I am currently using Visual C++ to develop my DLL program. This DLL also uses outside executables inside my local hard drive.
When doing testing, I manually install the DLL using this command regsvr32 filename.dll at the Windows command prompt.
What I would like to do now is an installer, like the Installshield etc. So, after this I can easily install it on other Windows machines without the need to manually use the command prompt, copying those separates executables into the hard drive and so on.
Is there a way to do this the open source way? or Is it available inside Visual Studio? Need advice on best practice.
Another possibility since you're already using VS, you can create a "Setup and deployment project", found under "Other Project Types". This allows you amongst other things to select the output of another VS project (in the same solution), add registry entries, package files from the file system, and register (regsvr32) files. To register a DLL (once you have added it to the project), change the "Register" entry on the "Properties" Window to vsdrfCOMSelfReg. However if you're packaging other executables off the hard drive, I'm not sure how you would make sure that they run. You prob have to make sure that you package all their run-times and dependencies.
AFAIR this functionality is not available in the express editions of VS.
WiX is open source, and there's a free (no cost) version of InstallShield available for Visual Studio 2010, so both.
Related
I'm a new C++ / visual studio learner so sorry if I don't know something that might be obvious.
Alright so I understand that to get my programs to run on machines without VS I need to distribute the correct .dll files to them. Here are my questions:
How do I know what files to distribute? Once I know the files I need, where can I find them? I already have the .dll package microsoft provides installed but I don't know where to find it or the files in it.
How do I supply these files to the user? Can I just include the files with the installer and then on program start through code move the files to the correct spot? How do I do this? Is it possible to move the files to the correct location through the installer or do I have to do it when the program launches for the first time?
Thanks! Sorry if I left out information or if I formatted this question improperly.
You can choose to statically link your application, then no C++ DLLs are needed.
Otherwise, Microsoft has "redistributable package" EXEs for each version of Visual Studio that you can include with the files that you provide to users. Your installer then runs these as a sub-install. (It does something like start another process that runs that package then waits for it to finish.)
Google visual studio redistributable.
Normally you would use a setup program / installer like InstallShield or WIX, and some of them already have built-in support for adding the redistributables for C++ and DirectX.
I create a new custom project type using a VSPackage project inheriting of MPF library (http://mpfproj11.codeplex.com/). As a result I obtain a .vsix but I need add this project type using a .msi. I'm using the Visual Studio 2010 Setup projet for it. In my setup project I add the content of the VS Package in the same directory where the .vsix put then, but I think Ineed to put in the registre the new type of project because when I use the setup , the project template does not come out in Visual Studio and when I give double click the file with extension of the type of new project and does not recognize it. When I look the registry after install the vsix, this was one of the things that I found diferent. I add this entries in my setup project but It's not working yet.I'm missing something else?
In the projecttemplatedir is the directory where I put the .dll of the project type, the vsixmifest and pkgdef. The project template is in [User]\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Templates\ProjectTemplates\[Name of new Project Type]\[projecttemplate.zip]
Best Regards
PS: The project type is for VS 2013 but I'm using the VS 2010 Setup project ;)
OK, so first the "don't"s of doing this:
In general, if you are installing via MSI you shouldn't be doing anything user-specific -- no writing in HKEY_CURRENT_USER, nor writing within their Documents folder, LocalAppData, or Visual Studio folders, etc. If you see yourself writing files or registry keys in either of those places, that should be your hint that there's a better way to do what you're trying to do. For what you've shown so far, this raises more than a few red flags for me.
Second, don't ever go writing keys into 12.0_Config. That part of the hive is nothing more than a cache that's built up from other parts of the registry and on-disk .pkgdef files from extensions. It's rebuilt in any number of senarios, including installing new extensions. Any writes there you should presume will get blown away at any time. If you need to write things there you should either (a) write in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\[version] and run devenv /setup or (2) [preferred] put your keys in a .pkgdef inside your extension which gets merged into 12.0_Config for you automatically.
Now the dos:
You said you already had a .vsix produced by the SDK: you can put project templates in there. You can then register those templates in the .vsixmanifest and those will pull in. That's far easier than mucking around with files in Documents -- that's the user's directory...don't go playing with that.
Once you have a .vsix that does most of what you need, you should simply take the files within that and install the files in a folder within C:\Program Files [(x86)]\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\Extensions. Even better, you might just want to WiX toolset to build your installer, since it has built-in support for installing extensions. It also has built-in support for invoking the "/setup" process if that's what you need to do as well. Visual Studio Setup projects are no longer supported in newer versions of Visual Studio, so you're better off starting with a technology that isn't already obsolete. WiX is even what we use at Microsoft to do the setup work for Visual Studio itself, so it's definitely up to the task.
Last point: almost everything when it comes to Visual Studio extensibility can be done with a VSIX directly, so presume there's a good way to do something that way before falling back to an MSI. Internally, we can register the entire C# and VB language services with just a VSIX -- they're quite powerful.
I found the answer in this link Registering Project and Item Templates. I set projecttemplatedir entry with
[User]\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Templates\ProjectTemplates[Name of new Project Type][projecttemplate.zip] that is where i put the project template.
I'm working on a project with Qt using the Visual Studio Addin in VS2010 Professional. Two branches of the project use two different Qt versions (4.8.4 and 5.0.2) so I have both versions of the addin installed (1.1.11 and 1.2.1). I'm also actively developing using at least two computers, both Windows 7, for which I have a networked, roaming user profile. I don't know the specifics of how this user account or network is setup.
Qt is installed in different locations on each system. If I set the correct paths in the Addin on one system (System A), it changes them for the other system (System B) and then complains to me that Qt doesn't exist at that directory when I later log into System B. Is there a way to save the paths to Qt versions on the system, without it affecting the paths on the other system? Or will I have to just deal with changing them each time I change computers?
EDIT:
I from looking through the source for the visual studio add-in, I found that these settings are saved as user registry values. I don't know much about Windows roaming profiles but I'm now assuming that user registry values are copied between computers just as their files are. I don't know if there's any way to move these registry values somewhere else without having to edit and recompile the add-in. I suppose the only other thing I could do is write a startup script to edit these settings upon login.
EDIT: Make sure visual studio on each computer can find the right add-in and the right environment variables on the computer you are using.
http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtVSAddin
In this documentation it talks about where it gets installed to:
"%USERPROFILE%\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Addins"
So you could manually change the location of the addin, to some local system path.
How to -> Visual Studio Add In Manager
Or you could change the qt path that the Add-in refers to every time you log in, or right before opening visual studio.
Setting a system environment variable from a Windows batch file?
I would use version control to just get the files that you need for the project, and exclude/ignore all the environment specific elements of the project.
One way you could achieve this is:
To install Bazaar. Create a standalone tree of the code on a shared drive or on a location on the harddrive that both users have access to.
Do an initial add of all your source and header files and your qt .pro file.
Checkout or branch the code to user specific folders. In those user specific folders, let Visual Studio create all the user specific, Qt Add-on specific, (etc) files.
Also create a .bzrignore file with files and folders like these listed:
Debug
Release
x64
*.ncb
*.suo
*.user
*.vssscc
*.scc
*.vspscc
*.lnk
*.bak
*.aps
*.pro.user
object_script.*
Makefile
Makefile.Release
Makefile.Debug
Then when you want to try your build for each setup, finish your edits, commit/push your changes on the user that did the edits, and update/pull on the user that wants the changes.
Although the version control may be a little tricky to get started with, it will make project collaboration both scalable, trackable, and very manageable!
And you aren't limited to Bazaar. Check this wiki out if you need ideas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software
Another way that you could try to go about doing this, is to have all the source code in some path (either absolute or relatively up from your projects locations), or on the computer, and have the project folders reference those paths in the project folders, but have two separate project folders. This would not be nearly as elegant, but would work.
C:/path/to/vs_proj1
C:/path/to/vs_proj2
C:/path/other/proj/source
And in the properties for vs_proj1, and vs_proj2, in the part about locating source files, have ../other/proj/source to find it relatively, or put the absolute path C:/path/other/proj/source.
Also two other things to be aware of when sharing projects over a drive like this, is that when you are referencing libraries, you may want to store that information in a user specific macro file in Visual Studio and reference the macro in your project settings.
Visual Studio - Where to define custom path macros?
And while I'm here, you may need to #define some things in your program to allow for behavior for one version of Qt that isn't in the other.
So for example, in the source of your program, you might have:
#if QT_VERSION < 0x050000
// some Qt 4.x specific stuff, not in Qt 5
#else
// some Qt 5 specific stuff, not in Qt 4.x
#endif
Hope that helps.
I have an update to third party .DLL that must be installed onto my clients' computers. We currently employ automated installs via MSI that are created in Visual Studio 2010
Unfortunately, the third party .DLL was versioned incorrectly and file version of it was not increased by the provider (they only increased assembly version). The third party provider is Microsoft, so waiting on them to fix the issue is not realistic. We need to get the new .DLL to people now and within one MSI update. Right now, MSI update is not overriding the .DLL
Is there a way within VS2010 Setup project to force override a .DLL even if the file versions match?
If you are willing to do msi postbuild tweaking you can hit the File table and do "version lying". Another thought is to not put that DLL in your install. Find an installer from Microsoft ( if it exists ) that you can put into a bootstrapper or create your own installer and use AMUS instead of OMUS for the version rules.
Can't you just add the file to your installer as a 'file' and install it with the other files? Don't set it as project output, or any of the canned install actions. Go to the file portion and right click the "Application Files" folder, and say > add file. Navigate to the file that you want and choose it.
I am wondering about the need for an install wizard for my little Windows Forms application. No database access, just file access on a shared network drive.
I have seen times when an executable is sent in an email, copied to a desktop and used.
Other times when an 'install wizard' seems to be used to set up the application.
What dictates the need for this or not?
And if I want to use one - what needs to be added to my windows form app?
If your application is truly just an .exe file, it's probably okay to distribute it as-is without an installer. This might be preferable for more advanced users, because they won't have to worry about cleaning up a broken/unwanted install - they can just delete the file and be done with it.
On the other hand, most Windows users are used to working with installers, and having shortcuts automatically created on the desktop or Start->Programs. This is where an .msi can really help. Also, using an installer will usually put your application in the "Add or Remove Programs" control panel, which most people know how to use. Also, if your application is more than just a single .exe file (e.g. multiple .dlls and resource files), you'll probably want to use an .msi.
Creating an installer is easy, look at "Setup Projects" in Visual Studio.
An installer is almost always a good idea, because it can work out what dependencies your application has - which you may not even be aware of.
It also looks more professional and users will have more confidence in it.
There's an open source installer called NSIS that's pretty good, if you find the Visual Studio setup wizard too clunky, as I sometimes have.
Sometimes simply copying a file just isn't sufficient, this is when you need a setup program.
Checking if the correct version of .NET is installed
Installing C++ runtime dependencies
Creating a desktop shortcut
Setting up "default" configuration data
Adding exceptions to the Windows Firewall
Preventing installation on unsupported systems such as Windows 95/98/ME
etc, etc.
If your program is a stand-alone application with no dependencies and can run on a stock-standard install of Windows 95... then you don't need to worry about setup ;) But if your app has any external dependencies then you want to spend some time on setup.