UPDATED CODE at the bottom
I am creating a story voting app via Simply Rails 2 book. I am getting this error when I click the button to vote up a story:
No route matches "/stories/4-pure-css-icons-showcase"
My routing file looks like this:
Shovell::Application.routes.draw do
get "votes/create"
root :to => "stories#index"
resources :stories do
resources :votes
end
end
votes_controller.rb:
class VotesController < ApplicationController
def create
#story = Story.find(params[:story_id])
#story.votes.create
end
end
create.rsj :
page.replace_html 'vote_score', "Score: #{#story.votes.size}"
page[:vote_score].visual_effect :highlight
show.html.erb:
<h2>
<span id="vote_score">
Score: <%= #story.votes.size %>
</span>
<%= #story.name %>
</h2>
<p>
<%= link_to #story.link, #story.link %>
</p>
<div id="vote_form">
<%= form_tag :url => story_votes_path(#story), :remote => true do %>
<%= submit_tag 'shove it' %>
<% end %>
</div>
story.rb :
class Story < ActiveRecord::Base
validates_presence_of :name, :link
has_many :votes
def to_param
"#{id}-#{name.gsub(/\W/, '-').downcase}"
end
end
I've been working through a number of other errors before this having to do with deprecated code and so forth, so I feel somewhat lost at the moment. It seems like it should just be a routing a issue, but since I've been working through AJAX errors that also have to do with the vote function I wanted to post those files just in case it was more than routing.
It says no route matches "/stories/4-pure-css-icons-showcase" but when I visit "/stories" (my root) and click on the link to take me to "/stories/4-pure-css-icons-showcase" it works fine, however after clicking on the vote button I get this error. As you could probably tell after reading the code, it is suppose to update the vote count and do a :highlight via ajax.
UPDATE:
Changed code (all changes are per Sam's advice):
routes:
Shovell::Application.routes.draw do
resources :votes
root :to => "stories#index"
resources :stories do
resources :votes
end
show.html.erb:
<div id="vote_form">
<%= form_tag :url => new_story_vote_path(#story), :remote => true do %>
<%= submit_tag 'shove it' %>
<% end %>
</div>
votes_controller.rb
class VotesController < ApplicationController
def create
#story = Story.find(params[:story_id])
#story.votes.create
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.js
end
end
The problem is still exactly the same, but I think (read: hope) we are making progress!
The scenario: My index (/stories) page randomly displays a story from the database, when you click the link it takes you to the story's internal page (ex. /stories/2-sitepoint-forums) on this page it displays the number of votes the story has and has a button to vote for it. When you click the vote button it is suppose to use ajax to update the #story.vote.size and use a :highlight visual effect. However, the problem is that when you click the vote button the page changes to a "Routing Error" page which displays:
No route matches "/stories/2-sitepoint-forums"
Its weird to me because you can in fact be routed to that address and you are from the link on the first page...
Here is the error in the console:
Started POST "/stories/2-sitepoint-forums?url=%2Fstories%2F2-sitepoint-forums%2F
votes%2F2-sitepoint-forums&remote=true" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-11-08 16:30:17 -08
00
ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches "/stories/2-sitepoint-forums"):
Rendered C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.0.rc2/lib/action_dis
patch/middleware/templates/rescues/routing_error.erb within rescues/layout (1.0m
s)
Im not sure if this is any more telling, but I thought I'd add it incase.
New:
I have not been able to solve this problem as of yet. Because I still don't feel like I completely understand the issue I have decided to move over to the Ruby on Rails 3 Tutorial Book online and see if I can't figure it out while working through it. Since I was planning to do it next anyway (I have plans to combine both apps later) it appears now is the time.
<%= form_tag :url => new_story_vote_path(#story), :remote => true do %>
<%= submit_tag 'shove it' %>
<% end %>
That should send it to the create action.
def create
#story = Story.find(params[:story_id])
#story.votes.create
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.js
end
end
And that should take care of your ajax.
take this get "votes/create" out of your routes
and add this
map.resources :votes
I'm not familiar with using form_tag and :remote (as I normally just write jQuery for stuff like this) but a couple of things definitely pop out at me with what you're doing here that may help you resolve the issue.
First of all, I think you can rework the way you set up a vote and thus the way you set up the form for the vote. In the stories controller, for the show action, I'd set up the vote right away:
#vote = Vote.new(:story_id => #story.id)
This lets you set up your form as so:
= form_for(#vote), :remote => true do |f|
= hidden_field f.story_id
= submit_tag "Vote"
This is both a cleaner way of doing things, in my opinion, but also may fix the general issue you are dealing with, because you are now passing data with the form (the hidden field) in your POST request. Rails will behave unexpectedly if you perform AJAX POST requests that do not actually submit data.
In other words, your original form is likely running as an AJAX POST request but it would have worked better as an AJAX GET request, since it is not actually submitting data, it is simply "hitting" an URL.
I am not sure if you found the answer to your problem yet, but I wanted to post for others that may be looking for an answer similar to yours.
The code:
<%= form_tag :url => new_story_vote_path(#story), :remote => true do %>
<%= submit_tag 'shove it' %>
<% end %>
will result in /stories/:story_id/votes/new url with a :post request. It won't work because the new route is a :get method request. If you wanted to go to the new method, you'll need to tell the form to use the get http method.
<%= form_tag :url => new_story_vote_path(#story), :remote => true, :html => { :method => :get } do %>
<%= submit_tag 'shove it' %>
<% end %>
However, I think that you are wanting to route to the create method in your controller. I would do something like:
<%= form_tag :url => story_votes_path(#story), :remote => true do %>
<%= submit_tag 'shove it' %>
<% end %>
This should route correctly to the create method in your VotesController.
Related
I'm fairly new to Rails and learning to create a blog using this tutorial. On step 10, once I define create and show, after creating a new post in browser I don't see any entries on show with id page. All I see is heading and and blank title and post header.
Following is my controller -
class PostController < ApplicationController
def index
end
def new
end
def create
#post = Post.new(params[:posts])
#post.save
redirect_to #post
end
def show
#post = Post.find(params[:id])
end
end
Show view ---
<h1>Show a post</h1>
<p>
<strong>Title:</strong>
<%= #post.title %>
</p>
<p>
<strong>Text:</strong>
<%= #post.text %>
</p>
Route ---
RailsBlog::Application.routes.draw do
resources :post
root :to => "post#index"
end
Form ---
<%= form_for :post, url: {action: 'create'} do |f| %>
<p>
<%= f.label :title %><br>
<%= f.text_field :title %>
</p>
<p>
<%= f.label :text %><br>
<%= f.text_area :text %>
</p>
<p>
<%= f.submit 'Submit' %>
</p>
<% end %>
May be this is just a spelling mistake, but since I've recently started learning Rails, I'm unable to resolve this.
Update: I can go to particular id using
http://localhost:3000/post/1
but am only seeing blank page with view headers
The problem is here:
#post = Post.new(params[:posts])
It should be params[:post] - singular, not plural.
Also note that the best practice with form_for is to pass an object instead of symbol:
form_for #post do |f|
Then:
You don't need to specify url
You can reuse the same form for an edit action or create action (if object creation failed due to failing validation)
This however requires to initialize new object in your new action:
def new
#post = Post.new
end
UPDATE:
Also your routes are incorrect. When defining plural resources, you need to use plural form (it's more the convention than requirement, but since you're learning stick with it). So change your routes to:
resources :posts
And rename your controller to PostsController (remember to rename file name as well). restart the server and all should work.
ANOTHER UPDATE:
You also need to rename folder app/views/post to app/view/posts.
AND YET ANOTHER UPDATE:
In rails 4, you are not allowed to mass assign any params which has not been whitelisted using strong parameters. You need to tell rails which fields you allow to be assigned first - this is a security thing. You need to make some changes to your controller:
class PostsController < ApplicationController
...
def create
#post = Post.new(post_params)
...
end
...
private
def post_params
params.require(:post).permit(:title, :text)
end
end
This is the way to tell your controller that you are expecting those attributes from your form and they can be safely assigned.
I had just similar problem on the same tutorial.
The code spelling was correct and clearly accorded to examples in tutorial and BroiSatse's answer above.
The mistake was in order of private method definition.
How it was:
...
private
def post_params
params.require(:post).permit(:title, :text)
end
def show
#post = Post.find(params[:id])
end
...
The working order:
def show
#post = Post.find(params[:id])
end
private
...
Anyway, this topic was rather helpful. Thak you for your answers!
I have an STI relationship where a conversation is composed of both messages and images.
Now when I go to render them i use:
<%= render conversation %>
which works perfect. It finds the given template for the given object and renders it.
Now for my mobile site I want to use the same thing only now it should find say:
/mobile/message/_message.html.erb
instead of
/message/_message.html.erb
So in my controller i said:
if mobile?
prepend_view_path "mobile"
end
Which does get called, and it "prepends my view path" which i can see is working when i do:
raise view_paths.inspect
However now when i do my
<%= render conversation %>
It is still looking in the default location i.e. /views/ for the partial
Well, this should work, but it is distressingly inelegant:
<% conversation.each do |c| %>
<% c_class = c.class.to_s.downcase.underscore %>
<%= render :partial => "mobile/#{c_class}/#{c_class}", :object => c %>
<% end %>
In order to remove (paperclip) images from my objects, I have a custom callback (and route) defined:
ActiveAdmin.register Camping do
#...
member_action :destroy_image, :method => :delete do
camping = Camping.find(params[:id])
camping.image.destroy
redirect_to({:action => :show}, :notice => "Image deleted")
end
end
This works as expected; trough a named route destroy_image_admin_camping => /admin/campings/:id/destroy_image.
The problem is that I cannot find how to add this to the form:
ActiveAdmin.register Camping do
form do |f|
f.inputs "Camping" do
f.input :name
f.input :image
f.action :delete_image, :url => destroy_image_admin_camping_path(#camping.id), :button_html => { :method => :delete }
f.input :description
end
f.actions
end
#...
end
More detailed: I don't know how to pass the "id of the current item we are editing" into destroy_image_admin_camping_path; #camping is nil, f.camping not defined and so I don't know how to pass the item in there.
Is this the right approach? I prefer this "ajax-ish" interface over a more common checkbox-that-deletes-images-on-update, but I am not sure if this will work at all.
There's a few questions here, I'll try to address them all.
How to access the "id of the current item we are editing"
You are pretty close in looking for f.camping. What you want is f.object, so:
destroy_image_admin_camping_path(f.object.id).
NOTE: f.object.id will be nil when it's a new form (as opposed to an edit form), you'll want to check for that with unless f.object.new_record?
"Is this the right approach?"
I'm not sure, really. To me it seems like making requests without actually saving the currently rendered form could create complications, but it might turn out to be a better interface. Anyway, if you want to do the checkbox-that-deletes-images-on-update, this should help you out: Rails Paperclip how to delete attachment?.
However, if you want the ajax-ish approach I think you'll want an <a> tag styled as a button. The problem with actually using a button is that you don't want to submit the form.
Here's an example:
f.inputs do
link_to 'Delete Image', delete_image_admin_camping_path(f.object.id), class: 'button', remote: true, method: :delete
end
remote: true will make it an ajax request and ActiveAdmin gives you a pretty reasonable button class for <a> tags. Updating the interface based on success / failure is left as an exercise to the reader.
Also, you'll probably want to use erb templates for this instead of the Active Admin DSL (see http://activeadmin.info/docs/5-forms.html at the bottom).
Like this:
# app/views/admin/campings/_form.html.erb
<%= semantic_form_for [:admin, #post] do |f| %>
<%= f.inputs do %>
<%= f.input :name %>
<%= f.input :image %>
<%# Actually, you might want to check for presence of the image, I don't know Paperclip well enough to demonstrate that though %>
<% unless f.object.new_record? %>
<%= image_tag f.object.image_url %>
<%= link_to 'Delete Image', delete_image_admin_camping_path(f.object.id), class: 'button', remote: true, method: :delete %>
<% end %>
...
<% end %>
<%= f.actions %>
<% end %>
I finished Michael Hartl's Ruby on Rails Tutorial. Now I'm working on the suggested exercises. The application he builds is basically a Twitter clone where one can post Microposts and they appear in your feed http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/user-microposts#fig-micropost_created
The main page is in home.html.erb from the StaticPagesController and features a Micropost textbox where one can post Microposts. The code for the textbox looks like so:
<%= form_for(#micropost) do |f| %>
<%= render 'shared/error_messages', object: f.object %>
<div class="field">
<%= f.text_area :content, placeholder: "Compose new micropost..." %>
</div>
<%= f.submit "Post", class: "btn btn-large btn-primary" %>
<% end %>
The #micropost variable is initialized in the StaticPagesController like so:
class StaticPagesController < ApplicationController
def home
if signed_in?
#micropost = current_user.microposts.build
end
end
Now inside the MicropostsController there's a create action like so:
def create
#micropost = current_user.microposts.build(params[:micropost])
if #micropost.save
flash[:success] = "Micropost created!"
redirect_to root_url
else
#feed_items = []
render 'static_pages/home'
end
end
My question is what is the purpose of the first #micropost variable as opposed to the second?
thanks,
mike
The first #micropost becomes available to the view rendered by the first controller method; the second #micropost becomes available to the view rendered by the second controller method. And it just so happens that the two methods are rendering the same view.
The only wrinkle is that since the second controller is conditional. If the create succeeds (passes validation and saves) then there's a redirect, so there's no proper view (although there will be in a moment, after the client-side redirect). But if it fails, then the view gets an object that contains the user-entered values as well as the validation errors which the view can then show to the user.
I'm using updated pre Ruby on Rails on Ruby 1.9.2 (with rvm), and made a new test application with
$ rails generate scaffold Project name:string
and
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
validates_presence_of :name
end
I change
<%= form_for #project do |f| %>
to
<%= form_for #project, :remote => true do |f| %>
I can now still (without any changes in the controller) add new items to the project. If I try to add with empty in the name field, it will not add anything (validates_presence_of :name stops this), but I don't get any validation error messages. I have tried the same on an application converted from 3.0 I'm working on with same results. Here I had:
class KursController < ApplicationController
# GET /kurs
# GET /kurs.xml
respond_to :js, :html
and:
def update
#kur = Kur.find(params[:id])
#kur.update_attributes(params[:kur])
flash[:notice] = "Lagret" if #kur.save
respond_with( #kur, :layout => !request.xhr? )
end
In 3.1 I get no validation error messages. Is this because of a bug in Ruby on Rails 3.1 or something I should do different?
You are missing to call these errors. Do something like this:
<%= form_for #project do |f| %>
<%= render :partial => 'my_error_messages_for', :locals => {:collection => #project} %>
In "_my_error_messages_for.html.erb":
<% if collection.errors.any? %>
<ul>
<% collection.errors.full_messages.each do |msg| %>
<li><%= msg %></li>
<% end %>
</ul>
<% end %>
You can create a helper for this work.
I don't believe that Ruby on Rails will automatically include the partial that you've requested. You'll need to add some JavaScript code to get it to work correctly. Something like this I imagine:
// Application.js
$("form").bind("ajax:success", function (event, data, status, xhr) {
$(event.target).replaceWith(data);
});