Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
For 9 months, I've been having reCaptcha problems. Craigslist is the main problem. It sometimes happens in Hotmail too. Anytime I go to post or respond to a CL ad that requires Image Verification (recaptcha), neither the challenge words or the box to type the words into pops up. Refreshing does not help. Hitting "new image" or "audio words" does nothing.
I end up forfeiting placing or responding to certain ads. As you might imagine, CL's Help Forums has amounted to no answers whatsoever. Some suggested I go to Google reCaptcha links. That did not help because anything Google-related was blocked even though in the Toolbar Google was activated. Both posters and staff alike venture all manner of solutions, none of which actually helped. It's mainly guesswork.
Many told me it was a scripting error and to disable javascript. Others claimed it was Norton (somehow) blocking any sites using reCaptcha. Norton comes with my Comcast X-Finity account. I could be wrong but I didn't see anything specific in Norton that might be blocking reCaptcha imaging. One person even swore it's a simple as fully rebooting the modem. Nope. Another said try another browser. I downloaded Mozilla Firefox. Firefox works great for everything but reCaptcha. I've even went to other tech sites. Again, no answers. 9 months and not one person or site can tell me how come CL's reCaptcha image words challenge won't pop up or how to fix it. If fixing it involves typing in code, I have no idea how to do that.
Surely there must be a fix for this as reCaptcha isn't rocket science. As specific as I've been seeking help, you'd think there'd be a solution?
Would someone kindly help?
"That did not help because anything Google-related was blocked" -- there's your problem. reCAPTCHA served from Google servers, so if you can't access anything Google-related, you can't access reCAPTCHA.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm having Problem logging in when I open any stackexchange website via Mozilla Firefox.
I use my yahoo login, so when my yahoo account is logged in, I should automatically logged in to stackexchange. So when I open stackoverflow for example, it recognizes me (a message appears on top of the page saying: "Hello Ashkan, Welcome back...), when click the message to log in, it refreshes the page but I'm not logged in.
Now I'm using chrome to post this question and it works fine.
I don't know it may be a silly mistake, but I'm having this problem for about 2 or 3 months, since Firefox is my favorite browser it's a little annoying to open chrome separately to search for questions on stackoverflow and etc.
I deleted cookies for stackoverflow.com and stackexchange.com, and the problem went away. The instructions to delete cookies for specific websites is available here. I don't know why this happened, but this solution worked for me.
I am facing the same problem and i did all that without a good result But i have found a way around. Under this answer was a link to connect to stackoverflow with facebook. I clicked on that link, it could not connect me but i just clicked on back and i am connected. Hope this will help someone out there.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
What's the Best way to let people know that a site can also be viewed in mobile devices?
Am thinking about putting something in the footer for computer users, that is hidden for mobile devices with display: none;, but what to put in there is the question? I've been searching google, and don't really see any images that say Mobile-Ready or something that would be unobtrusive to computer users that could let them know that the site is also optimized for mobile devices as well.
For example, what do other sites do about this? Should I even bother with worrying about this?
Also, we are using a mobile script in Javascript from this site here: http://detectmobilebrowsers.com/ that returns a boolean value false, if it is not any mobile devices that it searches for.
I wouldn't bother, people will see (and hopefully not notice) that it works when then visit your site on a mobile device.
Letting people know you have a mobile website isn't needed. Also a mobile-device website a part from the normal website isn't really '2013'.
I should go for
CSS #media-queries.
So in this case the people who visit it on desktop have no clue it's responsive, and people that visit the mobile-site don't know it's the same website, because of the #media-queries.
I see you have tagged the Q as CSS but if you have control over the backend you could first decided on what is a "mobile device" and then send back different data.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know how to disable Firefox's security warning:
Although this page is encrypted, the information you have entered is to be sent over an unencrypted connection and could easily be read by a third party.
Are you sure you want to continue sending this information?
I have set all security.warn to false in about:config. I still get the annoying pop-up.
Thanks for the help.
Unfortunately, as of 12.x it still can't be disabled.
You can read a years-long argument here on bugzilla about this very issue. Log in and upvote it!
I have found complaints about this message going back at least six years. This is regularly reported on bugzilla and through the other Mozilla support sites and is a popular question on many other support forums. The main Moz devs apparently feel it is a critical security feature that should not be disabled. Personally I find it very annoying, I hit MSDN via Google searches all day long and I have to click through that stupid warning every time. If you see it a lot, it quickly becomes one of those warnings you automatically ignore which makes the "mandatory security feature" argument rather unconvincing.
At least as of Firefox 16.x (and possibly before), the following strategy will disable the security warning:
In about:config, change the value of security.warn_viewing_mixed from true to false.
Also, the dialog box referenced in the question has a checkbox that says "Alert me whenever I'm about to view an encrypted page that contains some unencrypted information." You can simply uncheck that box the next time you encounter it, which will accomplish the same thing as manually changing the setting in about:config.
For me the below code handles the security pop up
IAlert alert = driver.switchto().alert();
alert.acccept();
Thanks
Anil
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Are there any services that allow you to place advertising in Windows software? I want to give away my software for free but still need to eat!
Check out OpenCandy, they have a really nice concept IMHO:
only a single, opt-in ad - in the installer (so your application remains ad-less). There is an interesting post about them # DonationCoder.
It is, of course, trivial to put a fixed collection of adverts into your code. The trouble comes if you want to sell eyeballs and have the ads change. Then the code has to go talk over the network to get new adds.
Many people would have a name for this: adware. If people find you making network connections behind their back, as it were, they are likely to break out some more negative terms.
However, if you are completely open and honest about it when you offer the code for download, then your conscience might be clear.
Practically, you need to have code that makes a network connection to some site of yours, pulls the ad content, and displays it in some sort of annoying popup.
Check with individual affiliate programs to see if they allow links in applications.
You can also try the Freemium model: Turn on some extra features if they pay for your program.
Or link to your website for support information, instructions, etc., and place ads there.
Or offer an e-mail newsletter with updates, news, etc. Advertising in these is easier.
You can also ask this over at http://www.startups.com
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Are you planning in requiring Google's Chrome Frame in production for your own websites?
Have you tested it?
Would your opinion on wether to use it or not change if Google were to require it for Youtube? (It will be required for Google Wave)
I wish they would require everyone who views YouTube to use it. I hate programming specifically just for IE... If it were required for YouTube I don't think that any of the users I care about would lack it.
I had a hard time finding info about big sites that require GCF, so I was a bit worried about requiring it for IE 6 and 7.
But I went ahead with it on a site with 6-digit number of monthly users, and the results were great.
IE 6 and 7 usage bombed, and about 90% of that usage was picked up by GCF. Only a few complaints from annoying users, but telling them to "just click install" has been a good enough solution.
The users lost were also less likely to purchase than those with better browsers.
I am aware of at least one site that now points to it rather than saying they don't support IE6.
If you've made the decision to not support IE6, for whatever reason, it at least gives the opportunity for more users to maybe* access your site.
*I say 'maybe' because if users aren't able to upgrade their browser it's quite unlikley they're able/allowed to install such extensions/plugins either.
I always wait a bit before picking up new technologies such as this. I'm a patient person and don't feel the need to rush out and get the latest thing first.
Once the consensus is that it looks ok, runs ok and won't hurt me or my nearest and dearest I'll have a look.