When you press F2 to edit a filename in Windows Shell, there is a limited set of editing keys that is understood - e.g. CTRL+Arrow Keys, Home, End, CTRL+X. For example, when you type CTRL+Right Arrow, the cursor will stop right after a dash, but will not stop at a period. Are these actions customizable, and if so, how?
Any additional information not directly related but which you feel might help the topic will also be appreciated.
You can set a custom word-break procedure for your edit control using EM_SETWORDBREAKPROC; EditWordBreakProc is the corresponding callback function that the OS calls when it needs to find where a word break occurs.
From the docs:
Either a multiline or a single-line edit control might call this function when the user presses arrow keys in combination with the CTRL key to move the caret to the next word or previous word.
The key combinations themselves are not directly customizable, and for a good reason -- so that the user experience is uniform across all applications. Of course, you could subclass the edit control and handle keyboard messages yourself but I guess that's not the point here.
The Windows version matters, but in general this behavior is baked into SysListView32, the native list view control. No, keyboard handling is hard-baked. Subclassing the control is technically possible, just not practical since it lives inside Explorer.exe. And having no clue where the caret is located inside the label, there are no messages for it.
By "Windows Shell" I assume you mean Windows Explorer, but the answer is likely the same no matter what program you are talking about.
Explorer simply creates an EDIT control and moves it into position. The editing behavior comes from this stock system control, plus whatever additional logic Explorer adds to its own instance of it.
While you can easily alter the behavior of an EDIT control that belongs to a thread in your own process, doing so in another process requires a global hook. We will stipulate that you understand the amount of work involved in doing a global hook correctly, and which will function in both x86 and x64 environments.
You cannot directly interfere with the behavior of an EDIT control in another process with WH_CALLWNDPROC, but you can use WH_CALLWNDPROCRET to observe keyboard messages, check that the window is and EDIT control, check that the EDIT control belongs to Explorer, and then knowing precicesly how the EDIT control responded to that keyboard event, do something additional like backing up to that period.
Or maybe you could use a WH_CBT hook to monitor HCBT_CREATEWND and subclass the EDIT control each time it gets created.
The effort is probably not worth the benefit.
Related
I'm working on a custom cross platform UI library that needs a synchronous "ShowPopup" method that shows a popup, runs an event loop until it's finished and automatically cancels when clicking outside the popup or pressing escape. Keyboard, mouse and scroll wheel events need to be dispatched to the popup but other events (paint, draw, timers etc...) need to be dispatched to their regular targets while the loop runs.
Edit: for clarification, by popup, I mean this kind of menu style popup window, not an alert/dialog etc...
On Windows I've implemented this fairly simply by calling GetMessage/DispatchMessage and filtering and dispatching messages as appropriate. Works fine.
I've much less experience with Cocoa/OS X however and finding the whole event loop/dispatch paradigm a bit confusing. I've seen the following article which explains how to implement a mouse tracking loop which is very similar to what I need:
http://stpeterandpaul.ca/tiger/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/EventOverview/HandlingMouseEvents/chapter_5_section_4.html
but... there's some things about this that concern me.
The linked article states: "the application’s main thread is unable to process any other requests during an event-tracking loop and timers might not fire". Might not? Why not, when not, how to make sure they do?
The docs for nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue: states "events that do not match one of the specified event types are left in the queue.". That seems a little odd. Does this mean that if an event loop only asks for mouse events then any pressed keys will be processed once the loop finishes? That'd be weird.
Is it possible to peek at a message in the event queue without removing it. eg: the Windows version of my library uses this to close the popup when it's clicked outside, but leaves the click event in the queue so that clicking outside the popup on a another button doesn't require a second click.
I've read and re-read about run loop modes but still don't really get it. A good explanation of what these are for would be great.
Are there any other good examples of implementing an event loop for a popup. Even better would be pseudo-code for what the built in NSApplication run loop does.
Another way of putting all this... what's the Cocoa equivalent of Windows' PeekMessage(..., PM_REMOVE), PeekMessage(..., PM_NOREMOVE) and DispatchMessage().
Any help greatly appreciated.
What exactly is a "popup" as you're using the term? That term means different things in different GUI APIs. Is it just a modal dialog window?
Update for edits to question:
It seems you just want to implement a custom menu. Apple provides a sample project, CustomMenus, which illustrates that technique. It's a companion to one of the WWDC 2010 session videos, Session 145, "Key Event Handling in Cocoa Applications".
Depending on exactly what you need to achieve, you might want to use an NSAlert. Alternatively, you can use a custom window and just run it modally using the -runModalForWindow: method of NSApplication.
To meet your requirement of ending the modal session when the user clicks outside of the window, you could use a local event monitor. There's even an example of just such functionality in the (modern, current) Cocoa Event Handling Guide: Monitoring Events.
All of that said, here are (hopefully no longer relevant) answers to your specific questions:
The linked article states: "the application’s main thread is unable to process any other requests during an event-tracking loop and
timers might not fire". Might not? Why not, when not, how to make
sure they do?
Because timers are scheduled in a particular run loop mode or set of modes. See the answer to question 4, below. You would typically use the event-tracking mode when running an event-tracking loop, so timers which are not scheduled in that mode will not run.
You could use the default mode for your event-tracking loop, but it really isn't a good idea. It might cause unexpected re-entrancy.
Assuming your pop-up is similar to a modal window, you should probably use NSModalPanelRunLoopMode.
The docs for nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:
states "events that do not match one of the specified event types are
left in the queue.". That seems a little odd. Does this mean that if
an event loop only asks for mouse events then any pressed keys will be
processed once the loop finishes? That'd be weird.
Yes, that's what it means. It's up to you to prevent that weird outcome. If you were to read a version of the Cocoa Event Handling Guide from this decade, you'd find there's a section on how to deal with this. ;-P
Is it possible to peek at a message in the event queue without removing it. eg: the Windows version of my library uses this to close
the popup when it's clicked outside, but leaves the click event in the
queue so that clicking outside the popup on a another button doesn't
require a second click.
Yes. Did you notice the "dequeue:" parameter of nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:? If you pass NO for that, then the event is left in the queue.
I've read and re-read about run loop modes but still don't really get it. A good explanation of what these are for would be great.
It's hard to know what to tell you without knowing what you're confused about and how the Apple guide failed you.
Are you familiar with handling multiple asynchronous communication channels using a loop around select(), poll(), epoll(), or kevent()? It's kind of like that, but a bit more automated. Not only do you build a data structure which lists the input sources you want to monitor and what specific events on those input sources you're interested in, but each input source also has a callback associated with it. Running the run loop is like calling one of the above functions to wait for input but also, when input arrives, calling the callback associated with the source to handle that input. You can run a single turn of that loop, run it until a specific time, or even run it indefinitely.
With run loops, the input sources can be organized into sets. The sets are called "modes" and identified by name (i.e. a string). When you run a run loop, you specify which set of input sources it should monitor by specifying which mode it should run in. The other input sources are still known to the run loop, but just ignored temporarily.
The -nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue: method is, more or less, running the thread's run loop internally. In addition to whatever input sources were already present in the run loop, it temporarily adds an input source to monitor events from the windowing system, including mouse and key events.
Are there any other good examples of implementing an event loop for a popup. Even better would be pseudo-code for what the built in
NSApplication run loop does.
There's old Apple sample code, which is actually their implementation of GLUT. It provides a subclass of NSApplication and overrides the -run method. When you strip away some stuff that's only relevant for application start-up or GLUT, it's pretty simple. It's just a loop around -nextEventMatchingMask:... and -sendEvent:.
Basically, I want to bind a certain letter to scroll up the mouse reel, and do so continuously if I hold the key continuously. I need it to work even if other keys are being pressed at the same time, and only work on a certain window title/tab title in the browser.
I basically want to emulate the function of the autohotkey program for the "Attack On Titan Tribute Game"'s reeling function.
An AutoHotKey equivalent is available at:
http://fenglee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7548
(Which may be offline due to unknown reasons, might have to wait)
Basically, if you download the application, set Reel In to the "x" or "e" key, it works regardless if other keys are being held. Just make sure you uncheck the checkbox so it can work in any window. It basically scrolls down for you. It also includes the source.
Or.. if I can use any other free application to do the same thing, that'd be nice.
All I want is the scrolling function and it has to be specific to a window/plugin/etc. and be able to be triggered while holding down other keys.
In child window of my application, I have placed one single line edit control named as sle_name. Its tab order is 1.
Below that control I have placed DataWindow having formatted as free form style.
When I run the app, if my focus is in sle_name, and I click on sle_name then rbuttondown event is triggered. Then I move my focus to DataWindow(dw_account). Once I got focus on dw_account and then if I try to click on sle_name, my focus is not moving on sle_name and neither I can run rbuttondown event on sle_name.
What is the reason for this problem?
One more thing: when I start this window my focus in set in sle_name, from that control if I press tab key then my focuse moves to dw_account and if I press again shift+tab then my focus is moved back to sle_account.
But if I try to set focus from dw_account to sle_account using mouse pointer it is not moving focus.
What is the reason behind this behaviour?
I had the same behavior in a child window.
It was fixed when disabled the 'ControlMenu' and 'TitleBar' properties in the window. (It's so strange).
Hope it helps
Juanma
This isn't natural behaviour, so the cause is likely something you've scripted. Depending on your architecture, the culprit code could be a number of places (e.g. framework objects). If this were my problem, I'd run with the PBDEBUG trace turned on (a System Option in the IDE, or /PBDEBUG on the command line after the deployed EXE name), and see what is firing when you try to move back to the SLE.
I'd also be using PBL Peeper to see the trace and the code side-by-side, so it's easier to see what code is being executed (the trace only shows you script name and line number).
Good luck,
Terry.
you must have to create the event ID pbm_lbuttonup, with the same parameter as rbuttondown event. Then in the code you write this.setfocus()
Babylon dictionary and a couple of other dictionaries allow to click on any word in any windows program
and automatically recognize the word under the cursor, and at once open the dictionary window while searching for that word in installed dictionaries.
You can on the other hand open your dictionary, type in your word and press Enter, the result will be the same.
There's a Delphi form, containing a text label, for example with the word "Automaton".
My question is:
How to send a word from my Delphi application right into the dictionary window, as if you typed it manually and pressed Enter?
The best solution is to send some message through the Windows mechanism, but if it is too complicated, there's another solution, and so the second answer: as I described, we need to model a [Ctrl+left mouse] click on a form where this word is displayed on a form [ a visual label on the screen of my Delphi application], to be exact, on some central pixel of this label.
Could you kindly give an advice how to do one thing or another in Delphi ?
** edit:
The problem with AppActivate is this: Babylon dict has a daemon part that seats in the tray.
In the task manager a real window where the text should be input also is named 'Babylon'.
So AppActivate('Babylon') tries to bring to front the non-visual part of the application.
Do you have any suggestion how to determine the windows handle or something of a real visual part of the application? In the task manager, I repeat both visual and non-visual parts are named 'Babylon'.
I cannot offer an answer so much as some insight and advice...
There are certain applications which "intercept" keyboard and mouse instructions, and essentially "nullify" them if they are being immitated by software. Generally-speaking, you'd only see this in proper AntiVirus software such as Kaspersky by design... however:
The way some (not many, but some) programs hook keyboard and mouse inputs, as a side-effect, behave the same way. If you have attempted all of the advice given as comments above, and cannot get Babylon to trigger an action as a result, it is likely Babylon behaves as I have described.
If what I suspect is true, then the method you are attempting is simply not possible (at least, not using any simple Pascal code on its own... ASM might be able to do it but that's beyond my knowledge).
A better solution may be to do a little research to see if any of the following options are available to you:
1) Does Babylon have a Pipeline or API you can use to interface your application(s) with it?
2) Is the particular functionality you require of Babylon accessible through one (or more) DLL files distributed as part of Babylon?
3) Is there an alternative to using Babylon for your needs?
I know it's not an answer as such (certainly not one you'd want to hear), but it may point you in a better direction.
We are designing the UI for a new line of business application. We have no real constraints and are free to design the UI as we see fit. The UI will be done in WPF and targeted for Windows 7, Vista, and XP Pro users.
Many dialog boxes contain OK and Cancel buttons in their lower right corner. Do you feel it is necessary to have this Cancel button or is the red X in the upper right corner sufficient? We are discussing this as we have been noticing more UIs that do not have cancel buttons, only the red X.
Not only you should add it but also make sure ESC is mapped to it.
Present the two designs to the customer - one with the "Cancel" button, the other without. See what their thoughts are.
Better still present them as partially working prototypes and watch them as they use the dialogs. If you ask them to perform a set of tasks and see if they have trouble when asked to cancel an operation.
Having said that, my preference is to include a "Cancel" button for the reasons others have mentioned:
Accessibility (especially as Esc should be mapped to it).
Convention (users will be expecting it).
Include the Cancel button. The red X is VERY hard to tab to. ;)
Include it. This is very common in other user interfaces. Give the user the choice of which to use; making it for them might make them annoyed with your interface.
Users are used to having standard GUI layouts - otherwise they get confused. They also have different ways of using the standard interface. Some people only use the X, some people only use Cancel. People usually ignore the one they're not using, but get confused if their one isn't present. So be safe and keep them both in - it should only be a one-liner function for Cancek anyway.
Include it!
From a user interface perspective, not including a cancel button might leave some users feeling like they have no choice, which is certainly not the case. Imagine the following simple decision scenario:
Warning: All of the files in the selected folder will be deleted. This action cannot be undone. Are you sure you would like to continue?
How silly would an interface be if the only option was Ok? Also, as noted above, on many platforms the Escape key is mapped to Cancel. It's also probably worthwhile setting a default button so that pressing the Enter/Space key doesn't inadvertently perform the action that cannot be undone.
+1 on including it. If you don't include it now and then need some different functionality on Cancel to Close later on, your users will already be used to automatically closing.
Just like we have 'ESC' button on keyboard, we need 'Cancel' in dialogs.
A matter of usability :-)
Include it. And please also make sure that you make sure that hitting the Escape key does the same thing as the Cancel button.
Also, just because you're designing from scratch, please don't throw out all convention. Take a look at MSFT's UX Guidelines for dialog boxes.
The red button is really for 'Close' rather than 'Cancel'. 'Cancel' canceling a running task. Use a 'Close' button instead. And yes include the 'Close' if there is a reason for people to click on it. The red button is quite difficult to click when you really want to close something quickly.
If you have that kind of freedom, consider eliminating dialog boxes from your application entirely, especially ones with the typical "OK | CANCEL" paradigm. Dialog boxes disrupt the flow of action and generally should only be used for things which absolutely require the program to interrupt the user.
You'll notice how disruptive they are in the web environment -- e.g., Stack Overflow only uses them when it needs to be able to OVERRIDE your action, e.g., when you navigate away from an unsubmitted answer.