asp.net mvc2 validations - validation

I am using DataAnnotations for validation (including client side)
I have a form with multiple fields. Basic validation for individual fields work fine. Now there are a couple of fields of which atleast one needs to have a value (if there are 3 fields then either 1st or 2nd or 3rd field should have a value).
I have read quite a few posts on this site and couple of blog entries. But I couldn't find a solution that works in the above mentioned scenario. I might have missed something or doing it incorrectly.
Can you help with this please?

try this
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = true)]
public sealed class EitherOr : ValidationAttribute
{
private const string _defaultErrorMessage = "'{0}' OR '{1}' OR '{2}' must have a value";
private readonly object _typeId = new object();
public EitherOr(string prop1, string prop2, string prop3)
: base(_defaultErrorMessage)
{
Prop1 = prop1;
Prop2 = prop2;
Prop3 = prop3;
}
public string Prop1 { get; private set; }
public string Prop2 { get; private set; }
public string Prop3 { get; private set; }
public override object TypeId
{
get
{
return _typeId;
}
}
public override string FormatErrorMessage(string name)
{
return String.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture, ErrorMessageString, Prop1, Prop2,Prop3);
}
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(Prop1)&&string.IsNullOrEmpty(Prop2) && string.IsNullOrEmpty(Prop3))
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
then mark your class with the EitherOr attribute:
[EitherOr("Bar","Stool","Hood", ErrorMessage = "please supply one of the properties")]
public class Foo
{
public string Bar{ get; set;}
public string Stool{ get; set;}
public string Hood{ get; set;}
}
Please note that i made use of string properties, if your property is of other type, makle sure to change the IsValid(object value) validation

Related

Url syntax with List property on complex type

Model:
[DataContract]
public class Employee
{
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
[DataMember(Name ="id")]
public int Id{ get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "fullName")]
public string FullName { get; set; }
}
[DataContract]
public class Department
{
public Department()
{
this.Employees = new List<Employee>();
}
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
[DataMember(Name = "id")]
public int Id { get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "name")]
public string Name { get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "employees")]
public List<Employee> Employees { get; set; }
}
Controller
public HttpResponseMessage Get([FromUri]Department model)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
}
return new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.OK);
}
Url : "http://localhost:2070/home/get/?id=1&name=IT&Employees=1,John"
I am trying to invoke above URL and the Model does not read the Employees. Other property like int,double,string,decimal are read by the Model.
Can anyone help me on what is the correct format in passing List thru Url.
Also, I dont want to decorate each of my class with modelbinders nor the parameter in my controller.
Tech : WebApi, .Net3.5
You need to specify the index of the list and property to bind with when using FromUri and list/array
Try it this way
http://localhost:2070/home/get/?id=1&name=IT&Employees[0].Id=1&Employees[0].Name=John

Fluent validation rule uppers without corresponding rule

I have strange issue. ModelState has error. But I don`t have a rule for it. No filters, no rules in validator file.
My code. ViewModel:
[Validator(typeof(TestValidation))]
public class PayerPayRateViewModel
{
public int TestId { get; set; }
public bool AllServices { get; set; }
public int ParentEntityId { get; set; }
}
Validator
public class TestValidation : BaseEntityRepositoryValidator<Core.Domain.Model.Entities.Payer, PayerPayRateViewModel>
{
public TestValidation()
{
RuleFor(x => x.ParentEntityId).Must(CheckUniqueService);
}
protected bool CheckUniqueService(PayerPayRateViewModel model, int value)
{
if (model.AllServices)
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
And if I have TestId with value 0 I get "TestId: Field is required".
When I remove validation attribute from Viewmodel class I get "A value is required." error.
Why it happens?
Because you are attempting to bind an empty string to a non-nullable type. If you want this to happen use nullable types:
[Validator(typeof(TestValidation))]
public class PayerPayRateViewModel
{
public int? TestId { get; set; }
public bool AllServices { get; set; }
public int ParentEntityId { get; set; }
}
By default there's an implicit Required attribute applied to all non-nullable types (think integers, datetimes, decimals, ...).
By the way you could disable this default behavior:
DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider
.AddImplicitRequiredAttributeForValueTypes = false;

How to keep the value of the source when using InjectFrom

By injecting values ​​into my domain object, I would keep the values ​​of some properties.
Example:
Domain model
public class Person
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public DateTime CreateAt { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public IList<string> Tags { get; set; }
}
View Model
public class PersonViewMode
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public DateTime CreateAt { get; set; }
public string Notes { get; set; }
public IList<string> Tags { get; set; }
public PersonViewMode() { ID = Guid.NewGuid(); } //You should use this value when it is the Target
}
Sample
var p = new Person
{
ID = Guid.NewGuid() //Should be ignored!
,
Name = "Riderman"
,
CreateAt = DateTime.Now
,
Notes = "teste de nota"
,
Tags = new[] {"Tag1", "Tag2", "Tag3"}
};
var pvm = new PersonViewMode();
pvm.InjectFrom(p); //Should use the ID value generated in the class constructor PersonViewMode
if you delete the set; from from the ViewModel's ID then it won't be set;
otherwise you could save the value of ID in a separate variable and put it back after injecting,
or you can create a custom valueinjection that would ignore "ID" or would receive a list of properties to ignore as a parameter
here's the example for a custom injection that receives a list of property names to ignore:
public class MyInj : ConventionInjection
{
private readonly string[] ignores = new string[] { };
public MyInj(params string[] ignores)
{
this.ignores = ignores;
}
protected override bool Match(ConventionInfo c)
{
if (ignores.Contains(c.SourceProp.Name)) return false;
return c.SourceProp.Name == c.TargetProp.Name && c.SourceProp.Type == c.TargetProp.Type;
}
}
and use it like this:
pvm.InjectFrom(new MyInj("ID"), p);
if you need to ignore more, you can do like this:
pvm.InjectFrom(new MyInj("ID","Prop2","Prop3"), p);

How to exclude a field from #Html.EditForModel() but have it show using Html.DisplayForModel()

I am reading up on ASP.NET MVC and all of it's fun uses and I just found out about DataTemplates.
In my hurry to test this thing out, I converted one of my simpler models over to using #Html.DisplayForModel() and #Html.EditForModel() and it worked like a lucky charm that it is :)
One thing that I immediately found out though was that I could not easily define a field to show up on display views but not be present at all for editing...
You can make use of IMetadataAware interface an create attribute which will set ShowForEdit and ShowForDislay in Metadata:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)]
public class TemplatesVisibilityAttribute : Attribute, IMetadataAware
{
public bool ShowForDisplay { get; set; }
public bool ShowForEdit { get; set; }
public TemplatesVisibilityAttribut()
{
this.ShowForDisplay = true;
this.ShowForEdit = true;
}
public void OnMetadataCreated(ModelMetadata metadata)
{
if (metadata == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("metadata");
}
metadata.ShowForDisplay = this.ShowForDisplay;
metadata.ShowForEdit = this.ShowForEdit;
}
}
Then you can attach it to your property like this:
public class TemplateViewModel
{
[TemplatesVisibility(ShowForEdit = false)]
public string ShowForDisplayProperty { get; set; }
public string ShowAlwaysProperty { get; set; }
}
And this is all you need.
You could write a custom metadata provider and set the ShowForEdit metadata property. So start with a custom attribute:
public class ShowForEditAttribute : Attribute
{
public ShowForEditAttribute(bool show)
{
Show = show;
}
public bool Show { get; private set; }
}
then a custom model metadata provider:
public class MyModelMetadataProvider : DataAnnotationsModelMetadataProvider
{
protected override ModelMetadata CreateMetadata(
IEnumerable<Attribute> attributes,
Type containerType,
Func<object> modelAccessor,
Type modelType,
string propertyName
)
{
var metadata = base.CreateMetadata(attributes, containerType, modelAccessor, modelType, propertyName);
var sfea = attributes.OfType<ShowForEditAttribute>().FirstOrDefault();
if (sfea != null)
{
metadata.ShowForEdit = sfea.Show;
}
return metadata;
}
}
then register this provider in Application_Start:
ModelMetadataProviders.Current = new MyModelMetadataProvider();
and finally decorate:
public class MyViewModel
{
[ShowForEdit(false)]
public string Prop1 { get; set; }
public string Prop2 { get; set; }
}
Now if in your view you have:
#model MyViewModel
<h2>Editor</h2>
#Html.EditorForModel()
<h2>Display</h2>
#Html.DisplayForModel()
the Prop1 property won't be included in the editor template.
Remark: you could do the same with the ShowForDisplay metadata property.
Can you display each of the fields you want using Html.DisplayTextbox or one of the other options? That way you can also customize the appearance and labels referring to the field.

Validation Attributes MVC 2 - checking one of two values

Could someone help me with this issue. I'm trying to figure out how to check two values on a form, one of the two items has to be filled in. How do I do a check to ensure one or both of the items have been entered?
I'm using viewmodels in ASP.NET MVC 2.
Here's a little snip of code:
The view:
Email: <%=Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Email)%>
Telephone: <%=Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.TelephoneNumber)%>
The viewmodel:
[Email(ErrorMessage = "Please Enter a Valid Email Address")]
public string Email { get; set; }
[DisplayName("Telephone Number")]
public string TelephoneNumber { get; set; }
I want either of these details to be provided.
Thanks for any pointers.
You can probably do this in much the same way as the PropertiesMustMatch attribute that comes as part of the File->New->ASP.NET MVC 2 Web Application.
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = true)]
public sealed class EitherOrAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
private const string _defaultErrorMessage = "Either '{0}' or '{1}' must have a value.";
private readonly object _typeId = new object();
public EitherOrAttribute(string primaryProperty, string secondaryProperty)
: base(_defaultErrorMessage)
{
PrimaryProperty = primaryProperty;
SecondaryProperty = secondaryProperty;
}
public string PrimaryProperty { get; private set; }
public string SecondaryProperty { get; private set; }
public override object TypeId
{
get
{
return _typeId;
}
}
public override string FormatErrorMessage(string name)
{
return String.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture, ErrorMessageString,
PrimaryProperty, SecondaryProperty);
}
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
PropertyDescriptorCollection properties = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(value);
object primaryValue = properties.Find(PrimaryProperty, true /* ignoreCase */).GetValue(value);
object secondaryValue = properties.Find(SecondaryProperty, true /* ignoreCase */).GetValue(value);
return primaryValue != null || secondaryValue != null;
}
}
The key part of this function is the IsValid function that determines if one of the two parameters has a value.
Unlike normal Property-based attributes, this is applied to the class level and can be used like so:
[EitherOr("Email", "TelephoneNumber")]
public class ExampleViewModel
{
[Email(ErrorMessage = "Please Enter a Valid Email Address")]
public string Email { get; set; }
[DisplayName("Telephone Number")]
public string TelephoneNumber { get; set; }
}
You should be able to add as many as these as you need per form, but if you want to force them to enter a value into one of more than two boxes (Email, Telephone or Fax for example), then you would probably be best changing the input to be more an array of values and parse it that way.

Resources