Livelook.com "shares" screens without requiring shared parties to download nor install anything. These are my guesses on how it works:
Proxy server keeping track of shared parties who both are browsing the same website (thus not really screen sharing)
Interaction is being "recorded" by host side javascript and then serialized over to the client's javascript (ajax) who will then have to de-serialize the actions from the host and mimic the behaviour.
Anyone else has a take on this?
I did some research on this, and I'm pretty sure it uses Java since that is one of the requirements.
"To use LiveLOOK's screen sharing and co browsing products you will need a browser and java. Java is typically pre-installed on all computers. If your computer d..."
http://www.livelook.com/faq.asp
Here is perhaps how they get access to the screen:
http://www.daniweb.com/software-development/java/code/216988/java-code-to-capture-your-screen-as-image
But I'm a C++ man so, I wouldn't know if there's a better way to do things like that in Java.
Related
I'm building an application that will provide a service to other applications (let's pretend like it solves differential equations). So my DifEq service will be running all the time and a client application can send it requests to solve DifEqs at any point.
This would be trivial using sockets or pipes.
The problem is some applications nefariously want to send linear equations instead of differential equations, so I want to register applications that I know are sending proper DifEqs to my application.
Traditional sockets break down here, as far as I know.
Ideally, I'd like to be able to look at some information about the application that is making a request of me and (either through some meta-data on that application, through communication with my web site, or through some other, unkown method) determine it is an acceptable DifEq app. Furthermore, this ideal method would not be spoofable without a root/admin-level compromise of the underlying OS. If the linear equation app is also a root kit, I'll concede to being broken. :)
I need to be able to do this on Windows, OS X, and Linux (and maybe Android); but I recognize that it may not be the same solution on all platforms. So, how would you accomplish this (specify the platform you are focusing on, if appropriate)? I've done a lot of server-side development, but it's been way too many years since I've done any client-side development outside the browser and the world is very different today than it was then.
I think your question is a little confusing when it comes to talking about DifEQ vs LinearEQ.
It sounds to me like you are just looking for a routine way to verify that clients are authorized to connect. There is a lot to read up on this subject. Common methods would be to use SSL certificates to verify the identity of clients. You can also tunnel over SSH, or use OAUTH, etc, etc.
You'll have to do some more digging around the web to see what kind of authentication fits your scenario. You mention 'not spoofable'. I think that people generally end up compiling-in a certificate of private key into their application. This will stop all but the very dedicated and experienced hackers.
I have to use scanner on Internet site web page. As far as I know not Flash nor Silverlight is capable to communicate with such hardware nowadays. It looks like there is no alternative to Active-X at present for such operation (correct me if I'm wrong).
After image is scanned I have to send it to server via HTTPS and wait for processing result.
I have some alternatives here:
Start ajax polling with regular interval
Put polling functionality straight into active-x component
What approach would you personally preffer?
Is it possible to establish event mechanism for Active-X approach (when server pushes result back to a web-page?). Will events work for javascript/ajax approach?
Thank you in advance!
Have the client scan and upload a file. That's how it's done these days. Scanning software is a part of OS - at least, in Windows and MacOS it is.
With an ActiveX object, it will become a support nightmare. Also, think of all the Firefox/Chrome/Opera/Non-Windows users out there.
Also, I vaguely recall scanner support will be added in HTML5.
I'm using the Selenium Client (v 1.2.18) to do automated navigation of retail websites for which there exists no external API. My goal is to determine real-time, site-specific product availability using the "Check Availability" button that exists on a lot of these sites.
In case there's any concern, each of these checks will be initiated by a real live consumer who is actually interested in whether or not something's available at that store. There will be no superfluous requests or other internet badness.
I'm using Selenium's Grid framework so that I can run stuff in parallel and I'm keeping each of the controlled browsers open between requests. The issue I'm experiencing is that I need to perform these checks across a number of different domains, and I won't know in advance which one I will have to check next. I didn't think this would be too big an issue, but it turns out that when a Selenium browser instance gets made, it gets linked to a specific domain and I haven't been able to find any way to change what domain that is. This requires restarting a browser each time a request comes in for a domain we're not already linked to.
Oh, and the reason we're using Selenium instead something more light-weight (eg. Mechanize) is because we need something that can handle JavaScript.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I suppose you are restricted from changing domain because of same origin policy. Did you try using browser with elevated security privileges like iehta for internet explorer and chrome for firefox browsers. While using these modes of browsers, use open method in your tests and pass the URL which you want to open. This might solve your problem.
I would like to setup a http proxy on my work machine (no admin rights, WinXP) to only allow access to a whitelist of URLs. What would be the easiest solution? I prefer open-source software if possible.
Squid seems to be the de facto proxy. This link describes how to set it up on a windows box: http://www.ausgamers.com/features/read/2638752
Why not use the Content Advisor in IE? You can provide a list of approved sites, anything else is blocked. Or do you want pass-through functionality like a true proxy?
Content advisor will ask for authorization every time a javascript function is called. At least that's my experience right now, and that's how I landed here, after hours of googling.
You are right, however, if the sites in the whitelist don't use javascript intensively and I would suggest that that option be tried first because (and I'm an IT person), it's FAAAAAAAAR easier to set up Content Advisor than a proxy server. Google "noaccess.rat" and you'll come accross articles that tell you how to set up IE using a white-list approach.
Having said this, however, you must be fully aware that Content Advisor can be easily disabled, even without knowing the password. One of my users did it in no time. You can find this in google as well.
Alex
I've always wanted a way to make a socket connection to a server and allow the server to manipulate the page DOM. For example, this could be used in a stock quotes page, so the server can push new quotes as they become available.
I know this is a classic limitation (feature?) of HTTP's request/response protocol, but I think this could be implemented as a Firefox plugin (cross-browser compatibility is not important for my application). Java/Flash solutions are not acceptable, because (as far as i know) they live in a box and can't interact with the DOM.
Can anyone confirm whether this is within the ability of a Firefox plugin? Has someone already created this or something similar?
You may want to look at Comet which is a fancy name for a long running HTTP connection where the server can push updates to the page.
It should be possible. I have developed a xulrunner application that connects to a TCP server using sockets. Extension development would likely have the same capabilities. I used a library from mozdev - JSLib. Specifically check out the networking code. The fact that there is a Firefox add-on for JSlib add-on for Firefox makes more more confident.
Essentially, as I understand it, sockets are not part of JavaScript, but through XPCOM, you can get raw socket access like you would in any c/c++ application.
Warning: JSLib doesn't seem to receive a lot of attention and the mailing list is pretty sparse.
Java/Flash solutions are not acceptable, because (as far as i know)
they live in a box and can't interact with the DOM.
That's not actually true of Java. You can interact with Java via JavaScript and make DOM changes.
http://stephengware.com/proj/javasocketbridge/
In this example there are two JavaScript methods for interaction
Send:
socket_send("This was sent via the socket\n\n");
Receive:
on_socket_get(message){ more_code(message); }
You may want to look at Comet
a.k.a. server push. This does not let the server "update" the client page directly, but all the new data is sent to the page through a single connection.
Of course, a Firefox extension (as well as plugins, which are binary libraries that can do whatever any other application can do) can work with sockets too. See 1, 2.