I am trying to achieve a query which includes a subquery which itself includes grouping.
I based my code from answers to this question
The purpose of the code is to perform a simple de-duplication of the 'person' table based on the email address and return the latest person row.
var innerQuery = (from p in db.Person
join r in db.Registration on p equals r.Person
join e in db.EventDetail on r.EventDetail equals e
where e.Client.ClientID == clientID
group p by p.Email into g
select g.Max(p => p.PersonID));
var query = (from p2 in db.Person where innerQuery.Contains(p2.PersonID) select p2);
When the query is attempted to execute, I get the following error message:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize
the method 'Boolean
Contains[Int32](System.Linq.IQueryable`1[System.Int32],
Int32)' method, and this method cannot
be translated into a store expression.
I have tested the innerquery and it just returns a list of ints as expected, but the query fails with the above message.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Isn't query just a join?
var query = from p2 in db.Person
join iq in innerQuery on p2.PersonID equals iq
select p2;
I'm not sure about = iq part but I don't usually use that syntax sorry - in the other form it would be
.Join(innerQuery, p2 => p2.PersonId, iq => iq, (p2, iq) => p2);
for the join and the select.
Related
I have the following query in one of my Entity Framework Core API controllers:
var plotData = await (from nl in _context.BookList
join ql in _context.PlotList on nl.PlotId equals ql.PlotId
join qc in _context.PlotChoices on ql.PlotId equals qc.PlotId
join nk in _context.BookLinks.DefaultIfEmpty() on qc.ChoiceId equals nk.ChoiceId
where nl.Id == ID
select new
{ .. }
I need it to return all rows even if data doesn't exist in the BookLinks table.
However, it's not returning rows if there is no data data in the BookLinks table for that row.
But this SQL query, from which I'm trying to model from, does return data...it returns nulls if there is no data in BookLinks.
select * from BookList bl
left join PlotList pl ON bl.plotId = bl.plotId
left join PlotChoices pc ON pl.plotId = pc.plotId
left join BookLinks bk ON pc.choiceID = bk.choiceID
where nl.caseID = '2abv1'
From what I read online, adding 'DefaultIfEmpty()' to the end of BookLinks should fix that, but it hasn't.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
When using left join , you can try below code sample :
var plotData = (from nl in _context.BookList
join ql in _context.PlotList on nl.PlotId equals ql.PlotId
join qc in _context.PlotChoices on ql.PlotId equals qc.PlotId
join nk in _context.BookLinks on qc.ChoiceId equals nk.ChoiceId into Details
from m in Details.DefaultIfEmpty()
where nl.Id == ID
select new
{
}).ToList();
I have a list of strings (converted from Guid) that contains the ID's of items I want to pull from my table.
Then, in my LINQ query, I am trying to figure out how to do an in clause to pull records that are in that list.
Here is the LINQ
var RegionRequests = (from r in db.course_requests
where PendingIdList.Contains(r.request_state.ToString())
select r).ToList();
It builds, but I get a run error: "System.NotSupportedException: LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.String ToString()' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression".
I would prefer to compare guid to guid, but that gets me nowhere.
Can this be converted to a lambda expression? If that is best, how?
LINQ to Entites tries to convert your expression to an SQL Statement. Your server didn't know the stored procedure ToString().
Fix:
var regionRequests =
from r in db.course_requests.ToList()
where PendingIdList.Contains(r.request_state.ToString())
select r;
With db.course_requests.ToList() you force LINQ to materialize your database data (if big table, you gonna have a bad time) and the ToString() is executed in the object context.
You stated: I have a list of strings (converted from Guid) ...
Can you NOT convert them into strings and keep it as a List< System.Guid>?? Then you can do this (assuming PendingIdGuidList is List< System.Guid>:
var regionRequets = (from r in db.course_requests
join p in PendingIdGuidList on u.request_state equals p
select r).ToList();
Edited to add:
I ran a test on this using the following code:
var db = new EntityModels.MapleCreekEntities();
List<System.Guid> PendingIdGuidList =
new List<System.Guid>() {
System.Guid.Parse("77dfd79e-2d61-40b9-ac23-36eb53dc55bc"),
System.Guid.Parse("cd409b96-de92-4fd7-8870-aa42eb5b8751")
};
var regionRequets = (from r in db.Users
join p in PendingIdGuidList on r.Test equals p
select r).ToList();
Users is a table in my database. I added a column called Test as a Uniqueidentifier data type, then modified 2 records with the following Guids.
I know it's not exactly a 1:1 of what the OP is doing, but pretty close. Here is the profiled SQL statement:
SELECT
[Extent1].[ID] AS [ID],
[Extent1].[UserLogin] AS [UserLogin],
[Extent1].[Password] AS [Password],
[Extent1].[Test] AS [Test]
FROM [dbo].[Users] AS [Extent1]
INNER JOIN (SELECT
cast('77dfd79e-2d61-40b9-ac23-36eb53dc55bc' as uniqueidentifier) AS [C1]
FROM ( SELECT 1 AS X ) AS [SingleRowTable1]
UNION ALL
SELECT
cast('cd409b96-de92-4fd7-8870-aa42eb5b8751' as uniqueidentifier) AS [C1]
FROM ( SELECT 1 AS X ) AS [SingleRowTable2]) AS [UnionAll1] ON [Extent1].[Test] = [UnionAll1].[C1]
I have this simple sql query:
select c.LastName, Sum(b.Debit)- Sum(b.Credit) as OpenBalance from Balance as b
inner join Job as j on (b.Job = j.ID)
inner join Client as c on (j.Client = c.ID)
Group By c.LastName
and I am trying to convert it to work in linq like this:
from b in Balance
join j in Job on b.Job equals j.ID
join c in Client on j.Client equals c.ID
group b by new { c.LastName } into g
select new {
Name = c.Lastname,
OpenBalance = g.Sum(t1 => t1.Credit)
}
but when I try to run it in LINQPad I get the following message:
The name 'c' does not exist in the
current context
and it highlights c.Lastname in select new statement.
Any help on this will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Well, you've grouped b by c.LastName. So after the grouping operation, you're dealing with g which is a grouping with the element type being the type of b, and the key type being the type of c.LastName. It could well be that all you need is:
select new {
Name = g.Key,
OpenBalance = g.Sum(t1 => t1.Credit)
}
... but if you need to get at any other aspects of c, you'll need to change your grouping expression.
I want to achieve the following in Linq to Entities:
Get all Enquires that have no Application or the Application has a status != 4 (Completed)
select e.*
from Enquiry enq
left outer join Application app
on enq.enquiryid = app.enquiryid
where app.Status <> 4 or app.enquiryid is null
Has anyone done this before without using DefaultIfEmpty(), which is not supported by Linq to Entities?
I'm trying to add a filter to an IQueryable query like this:
IQueryable<Enquiry> query = Context.EnquirySet;
query = (from e in query
where e.Applications.DefaultIfEmpty()
.Where(app=>app.Status != 4).Count() >= 1
select e);
Thanks
Mark
In EF 4.0+, LEFT JOIN syntax is a little different and presents a crazy quirk:
var query = from c1 in db.Category
join c2 in db.Category on c1.CategoryID equals c2.ParentCategoryID
into ChildCategory
from cc in ChildCategory.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new CategoryObject
{
CategoryID = c1.CategoryID,
ChildName = cc.CategoryName
}
If you capture the execution of this query in SQL Server Profiler, you will see that it does indeed perform a LEFT OUTER JOIN. HOWEVER, if you have multiple LEFT JOIN ("Group Join") clauses in your Linq-to-Entity query, I have found that the self-join clause MAY actually execute as in INNER JOIN - EVEN IF THE ABOVE SYNTAX IS USED!
The resolution to that? As crazy and, according to MS, wrong as it sounds, I resolved this by changing the order of the join clauses. If the self-referencing LEFT JOIN clause was the 1st Linq Group Join, SQL Profiler reported an INNER JOIN. If the self-referencing LEFT JOIN clause was the LAST Linq Group Join, SQL Profiler reported an LEFT JOIN.
Do this:
IQueryable<Enquiry> query = Context.EnquirySet;
query = (from e in query
where (!e.Applications.Any())
|| e.Applications.Any(app => app.Status != 4)
select e);
I don't find LINQ's handling of the problem of what would be an "outer join" in SQL "goofy" at all. The key to understanding it is to think in terms of an object graph with nullable properties rather than a tabular result set.
Any() maps to EXISTS in SQL, so it's far more efficient than Count() in some cases.
Thanks guys for your help. I went for this option in the end but your solutions have helped broaden my knowledge.
IQueryable<Enquiry> query = Context.EnquirySet;
query = query.Except(from e in query
from a in e.Applications
where a.Status == 4
select e);
Because of Linq's goofy (read non-standard) way of handling outers, you have to use DefaultIfEmpty().
What you'll do is run your Linq-To-Entities query into two IEnumerables, then LEFT Join them using DefaultIfEmpty(). It may look something like:
IQueryable enq = Enquiry.Select();
IQueryable app = Application.Select();
var x = from e in enq
join a in app on e.enquiryid equals a.enquiryid
into ae
where e.Status != 4
from appEnq in ae.DefaultIfEmpty()
select e.*;
Just because you can't do it with Linq-To-Entities doesn't mean you can't do it with raw Linq.
(Note: before anyone downvotes me ... yes, I know there are more elegant ways to do this. I'm just trying to make it understandable. It's the concept that's important, right?)
Another thing to consider, if you directly reference any properties in your where clause from a left-joined group (using the into syntax) without checking for null, Entity Framework will still convert your LEFT JOIN into an INNER JOIN.
To avoid this, filter on the "from x in leftJoinedExtent" part of your query like so:
var y = from parent in thing
join child in subthing on parent.ID equals child.ParentID into childTemp
from childLJ in childTemp.Where(c => c.Visible == true).DefaultIfEmpty()
where parent.ID == 123
select new {
ParentID = parent.ID,
ChildID = childLJ.ID
};
ChildID in the anonymous type will be a nullable type and the query this generates will be a LEFT JOIN.
Is it possible to make a join in linq and only return data from one dataset where the other key was present, a little like:
var q = from c in customers
join o in orders on c.Key equals o.Key
select new {c.Name, o.OrderNumber};
and then instead of returning just the two records then returning customers like:
var q = from c in customers
join o in orders on c.Key equals o.Key
select c;
When I try to do (something similar) I get this error:
The specified LINQ expression contains references to queries that are associated with different contexts.
I going to assume that you've skipped a Where clause which involved the orders table (or otherwise the join would be pointless)
In which case, you can just have Linq infer the join.
var q = from c in customers
where c.Orders.Any(o=> o.ProductCode == productCode)
select c;
Linq2Sql will automatically create the Orders property if you have a foreign key defined; I believe with the Entity Framework, you have to manually specify it.
The error indicates an other problem:
You have to use the same DataContext on every object in the query if you're using Linq to SQL.
Your code should look somehow like that:
using (MyDataContext dc = new MyDataContext())
{
var q = from c in dc.customers
join o in dc.orders on c.Key equals o.Key
select c;
// process q within the DataContext
// the easies would be to call q.ToList()
}
Will it be in EF 4.0 to create join from multiple context?
For example:
TestModelEntities e1 = new TestModelEntities();
TestModelEntities e2 = new TestModelEntities();
var d = from firme1 in e1.firme
join g in e2.grad on firme1.grad.grad_id equals g.grad_id
select firme1;