Does hibernate have any mapping for this oracle data type:(10G)
TIMESTAMP(6) WITH TIME ZONE
I am getting:
No Dialect mapping for JDBC type: -101
My manager does not want to do the: registerHibernateType(-101, Hibernate.getText().getname())
He thinks it is too much.:)
What alternative can I have?
The answer you provide to yourself is more like a workaround than a proper solution. For the sake of the visitors looking for an answer, I'll provide my view on this:
1) Database date-based fields should be always set to UTC, never with a specific timezone. Date calculation with timezone information is an unneeded complexity. Remember that timezones usually changes twice a year for a lot of countries in the world ("daylight saving time"). There's a reason why only a few RDMBS' supports this, and there's a reason why Hibernate developers refuse to support this data-type. The patch for Hibernate is simple enough (one line of code), the implications aren't.
2) Converting your "timestamp with timezone" to a String will only cause problems later. Once you retrieve it as String, you'll need to convert it again to a Date/Calendar object, an unneeded overhead. Not to mention the risks associated with this operation.
3) If you need to know in which timezone is some user, just store the String representing the timezone offset (like "Europe/Prague"). You can use this in Java to build a Calendar with date/time and timezone, as it'll take care of DST for you.
For now, I solved the problem by:
`select TO_CHAR(TRUNC(field)) from table` //field is the one having type= timestamp with timezone
This ensures that when the query returns, the field has datatype 'String'
Related
I have a conversation today with my engineering coworkers about application and database design in Fintech.
How do we handle time? We all know that we need to store the datetime information normalized in UTC. But our debate is among whether we should store in 1) unix epoch timestamp which is an integer in our database, for example, 1596507157. which is 08/04/2020 # 2:12am UTC or 2) store in ISO 8601 format in string 2020-08-04T02:12:37+00:00 or 2020-08-04T02:12:37.123456789Z
The downside of unix timestamp is obviously not immediate human-readable.
I am here looking for some design advices on whether we should adopt either approach.
In my opinion, you should store it as integer rather than string, one of many reasons is obvious, int just needs 4 byte while string as ISO 8601 takes a lot more.
What you see as downside, it doesn't impact the backend, it's just a make up (only needed on user view).
Most of database have datetime data type. I guess your 'epoch timestamp' means this datetime or timestamp data type. It's easier (and better performance) to handle datetime type for database engineer. and database also have datetime formatting function.
(Oracle/MS SQL Server - convert, MySQL - date_format, PostgreSQL - to_char ...)
In my opinion, store and handle with datetime type and use formatting function for human.
A lot of questions have been asked about this subject. The best answer that I found is this one: How to set local timezone in laravel
So the main rule is to keep all database entries in the same timezone.
But I have a specific case where this answer does not work for me. For some models, I have only a date (no datestamp). Example: suppose that I only store the date of when this question was asked (= 2018-01-25). However in Europe it is already 2018-01-26. Someone has a solution for this?
Changing my date field to a datestamp? What with existing dates?
You can use this library jamesmills/laravel-timezone
OR
If you need custom configuration:
Configure your app timezone to UTC.
'timezone' => 'UTC',
You can store different timezones in database column.
When outputting/displaying dates, just format it to use that timezone.
$timezone = 'America/Vancouver';
$model->created_at->setTimezone($timezone);
created_at and updated_at are automatically converted to carbon instances, which makes this easier. If you have other dates that you're using, add them to the protected $dates array on the model and laravel will convert them to carbon instance too. Then you can use carbons setTimezone() to change the date/time to the timezone.
If you're only talking about a date, then there is no time component and thus time zones are irrelevant. For this reason, most platforms do not have a separate date-with-zone type.
You're correct that not every time zone experiences the same date at all times, and that the start of a date and the end of the date occur at different times in different time zones. However, did you notice that in the prior sentence that I had to use the word "time" to rationalize about these points? :-)
Because date and time zone don't come together without time, there's no purpose in keeping them in the same field. Instead, keep two fields in your model - one for the date, and one for the time zone. In many cases, you may even find they belong in two different models.
As a use case example, consider birthdays. Mine is 1976-08-27. That's all it is - just a date. The time zone of my birth is irrelevant, and so is the time zone I'm located in - until I want to evaluate whether it's currently my birthday (or how long until my birthday, etc.) For those operations, my current time zone is important, and so is the start time-of-day and end time-of-day of that time zone. Thus - two different fields.
I have a situation where a table in the database has a date field defined as date where time also is important (for sorting later).
At first, all times for the date where coming as 000000 but I updated the code to use timestamp and when inserting new records, it's working fine.
Update on the other hand will not change the database if the date is the same (but different time). Apparently, while inserting, hibernate doesn't take into consideration the time and the record is not change (or at least this is what I discovered from my testing).
I can't change the database structure to use timestamp or add a time field.
Any help is really appreciated :)
Thanks
I have last_update_date column defined as DATE field
I want to get time in milliseconds.
Currently I have:
TO_CHAR(last_update_date,'YYYY-DD-MM hh:mi:ss am')
But I want to get milliseconds as well.
I googled a bit and think DATE fields will not have milliseconds. only TIMESTAMP fields will.
Is there any way to get milliseconds? I do not have option to change data type for the field.
DATE fields on Oracle only store the data down to a second so there is no way to provide anything more precise than that. If you want more precision, you must use another type such as TIMESTAMP.
Here is a link to another SO question regarding Oracle date and time precision.
As RC says, the DATE type only supports a granularity down to the second.
If converting to TIMESTAMP is truly not an option then how about the addition of another numerical column that just holds the milliseconds?
This option would be more cumbersome to deal with than a TIMESTAMP column but it could be workable if converting the type is not possible.
In a similar situation where I couldn't change the fields in a table, (Couldn't afford to 'break' third party software,) but needed sub-second precision, I added a 1:1 supplemental table, and an after insert trigger on the original table to post the timestamp into the supplemental table.
If you only need to know the ORDER of records being added within the same second, you could do the same thing, only using a sequence as a data source for the supplemental field.
I'm storing a simple java.util.date in an Oracle XE database via hibernate.
When testing with JUnit if I can retrieve the correct value, I get an error like this:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
expected:<Sun Dec 28 11:20:27 CET 2008>
but was:<2008-12-28 11:20:27.0>
The value is stored in an Oracle Date column (which should have a second-precision) which looks okay to me. Also, I'm surprised that 11:20:27 is not equal to 11:20:27.0. Or does this have to do with timezones?
Any help is welcome.
Thorsten
Okay, worked some more on it ...
Oracle Date columns only store values with an accuracy of a second.
Java Dates do contain milliseconds, but they are typically not printed. So
expected:
was actually created by a date like 11:20:27,345, which is of course not equal to 11:20:27.0
Solution:
either only use full second dates to store and retrieve
or
get hibernate to create the correct Oracle Datatype (TIMESTAMP) - this is very dependent on the dialect specified in the hibernate config (OracleDialect and Oracle10gDialect create different types).
If you compare a java.util.Date to a java.sql.Date that both represent the same instant in time, equals(Object) will return false (it considers two objects of different classes to never be equal).
Your tests need to account for that. The easiest way to do this is to convert the dates to UNIX time (e.g. java.util.Date.getTime()) and compare those values.