I have one Materialized view on one server which is created by DB link.
There is one job running on that Mview. (created with dbms_refresh.make earlier).
Now I have created 3 new fields in original table.
My queries are.
1) Do I need to drop and create Mview again, if yes, do i need to create Mview log on main server again
2) What happens to job running on Mview , do i need to create it agin?
Also there are views created on Mview ,so
--If i run create or replace view query , will it create any problem?
Please guide.
Thanks!
If you need to include the new columns in your materialized view then yes you need to re-create the materialized view. You must explicitly drop the view as there is no "create or replace materialized view" statement.
DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW blah;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW blah...
Dropping/recreating the materialized view should re-create the refresh job. Not 100% certain, but you should probably recreate the log as well.
And, if you don't need to include the new columns in your view, you really don't need to do anything...
After dropping/creating the materialized view, you should recompile the other views afterwards, because they may have become invalid.
You can check if that happened with
select *
from user_objects
where status = 'INVALID';
Recompile a view can be done with
alter view the_view compile;
or
exec dbms_utility.compile_schema(user);
This simply recompiles everything in your schema. Be sure to have no running jobs while doing this!
Related
I'm using clickhouse-go, sometimes when I run create multiple materialized view, then query from those materialized view it shows success, but sometimes failed because the materialized view not yet created (table default.the_mv_name doesn't exists)
Is there any workaround so the db.Exec("CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW .... POPULATE AS SELECT ...") only return when it's successfully created. Something like SELECT ... FROM bla FINAL when querying.
Or there's no workaround, so I have to loop and check system.columns table until it's ready?
for non-replicated engine - there's around 50% chance it's happened, for replicated engine - almost always happened
Something failed while we were swapping disks for our ClickHouse database. When ClickHouse started, I had to attach all the tables as they were not there via ATTACH TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ....
Is there a way to do the same for materialized views? I couldn't find a way how to do that and when I try to create it from scratch (CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS ..., ClickHouse says:
Data directory for table already containing data parts - probably it
was unclean DROP table or manual intervention. You must either clear
directory by hand or use ATTACH TABLE instead of CREATE TABLE if you
need to use that parts.
So the files are still there but dunno how to attach the view.
You need to attach the ".inner." table first.
Materialized views do not store data, they create a special table with the engine that you choose when you create the view. The name of that table is ".inner.the_name_of_the_view".
So you need to attach that table first, and then attach the materialized view.
When attaching other tables and restarting the ClickHouse server, the views got attached automatically. I was trying to attach .inner tables too but it didn't let me.
Good day,
Is it technically possible to create a materialized view against a another view in the master database (as opposed to a solid table)?
My DBA advises that oracle does not allow creation of materialized view logs against a view. IMO a view is pretty much the same as a table, so it ought to be possible.
Has anyone ever done this successfully (Oracle 11g).
The documentation is pretty clear about this:
Restrictions on Master Tables of Materialized View Logs
The following restrictions apply to master tables of materialized view logs:
You cannot create a materialized view log for a temporary table or for a view.
You cannot create a materialized view log for a master table with a virtual column.
A view is not pretty much the same as a table. It's a stored query, so it has no storage and DML is only possible through instead-of triggers. It doesn't have the basis for noticing an underlying data change.
Just thinking about it, in order to support a view log - even for a simple single-table view - an update to the view's base table would have to check if there were any views; check if any of those had materialized view logs; and then work out if the change needed to be logged - which would mean executing each view's query and looking at the entire result set. Imagine doing that for every change to the underlying table. And then imagine a more complicated view query, with aggregates or multiple tables, etc.
You'd effectively be materialising the view query to decide whether was a change that needed to be logged, to update an actual materialized view. This is partly what actual materialized views do - stop you having to repeatedly re-execute an expensive view query by tracking changes on the master table(s).
You have to create the materialized view logs on the (normal) view's base tables.
I have two tables, TABLE_1 and TABLE_2. Then we have a synonym called TABLE that points to either TABLE_1 or TABLE_2. When TABLE_1 is active, an ETL populates TABLE_2 and when the run is complete, it switches the TABLE synonym to TABLE_2 to make it the active table. Then I have a materialized view that does something like this as the SQL: select * from TABLE. What I am seeing happen is that after the materialize view runs the first time, it caches the actual table the synonym is pointing too. So when the ETL runs and flips the synonym to point at TABLE_2, when a complete refresh is done on the materialized view, it still thinks the synonym is pointed at TABLE_1. Why when I do a complete refresh does the materialized view not pick up the new synonym pointer to TABLE_2?
Here is a workaround to Oracle's bug:
alter materialized view MV_NAME nocache;
BEGIN DBMS_SNAPSHOT.REFRESH( MV_NAME,'C'); end;
alter materialized view MV_NAME cache;
I cannot find anything useful in Oracle documentation but just enable the logic:
I firstly create materialized view
In reality to support this materialized view Oracle makes the TABLE with some specific structure (dependent on your query structure) and the rule to refresh the table (as far as I remember it is called SUMMARY, but the name does not play any role here)
I change synonym target to the table which has another structure
The new target table is not "fitting" to the previous structure (e.g. it has totally different amount/data types of columns), the previous structure is invalid then and not working anymore. The underground table must be recreated then.
That's why I would say it is the only way to prevent the errors: reference the real target instead of synonym for creating materialized view.
So, the answer is: because the materialized view is a static table-like object dependent on the data set it is selecting; that's why to prevent the inconsistencies materialized view references the real object.
Sometimes I really wonder how many details Oracle hides inside.
I have a materialized view that I need to redefine the SQL for. We have an external system that hits the view over a db link, and the monster view takes 5 minutes to refresh the data in the view. The only way I know how to redefine the SQL for a view is to drop it and recreate it, but it would be very bad if the external system couldn't find the table, or it didn't have a complete data set. I need to have as little downtime as possible.
Is there any way to do this natively or more elegantly than:
Create public synonym for materialized view and make everything that uses the view use the synonym instead.
Create new materialized view with new SQL
Change the synonym to point to the new view
Drop the old view.
I've got code to do this dynamically but it is getting really ugly. It seems like there should be a better way to handle this.
Oracle has a build in solution for that. Keep in mind that the mview declaration is separate from that of the table.
The original mview
create materialized view mv1 as select dept , count(*) as cnt from scott.emp;
we want to change the declaration so that only dept over 5 will be calculated
drop materialized view mv1 preserve table;
notice the PRESERVE TABLE clause - the table mv1 is not droped - only the mview layer.
desc mv1
now we create the mview with a different query on top of the existing table
create materialized view mv1 on prebuilt table as
select dept , count(*) as cnt from scott.emp where dept > 5;
notice the on prebuilt table clause. the mview is using the existing object.
exec dbms_mview.refresh_mview('mv1');