assembly programming in Emacs how to?
I want Emacs to do following things
1. assembling
2. run the just before made program inside Emacs
3. debugging with watching flags and registers as like ollydbg or softice
4. decompile executable file for see what assembly codes are made by c
but I don't know how to do this
could somebody let me know ?
Which operating system (and machine architecture) are you using? I think that's quite essential information for questions about assembly programming.
I'll try to answer your four points anyway:
Just run your assembler (e.g. as) from M-x compile.
Run it from a shell buffer or from shell-command (bound to M-!).
Emacs' built-in graphical debugging support is started with M-x gdb. You may have to look for some external debugger support package if GDB is not suitable for your purposes.
For disassembling object code, I'd use GDB. But I think if you have the C sources, it would be better to compile them with the -S flag to see the assembly code emitted by the compiler instead of what can be reconstructed from the machine code.
Since you mention SoftICE, I'm assuming you're on windows.
(Good old times, by the way. If anybody ever used SoftICE on windows 9x, he/she will know what I mean :)
I don't use Emacs, but here's how to get started:
Get the tools you need to assemble your program (ie: at least, the assembler and the linker). On windows, the MASM package comes with everything you need : http://www.masm32.com/
Figure out wich commands you need to compile a simple hello world.
Configure Emacs so that it runs the above commands for you
Related
Should I use GDB or Radare2 for reversing an executable(I am a beginner)?
I try to programming in C and I got a SegFault. I want to Reverse Engineer it to get experience in Assembly and see where I get the SegFault.
For debugging an executable you built from source yourself, GDB is intended as a debugger. You can use layout reg to get a disassembly + registers view which can help understanding segfaults, if looking at C variables didn't help.
Debug info from compiling with gcc -g means you don't need to reverse-engineer anything, just use a normal debugger. But to get experience in asm, using a debugger both ways (source view and asm view) can help you understand how the compiler used certain asm instructions to implement each C statement. So you definitely want a debugger that can take advantage of debug info. There are some GUI GDB front-ends, like https://www.gdbgui.com that can be easier to use than command-line GDB.
But see also How to remove "noise" from GCC/clang assembly output? for more about seeing how C compiles to asm.
I haven't used radare2. I assume it has features that are good for intentionally-obfuscated executables without source, which is the opposite of what you have from compiling your own C programs with a normal compiler.
I would recommend Radare2 because it's clearer than GDB and easier for beginners ;)
When I'm stepping into debugged program, it says that it can't find crt/crt_c.c file. I have sources of gcc 6.3.0 downloaded, but where is crt_c.c in there?
Also how can I find source code for printf and rand in there? I'd like to step through them in debugger.
Ide is codeblocks, if that's important.
Edit: I'm trying to do so because I'm trying to decrease size of my executable. Going straight into freestanding leaves me with a lot of missing functions, so I intend to study and replace them one by one. I'm trying to do that to make my program a little smaller and faster, and to be able to study assembly output a bit easier.
Also, forgot to mention, I'm on windows, msys2. But answer is still helpful.
How can I find source code for printf and rand in there?
They (printf, rand, etc....) are part of your C standard library which (on Linux) is outside of the GCC compiler. But crt0 is provided by GCC (however, is often not compiled with debug information) and some C files there are generated in the build tree during compilation of GCC.
(on Windows, most of the C standard library is proprietary -inside some DLL provided by MicroSoft- and you are probably forbidden to look into the implementation or to reverse-engineer it; AFAIK EU laws might mention some exception related to interoperability¸ but then you need to consult a lawyer and I am not a lawyer)
Look into GNU glibc (or perhaps musl-libc) if you want to study its source code. libc is generally using system calls (listed in syscalls(2)) provided by the Linux kernel.
I'd like to step through them in debugger.
In practice you won't be able to do that easily, because the libc is provided by your distribution and has generally been compiled without debug information in DWARF format.
Some Linux distributions provide a debuggable variant of libc, perhaps as some libc6-dbg package.
(your question lacks motivation and smells like some XY problem)
I intend to study and replace them one by one.
This is very unrealistic (particularly on Windows, whose system call interface is not well documented) and could take you many years (or perhaps more than a lifetime). Do you have that much time?
Read also Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces and look into OsDev wiki.
I'm trying to do so because I'm trying to decrease size of my executable.
Wrong approach. A debugger needs debug info (e.g. in DWARF) which will increase the size of the executable (but could later be stripped). BTW standard C functions are in some common shared library (or DLL on Windows) which is used by many processes.
I'm on windows, msys2.
Bad choice. Windows is proprietary. Linux is made of free software (more than ten billions lines of source code, if you consider all useful packages inside a typical Linux distribution), whose source code you could study (even if it would take several lifetimes).
I want to write a GUI based debugger wrapped over GDB. Because, I dont want the program to stop after watch points or break points. Instead, it should redirect the details like filename, line number, new value and stuffs to a file and continue execution.
I am pretty bad at scripting. So, I want some starting point to start developing front end for GDB. As far as I googled, this link http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb-5.1.1/html_node/gdb_211.html is not much understandable for a beginner in this activity?
Hopefully, I will get help on development in C/C++.
For writing a GDB frontend, you indeed want to use the GDB/MI protocol but perhaps read this up-to-date copy instead of the older one you linked to.
Sample GDB/MI session
(Lightly edited version of this section from the GDB manual)
Launching GDB with the MI Command Interpreter
$ gdb -q --interpreter=mi2
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
(gdb)
File /bin/true
-file-exec-and-symbols /bin/true
^done
(gdb)
Break main
-break-insert main
^done,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",addr="0x00000000004014c0",func="main",file="true.c",fullname="/usr/src/debug/coreutils-8.17/src/true.c",line="59",times="0",original-location="main"}
(gdb)
Run and Breakpoint Hit
-exec-run
=thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="2275"
=thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"
^running
*running,thread-id="all"
(gdb)
=library-loaded,id="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",target-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",host-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
=library-loaded,id="/lib64/libc.so.6",target-name="/lib64/libc.so.6",host-name="/lib64/libc.so.6",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
=breakpoint-modified,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",addr="0x00000000004014c0",func="main",file="true.c",fullname="/usr/src/debug/coreutils-8.17/src/true.c",line="59",times="1",original-location="main"}
*stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",disp="keep",bkptno="1",frame={addr="0x00000000004014c0",func="main",args=[{name="argc",value="1"},{name="argv",value="0x7fffffffde98"}],file="true.c",fullname="/usr/src/debug/coreutils-8.17/src/true.c",line="59"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="1"
(gdb)
Continue
-exec-continue
^running
*running,thread-id="1"
(gdb)
=thread-exited,id="1",group-id="i1"
=thread-group-exited,id="i1",exit-code="0"
*stopped,reason="exited-normally"
Quitting GDB
(gdb)
-gdb-exit
^exit
Existing GDB/MI Clients
There are several GDB/MI client implementations in C, C++, Java, Python. I'll list a few that I find easy to read:
The inactive libmigdb project (sample program, public interfaces) -- The good news is that it's an attempt at creating a reusable C library. The bad news is that it's not well maintained, e.g. I think it's missing GDB non-stop mode and catchpoint commands support, features that your use case would likely need.
python-gdb-mi -- Quite readable if you know Python
The C++ GDB/MI client code in QtCreator -- Also quite readable though it's written as part of an abstraction layer to support multiple debugger engines.
You might want to also browse this list of GDB frontends.
Since you already pointed out the gdb/mi interface maybe an existing solution might give you an idea on how to address your needs. Here is a list of existing interfaces. Look at their approaches and how they address the different issues.
Another approach that might be helpful could be automated sessions. Not to discourage you from writing a gdb gui, but such an automation could be a good start to get a feeling for the steps needed and could maybe also used as a start. Maybe generating a session script and starting gdb with it. gdb -x to load a command file.
Here a link concerning automating:
What are the best ways to automate a GDB debugging session?
I hope it helps. Good luck!
Though writing new GUI tools gives you more knowledge, I suggest you to take up eclipe and modify according to your needs. It saves lot of your time as well as more flexible.
Programming a gdb wrapper to achieve your goal is way to much work.
See how you can execute script on breakpoint hits: gdb scripting: execute commands at selected breakpoint
Also take a look a gdb tracepoints: http://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Tracepoints.html
I'm pretty sure this is possible but I'm not sure how to go about it. I'm very new to building with GCC in general and I have never used FreeRTOS, but I'd like to try getting the OS up and running on a TI ARM Cortex MCU but with a slight twist: I'd like to get it up and running with Pascal. I'm curious:
Is this even possible to get work? If not, the next issues are kind of moot points.
From my Delphi days, I vaguely recall the ability to access functions in C libraries. I'm wondering if I would have access to the C routines in FreeRTOS.
If I use the GCC version (preferable) would I be able to debug using OpenOCD on the target? I'm not quite sure how debug symbols work and if it's more or less language agnostic (hopefully, in this case).
As kind of a bonus question a bit outside the scope of the original query, can I simulate FreeRTOS on an x86 processor (e.g. my development PC) for easier debugging during development? (With a Pascal program, of course..)
I haven't found any documentation on achieving this, so hopefully someone here can shed some light! Any resources would be most helpful. Like I said, I'm very new to this kind of development. I'm also open to suggestions if you think there is a better alternative.
FYI, my preferred host configuration would be something similar to:
Linux (Ubuntu/Debian)
Eclipse IDE for development, unit testing, and hopefully simulation / debugging
OpenOCD for target debugging
GNU Pascal + FreeRTOS on target
FreeRTOS is C source code, so like you say you would have to have some mechanism for linking C with your Pascal programs. Also, FreeRTOS relies on certain registers to be used for things like passing a parameter into a task (as a hypothetical example, the task might always expect the parameter to be in register R0) so you would have to ensure the ABI for the C compiler and the Pascal compiler was the same - or have your task entry in C then have it call a Pascal function (very nasty). Then there is the issue of interrupts, calling inline macros, etc. I would say this would be extremely difficult to achieve.
Both GNU Pascal and Free Pascal support linking to C (gcc) and ARM, as well as calling pascal code from C etc. Writing a header and declaring the prototypes with cdecl is all there is to it.
Macros are a bit bigger problem. Usually I just rewrite them to inline functions (what they should have been anyway). Except for the macro/header issue, the problems are more compiler specific functionality (which you also would have a problem with when porting from one C compiler to the next)
If you prefer TP/Delphi dialect, Free Pascal is the better choice.
I run my old Delphi code fine on my sheevaplug.
There is already an example for FreeRTOS/GCC/OpenOCD on a TI Cortex-M3 (was Luminary Micro Cortex-M3). Be aware though that this is a really old example and both the Eclipse and OpenOCD versions used are out of date.
Although there is an Eclipse project provided, the project is configured as a standard make (as opposed to a managed make) project, so there is a standard makefile that can be just as easily executed from the command line as from within Eclipse.
http://www.freertos.org/portLM3Sxxxx_Eclipse.html
I'm in an Assembly class focusing on the intel 8086 architecture (all compiling / linking / execution comes from running DOS on win7 via DOS-Box).
I've finished programming the latest assignment, but as I have yet to program any program successfully the first time through, I am now stuck trying to debug my code.
I have visual studio 2010 and was wondering if there was some built in feature that would help me debug my assembly code, specifically, I'm looking to track the value of a variable.
Failing that, instructions pointing to a DOS-Box debugger (and instructions!) would be much appreciated. (I think I've been able to run codeview debug, but I couldn't figure out how to do what I was looking for).
You are generating 16-bit code, you have to break into a museum to find better tooling. Try Borland's, maybe the debugger included with Turbo C.
Yes, indeed, you can use the debugger in VS to examine pretty much everything. Irvine's site has a section specifically on using the debugger here. You can examine registers, use the watch window, etc. He also has a guide for highlighting asm keywords if you need that.
Edit: as Hans pointed out, if you are using 16-bit instead of 32-bit protected, you'll need different tools. There are several choices, listed here.
Borland's tools for DOS were called tasm, tlink, and tdebug.