In C and many other languages, there is a continue keyword that, when used inside of a loop, jumps to the next iteration of the loop. Is there any equivalent of this continue keyword in Ruby?
Yes, it's called next.
for i in 0..5
if i < 2
next
end
puts "Value of local variable is #{i}"
end
This outputs the following:
Value of local variable is 2
Value of local variable is 3
Value of local variable is 4
Value of local variable is 5
=> 0..5
next
also, look at redo which redoes the current iteration.
Writing Ian Purton's answer in a slightly more idiomatic way:
(1..5).each do |x|
next if x < 2
puts x
end
Prints:
2
3
4
5
Inside for-loops and iterator methods like each and map the next keyword in ruby will have the effect of jumping to the next iteration of the loop (same as continue in C).
However what it actually does is just to return from the current block. So you can use it with any method that takes a block - even if it has nothing to do with iteration.
Ruby has two other loop/iteration control keywords: redo and retry.
Read more about them, and the difference between them, at Ruby QuickTips.
I think it is called next.
Use next, it will bypass that condition and rest of the code will work.
Below i have provided the Full script and out put
class TestBreak
puts " Enter the nmber"
no= gets.to_i
for i in 1..no
if(i==5)
next
else
puts i
end
end
end
obj=TestBreak.new()
Output:
Enter the nmber
10
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
Use may use next conditionally
before = 0
"0;1;2;3".split(";").each.with_index do |now, i|
next if i < 1
puts "before it was #{before}, now it is #{now}"
before = now
end
output:
before it was 0, now it is 1
before it was 1, now it is 2
before it was 2, now it is 3
Related
For example:
def recurse(value)
if value < 5
self.send(__method__, value + 1)
else
value
end
end
This works, but it's a bit ugly.
Basically I'm looking for a prettier way to call the currently executing method, without referring to it explicitly by name.
If there is a less-cryptic syntax for this, I would probably use it (to avoid the name duplication, reduce effort required for renaming a function, etc). If there isn't a nicer syntax for this, I'll just hard-code the name like normal.
It's a comment rather, as #sagarpandya82 mentioned, you can omit some redundant parts and use both variants. I would refactor it a bit:
def recurse(value)
return value unless value < 5 # return value if value >= 5
send(__method__, value + 1) # or just recurse(value + 1)
end
Non-recursion version with a block:
def non_recurse(value)
if value >= 5
yield value
else
(value..5).each do |i|
yield i
end
end
end
non_recurse(3) {|i| puts i}
#=> 3, 4, 5
non_recurse(6) {|i| puts i}
#=> 6
If you really want to use __method__, your method is correct and reasonably readable. To comply with usual Ruby guidelines, you could just remove returns and use 2 spaces as indent (as mentioned by #sagarpandya82 in the comments):
def recurse(value)
if value < 5
self.send(__method__, value + 1)
else
value
end
end
I don't see any reason to use self.send(__method__) here, so you could write :
def recurse(value)
if value < 5
recurse(value + 1)
else
value
end
end
Actually, I'd say that you don't need recursion at all. All your method does is to keep adding 1 to the value until it reaches 5. If the value is bigger than 5, it returns the value :
For integers:
def no_recurse(value)
[value, 5].max
end
no_recurse(4)
# 5
no_recurse(-3)
# 5
no_recurse(7)
# 7
no_recurse(-2**1000)
# 5
no_recurse(4.5)
# 5 # <- That's wrong
For floats, you'd just need to add the decimal part to 5. This will work for any number:
def no_recurse(value)
[value, 5 + value % 1].max
end
no_recurse(4.5)
# 5.5
no_recurse(5.5)
# 5.5
no_recurse(6)
# 6
no_recurse(-7)
# 5
I want to run some code after every iteration of each. Is there a way to do this without repeating the code? I tried this:
(1..10).each do |n|
continue = Proc.new {
puts "ended #{n}"
next
}
continue.call if n == 2
puts n
continue.call
end
but it didn't work.
In my actual code, I have lots of next calls. That's why it's unpractical to call a method every time I call next.
Approach 1
Define the contents of the loop in a method that you call from the loop. You can put an ensure block in the method. That way, your method can use return anywhere you want to move onto the next iteration, but you still guarantee you execute the ensure code:
def doit(x)
return if x == 2
puts "I like the number #{x}"
ensure
puts "LOOP"
end
[1,2,3,4].each{|x| doit(x)}
results in
I like the number 1
LOOP
LOOP
I like the number 3
LOOP
I like the number 4
LOOP
Approach 2
Similar to approach 1, but allows you reuse the "callback" code for different concerns. It also keeps you using next instead of return. This is to define a method that yields and then does other stuff:
def ensure_LOOP(x)
yield
puts "LOOP"
end
[1,2,3,4].each do |x|
ensure_LOOP(x) do
next if x == 2
puts "I really like the number #{x}"
end
end
Results in
I really like the number 1
LOOP
LOOP
I really like the number 3
LOOP
I really like the number 4
LOOP
And
[1,2,3,4].each do |x|
ensure_LOOP(x) do
next unless x == 2
puts "I don't like the number #{x}"
end
end
results in
LOOP
I don't like the number 2
LOOP
LOOP
LOOP
As I understand the question, you don't want anything executed after continue.call if n==2. If that's correct, you could use the control expression next with an argument.
def m(n)
puts "Only #{n} more days!"
end
(1..6).each do |n|
next m(n) if n==3
puts n
m(n)
end
1
Only 1 more days!
2
Only 2 more days!
Only 3 more days!
4
Only 4 more days!
5
Only 5 more days!
6
Only 6 more days!
Just call it within the each loop?
(1..10).each do |n|
puts n
puts "ended #{n}"
end
The code you provided actually does run, and outputs the following:
1
ended 1
ended 2
2
ended 2
3
ended 3
4
ended 4
5
ended 5
6
ended 6
7
ended 7
8
ended 8
9
ended 9
10
ended 10
As you can see, the Proc gets called twice for the number 2, as your if condition passes in that case and calls the Proc.
Stepping back, defining a method outside the context of the iteration is probably a better choice. It will make the code easier to read and avoid redefining the Proc each time the each block executes.
That said, technically what you have here seems to run okay.
I'm wondering if it's possible to use a Proc for skipping iteration in Ruby?
I wrote some piece of code
def validation i
pr = Proc.new do |i|
if i < 3
next
end
end
pr.call(i)
end
(1..5).each do |i|
validation i
puts "#{i} is bigger than 3"
end
and I expected something like this as result:
3 is bigger than 3
4 is bigger than 3
5 is bigger than 3
but instead I got:
1 is bigger than 3
2 is bigger than 3
3 is bigger than 3
4 is bigger than 3
5 is bigger than 3
So is it possible to use somehow next in Proc for skipping from outer iteration or there is some other way?
You can't call next in your validation method because the loop is external. What you can do is use next within your (1..5).each loop that's dependent on a call to validation. The following code produces your desired result.
Edit - The code has been refactored to make appropriate use of Proc.
pr = Proc.new {|i| i < 3}
(1..5).each do |i|
next if pr.call(i)
puts "#{i} is bigger than 3"
end
So my goal is to be able to run through a "while" loop and in each iteration create a new variable that includes the "iteration count" within that variables name and stores it for later use outside of the loop. See below for more details.
NOTE: The code is clearly wrong in so many ways but I'm writing it this way to make it more clear? as to what I am trying to accomplish. Thanks for any input on how this is possible.
count = "4"
while count > "0"
player"#{count}"_roll = rand(20)
puts 'Player "#{count}" rolled: "#{player"#{count}"_roll}"'
count -= 1
end
My goal is then to be able to access the variables that were created from within the loop at a later part of the program like so (more or less)
puts player4_roll
puts player3_roll
puts player2_roll
puts player1_roll
The key being that these variables were A) created in the loop B) With names relying on another variables input, and C) accessible outside the loop for later use.
Hopefully my question came out clear and any input will be greatly appreciated. I'm very new to programming and trying to get my head wrapped around some more complex ideas. I'm not sure if this is even possible to do in Ruby. Thanks!
I think the best way is to use arrays or hashes, with arrays its something like this:
count = 0
array = []
while count < 4 do
array[count] = rand(20)
puts "Player #{count} rolled: #{array[count]}"
count += 1
end
array.each do |var|
puts var
end
You store the result in the array and then you loop trough it. If you want the result of the second iteration of the loop you do something like this:
puts array[1]
If you want to use Hashes there are some modifications you need to do:
count = 0
hash = {}
while count < 4 do
hash["player#{count}_roll"] = rand(20)
puts "Player #{count} rolled: #{hash["player#{count}_roll"]}"
count += 1
end
hash.each do |key, var|
puts var
end
If you want the result of the second iteration of the loop you do something like this:
puts hash["player1_roll"]
You could set the variable using instance_variable_set and reference it that way
instance_variable_set("#player#{count}_roll", rand(20))
Is there a way to offset the value that has been passed in the code block.
For example
C# - This will always print 5
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
i=5
Console.WriteLine(i);
}
Ruby - This will print 5 for only 10 times.
10.times do |i|
i = 5
puts i
end
Is there a way to get |i| to get back to 5?
and another question. How can you make .times block skip(not increasing by 1 all the time)
No, you can't reset the counter of times, upto etc. from within the block.
You can use redo to restart the current iteration of the loop, which in this case will have a similar effect:
10.times do |i|
i = 5
puts i
redo
end
This will print 5 forever (though take note, that the initial value of i will still be 0 at each iteration).
If you need more control than this, you need to use a while loop. Though I'd advice that in most cases where you think you need this, you actually don't and you're just approaching your problem from the wrong angle.
You can use the 'next' keyword to skip iterations based on certain criteria if need be.
10.times do |i|
next if i < 5
puts i
end
Also you may use the keyword 'redo' as described by sepp2k.
This will print the value 5 ten times.
i=5
10.times{puts i}