i am using shell script to monitor the working of a php script. My aim is that this php script should not sleep / terminated and must always be running.The code i used is -
ps aux | grep -v grep | grep -q $file || ( nohup php -f $file -print > /var/log/file.log & )
now this idea would not work for cases if the php script got terminated(process status code T). Any idea to handle that case. can such processes be killed permanently and then restarted.
How about just restarting the php interpreter when it dies?
while true ; do php -f $file -print >> /var/log/file.log ; done
Of course, someone could send the script a SIGSTOP, SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU to cause it to hang, but perhaps that person has a really good reason. You can block them all except SIGSTOP, so maybe that's alright.
Or if the script does something like call read(2) on a device or socket that will never return, this won't really ensure the 'liveness' of your script. (But then you'd use non-blocking IO to prevent this situation, so that's covered.)
Oh yes, you could also stuff it into your /etc/inittab. But I'm not giving you more than a hint about this one, because I think it is probably a bad idea.
And there are many similar tools that already exist: daemontools and Linux Heartbeat are the first two to come to mind.
If the script is exiting after it's been terminater, or if it crashes out, and needs to be restarted, a simple shell script can take care of that.
#!/bin/bash
# runScript.sh - keep a php script running
php -q -f ./cli-script.php -- $#
exec $0 $#;
The exec $0 re-runs the shell script, with the parameters it was given.
To run in the background you can nohup runScript.sh or run it via init.d scripts, upstart, runit or supervisord, among others.
Related
According to this docker tutorial
What's the difference between
./my_first_process -D
./my_main_process &
They both seem unblocking to bash script and run in background
& tells the shell to put the command that precedes it into the background. -D is simply a flag that is passed to my_first_process and is interpreted by it; it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the shell.
You will have to look into the documentation of my_first_process to see what -D does … it could mean anything. E.g. in npm, -D means "development", whereas in some other tools, it may mean "directory". In diff, it means "Output merged file to show `#ifdef NAME' diffs."
Some programs, by convention, take -D as an instruction to self-daemonize. Doing this looks something like the following:
Call fork(), and exit if it returns 0 (so only the child survives).
Close stdin, stdout and stderr if they are attached to the console (ideally, replacing their file descriptors with handles on /dev/null, so writes don't trigger an error).
Call setsid() to create a new session.
Call fork() again, and exit if it returns 0 again.
That's a lot more work than what just someprogram & does! A program that has self-daemonized can no longer log to the terminal, and will no longer be impacted if the terminal itself closes. That's not true of a program that's just started in the background.
To get something similar to the same behavior from bash, correct code would be something like:
someprogram </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 & disown -h
...wherein disown -h tells the shell not to pass along a SIGHUP to that process. It's also not uncommon to see the external tool nohup used for this purpose (though by default, it redirects stdout and stderr to a file called nohup.out if they're pointed at the TTY, the end purpose -- of making sure they're not pointed at the terminal, and thus that writes to them don't start failing if the terminal goes away -- is achieved):
nohup someprogram >/dev/null &
I'm trying to write a bash script.
The script should check if the MC server is running. If it crashed or stopped it will start the server automatically.
I'll use crontab to run the script every minute. I think I can run it every second it won't stress the CPU too much. I also would like to know when was the server restarted. So I'm going to print the date to the "RestartLog" file.
This is what I have so far:
#!/bin/sh
ps auxw | grep start.sh | grep -v grep > /dev/null
if [ $? != 0 ]
then
cd /home/minecraft/minecraft/ && ./start.sh && echo "Server restarted on: $(date)" >> /home/minecraft/minecraft/RestartLog.txt > /dev/null
fi
I'm just started learning Bash and I'm not sure if this is the right way to do it.
The use of cron is possible, there are other (better) solutions (monit, supervisord etc.). But that is not the question; you asked for "the right way". The right way is difficult to define, but understanding the limits and problems in your code may help you.
Executing with normal cron will happen at most once per minute. That means that you minecraft server may be down 59 seconds before it is restarted.
#!/bin/sh
You should have the #! at the beginning of the line. Don't know if this is a cut/paste problem, but it is rather important. Also, you might want to use #!/bin/bash instead of #!/bin/sh to actually use bash.
ps auxw | grep start.sh | grep -v grep > /dev/null
Some may suggest to use ps -ef but that is a question of taste. You may even use ps -ef | grep [s]tart.sh to prevent using the second grep. The main problem however with this line is that that you are parsing the process-list for a fairly generic start.sh. This may be OK if you have a dedicated server for this, but if there are more users on the server, you run the risk that someone else runs a start.sh for something completely different.
if [ $? != 0 ]
then
There was already a comment about the use of $? and clean code.
cd /home/minecraft/minecraft/ && ./start.sh && echo "Server restarted on: $(date)" >> /home/minecraft/minecraft/RestartLog.txt > /dev/null
It is a good idea to keep a log of the restarts. In this line, you make the execution of the ./start.sh dependent on the fact that the cd succeeds. Also, the echo only gets executed after the ./start.sh exists.
So that leaves me with a question: does start.sh keep on running as long as the server runs (in that case: the ps-test is ok, but the && echo makes no sense, or does start.sh exit while leaving the minecraft-server in the background (in that case the ps-grep won't work correctly, but it makes sense to echo the log record only if start.sh exits correctly).
fi
(no remarks for the fi)
If start.sh blocks until the server exists/crashes, you'd be better off to simply restart it in an infinite loop without the involvement of cron. Simply type in a console (or put into another script):
#!/bin/bash
cd /home/minecraft/minecraft/
while sleep 3; do
echo "$(date) server (re)start" >> restart.log
./start.sh # blocks until server crashes
done
But if it doesn't block (i.e. if start.sh starts the server and then returns, but the server keeps running), you would need to implement a different check to verify if the server is actually still running, other than ps|grep start.sh
PS: To kill the infinite loop you have to Ctrl+C twice: Once to stop ./start.sh and once to exit from the immediate sleep.
You can use monit for this task. See docu. It is available on most linux distributions and has a straightforward config. Find some examples in this post
For your app it will look something like
check process minecraftserver
matching "start.sh"
start program = "/home/minecraft/minecraft/start.sh"
stop program = "/home/minecraft/minecraft/stop.sh"
I wrote this answer because sometimes the most efficient solution is already there and you don't have to code anything. Also follow the suggestions of William Pursell and use the init system of your OS (systemd,upstart,system-v,etc.) to host your scripts.
Find more:
Shell Script For Process Monitoring
I have a bash script which will be running a main command, let's say for one hour. I would like to execute another command after a certain time since the main command has been started (at t_x). Something like this:
main starts -------> main ends
|
|
at time t_x, second command is executed
At the moment I have something like this:
mpirun main_command & sleep 1m && second_command
and the problem is that after second command is executed, the main command is killed. Can anyone help me? Thanks!
The first command is failing to lock the console, as another process is also using it. You will need to redirect the standard io pipelines, 0<&- mpirun main_command >/dev/null 2>/dev/null If this still does not work, use shell -c 'mpirun main_command' & sleep 1m;second_command You can use ; instead of &&, unless you need a failing exit code when someone interrupts the sleep.
Ive got a script that takes a quite a long time to run, as it has to handle many thousands of files. I want to make this script as fool proof as possible. To this end, I want to check if the user ran the script using nohup and '&'. E.x.
me#myHost:/home/me/bin $ nohup doAlotOfStuff.sh &. I want to make 100% sure the script was run with nohup and '&', because its a very painful recovery process if the script dies in the middle for whatever reason.
How can I check those two key paramaters inside the script itself? and if they are missing, how can I stop the script before it gets any farther, and complain to the user that they ran the script wrong? Better yet, is there way I can force the script to run in nohup &?
Edit: the server enviornment is AIX 7.1
The ps utility can get the process state. The process state code will contain the character + when running in foreground. Absence of + means code is running in background.
However, it will be hard to tell whether the background script was invoked using nohup. It's also almost impossible to rely on the presence of nohup.out as output can be redirected by user elsewhere at will.
There are 2 ways to accomplish what you want to do. Either bail out and warn the user or automatically restart the script in background.
#!/bin/bash
local mypid=$$
if [[ $(ps -o stat= -p $mypid) =~ "+" ]]; then
echo Running in foreground.
exec nohup $0 "$#" &
exit
fi
# the rest of the script
...
In this code, if the process has a state code +, it will print a warning then restart the process in background. If the process was started in the background, it will just proceed to the rest of the code.
If you prefer to bailout and just warn the user, you can remove the exec line. Note that the exit is not needed after exec. I left it there just in case you choose to remove the exec line.
One good way to find if a script is logging to nohup, is to first check that the nohup.out exists, and then to echo to it and ensure that you can read it there. For example:
echo "complextag"
if ( $(cat nohup.out | grep "complextag" ) != "complextag" );then
# various commands complaining to the user, then exiting
fi
This works because if the script's stdout is going to nohup.out, where they should be going (or whatever out file you specified), then when you echo that phrase, it should be appended to the file nohup.out. If it doesn't appear there, then the script was nut run using nohup and you can scold them, perhaps by using a wall command on a temporary broadcast file. (if you want me to elaborate on that I can).
As for being run in the background, if it's not running you should know by checking nohup.
I have a VM that I want running indefinitely. The server is always running but I want the script to keep running after I log out. How would I go about doing so? Creating a cron job?
In general the following steps are sufficient to convince most Unix shells that the process you're launching should not depend on the continued existence of the shell:
run the command under nohup
run the command in the background
redirect all file descriptors that normally point to the terminal to other locations
So, if you want to run command-name, you should do it like so:
nohup command-name >/dev/null 2>/dev/null </dev/null &
This tells the process that will execute command-name to send all stdout and stderr to nowhere (instead of to your terminal) and also to read stdin from nowhere (instead of from your terminal). Of course if you actually have locations to write to/read from, you can certainly use those instead -- anything except the terminal is fine:
nohup command-name >outputFile 2>errorFile <inputFile &
See also the answer in Petur's comment, which discusses this issue a fair bit.