Using Mongoid, let's say I have the following classes:
class Map
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_many :locations
end
class Location
include Mongoid::Document
field :x_coord, :type => Integer
field :y_coord, :type => Integer
embedded_in :map, :inverse_of => :locations
end
class Player
include Mongoid::Document
references_one :location
end
As you can see, I'm trying to model a simple game world environment where a map embeds locations, and a player references a single location as their current spot.
Using this approach, I'm getting the following error when I try to reference the "location" attribute of the Player class:
Mongoid::Errors::DocumentNotFound: Document not found for class Location with id(s) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
My understanding is that this is because the Location document is embedded making it difficult to reference outside the scope of its embedding document (the Map). This makes sense, but how do I model a direct reference to an embedded document?
Because Maps are their own collection, you would need to iterate over every Map collection searching within for the Location your Player is referenced.
You can't access embedded documents directly. You have to enter through the collection and work your way down.
To avoid iterating all of the Maps you can store both the Location reference AND the Map reference in your Player document. This allows you to chain criteria that selects your Map and then the Location within it. You have to code a method on your Player class to handle this.
def location
self.map.locations.find(self.location_id)
end
So, similar to how you answered yourself except you could still store the location_id in your player document instead of using the coord attribs.
Another way would be to put Maps, Locations, and Players in their own collections instead of embedding the Location in your Map collection. Then you could use reference relationships without doing anything fancy... however your really just using a hierarchical database likes it's a relational database at this point...
PLEASE go and VOTE for the "virtual collections" feature on MongoDB's issue tracker:
http://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-142
It's the 2nd most requested feature, but it still hasn't been scheduled for release. Maybe if enough people vote for it and move it to number one, the MongoDB team will finally implement it.
In my use case, there is no need for the outside object to reference the embedded document. From the mongoid user group, I found the solution: Use referenced_in on the embedded document and NO reference on the outside document.
class Page
include Mongoid::Document
field :title
embeds_many :page_objects
end
class PageObject
include Mongoid::Document
field :type
embedded_in :page, :inverse_of => :page_objects
referenced_in :sprite
end
class Sprite
include Mongoid::Document
field :path, :default => "/images/something.png"
end
header_sprite = Sprite.create(:path => "/images/header.png")
picture_sprte = Sprite.create(:path => "/images/picture.png")
p = Page.create(:title => "Home")
p.page_objects.create(:type => "header", :sprite => header_sprite)
p.page_objects.first.sprite == header_sprite
My current workaround is to do the following:
class Map
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_many :locations
references_many :players, :inverse_of => :map
end
class Player
referenced_in :map
field :x_coord
field :y_coord
def location=(loc)
loc.map.users << self
self.x_coord = loc.x_coord
self.y_coord = loc.y_coord
self.save!
end
def location
self.map.locations.where(:x_coord => self.x_coord).and(:y_coord => self.y_coord).first
end
end
This works, but feels like a kluge.
Thinking outside the box, you could make Location its own document and use Mongoid Alize to automatically generate embedded data in your Map document from your Location documents.
https://github.com/dzello/mongoid_alize
The advantage of this method is that you get efficient queries when conditions are suitable, and slower reference based queries on the original document when there's no other way.
Related
I need to search within Mongoid objects that have array attributes. Here are the relevant objects:
class Author
include Mongoid::Document
field :name, type: String
class Book
include Mongoid::Document
field :name, type: String
field :authors, type: Array
I can see that at least one book has a given author:
Book.all.sample.authors
=> [BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257805e00'),
BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257835e00'),
BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257c75e00'),
BSON::ObjectId('5363c73b4d616352574a5f00')]
But I'm unable to find books that have that author.
Book.where(authors: '5363c73a4d61635257805e00').first
=> nil
I've tried the solution listed here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mongoid/csNOcugYH0U but it didn't work for me:
Book.any_in(:author => ["5363c73b4d616352574a5f00"]).first
=> nil
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Any ideas? I'd prefer to use Mongoid Origin commands.
This output:
Book.all.sample.authors
=> [BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257805e00'),
BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257835e00'),
BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257c75e00'),
BSON::ObjectId('5363c73b4d616352574a5f00')]
tells us that authors contains BSON::ObjectIds. ObjectIds are often presented as Strings and sometimes you can use a String instead of a full blown ObjectId (such as with Model.find) but they're still not Strings. You are searching the array for a String:
Book.where(authors: '5363c73a4d61635257805e00')
but '5363c73a4d61635257805e00' and ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257805e00') are not the same thing inside MongoDB. You need to search for the right thing:
Book.where(authors: BSON::ObjectId('5363c73a4d61635257805e00'))
You might want to monkey patch a to_bson_id method into various places. Something like this:
class String
def to_bson_id
BSON::ObjectId.from_string(self)
end
end
module Mongoid
module Document
def to_bson_id
id
end
end
end
module BSON
class ObjectId
def to_bson_id
self
end
end
end
class NilClass
def to_bson_id
self
end
end
Should do the trick. Then you can say things like:
Book.where(authors: '5363c73a4d61635257805e00'.to_bson_id)
Book.where(authors: some_string_or_object_id.to_bson_id)
and The Right Thing happens.
You might want to rename authors to author_ids to make its nature a little clearer.
Suppose we have these models:
class Person
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_many :albums
end
class Album
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_many :photos
end
class Photo
include Mongoid::Document
end
What I want is to retrieves all Photo of a particular Person. Is there a mongoid/mongodb shortcuts or the only way is to iterate over person.albums and store all album.photos in a new array?
Thanks.
You have 2 ways to do this, one is through Mongoid, which, AFAIK, will inflate all objects.
Something like:
Person.only("albums.photos").where(id: '1').albums.map(&:photos).flatten
Or you can do it in Moped(driver) which will return only an array of photos.
Person.collection.find(id: "1").select("albums.photos" => 1).
first["albums"].map { |a| a["photos"] }.flatten
On the DB load, both dont make any difference, as they will yield the same query, only difference is that the first one will create way more objects than the second one.
I have a Mongoid document called Equipment which can embed multiple Question documents. Here are the document schemas:
class Equipment
include Mongoid::Document
include Mongoid::Timestamps
field :description
field :modelNumber
field :title
field :categoryId
field :subCategoryId
field :stateId
field :city
field :askingPrice
embeds_many :questions
end
class Question
include Mongoid::Document
field :content
attr_accessible :content
embedded_in :equipment, :inverse_of => :questions
embeds_one :answers
end
My issue is that I can retrieve a Question document based on the Question Id. However, my current query returns the parent Equipment document. I would have expected the query to return the embedded Question document. I can eventually get the embedded Question document but I have to loop through all the Question documents of the parent Equipment document.
Here is my current query:
#question = Equipment.where('questions._id' => Moped::BSON::ObjectId(params[:id])).first
Is there a way to directly obtain the embedded Question document?
Because you are using embedded documents, grabbing a single question may not make sense. It does, however, make sense in the context of the parent document. If you really just want a specific question, you can just use normal ARish syntax:
question = Question.find(params[:id])
I would strongly suggest you make sure you have an index on the question._id field. This will help ensure this query is a fast read operation. Otherwise, Mongo will need to run through all of the Equipment documents and check each of the embedded Question objects.
If the above doesn't work, you can try a nested relation:
Equipment.find(params[:equipment_id]).questions.find(params[:id])
With rails (3.2.15) and mongoid (3.1.5) I can only do it in this way:
#equipment = Equipment.where('questions._id' => Moped::BSON::ObjectId(params[:id])).first
#question = #equipment.questions.find(params[:id])
Say I am keeping track of email correspondances. An enquiry (from a customer) or a reply (from a supporter) is embedded in the order the two parties are corresponding about. They share the exact same logic when put into the database.
My problem is that even though I use the same logic, the object classes are different, the model fields I need to call are different, and the method names are different as well.
How do I put methods and objects references in before I actually have to use them? Does a "string_to_method" method exists or something like that?
Sample code with commentaries:
class Email
include Mongoid::Document
field :from, type: String
field :to, type: String
field :subject, type: String
belongs_to :order, :inverse_of => :emails
def start
email = Email.create!(:from => "sender#example.com", :to => "recipient#example.com", :subject => "Hello")
from_or_to = from # This represents the database field from where I later on will fetch the customers email address. It is either from or to.
enquiries_or_replies = enquiries # This represents a method that should later be called. It is either enquiries or replies.
self.test_if_enquiry_or_reply(from_or_to, enquiries_or_replies)
end
def test_if_enquiry_or_reply(from_or_to, enquiries_or_replies)
order = Order.add_enquiry_or_reply(self, from_or_to, enquiries_or_replies)
self.order = order
self.save
end
end
class Order
include Mongoid::Document
field :email_address, type: String
has_many :emails, :inverse_of => :order
embeds_many :enquiries, :inverse_of => :order
embeds_many :replies, :inverse_of => :order
def self.add_enquiry_or_reply(email, from_or_to, enquiries_or_replies)
order = Order.where(:email_address => email.from_or_to).first # from_or_to could either be from or to.
order.enquiries_or_replies.create!(subject: email.subject) # enquiries_or_replies could either be enquiries or replies.
order
end
end
Judging by the question and the code sample, it sounds like you are mixing concerns too much. My first suggestion would be to re-evaluate your method names and object structure. Ambiguous names like test_if_thing1_or_thing2 and from_or_to (it should just be one thing) will make it very hard for others, and your future self, to understand the code laster.
However, without diverging into a debate on separation of concerns, you can change the methods you call by using public_send (or the private aware send). So you can do
order.public_send(:replies).create!
order.public_send(:enquiries).create!
string to method does exist, it's called eval
so, you could do
method_name = "name"
eval(method_name) #calls the name method
I have a list of games. Each one has an embedded list of scores. I'd like to keep a reference to the best score outside of the scores list.
class Game
include Mongoid::Document
field :best_score_id, type: Moped::BSON::ObjectId
...
embeds_many :scores
class Score
include Mongoid::Document
field :user, type: String
field :score, type: Int
I tried doing an belongs_to and a has_one but got an error message: "Referencing a Score document from the Game document via a relational association is not allowed since the price history is embedded." I suppose I can store the relevant bits of the Score in a hash called "best_score" but it makes more sense to me to embed many scores and then reference one of them as "Best". Is this possible?
You could do something like this -
Write a method to pick the best score in the game model class -
def best_score
score = scores.order_by(:score, :desc).limit(1)
if score.nil?
nil
else
score.first
end
end
And since scores are embedded in the game, there won't be any +1 query to the database also.