What is counterpart of SIGKILL(in POSIX) in WIN32. VS cannot recognize SIGKILL.
API function TerminateProcess is probably closest. SIGKILL is special anyway in POSIX and not really a signal. You need to open the process handle with OpenProcess and close it afterwards with CloseHandle.
Related
Related to a question I asked here -- I have a process that I launched which is in a "suspended" state. I cannot kill or resume this process through any of the normal means (process explorer, task manager, WinDbg).
Logging-out of my session DOES kill this process though. How? What mechanism is the OS using when I log out that is somehow different to what Process Explorer is trying to do?
Edit: To clarify - I am assuming that Process Explorer is calling the TerminateProcess API function when it tries to kill a process. Something in the process state is stopping this from working though. Logging out obviously invokes some different behaviour and Windows ignores whatever was blocking TerminateProcess, and kills the process due to my session ending.
As a user, is there any different way to try and terminate a process other than calling the TerminateProcess API?
Process Explorer can't kill a process itself; it can only ask the OS to do so. The OS itself doesn't have to play by its own rules.
Remember, it's the OS itself which defines what a process is. It might very well define a process as part of a logon session. This would imply that if you clean up the whole session then you don't need to clean up individual processes. Just like you don't need to bother with CloseHandle before ExitProcess either.
Visual Studio /analyze build warns me that I'm leaking PROCESS_INFORMATION.hProcess after starting a background process with CreateProcessA. I don't need to wait for that process, and it will exit on its own when it is time. Is there something I should do with hProcess in that case?
This is /analyze result C6335
All you have to do is call CloseHandle once you no longer care about it, which, in your case, sounds like right after you create the process.
You might be worried that this would prematurely terminate the process, but it won't. The process also holds a handle to itself. The OS won't destroy the process object until the last handle to it is closed.
I've read in a couple of places that ShellExecute() and ShellExecuteEx() calls CreateProcess() internally, is this true? is it documented somewhere in MSDN?
Yes, ShellExecuteEx calls CreateProcess internally, as you can easily show by setting a breakpoint on CreateProcess and then making a call to ShellExecuteEx:
In POSIX, there is the fork() function to create a sub-process. How can I achieve fork()'s functionality in Windows?
There is no direct equivalent of fork() on Windows.
CreateProcess() is the native function that can be used to create a new process (but, again, the semantics are rather different to fork()'s).
To put this another way, on Unix it is possible for a process to cheaply create a clone of itself. There is no inexpensive way to do this on Windows.
If you don't care about the cloning aspect of fork(), then CreateProcess() should do just fine.
In Windows -- and probably Unix for that matter -- using the chdir() function in a (32-bit) program doesn't change the directory when the program exits. (It does in a 16-bit Windows program.)
Does anybody know how to do that in a Windows 32-bit program?
Uhm... IMHO it's exactly one of the things that the OS must guarantee not to happen. The current dir is a per-process property, a child process usually inherits it from the parent process, but the reverse should not happen (and it doesn't).
To obtain what you want, the parent could actively watch some information (message, file, shared memory...) in which the child process stores the new directory, and then call chdir() with the new value.
As far as I know, Windows' cmd.exe doesn't have any mechanism like that.
Actually, by using code injection techniques (e.g. CreateRemoteThread) on the parent process it could be possible to force it to do something unexpected, but it's a very dirty trick, not at all good neither general.
Win16 was different: there was a single "msdos" state for all the programs, but it was a limitation, not a feature.
It sounds like you're asking one process (your Win32 program) to change the CWD of another process (your shell). As far as I know, this is impossible without the latter process providing an API for such a purpose. The nearest I can come to any sort of reference for this assertion, however, is the following quote from MSDN:
A parent process can directly alter the environment variables of a child process during process creation. This is the only situation when a process can directly change the environment settings of another process.
Well yeah it's true the popular API calls to change directory change it for the process. ... BUT ...
(1.) 16-bit windows programs can change the global directory; probably because they run in the same process as the command.com thing. That's what I've been happily using for years; I assume XP somehow emulates this? ... But now Windows 7 64-bit won't run 16-bit programs anymore! (?)
(2.) Both Windows and Unix "cd" commands can of course change directories for the calling process -- presumably because they are built-in commands of the command shell. But successor Windows shells manage to accomplish this, or at least I hope PowerShell can do that. All built-ins?
(3.) The way I've wound-up doing it is modifying my programs that used to call the API to simply emit "cd \dst\directory" to stdout, then in a procedure do
chdirprogram >t~.bat
call T~.bat
Which works great. And of course the usual point of a change-directory program is to provide the functionality in a batch procedure with a computed destination. Which of course you can do in Unix with Bash etc. variables, but not in Windows batch files, although maybe (?) in the numerous successor Windows procedure things, which I don't want to use. ... Since this functionality is obviously useful, I was hoping someone knew of a sneaky Windows call what'd do it. The explanation that it's somehow wrong for a process to change the directory for a calling process is one of those bogus, "you're not supposed to do that and I won't tell you why" excuses. ... But I guess I'll just stick to my pitiful little batch files.
Are you talking about the SetCurrentDirectory function of Windows API? The article says that the function "changes the current directory for the current process". In for instance Delphi, there is a function ChDir that actually calls this API function.