I have installed a plugin to my Rails app. The plugin has files in its public directory that I want to make available.
For example, vendor/plugins/myplugin/public/javascripts/myplugin.js. Can I make this available via Rails at /javascripts/myplugin.js?
I've got it working by copying the files from vendor/plugins/______/public/* to public/*, but that seems like a bad idea.
I think this only works if you make your plugin into an engine. Engines can access deeper into the rails initialization process so they can add an additional static asset path.
Here is a snippet of my engine.rb file that does this:
module MoxieForum
class Engine < Rails::Engine
initializer "static assets" do |app|
app.middleware.use ::ActionDispatch::Static, "#{root}/public"
end
end
end
I recently wrote a handy starting point for creating a rails 3 engine that has this and lots of other basic functionality built in:
http://keithschacht.com/creating-a-rails-3-engine-plugin-gem
with rails 2.1 at least copying used to be "the only way" (I think it probably still is, though you could use mod_rewrite apache module to get them all...)
Related
Recently I made a simple ruby application and have been using minitest to test it.
Following the advice of the Head First Ruby book, I automated this testing using Rake(I'll write what it told me to put in the Rakefile at the end of this post, in case that helps). The test seems to run fine (everything passes in a way I would expect it to), but I always get this notification at the end of it all:
rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.0/gems/guard-2.14.0/lib/guard/notifier.rb:28: warning: instance variable #notifier not initialized
Testing things manually by telling ruby to include which files I want, does not have this issue, only when I use "rake test" to test things.
As far as I can tell, this is related to when I set up Guard when I was following Michael Hartl's Rails Tutorial, at the end of chapter 3. I followed the directions for setting that up (correctly, as far as I can tell), and this was all in a completely different folder(ultimately my ruby and rails projects do have the same parent folder that they sit in, but are themselves in completely separate ruby_projects and rails_projects folders). If possible, I would like to stop this notification on my ruby application that I am testing. Is there a good way to do this?
Contents of the Rakefile I am using, if that helps:
require "rake/testtask"
Rake::TestTask.new(:test) do |t|
t.libs << "lib"
t.test_files=FileList['test/**/test_*.rb']
end
My test file requires minitest/autorun, and the file for the application that I am testing, then has the normal tests
Seems like there's some weird conflict...
The reason is that Guard::Notifier.connect isn't connected. Normally, when you run guard, Guard.setup is called which does this.
If you're not using guard (e.g. interactively), then calling the following from your Rakefile should work around the problem:
Guard::Notifier.connect(notify: false, silent: true)
Guard::Notifier.disconnect
This will initialize the variable.
For a faster response, always report such issues on the project page on Github. If you can share the project where this occurs, maybe a better fix is possible. (It's best to provide a repository, since it really speeds up fixing things and often errors like this are very hard to simulate without the exact code).
I am attempting to remove caching and discovered this post:
How to prevent browser page caching in Rails
The problem it along with a number of other posts relating to ruby rails refer to an application_controller.rb file that my project does not have. I inherited this system so wasnt part of its initial development. Can someone explain why this would be the case? I am using padrino and in my config folder i have the following files:
Deploy
production.rb
staging.rb
Recipes
base.rb
nginx.rb
rbenv.rb
apps.rb
boot.rb
From what you've provided me I can say that I'm quite certain the project is using the Padrino ruby framework and not rails :)
See: http://www.padrinorb.com/
I have a class in the lib directory: lib\db_cache.rb, that defines class DbCache.
My Rails model can access it when in dev mode and also when I run rails console in production mode.
But when I run the production mode rails server, the model class, eg Foo, complains about "uninitialized constant" Foo::DbCache,
org/jruby/RubyModule.java:2677:in `const_missing',
org/jruby/RubyMethod.java:134:in `call'
I have this line in application.rb
config.autoload_paths += %W(#{Rails.root}/lib)
I have also tried the other variations shown in the linked SO questions - but no joy.
I am using jruby 1.7.3 (1.9.3p385) - Java 1.7.0_13-b20, on linux. Rails is version 3.2.12.
I've seen these questions Rails - why would a model inside RAILS_ROOT/lib not be available in production mode? and Best way to load module/class from lib folder in Rails 3? but that doesnt seem to help my case.
Thanks in advance for any ideas on this.
PS My work-hack-around for now is to require 'db_cache' in my model class :(
It sounds like you are trying to extend a class. Without seeing the db_cache.rb file I can't know for sure.
If that is the case it is perfectly fine to have
extend DbCache
in your model class definition
The problem seemed to related to enabling config.threadsafe! in /config/environments/production.rb
This is what I had:
# Enable threaded mode
if defined?(Rails::Server)
puts "Rails Server running - so enable threadsafe!"
config.threadsafe!
end
As I am using jruby, I dont believe this is so much of an issue. At least, when I removed these lines, things worked much better :)
I was hoping to make a Rails app usable both as an Engine and as a standalone Application.
Specifically, I have a nascent app which I'd like to plug in to a customer's site, but ideally, I'd like to just as easily use the app as a standalone system. However, if config/environments/*.rb exist in the enginified version of my app, I get an Uninitialized Constant error at the time the app that I'm having take a dependency on my engine starts up; Rails complains that the MyEngineModule::Application constant can't be found in development.rb, which I think is simply a load order issue, since this does NOT occur when I run the app standalone. If I delete development.rb, the original initializers that reference my MyEngineModule::Application complain, so then I tried to delete those, and all is well.
Great, except that the original app doesn't work, since its configuration is gone.
Is there some tweak I can make to the initialization load order (or load paths, in the Engine < Rails::Engine class definition) that would prevent the original configs and initializers from being loaded when in an engine context, and allow me to leave them in place for the app context?
The simpler answer is probably this, but I'm feeling stubborn, and would like to know what it would take to make my original goal possible:
extract the code for MyEngine into an engine, remove the config/environments/* files and config/initializers/* files, and make the client app depend on this.
Make a "new" minimalist app depend on MyEngine, and move the environment files and initializers to NewApp.
Assuming I feel some unnatural compulsion to keep my original application runnable as it was, if I want to prevent the "engine" from loading the "application" configuration, what's the best way to handle that? I presume this is only really a problem during development, because I can prevent the environments/*.rb files from being pulled into the gem itself, but I like being able to test locally while I'm developing the engine and its client app.
Continuing my tradition of answering my own esoteric questions, it seems like one passable alternative is to include a guard clause in the engine's environments/*.rb and the initializers that goes something like this:
if defined? CuteEngine::Application
CuteEngine::Application.configure do
config.whatever = something
end
end
This gets around the problem of having two Rails::Application objects at a relatively small cost. Not very happy about it, but I'll live.
Bumping this for new comers.
Rails 3.1 comes with mountable engines, which sounds like exactly what you are describing. The docs aren't great for converting existing code, but it looks like this will do what you want:
module CuteEngine
class Engine < ::Rails::Engine
isolate_namespace CuteEngine
end
end
In your other app's routes.rb file, you'll add:
mount CuteEngine::Engine, at: "/cuteness"
http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/engines.html#mounting-the-engine
http://railscasts.com/episodes/277-mountable-engines
Whenever two concurrent HTTP requests go to my Rails app, the second always returns the following error:
A copy of ApplicationController has been removed from the module tree but is still active!
From there it gives an unhelpful stack trace to the effect of "we went through the standard server stuff, ran your first before_filter on ApplicationController (and I checked; it's just whichever filter runs first)", then offers the following:
/home/matchu/rails/torch/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:414:in
`load_missing_constant'
/home/matchu/rails/torch/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:96:in
`const_missing'
which I'm assuming is a generic response and doesn't really say much.
Google seems to tell me that people developing Rails Engines will encounter this, but I don't do that. All I've done is upgrade my Rails app from 2.2 (2.1?) to 2.3.
What are some possible causes for this error, and how can I go about tracking down what's really going on? I know this question is vague, so would any other information be helpful?
More importantly: I tried doing a test run in a "production" environment just now, and the error doesn't seem to persist. Does this only affect development, then, and need I not worry too much?
This is a bug in Rails 2.3.3:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/2948-exception-a-copy-of-actorscontroller-has-been-removed-from-the-module-tree-but-is-still-active
There is a patch for it (but incomplete?) in 2-3-stable:
http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/d37ac7958fc88fdbf37a8948102f6b4e45c530b3
You have a few options to address the problem:
Revert to Rails 2.3.2, wait for 2.3.4 to come out, probably at the end of August. 2.3.3 has a couple bad issues, so that might be best.
The problem should not happen in production mode, nor will it happen in development mode under the Thin server. If you are having this issue on Google Engines in production mode, the patch is your only hope. If it's only in dev mode, you can just run your local server with Thin instead of Mongrel.
If it is Google Engines, you can move off of Google Engines and host your app another way. This seems like a lot of work though.
Best of luck, this is a really bad bug many people are running into.
I addition to the workarounds mentioned in the other answers, I have encountered two others:
Add "config.cache_classes = false" to your config/environments/development.rb file. This has the unfortunate side effect of requiring you to restart your server whenever you want to see your changes.
Add 'unloadable' inside your controller classes in your engine. See http://strd6.com/?p=250 and http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6001
I haven't tried the second approach, since I found the other solution first, but there is of course a trade-off between avoiding having to edit plugin code, which may be reverted if a newer version of the plugin is downloaded, and then the ease of development provided by not having to restart the development server all the time in the second solution.
i faced with same problem for my new engine on rails 2.3.4 and i found solution here.
calling unloadable method solved my problem.
Weird.
Trying running "rake rails:update" to make sure the configs are scripts are up to date. You may have to check the existing ones against a template application.
i had this error and from memory it was one of one of these three things that fixed it.
1) I needed to update mongrel/rack
2) I had an environment variable from restful authentication that i had moved into the production.rb and development.rb files from the environment.rb - shifting it back to environment.rb seemed to help
3) will_paginate was out of date
We called out to an activerecord model in a namespaced module which overrides the "name" class method. Rails expects that the name method returns Product::Categories::MilkProducts::Firstproduct but gets just Firstproduct and throws an error. So if you get this error first check if you redefined self.name.
Firstproduct.method(:name).owner should be Module
Firstproduct.method(:name).source_location
source:
module Product::Categories::MilkProducts
class Base
def self.name
self.to_s.demodulize
end
end
class Firstproduct < Base
self.product = Product.first
end
end