In a specific partial view, I consistently get a message in the breakpoints I set:
"The breakpoint will not currently be hit. No symbols have been loaded for this document."
Is there any reason for this to happen? What may I have done?
I restarted Visual Studio and I even restarted my computer, but it didn't work.
What do I have to do to debug this page?
Thanks!
Edit
I edit the partial view file with which I am having problems, but the changes do NOT take effect. So, somehow, that bastard compiler is getting the file from somewhere else. Where?!
I had the same situation after modifying a view that used to debug ok. I reverted my changes and debugging resumed working. I found I had a syntax error on a line. There was no clue it was wrong - there was no red underlining and the project compiled fine.
If you have the problem in your view, I suggest commenting most of the code to a minimal skeleton. If debug works again, uncomment some of your lines back in until you find the problem code. Good luck with that.
There are several possible reasons for that:
The version of the source file is not the one you compiled. Try to recompile.
The DLL containing the code is not loaded in the program at runtime. Use the program in a way that the DLL will be needed if you have dynamic loading of DLL.
You are visualizing a source file which is not in the right directory (another copy of the solution somewhere else on the hard disk). Open the right source file.
You didn't compile the program in debug mode. Recompile it in debug mode.
You didn't launch the program in debug mode. Launch it in debug mode.
This is happening to me too...it's a real pain in the arse. The reason is because your PDB files are missing from C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root[random][random]\assembly\dl3[random][guid]
I have about 30 DLL files that get built with my project, I have to go into each one of those stupid temp directories and copy the PDB file for each DLL from my VS build bin. I've posted questions on here about it too but haven't gotten any help. For a quick fix, you can try to copy your matching pdb files over but I'm telling you it's gonna get old real fast.
Someone else in my office has fixed the problem by using the "Publish" feature in Visual Studio and publishing their site straight into a web directory but I haven't had any time to mess with that yet. Someone else has told me that it's a x64 bug in Visual Studio but I find that hard to believe considering how crippling it is.
The way I resolved it is by going to the properties(F4) of the file and set the value of Build Action to Compile.
Related
In a team project I'm working on, setting a breakpoint in a file (say IdeasController.cs) will lead to erratic debugger behaviour if there's another file with the same name in the solution. I've reproduced the problem on several developers' workstations.
Example
I set a breakpoint in IdeasController.cs in our Web API:
Another file called IdeasController.cs exists in our separate MVC 4 web project. In the screenshot below, the debugger shows the Api->IdeasController source code, but the line highlight matches the code structure of Web->IdeasController. The breakpoint is duplicated, with one of them in the middle of a comment block.
The Breakpoint window shows the breakpoint in both files simultaneously:
On some workstations the debugger steps through the correct lines (regardless of the line highlight); on others it cheerfully steps through irrelevant lines (including comments and whitespace). I'm guessing this depends on which source file it chooses to display.
What I've tried
I've trawled the Internet. This kind of problem seems to occur when there's a mismatch between the debug file (*.pdb), the source file, and the compiled code. There are a lot of possible causes: duplicate file names (which can confuse the debugger[5]), outdated project build files, invalid solution cache, or incorrect build configuration.
These are the solutions I've found and tried:
Checked my build configuration.
Made sure the project isn't built in release mode.
Made sure we don't have code optimization enabled.
Made sure the project's debug module was loaded correctly. (Started debugging the project and checked Debug > Windows > Modules. Both assemblies are listed, not optimized, and have a symbol status of "Symbols loaded".)
Reset the debugging metadata & Visual Studio cache.
Closed Visual Studio and deleted the solution cache file (*.suo).[1]
Deleted each project's build output (the bin and obj folders). (For future reference: open the solution folder in Windows Explorer and type this in the search box: "type:folder AND (name:=bin OR name:=obj)".
Deleted the assembly cache folder (C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Local Settings\Application Data\dl3).[2][3]
None of these had any effect. I can rename one of the files (without renaming the class) to temporarily work around the problem, but that's far from ideal.
Where I am now
Page 14 of my latest Google search. Suggestions would be much appreciated. :)
If no better alternatives exist, you could put the breakpoint in code:
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break();
Just don't forget to remove it afterwards...
I'm so glad I found this post, thought I was the only one and was going insane! I'm having the same problem in VS2012 with VB.Net and have tried everything the OP mentioned.
Unique naming of the files seems to be the only 100% fix that I've found. Disabling all breakpoints until the application has loaded and then re-enabling the breakpoints you need works most of the time. Breakpoints in Lambda functions can still give you issues.
I just had the exact same problem. What solved it for me was deleting the .suo files belonging to the solution that contained the affected project/source file.
I also deleted my local symbolcache but I don't think that had anything to do with it.
(My solution contains multiple projects, one file (DataAdapter.cs) in one project was affected by this (VisualStudio put my breakpoints in the pdb belonging to System.Data.DataAdapter). I opened the .csproj file directly and was able to correctly set the breakpoint.)
I had the same problem today. I was able to trace it back to the fact that I had forgotten to set the platform target to x86 while debugging. Unfortunately the others (x64 / Any CPU) can be problematic while debugging. At least VS 2008 doesn't like them. I guess this is yet another reason to stay away.
Some speculation... I think the debugger (while running a 64 bit app) somehow "steals" breakpoints away from a file in certain cases. For me it was because another assembly was loaded first which had the same file name. I was able to avoid the issue, even in 64 bit mode, if I first manually loaded the assembly with my breakpoints: Assembly.Load("MyAssemblyWithBreakpoints");
Hope this (my first stackoverflow contribution) helps.
Although renaming one of the files will work, I found that the simplest solution is to temporarily disable automatic loading of symbols for the "other" assembly.
Start the debugger and continue until you hit the erroneous breakpoint.
Find where the debugger actually set the breakpoint using the Call Stack window:
Right-click on the row with the yellow arrow and enable Show Module Names. (The row should also have the red breakpoint symbol on it.)
The assembly name is now visible on that row.
Find that assembly in the Modules window (Debug > Windows > Modules).
Right-click on the assembly and disable Always Load Automatically.
Stop the debugger.
Start debugging again.
By doing this, you're preventing the Visual Studio debugger from mapping the breakpoint to the wrong assembly. It will then load the symbols from the other [presumably] correct assembly first, therefore mapping the breakpoint to the correct assembly.
Why does this happen?
This seems to occur when two different symbol files (PDB files) — for two different assemblies — both reference a source file with the same name. Although the source files are completely different, the Visual Studio debuggger seems to get confused.
For example, imagine there are two different files both with the name IdeasController.cs. The first one compiles into assembly Api.dll, and the second one compiles into assembly Web.dll.
When the debugger loads symbols, it will either load Api.pdb or Web.pdb first. Let's say it loads Api.pdb first. Then even if you set a breakpoint in Web\IdeasController.cs, it will find a match for IdeasController.cs in Api.pdb. It then maps code from Web\IdeasController.cs to Api.dll. This won't map correctly, of course, and so you see all sorts of odd issues while debugging.
I just had this issue on Visual Studio 2017 (Version 15.9.7), were break points were skipped and the debugger just "jumped" over return statements etc.
After a while I noticed, that I've recently added a .runsettings file to the project - and it turned out, that in my case configuring the CodeCoverage data collector is causing this problem.
As soon as I removed this section:
<DataCollector friendlyName="Code Coverage" uri="datacollector://Microsoft/CodeCoverage/2.0" assemblyQualifiedName="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Coverage.DynamicCoverageDataCollector, Microsoft.VisualStudio.TraceCollector, Version=11.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"> ... </DataCollector>
from the .runsettings file, it worked like a charm again.
I just backed up and deleted the file and then added back to the project, that solved the problem. I just whish i did it before going through the beforementioned list :)
You may also try to Clean and Rebuild (not Build) all projects.
I was hitting this issue in Visual Studio 2015.
I had a sub-folder with a DLL I wanted to save as Version1. It seems even after removing the reference to that DLL, and then adding a reference to another project studio pulled in the existing reference and went to the wrong source file. I removed that DLL in the sub-folder then Studio got the correct source.
I found a helpful link on [MSDN that shows how to clear prior associated source files in studio at this link][1].
Summary:
In the Solution Explorer, right click on the solution name (ex: Solution ‘TestApplication’) and select Properties This will bring up the Solution Property Pages dialog
Under Common Properties, select Debug Source Files
In the Search these paths for source code files (Visual Studio .NET 2003) / Directories containing source code (Visual Studio 2005) box, add, remove and/or reorder the directories as desired
Click the OK button
I was having the same issue. In my case both the projects had same port numbers. I was able to resolve it by changing the port number of the project whose file's breakpoints were not hitting.
My guess is that IIS Express was caching the pdb file from the second project since both files had the same name, and the projects had the same port number.
What worked for me (VS2017) was disabling this option in Tools --> Options... --> Debugging --> General: "Require sources files to exactly match the original version", which is enabled by default but I had it turned on.
That was not enough though, I also had to manually remove obj and bin folders for all projects in solution.
Delete all the .pdb files of the project where the break point is hitting wrongly. This will solve the issue.
It happened to me (in VS 2008) to have two child breakpoint with the same memory address and the same associated file.
Those breakpoints were spawned at a certain time during the running of the process.
I noticed that I had duplicated .dll files in my project folders, and resolved removing the duplicated .dll, while keeping only one .dll per name in the debugging folder structure. (As example in my case I had /bin/Example.dll and /bin/Plug-in/Example.dll both present under my debug folder structure).
I had a very similar problem. In my case the problem was a different target .net framework in one of the projects causing VS2017 to wrongly load a source file (with the same name) of another project, not the one being activated with
ObjectHandle handle = Activator.CreateInstance
Changing the project's target framework to be the same in all projects fixed it.
I had a similar issue with the breakpoint being set in another file with the same filename in a different project.
It was caused by the fact that the debugging was started for that other project, while it was not started for the project where I tried to set the breakpoint. The breakpoint creation worked correctly after doing the Debug > Start New Instance for the intended project.
my friend has made a really helpful class library which I use all the time. I usually use Reflector to see what his code does.
What I really wanted to do was to step through his code while I'm debugging. So he gave me his .pdb file.
Foo.dll (release configuration, compile)
Foo.pdb
Now, I'm not sure how I can get it to auto break into his code when it throws an exception (his code, at various points, thorws exceptions .. like A first chance exception of type 'System.Web.HttpException' occurred in Foo.dll ...
Can I do this? Do i need to setup something with the Symbol Server settings in Visual Studio ? Do i need to get the dll compiled into Debug Configuration and be passed the .dll and .pdb files? Or (and i'm really afraid of this one) .. do i need to have both the .dll, .pdb AND his source code ...
I also had a look at this previous SO question, but it sorta didn't help (but proof I've tried to search before asking a question).
Can someone help me please?
Yes you can, if your friend indexes those PDB's, so that the debugger knows where to find the appropriate source in a source-control system, and if your friend uploads those pdb's to a symbol-server, you can perfectly step through the code while debugging.
I have done this for some projects at work, and this works like a charm.
More info about setting up a symbol server:
Source server helps you kill bugs
Setting up a symbol server
Using symstore
The answer is in in the linked question, though perhaps it's not blindingly obvious, so I'll say it: yes, you need to have the source code in order to step through the source code. The PDB file only tells the debugger what line of what source file corresponds to a particular machine instruction.
You don't need to set up a "symbol server" or anything like that. Just get him to send you the source. When you load the PDB file Visual Studio will prompt for the location of the source files if they're not at the same path.
I guess you posted link to another question just to prove that you have searched because that question does have an answer to your question.
This may sound like a newbie question - and it is. I'm relatively new to vs, we started using it a few months ago, and I still haven't "mentally" made the change from the command line. So, if you could help me with 2 things:
I create a new project (not a solution). He puts the files in some directory. After putting my code inside it, I click on the little green triangle (Debug, it says), and he compiles it, builds it and runs it. It works ok. Now, sometimes, I have to change only a tiny bit of code and I don't feel like getting the whole VS up just for that. How can I do that Debug thing from the command line, with the assumption I didn't change anything else.
Where do I tell him not to create a "Debug" subdirectory, not to create a HTML Build log, an object file ... and so on, generally, where can I find the settings which will help me to get as little files ... apart from my original source, and the .exe resultant one ?
I have to change only a tiny bit of code and I don't feel like getting the whole VS up just for that. How can I do that Debug thing from the command line, with the assumption I didn't change anything else.
I think what you want here is not debugging but a rebuild of your project.
Where do I tell him not to create a "Debug" subdirectory, not to create a HTML Build log, an object file ... and so on, generally, where can I find the settings which will help me to get as little files ... apart from my original source, and the .exe resultant one ?
The answer to both these questions is to use the command line! You can make VS emit a make file from the loaded project. Use NMAKE to build this make file after you have made your desired modifications. The ".obj" files are created as an intermediate step between compilation and linking phase this is how the C++ compilation model works. Why do insist on not generating them?
You can't really start debugging without starting up Visual Studio, since Visual Studio is the debugger. You can tell VS to rebuild a solution from the command line without firing up the UI if you want to just build it: See MSDN for details.
You can control the creation of the DEBUG and RELEASE directories via the 'intermediate files' option in the project settings. Though you need to create the obj file somewhere in order for the compile to work.
Are there any VC++ settings I should know about to generate better PDB files that contain more information?
I have a crash dump analysis system in place based on the project crashrpt.
Also, my production build server has the source code installed on the D:\, but my development machine has the source code on the C:\. I entered the source path in the VC++ settings, but when looking through the call stack of a crash, it doesn't automatically jump to my source code. I believe if I had my dev machine's source code on the D:\ it would work.
"Are there any VC++ settings I should know about"
Make sure you turn off Frame pointer ommision. Larry osterman's blog has the historical details about fpo and the issues it causes with debugging.
Symbols are loaded successfully. It shows the callstack, but double clicking on an entry doesn't bring me to the source code.
What version of VS are you using? (Or are you using Windbg?) ... in VS it should defintely prompt for source the first time if it doesn't find the location. However it also keeps a list of source that was 'not found' so it doesn't ask you for it every time. Sometimes the don't look list is a pain ... to get the prompt back up you need to go to solution explorer/solution node/properties/debug properties and edit the file list in the lower pane.
Finally you might be using 'stripped symbols'. These are pdb files generated to provide debug info for walking the callstack past FPO, but with source locations stripped out (along with other data). The public symbols for windows OS components are stripped pdbs. For your own code these simply cause pain and are not worth it unless you are providing your pdbs to externals. How would you have one of these horrible stripped pdbs? You might have them if you use "binplace" with the -a command.
Good luck! A proper mini dump story is a godsend for production debugging.
If your build directly from your sourcecode management system, you should annotate your pdb files with the file origins. This allows you to automatically fetch the exact source files while debugging. (This is the same proces as used for retrieving the .Net framework sourcecode).
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163563.aspx for more information. If you use subversion as your SCM you can check out the SourceServerSharp project.
You could trying using the MS-DOS subst command to assign your source code directory to the D: drive.
This is the procedure I used after some trouble similar to yours:
a) Copied to the production server all the EXE & DLL files that were built, each with its corresponding PDB to the same directory, started the system, and waited for the crash to happen.
b) Copied back all the EXE, DLL & PDB files to the development machine (to a temporary folder) along with the minidump (in the same folder). Used Visual Studio to load the minidump from that folder.
Since VS found the source files where they were originally compiled, it was always able to identify them and load them correctly. As with you, in the production machine the drive used was not C:, but in the development machine it was.
Two more tips:
One thing I did often was to copy an EXE/DLL rebuilt and forget to copy the new PDB. This ruined the debug cycle, VS would not be able to show me the call stack.
Sometimes, I got a call stack that didn't make sense in VS. After some headache, I discovered that windbg would always show me the correct stack, but VS often wouldn't. Don't know why.
In case anyone is interested, a co-worker replied to this question to me via email:
Artem wrote:
There is a flag to MiniDumpWriteDump()
that can do better crash dumps that
will allow seeing full program state,
with all global variables, etc. As for
call stacks, I doubt they can be
better because of optimizations...
unless you turn (maybe some)
optimizations off.
Also, I think disabling inline
functions and whole program
optimization will help quite a lot.
In fact, there are many dump types,
maybe you could choose one small
enough but still having more info
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms680519(VS.85).aspx
Those types won't help with call stack
though, they only affect the amount of
variables you'll be able to see.
I noticed some of those dump types
aren't supported in dbghelp.dll
version 5.1 that we use. We could
update it to the newest, 6.9 version
though, I've just checked the EULA for
MS Debugging Tools -- the newest
dbghelp.dll is still ok to
redistribute.
Is Visual Studio prompting you for the path to the source file? If it isn't then it doesn't think it has symbols for the callstack. Setting the source path should work without having to map the exact original location.
You can tell if symbols are loaded by looking at the 'modules' window in Visual Studio.
Assuming you are building a PDB then I don't think there are any options that control the amount of information in the PDB directly. You can change the type of optimizations performed by the compiler to improve debuggabilty, but this will cost performance -- as your co-worker points out, disabling inline will help make things more obvious in the crash file, but will cost at runtime.
Depending on the nature of your application I would recommend working with full dump files if you can, they are bigger, but give you all the information about the process ... and how often does it crash anyway :)
Is Visual Studio prompting you for the
path to the source file?
No.
If it isn't then it doesn't think it has symbols
for the callstack. Setting the source
path should work without having to map
the exact original location.
Symbols are loaded successfully. It shows the callstack, but double clicking on an entry doesn't bring me to the source code. I can of course search in files for the line in question, but this is hard work :)
I have an executable (compiled by someone else) that is hitting an assertion near my code. I work on the code in Visual C++ 2003, but I don't have a project file for this particular executable (the code is used to build many different tools). Is it possible to launch the binary in Visual C++'s debugger and just tell it where the sources are? I've done this before in GDB, so I know it ought to be possible.
Without the PDB symbols for that application you're going to have a tough time making heads or tails of what is going on and where. I think any source code information is going to be only in that PDB file that was created when whoever built that application.
This is assuming that the PDB file was EVER created for this application - which is not the default configuration for release mode VC++ projects I think. Since you're asserting, I guessing this is a debug configuration?
Short of any other answers, I would try attaching to the executable process in Visual Studio, setting a break point in your code and when you step into the process you don't have source to, it should ask for a source file.
Yes, it's possible. Just set up an empty project and specify the desired .exe file as debug target. I don't remember exactly how, but I know it's doable, because I used to set winamp.exe as debug target when I developed plug-ins for Winamp.
Since you don't have the source file it will only show the assembly code, but that might still be useful as you can also inspect memory, registers, etc.
Update
If you are debugging an assertion in your own program you should be able to see the source just fine, since the path to the source file is stored in the executable when you compile it with debug information.