Update Apex Tabular form with PLSQL - oracle

How can I update an Apex Tabular Form with pl/sql instead of using a multi-row update(MRU), is it even possible?
Thanks in advance.

Yes, it is possible. You can delete (or disable) the standard processes such as ApplyMRU, and replace them with your own PL/SQL processes to handle the tabular form arrays something like this:
for i in 1..apex_application.g_f02.count loop
update dept
set dname = apex_application.g_f03(i)
where deptno = apex_application.g_f02(i);
end loop;
However, it isn't simple and there is a fair bit you need to know to get this right, such as:
How the tabular form columns map to arrays like apex_application.g_f03 (view the page source and look for the names of the controls, e.g. "f03_0001").
How some item types like checkboxes a work differently to others
How to perform optimistic locking to prevent lost updates
There used to be a "how to" document on apex.oracle.com that described this in detail, but I haven't been able to locate it recently.

Related

Oracle Apex Apex_application.G_fNN processing not pulling all the values

I'm very much new to oracle apex and have been constantly failing on creating tabular form for inserting data into my table. My scenario is as follows.
i have two tables
1. tasks(task_id, task_Name)
2. Efforts (Eff_id,Task_id,Hours_spent,NOtes).
I want to create a tabular form to insert data into Efforts table with the tasks that I've in Tasks table. I created the tabular form with the query below.
SELECT APEX_ITEM.CHECKBOX(1,TASK_ID) "TASK_ID",
TASK_NAME,
APEX_ITEM.TEXT(2,'')"HOURS_SPENT",
APEX_ITEM.TEXT(3,'')"NOTES"
FROM TASKS;
but when I create the "after Submit" process to read the values of this report and tried to insert into my table effortS with the following code, something strange is happening. When i select the checkbox of row-1,2 and 3 then only row 1 is getting inserted into my efforts table but for the rest, only task id values are getting inserted not the whole row. I was missing "hours_spent and NOtes". in my efforts table for rows-2 and 3..here is my plsql block
BEGIN
FOR i in APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT LOOP
INSERT INTO EFFORTS(EFF_ID,TASK_ID,HOURS_SPENT,NOTES)
VALUES (SEQ_EFFORTS.NEXTVAL,APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01(i),APEX_APPLICATION.G_F02(i),APEX_APPLICATION.G_F03(i))
END LOOP;
commit;
END;
Can Someone help me! if there's another way of doing my requirement, then I'm more than happy to do it..
Welcome to the APEX community.
This is a classic problem, due to the nature of HTML
Get the values of the selected rows with checked checkbox
Note, the usage of tabular forms is also waning in favour of Interactive Grids.

PL/SQL: ORA 01422 fetch returns more than requested number of rows

I am developing an order transaction where a user can order a product. Once they clicked the 'add to cart' button, it will be able to save on the database in how many times they want with the same order id. Order id is like a transaction id.
My problem is that whenever I want to display the items that customer ordered, it displays an error or ORA 01422. How can I resolve this error?
Here is my code
DECLARE
order_item_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
order_item_id := :MOTOR_PRODUCTS_ORDER.M_ORDERID;
SELECT MOTOR_ID,
MOTOR_QTY_PURCHASED,
UNITPRICE
INTO :MOTOR_ORDER_ITEMS.MOTOR_ID,
:MOTOR_ORDER_ITEMS.MOTOR_QTY_PURCHASED,
:MOTOR_ORDER_ITEMS.UNITPRICE
FROM MOTOR_ORDERS
WHERE motor_order_id = order_item_id;
END;
As krokodilo says, this error is caused because your query returns multiple rows. Depending on what you want to do, you have a couple of options.
If you want multiple values then either use a loop and process them one row at a time (if you are going to be performing a dml operation use bulk collect). If you only want a single row then narrow your result set down with an extra where clause, or use MAX to ensure you only get one value back.
If there is more than one row which will be returned from a query you'll need to use a cursor. One way to do this is with a cursor FOR loop:
DECLARE
order_item_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
order_item_id := :MOTOR_PRODUCTS_ORDER.M_ORDERID;
FOR aRow IN (SELECT MOTOR_ID, MOTOR_QTY_PURCHASED, UNITPRICE
FROM MOTOR_ORDERS
WHERE motor_order_id = order_item_id)
LOOP
-- Do something here with the values in 'aRow'. For example, you
-- might print them out:
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('MOTOR_ID=' || aRow.MOTOR_ID ||
' MOTOR_QTY_PURCHASED=' || aRow.MOTOR_QTY_PURCHASED ||
' UNITPRICE=' || aRow.UNITPRICE);
END LOOP;
END;
Best of luck.
This looks like a Forms question; is it? If so, my suggestion is to let Forms do that job for you.
According to what you posted, there are two blocks:
MOTOR_PRODUCTS_ORDER (a master block, form type)
MOTOR_ORDER_ITEMS (a detail block, tabular type)
I guess that there is a master-detail relationship between them. If there's none, I'd suggest you to create it. Although you can make it work without such a relationship, it'll be much more difficult. If you are unsure of how to do it, start from scratch:
delete MOTOR_ORDER_ITEMS block (detail)
create it once again, this time by following the Data Block Wizard
Set MOTOR_PRODUCTS_ORDER to be its master block
Relationship is on ORDER_ID column/item
Let's presume that by this point everything is set up. Retrieving items that belong to that ORDER_ID is now very simple:
navigate to master block
enter query mode
enter value into an item that represents ORDER_ID
execute query
End of story. Forms triggers & procedures (which were created by the Wizard) will do its job and retrieve both master and detail records.
No need for additional coding; if you're skilled developer, you can create such a form in a matter of minutes. Won't be beautiful, but will be effective & reliable.
There's really no use in doing it manually, although it is possible. Your code works if there's a single item for that ORDER_ID. For two or more items, as you already know, it'll fail with TOO-MANY-ROWS error.
Basically, if you insist, you should use a loop:
you'd enter ORDER_ID into the master block
as you need to move through the detail block, i.e. use NEXT_RECORD, which is a restricted procedure, you can't use number of triggers (open Forms Online Help System and read about them) so a "Show items" button (with its WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED trigger) might be just fine
a cursor FOR loop would be your choice
for every row it fetches, you'd populate block items and
navigate to next record (otherwise, you'd keep overwriting existing values in the 1st tabular block row)
As I said: possible, but not recommended.

Using PL/SQL block with an interactive grid (Oracle Apex)

How can I use a plsql code block like this with an Interactive Grid (Using Oracle Apex) :
begin
Query A;
exception when no_data_found then
Query B;
end;
Actually sometimes 'Query A' returns nothing and I want to run 'Query B'. any solution?
An interactive grid has to use a sql-query as source.
a. Write one query and use sql-query as source:
SELECT * FROM A
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM B WHERE COUNT(SELECT * FROM A) = 0;
b. Write some function which does the work
Read this:
How to return a resultset / cursor from a Oracle PL/SQL anonymous block that executes Dynamic SQL?
But it sounds a little bit strange, that you got one grid for two datasources. This will bring up some problems when manipulating the data.
Open questions
Do you want to modify the data?
Do you want to insert new rows?
Does the user understand what's going on and what he is seeing?
Since there is no apparent way to NOT use an SQL query as the Interactive Grid source, you could maybe (depending on your specific solution) think differently and create an Interactive Grid region for each query. Then you could show one or another when the page loads, using a region server-side condition or even a Dynamic Action.
To expand on other answers with a little specificity, since this is about managing results of 2 different queries, you can put the 2 different queries in 2 different Grid regions. Then on the first region add a Server-side Condition of "Rows returned" and copy the SQL Query into the query input provided. On the 2nd region, you would set "No Rows returned" condition and again copy Query 1 into the SQL input provided.

When using Toad to create a view in Oracle, how can I store the formatted script also?

This question may be Toad specific. I have no idea how Oracle stores views, so I'll explain what happens when I use Toad. If I get an answer that is Oracle specific, so much the better.
I have created a rather complex view. To make it clearer, I have formatted the code nicely, and entered some comments where needed. When I need to make changes to the view, I use Toad's "describe objects" window, where I can find a script to recreate the view. The only problem is that all my formatting is gone. Comments before the select keyword (but after "create view xxx as") will also disappear.
If I enter this script to create a view:
create or replace view TestViewFormatting as
-- Here I have a long comment explaining the role of the
-- view and certain things to be aware of if changing it.
-- Unfortunately this comment will disappear...
select
name, --This comment will be kept
accountnumber --This also
from
debtable
where
name like 'S%';
Toad will display this when I describe it later:
DROP VIEW XXX.TESTVIEWFORMATTING;
/* Formatted on 04.07.2012 09:35:45 (QP5 v5.185.11230.41888) */
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW XXX.TESTVIEWFORMATTING
(
NAME,
ACCOUNTNUMBER
)
AS
select name, --This comment will be kept
accountnumber --This also
from debtable
where name like 'S%';
Note that the first comment has disappeared, and that the format is totally different.
I suspect that Oracle doesn't store the code of the view, just some parsed version, and when Toad brings up the script, it reverses this parsed version and generates a script on the fly.
What will I have to do to make Toad/Oracle keep the original formatting?
(PS: I know I can change the settings for Toad's code formatter, but this is not what I want to do. Due to some questionable choices in my past, this particular view has several levels of inline views, and I need a very specific formatting to make it clear what happens)
select text from user_views
where view_name = 'YOUR_VIEW_NAME';
I've tested with:
create view z_v_test as
select
-- te
--st
* from
dual;
and it keeps even the blank line.
Another way is to use DBMS_METADATA:
select dbms_metadata.get_ddl('VIEW', 'YOUR_VIEW_NAME', user) from dual
This works not only for views, but also for (nearly) all kind of database objects (tables, triggers, functions, ...).

Oracle Apex - Updating a view with instead-of trigger

Apex beginner here. I have a view in my Oracle database of the form:
create or replace view vw_awkward_view as
select unique tab1.some_column1,
tab2.some_column1,
tab2.some_column2,
tab2.some_column3
from table_1 tab1,
table_2 tab2
WHERE ....
I need the 'unique' clause on 'tab1.some_column1' because it has many entries in its underlying table. I also need to include 'tab1.some_column1' in my view because the rest of the data doesn't make much sense without it.
In Apex, I want to create a report on this view with a form for editing it (update only). I do NOT need to edit tab1.some_column1. Only the other columns in the view need to be editable. I can normally achieve this using an 'instead-of' trigger, but this doesn't look possible when the view contains a 'distinct', 'unique' or 'group by' clause.
If I try to update a row on this view I get the following error:
ORA-02014: cannot select FOR UPDATE from view with DISTINCT, GROUP BY, etc.
How can I avoid this error? I want my 'instead-of' trigger to kick in and perform the update and I don't need to edit the column which has the 'unique' clause, so I think it should be possible to do this.
I think that you should be able to remove the "unique".
if tab2.some_column1, tab2.some_column2, tab2.some_column3 are not unique, then how do you want to update them ?
if they are unique then the whole result: tab1.some_column1, tab2.some_column1, tab2.some_column2, tab2.some_column3 is unique.
When you state in a sql query "unique" or "distinct" it's for all columns not only 'tab1.some_column1'
Hope i'm in the correct direction of your question here ;)
Your query could be achieved by doing something like:
select a.some_column1, tab2.some_column1, tab2.some_column2, tab2.some_column3
from table_2 tab2
join (select distinct some_column1 from table_1) a
on tab2.column_in_tab1 = a.some_column1
The reason you get the ORA-02014 error is because of the automatically generated ApplyMRU process. This process will attempt to lock a (the) changed row(s):
begin
for r in (select ...
from vw_awkward_view
where <your first defined PK column>= 'value for PK1'
for update nowait)
loop
null;
end loop;
end;
That's a bummer, and means you won't be able to use the generated process. You'll have to write your own process which does the updating.
For this, you'll have to use the F## arrays in apex_application.
If this sounds totally unfamiliar, take a look at:
Custom submit process, and on using the apex_application arrays.
Also, here is a how-to for apex from 2004 from Oracle itself. It still uses lots of htmldb references, but the gist of it is there.
(it might be a good idea to use the apex_item interface to build up your form, and have control over what is generated and what array it takes.)
What it comes down to is: loop over the array containing your items and do an UPDATE on your view with the submitted values.
Of course, you don't have locking this way, nor a way to prevent unnecessary updates.
Locking you can do yourself, with for example using the select for update method. You'd have to lock the correct rows in the table(s) you want to alter, before you update them. If the locking fails, then your process should fail.
As for the 'lost update' story: here you'd need to check the MD5-checksums. A checksum is generated from the editable columns in your form and put in the html-code. On submit, this checksum is then compared to a newly generated checksum from those same columns, but with values from the database at that time of submit. If the checksums differ, it means the record has changed between the page load and the page submit. Your process should fail because the record has been altered, and you don't want to have those overwritten. (if you go the apex_item way, then don't forget to include an MD5_CHECKSUM call (or MD5_HIDDEN).
Important note though: checksums generated by either using apex_item or simply the standard form functionality build up a string to be hashed. As you can see in apex_item.md5_hidden, checksums are generated using DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT.MD5.
You can get the checksum of the values in the DB in 2 ways: wwv_flow_item.md5 or using dbms_obfuscation.
However, what the documentation fails to mention is this: OTN Apex discussion on MD5 checksums. Pipes are added in the generated checksums! Don't forget this, or it'll blow up in your face and you'll be left wondering for days what the hell is wrong with it.
Example:
select utl_raw.cast_to_raw(dbms_obfuscation_toolkit.md5(input_string=>
"COLUMN1" ||'|'||
"COLUMN2" ||'|'||
"COLUMN5" ||'|'||
"COLUMN7" ||'|'||
"COLUMN10" ||'|'||
"COLUMN12" ||'|'||
"COLUMN14" ||
'|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||'
)) md5
from some_table
To get the checksum of a row of the some_table table, where columns 1,2,5,7,10,12,14 are editable!
In the end, this is how it should be structured:
loop over array
generate a checksum for the current value of the editable columns
from the database
compare this checksum with the submitted checksum
(apex_application.g_fcs if generated) if the checksums match,
proceed with update. If not, fail process here.
lock the correct records for updating. Specify nowait, and it
locking fails, fail the process
update your view with the submitted values. Your instead-of trigger
will fire. Be sure you use correct values for your update statement so that only this one record will be updated
Don't commit inbetween. It's either all or nothing.
I almost feel like i went overboard, and it might feel like it is all a bit much, but when you know the pitfalls it's actually not so hard to pull this custom process off! It was very knowledgable for me to play with it :p
The answer by Tom is a correct way of dealing with ths issue but I think overkill for your requirements if I understand correctly.
The easiest way may be to create a form on the table you want to edit. Then have the report edit link take the user to this form which will only update the needed columns from the one table. If you need the value of the column from the other table displayed it is simple when you create the link to pass this value to the form which can contain a display only item to show this.

Resources