I would like to know if anyone has experience with good DDOS Proxy Providers, where it is posible to switch only the NS of the domain and to prevent the attack. Please post any provider, that you have used and you recommend and maybe the price range, because I am collecting now some sorces to find the best one for me. I have found some with price ranges from 299$-699$ for small bussines sites.
Thanks
The only guys you should trust are:
http://www.gigenet.com/ddos-protection.html and http://www.blacklotus.net/protection/elite-protection/
Yeah, I helped someone run a website that was risky. I stopped helping him but what you're looking for is CloudFlare.
Helps keep you up during attacks.
I don't know if you know, but a hacking group known as lulzsecurity had a site up for awhile and there were lots of people that didn't want them up. They were successful with cloud flare.
Hope that helps
Sometimes you can use low cost vds-server with ddos-protection and another dedicated server on other host, like this pack :
VDS : http://www.sim-networks.com/ with plan ESXi-M, it include 100Gbp/s DDOS protection
and other Dedicated Server, for example http://www.online.net/en/dedicated-server
All you need to do is to set up nginx proxy from VDS to Dedicated Server
Related
I am new at using SiteMinder and I would like to know ALL the things that I need to read and understand in order to use it. Please proportionate good references. Thanks.
You should start from the SiteMinder bookshelf.. and proceed from there. One of the good websites that you can look at is ssohelp.com.
You should definitely have some knowledge of web servers and the server platform that you are running SiteMinder on. There aren't a lot of public resources available for Siteminder, so you will need to do some digging through the CA Siteminder book shelf which is fairly thorough but sometimes topics are not arranged correctly.
CoreBlox.com (parent company for ssohelp.com) has some good blog entries that describe some of the not so well documented features of SiteMinder.
I would say that first you must know and understand how HTTP 1.1 works, with a good level of details.
Learning Siteminder is a lot easier if you are knowledgeable enough with HTTP.
I've been looking for a free web host where I don't have to use a template. I have my own website fully coded and just want to port it into their server. I don't know if I'm missing something, but every free web host I've come across requires me to choose a template. Please help.
I think this information can be useful for you. If you plan to get your website, here is one good free web hosting provider to choose - 000webhost.com
They provide hosting absolutely free, there is no catch. You get 1500 MB of disk space and 100 GB bandwidth. They also have cPanel control panel which is amazing and easy to use website builder. Moreover, there is no any kind of advertising on your pages.
You can register here: http://www.000webhost.com/864177.html
When it comes to web hosting, what you pay for is always what you get. The more expensive companies are expensive for a reason - they can afford all of the costs to maintain and secure your site. Free hosts are not going to treat your site the same way at all.
Venture at your own risk, but no matter what company you look at, always research customer reviews!
I like to have my domains registered via the same company so when I'm looking for a web host I have a very specific requirement -- that I just need space to upload stuff that I can direct to via my registar's DNS/CNAME settings. I don't need a 'free' domain name, or email, or to transer my existing registrations. Just space and the config info to send traffic to it.
So I'm shopping around for a new host at the moment and was wondering if there's a shorthand term for what I'm after, because it seems like it would be a fairly regular requirement and there'd be a term for it.
So that's my question, really. What's the most succunct way to articulate the kind of hosting I require to prospective hosts? (All suggestions for good, affordable hosts who do this sort of thing gratefully received of course!)
Most hosting companies do this for you. I believe what you are asking for is the term VirtualHost
We have application hosted in the UK and we also have a lot of users in the US.
We can't duplicate our servers to the US (big database with hard replication) but I like to know what do you think about this solution:
The users from the US get to a proxy server we host in the US and he in the background will talk with our servers in UK.
Do I get an high speed from this move or I will only make another action to the user?
If I will not get a slower speed from this move I think it's will be great that users from the US will see US IP address, what do you think about that?
Thanks for your time.
If the US proxy acts as a reverse proxy (cache some of the information), your users will definitely benefit from it.
If that proxy can make heavy use of caching (i.e. not overseas network access necessary) a proxy will indeed improve loading times.
There are a bunch of services (dyndns, nettica, etc.) that offer API's but I'm having trouble with Nettica's and I was just wondering if anyone has a nice gem suggestion for any of the DNS services... I'm not set on one or the other.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Chad
This just in, Nettica does work as intended, but you need to buy the bulk DNS service in order to enable the AddRecord API call....... wasn't documented clearly but their support was able to point this out.