I'm trying to get results of a facet query using solrj, but it seems it doesn't matter whether I add the facet query or not. I get the same document list anyway.
So this query returns the same document list...
query.setQuery(searchString);
query.setFacet(true);
query.addFacetField("CATNAME_STR");
query.addFacetQuery("CATNAME_STR:" + facetName);
...with this query
query.setQuery(searchString);
query.setFacet(true);
query.addFacetField("CATNAME_STR");
Only difference is I can get number of documents that matches the facet query with response.getFacetQuery();
I was expecting it to work like
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&facet=on&facet.field=CATNAME_STR&fq=CATNAME_STR:Erasmus
Any ideas?
Thanks.
By the way I'm using Solr Version 3.1.0 and solr-core-3.1.0
As it turns out fq=CATNAME_STR:Erasmus does not mean query.addFacetQuery("CATNAME_STR:Erasmus") but instead query.addFilterQuery("CATNAME_STR:Erasmus")
Related
I'm querying ES to get me list of documents within some specific timestamp. Now I encountered a scenario where we had multiple versions of single documentId. By default ES returned me all the versions of that single documentId. My requirement is to get only one last version of all the docs.
Also I wanted to get all the ES response sorted in Ascending order of one the indexed timestamp field(called as streamingSegmentStartTime)
my current query looks like following :
{"size":25,"query":{"bool":{"must":[{"terms":{"streamingSegmentId":["00002933-be25-3b9c-9970-472b41aa53cc"],"boost":1.0}},{"range":{"streamingSegmentStartTime":{"from":1644480000000,"to":1647476658447,"include_lower":true,"include_upper":false,"boost":1.0}}}],"adjust_pure_negative":true,"boost":1.0}},"_source":{"includes":["errorCount","benefitId","streamingSegmentStopTime", "fanoutPublishTimestamp", "search.version"],"excludes":[]},"sort":[{"streamingSegmentStartTime":{"order":"asc"}}, {"_timestamp": {"order": "desc"}}]}
try to use the collapse parameter to collapse search results based on field values
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.1/collapse-search-results.html#collapse-search-results
I am trying to create one query in the Kibana search bar to retrieve some specific documents.
The goal is to get the documents that either have the field "myDate" before 2019-10-08 or "myDate" does not exist.
I have documents that meet one or the other condition.
I started by creating this query :
myDate:<=2019-10-08 OR NOT _exists_:myDate
But no documents were returned.
Since it did not work, I tried some other ways i found online :
myDate:<=2019-10-08 OR NOT (_exists_:myDate)
myDate:<=2019-10-08 OR !(_exists_:myDate)
myDate:<=2019-10-08 OR NOT (myDate:*)
But still, no results.
When I use either "part" of the "OR" condition, it works perfectly : I get either the documents who have myDate<=2019-10-08 or the ones that do not have a "myDate" field filled.
But when I try with both conditions, I get no document.
I have to use only the search bar to find these documents, neither an elasticsearch rest query nor by using kibana filters.
Thank you for your help :)
Below query works. Use Inspect button in kibana to see what query is actually being fired and make sure you are using correct index pattern as well.
(myDate:<=2019-12-31) OR (NOT _exists_:myDate)
Take a look at Query DSL documentation for Boolean operators for more better understanding with different use cases
I'm using Solr to run a query on one of our cores. Suppose my documents have two fields: ID, and Name. I also have a separate list of IDs I'm grabbing from a database and passing into the query to boost certain results.
If the document gets returned in the query and the ID is in the list it goes to the top of the results, and if it gets returned in the query and the ID is not in the list then it goes below those that are in the list. The former is from the "boost". My query is something like this -
http://mysolrserver:8983/solr/MyCore/MyQueryHandler?q=Smith&start=0&rows=25&bq=Id%3a(36+OR+76+OR+90+OR+224+OR+391)
I am able to get the boost query working but I need the boosted results to be in alphabetical order by name, then the non boosted results under that also in alphabetical order by name. I need to know what to user for the &sort= parameter.
&sort=score%20desc,Name+asc does not work.
I've looked over a lot of documentation, but I still don't know if this even possible. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
Solr version is 6.0.1. I am actually using SolrNet to interface with Solr, but I think I can figure out the SolrNet part if I know what the url's &sort= parameter value needs to be.
I figured it out, by doing away with the boost query. I added a sort query using the "exists" function and passing it a sub-query for the ID. The exists returns a boolean value to sort on, then I added the name as a second sort. It works perfect!!
The URL looks like this:
http://mysolrserver:8983/solr/MyCore/MyQueryHandler?q=Smith&start=0&rows=25&sort=exists(query({!v=%27Id:(36+OR+76+OR+90+OR+224+OR+391)%27}))%20DESC,%20Name%20ASC
The closest match to your requirement is the query elevation component[1] .
In your particular case I would first sort my Ids according to my requirements ( sorting them by name for example), then maintain them in the elevate.xml.
At query time you can use the "forceElevation" parameter to force the elevation and then sort the remaining results by name.
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Query+Elevation+Component
We're running Solr 3.6 and are trying to apply a conditional sort on the result set. To clarify, the data is a set of bids, and we want to add the option to sort by the current user's bid, so it can't function as a regular sort (as the bid will be different for each user that runs the query).
The documents in the result set include a "CurrentUserId" and "CurrentBid" field, so I think we need something like the following to sort:
sort=((CurrentUserId = 12345) ? CurrentBid : 0) desc
This is just pseudocode, but the idea is that if the currentUserId in Solr matches the user Id (12345 in this example), then sort by CurrentBid, otherwise, just use 0.
It seems like doing a sort by query might be the way to go with achieving this (or at least form part of the solution), using something like the following query:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=:&sort=query(CurrentUserId:10330 AND CurrentBid:[1 TO *])+desc
This doesn't seem to be working for me though, and results in the following error:
sort param could not be parsed as a query, and is not a field that exists in the index: ...
The Solr documentation indicates that the query function can be used as a sort parameter from Solr 1.4 onwards, so this seems like it should work.
Any advice on how to go about achieving this would be greatly appreciated.
According to the Solr Documentation link you provided,
Any type of subquery is supported through either parameter dereferencing $otherparam or direct specification of the query string in the LocalParams via "v".
So based on the examples and your query, I think one or both of the following should work:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=:&sort=query($qq)+desc&qq=(CurrentUserId:10330 AND CurrentBid:[1 TO *])
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=:&sort=query({v='CurrentUserId:10330 AND CurrentBid:[1 TO *]'})+desc
I need to facet inside n documents which are selected like
... ORDER BY something DESC LIMIT 100
Is that possible with Solr? How?
this is a total hack, but here goes...
do your initial query, and get your results back.
construct a new query, like so:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=id%3A123+OR+id%3A456...(keep OR-ing them up)...&facet=true&facet.field=something
where you concatenate all of your ids to a new query using OR. then, when you facet on your field, the facet summary will only apply to the results.
AFAIK no, that's not supported / implemented. Facets aren't really meant to be "stats" but a guidance to the end-user. Picture yourself browsing a faceted interface and seeing facets change whenever you change sort order or paging. Faceted browsing would be useless if it worked like that.
I think this would be a nice feature for the StatsComponent though.
I think this is possible with results grouping (now in trunk!):
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
... the only problem is that you can set only one 'facet.field' (i.e. group.field)
But the great thing is that you get scored facets!