course of action (before I potentially waste weeks investigating how to write drivers for the PC only to find my selected course of action can't deliver what I required).
Any help or suggest much appreciated.
Thanks,
Rich
Added after trying suggestions below:
I tried using the LibUsbDotNet inf wizard to create the necessary files and install them and this appeared to work - certainly the device was now appearing in Device Manager as a libusb-win32 device - not HID device and the associated driver was libusb driver. Even after doing this the device still seems to become initialised and start sending the wrong type of data packets although now those packets are no longer handled by the class driver and are just lost.
I also came across Zadig which has a similar inf creation wizard for WinUSB and this had exactly the same result.
A colleague has suggested that it might not be windows itself that is switching the device into this mode, rather the device identifying that it is connected to a windows machine and switching itself into this mode. I suspect this is the case, in which case I am stuck - time to have another conversation with the client.
Many thanks for the help.
You're using libusb-win32 as a filter driver; that is, the HidUsb device driver is assigned and loaded for your device, but then the libusb-win32 driver is loaded on top and gives you unobstructed access to the hardware.
If you don't want a HidUsb (or any other class driver) to perform any communication "on your behalf", simply associate libusb-win32 as a device driver with your hardware. For this, you'd have to create an .INF file associating it with the VID/PID/Revision of each USB device. If I recall correctly, libusb-win32 even comes with a utility to generate such .INF files.
If you install this .INF file e.g. with PnpUtil.exe (available on Vista or higher), you might still run into issues where, although you're a better match than the generic HID driver, the HID driver is still selected.
The generic HID driver matches devices by their Compatible IDs (i.e. by a USB interface class) while you'd be matching by Hardware IDs (which have higher priority). However, Windows might give priority to other aspects, such as your driver being unsigned. Read: How Windows Selects Drivers
Luckily, even in that scenario, signing drivers with a self-generated certificate (use CertUtil.exe, MakeCat.exe and SignTool.exe) is not too difficult.
I have got a piece of hardware which communicates with my program using an FT2232C USB serial converter. All works fine if the device has already been attached to a computer before and the drivers were installed using an administrator account. But that is not the usual case.
These devices will be attached and removed at will and it will also not always be the same device that will be attached to a particular computer. Also, most of the users will not have administrator privileges and the computers are not connected to a LAN.
It is possible to automatically push files to these computers and add registry entries.
Does anybody have got any pointers on how to make Windows believe the devices driver has already been installed? I am currently thinking along the lines of tracking all changes that the driver installer does to the Windows installation and making these changes without any user interaction. But maybe there is an easier way?
We are currently talking Windows XP but in the not so far future there will be more and more Windows 7 (64 bit) computers as well.
While you could "pre-install" the driver by doing all the changes to the registry yourself (under a SYSTEM account, not regular Administrator -- you can use SysInternals PsExec to do this), this wouldn't help you unless you'd preinstall it for all possible ports. (Only USB devices which have an embedded serial number can be installed just once. Others are installed per-port.)
Another option is to sign the driver. A signed driver installs silently without the need for administrative credentials.
Does the vendor driver come with a .cat file? (And is the .cat file WHQL-signed?) If yes, you don't have a problem. Just install the driver with the standard tools (e.g. DPInst).
If not, you can always generate your own WHQL certificate (you cannot BUY a WHQL certificate), push this to all computers (since you're an administrator, you can do this) and then use the regular Windows tools (e.g. DPInst) to place the driver in the machines' driver stores. To generate the certificate, use CertUtil.exe and make sure you specify the "Windows System Component Verification" EKU. To sign the driver, use MakeCat.exe and SignTool.exe.
The best method with XP for the timebeing is to get hold of the administrator password, I used the following method a few months back and it has been brilliant, there is free software and instructions available here:
http://www.loginrecovery.com/
I'm using InstallShield to install my application, a driver and a service.
I need to install the plug-N-play driver only if it's hardware ID was found in the device manager. The driver installation is done using DPInst.exe.
My problem, is that a user can sometimes manually uninstall the driver (After it was installed or even uninstall the "Unknown driver" under "Other devices") and then I can't find the hardware ID in the device tree, although the device is plugged.
If I rescan the device tree during installation using CM_Reenumerate_DevNode_Ex (The code equivalent of "Scan for new hardware"), I can find the hardware ID but this brings up the "Found new hardware wizard".
Is there anyway to rescan the device tree but suppress the "Found new hardware wizard" or to avoid rescanning but still making sure my device hardware ID is present in the system?
I'm writing a new answer since we already have too many comments on my older one, and its content was based on a small misunderstanding of the situation.
The actual problem, as I understand it now, is the "Add new hardware" wizard that pops-up when rescanning for devices, before installing your driver. Unfortunately, this wizard pops-up whenever no suitable driver is found to handle a new device in the system, so in order to overcome it, the only option is to make sure that such a driver exists in the system. This leads to two possible solutions that I can see:
Go for a software first installation, and make sure that your driver is suitable for the device (the inf is well formed, and you have WHQL signing). As far I understand, this is not an option, because you do not want to install the driver on machines that don't have the device connected (I would love to hear why).
Make sure that some other driver in the system is suitable to handle it. In that case you need to choose one of the built-in drivers (one that wouldn't wreak havoc if it were to act as a function driver for your device), and give your device a matching compatible ID - one that would cause the built-in driver to be found suitable. This way you will not have to wait for the user after re-scanning for devices, but depending on your device, finding a fitting built-in driver might be impossible.
It sounds like you're going about it the wrong way. If you have an MSI based installation, why not use DIFxApp instead of DPInst?
As for the "Found new hardware" wizard, you'll need two things here:
Make sure that your inf file is correct (so that your driver is associated with the hardware id)
Get a WHQL signature from MS. This step is needed for XP, as untrusted drivers will not be automatically assigned to devices. With Vista and 7 you can digitally sign the driver yourself, but you'll get a warning during installation, asking the user whether he/she wishes to trust this publisher (you).
I'm developing a project that has a number of hardware sensors connecting to the deployment machine through RS232 serial ports.
But ... I'm developing on a machine without an physical RS232 serial ports, but I would like to make fake serial ports that I can connect to and output data from with the aim of faking input from hardware sensors.
Does anyone know of a way to create a fake serial port and control it on Windows XP?
If you are developing for Windows, the com0com project might be, what you are looking for.
It provides pairs of virtual COM ports that are linked via a nullmodem connetion. You can then use your favorite terminal application or whatever you like to send data to one COM port and recieve from the other one.
EDIT:
As Thomas pointed out the project lacks of a signed driver, which is especially problematic on certain Windows version (e.g. Windows 7 x64).
There are a couple of unofficial com0com versions around that do contain a signed driver. One recent verion (3.0.0.0) can be downloaded e.g. from here.
I know this is an old post, but in case someone else happens upon this question, one good option is Virtual Serial Port Emulator (VSPE) from Eterlogic
It provides an API for creating kernel mode virtual comport devices, i.e. connectors, mappers, splitters etc.
However, some of the advertised capabilities were really not capabilities at all.
EDIT
A much better choice, Eltima. This product is fully baked. Good developer tech support. The product did all it claimed to do. Product options include both desktop applications, as well as software development kits with APIs.
Neither of these products are open source, or free. However, as other posts here have pointed out, there are other options. Here is a list of various serial utilities:
com0com (current)
com0com - With Signed Driver (old version)
Yet another place for com0com with Signed Driver (Pete's Blog)
Tactical Software
Termite
COM Port Serial Emulator
Kermit (obsolete, but still downloadable)
HWVSP3
HHD Software (free edition)
I use com0com - With Signed Driver, on windows 7 x64 to emulate COM3 AND COM4 as a pair.
Then i use COM Dataport Emulator to recieve from COM4.
Then i open COM3 with the app im developping (c#) and send data to COM3.
The data sent thru COM3 is received by COM4 and shown by 'COM Dataport Emulator' who can also send back a response (not automated).
So with this 2 great programs i managed to emulate Serial RS-232 comunication.
Hope it helps.
Both programs are free!!!!!
There's always the hardware route. Purchase two USB to serial converters, and connect them via a NULL modem.
Pro tips:
1) Windows may assign new COM ports to the adapters after every device sleep or reboot.
2) The market leaders in chips for USB to serial are Prolific and FTDI. Both companies are battling knockoffs, and may be blocked in future official Windows drivers. The Linux drivers however work fine with the clones.
Another alternative, even though the OP did not ask for it:
There exist usb-to-serial adapters.
Depending on the type of adapter, you may also need a nullmodem cable, too.
They are extremely easy to use under linux, work under windows, too, if you have got working drivers installed.
That way you can work directly with the sensors, and you do not have to try and emulate data.
That way you are maybe even save from building an anemic system.
(Due to your emulated data inputs not covering all cases, leading you to a brittle system.)
Its often better to work with the real stuff.
i used eltima make virtual serial port for my modbus application debug work. it is really very good application at development stage to check serial port program without connecting hardware.
This may not be considered to be directly programming related but I am at a loss to know where else to ask. I have tried looking at a variety of websites but so far Google has not been my friend.
I am having trouble finding out whether I need to write my own device driver for the various windows/linux/mac platforms that the device I am developing may be connected to, or whether the functionality is provided by the standard drivers.
My device is a USB CDC (communications device) that appears as a COM: port. It also includes a battery charger that will, once the device has been enumerated require the full 5 unit load (500mA) supply current that can be drawn from the USB connector. My problem is that if the USB driver in the host decides that it cannot deliver the full supply current then it should fail to enumerate the device.
If, as a fallback, I provide a second configuration set that only allows the device to draw 1 unit load from the interface connector will the standard drivers enumerate the device using this configuration.
You need to write a .inf file for Windows that ties up your device VID and PID with the system usbser.sys. Mine looks like this (Replace YourCompany as necessary, put in your VID and PID (in hex), and change the DriverVer line to whatever date and version you want):
; -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
; XP/2000 USB Comms Port Setup
; -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Version]
DriverVer=12/03/2008,1.0.0000.0000
Signature="$Windows NT$"
Class=Ports
ClassGUID={4d36e978-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}
Provider=%YourCompany%
[DestinationDirs]
DefaultDestDir=10,system32\drivers
DriverCopyFiles=12
[ControlFlags]
ExcludeFromSelect = *
[Manufacturer]
%YourCOmpany%=YourCompanySerialPort
[YourCompanySerialPort]
%YourCompanyUSBSerialPort%=YOURCOMPANYUSB,USB\VID_1234&PID_ABCD
;
; Win 2000/XP
;
[YOURCOMPANYUSB]
Include=mdmcpq.inf
CopyFiles=FakeModemCopyFileSection
[YOURCOMPANYUSB.HW]
AddReg=YOURCOMPANYUSBAddReg.HW
[YOURCOMPANYUSBAddReg.HW]
HKR,,DevLoader,0,*ntkern
HKR,,NTMPDriver,,"usbser.sys"
[YOURCOMPANYUSB.Services]
AddService=usbser, 0x00000002, FuncDrv_Service_Inst
[FuncDrv_Service_Inst]
DisplayName=%USBFilterString%
ServiceType= 1
StartType = 3
ErrorControl = 0
ServiceBinary = %12%\usbser.sys
[Strings]
YourCompany="YourCompany"
YourCompanySerialPort="Your Company USB Serial Port"
USBFilterString = "USB Serial Service"
Note this works with 32 bit OSs only. It also works with Vista although the file header doesn't say so!
Be aware that some versions of usbser.sys have significant problems, including bluescreening, for example when transferring packets that are exact multiples of 64 bytes. If you're using XP SP2 or previous then install hotfix KB943198. XP SP3 and Vista are fine.
For the Mac you simply need to report your device class correctly and the driver scan picks up the correct drivers. (Windows ignores the device class which is why you need to supply the .inf file).
EDIT: Sorry, I should have been clearer. This will not fail to enumerate if it can't draw the full load - I'm not sure that's possible.
You are correct on the driver question. When the device is plugged in and goes through the enumeration process it is required to stay < 100mA. The host will interrogate and determine the configuration(s). If there are more than one which support different power levels, then the driver will need to decide to select the appropriate configuration. If there is only high-power and it is not available, then it will not enumerate the device. In general, the standard driver doing CDC wouldn't be aware of the different device level configurations that would possible and so would require some degree of customization to handle them.
I am not sure about power question but ther is pleanty CDC drivers (or I think there is) so you could use one. For the power question, the solution with many configuration is probably good one, I have never encountered this in work (I have USB analyzer) but at home sometimes when I have 3 or more different devices that requires power from USB I got failed enumeration. I supose this is operating system choice if it can't supply power to new device it cut's it off (sensible choice as it can't power it). This is my gues rather checking USB standart.
If your device reports a device ID that the host OS already supports,
then they won't need a driver.
You may need to impersonate an existing USB uart. Data sheets are readily available.
(But I figure you already knew that.)
I'm not sure that the host OS will honour your multi-configuration idea.
But give it a punt so we all know!
If your device is connecting as USB CDC-ACM device to the windows desktop host, the windows desktop already provides the driver usbser.sys. But there are some some issues in windows Vista. You just need the inf to install the usbser.sys on desktop. For WinCE you do not have the driver and for you need to write or get one from any third party vendor. Here is one
http://www.em.avant-garde-lab.com/Products.html
If your device specifies itself as self powered in its device descriptor then the host would rely on the devices self power capability. You can check at usb.org for details.
Thanks.