suppose my LINQ query is like
var qry = from c in nwEntitiesContext.CategorySet.AsEnumerable()
let products = this.GetProducts().WithCategoryID(c.CategoryID)
select new Model.Category
{
ID = c.CategoryID,
Name = c.CategoryName,
Products = new Model.LazyList<Core.Model.Product>(products)
};
return qry.AsQueryable();
i just want to know what query it will generate at runtime....how to see what query it is generating from VS2010 IDE when we run the code in debug mode....guide me step by step.
There is not much to see here - it will just select all fields from the Category table since you call AsEnumerable thus fetching all the data from the Category table into memory. After that you are in object space. Well, depending on what this.GetProducts() does - and my guess it makes another EF query fetching the results into memory. If that's the case, I would strongly recommend you to post another question with this code and the code of your GetProducts method so that we can take a look and rewrite this in a more optimal way. (Apart from this, you are projecting onto a mapped entity Model.Category which again won't (and should not) work with Linq-to-Entities.)
Before reading into your query I was going to recommend doing something like this:
string sqlQueryString = ((ObjectQuery)qry).ToTraceString();
But that won't work since you are mixing Linq-to-Entities with Linq-to-objects and you will actually have several queries executed in case GetProducts queries EF. You can separate the part with your EF query and see the SQL like this though:
string sqlString = nwEntitiesContext.CategorySet.ToTraceString();
but as I mentioned earlier - that would just select everything from the Categories table.
In your case (unless you rewrite your code in a drastic way), you actually want to see what queries are run against the DB when you execute the code and enumerate the results of the queries. See this question:
exact sql query executed by Entity Framework
Your choices are SQL Server Profiler and Entity Framework Profiler. You can also try out LinqPad, but in general I still recommend you to describe what your queries are doing in more detail (and most probably rewrite them in a more optimal way before proceeding).
Try Linqpad
This will produce SELECT * FROM Categories. Nothing more. Once you call AsEnumerable you are in Linq-to-objects and there is no way to get back to Linq-to-entities (AsQueryable doesn't do that).
If you want to see what query is generated use SQL Profiler or any method described in this article.
Related
Is there a way to do
"UPDATE Item SET start_date = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP" ?
in Nhibernate without using hql/sql.
I am trying to avoid hql/sql because the rest of my code is in criteria. I want to do something like :
var item = session.get<Item>(id)
item.start_date = current_timestamp
There are two ways and sql is correct one.
Either you will
load all entities, change, update and commit, or
write sql query and let dbms handle most of the work
I am trying to avoid hql/sql because the rest of my code is in criteria
That is not a valid argument. Criteria is an API intended for relational search, and it does not support mass updates.
Different tasks, different APIs.
In this case, you can use either HQL or SQL, as the syntax is the same. I recommend the former, because you'll be using your entity/property names instead of table/column ones.
We have a database with some fields that are varchar(max) which could contain lots of text however I have a situation where I only want to select the first for example 300 characters from the field for a paginated table of results on a MVC web site for a "preview" of the field.
for a simplified example query where I want to get all locations to display in the table
(this would be paginated, so I don't just get everything - I get maybe 10 results at a time):
return db.locations;
However this gives me a location object with all the fields containing the massive amounts of text which is very time consuming to execute.
So what I resorted to before was using SQL stored procedures with the:
LEFT(field, 300)
to resolve this issue and then in the Linq to SQL .dbml file included the stored procedure to return a "location" object for the result.
However I have many queries and I don't want to have to do this for every query.
This maybe a simple solution, but I am not sure how I can phrase this on a search engine, I would appreciate anyone who can help me with this problem.
You can use functions that directly translate to those functions too, this is useful when you need to translate code that functionally works just fine in SQL at no risk in LINQ.
Have a look at System.Data.Objects.EntityFunctions
Locations.Select(loc=>System.Data.Objects.EntityFunctions.Left(loc.Field,300))
This will get directly translated into a LEFT on the server side.
EDIT: I misread LEFT for LTRIM. Here's all the String functions that can't be used in LINQ to SQL. Have you tried String.Substring()?
Your best option is to map the stored procedure and continue using it. Here is an excellent article with screen shots showing you how to do so.
If you're not using the designer tool you can also call ExecuteCommand against the DataContext. It isn't pretty, but it's what we have for now.
I found something like this worked for me:
return from locationPart in db.locations
select new LocationPart
{
Description = locationPart.description,
Text = locationPart.text.Substring(0,300)
};
Not ideal because I have to use "select new" to return a a different object, but it seems to work.
I have a simple LINQ EF query below using the method syntax. I'm using my Include statement to join four tables: Event and Doc are the two main tables, EventDoc is a many-to-many link table, and DocUsage is a lookup table.
My challenge is that I'd like to shape my results by only selecting specific columns from each of the four tables. But, the compiler is giving a compiler is giving me the following error:
'System.Data.Objects.DataClasses.EntityCollection does not contain a definition for "Doc' and no extension method 'Doc' accepting a first argument of type 'System.Data.Objects.DataClasses.EntityCollection' could be found.
I'm sure this is something easy but I'm not figuring it out. I haven't been able to find an example of someone using the multi-table include but also shaping the projection.
Thx,Mark
var qry= context.Event
.Include("EventDoc.Doc.DocUsage")
.Select(n => new
{
n.EventDate,
n.EventDoc.Doc.Filename, //<=COMPILER ERROR HERE
n.EventDoc.Doc.DocUsage.Usage
})
.ToList();
EventDoc ed;
Doc d = ed.Doc; //<=NO COMPILER ERROR SO I KNOW MY MODEL'S CORRECT
DocUsage du = d.DocUsage;
Very difficult to know what is going on without a screencap of your model, including the navigational properties on each entity.
But if your saying it's a many-to-many between Event and Doc (with EventDoc being the join table), and assuming your join table has nothing but the FK's and therefore doesn't need to be mapped, then shouldn't a single Event have many Doc's?
This query:
var query = ctx.Event.Include("EventDoc.Doc");
Would imply (based on the lack of pluralization): a single Event has a single EventDoc which has a single Doc.
But shouldn't that be: a single Event has a single EventDoc which has many Doc's.
Therefore your projection doesn't really make sense. Your trying to project to an anonymous type, with EventDate and Filename for a single Doc, but an Event has many Docs.
Maybe a projection like this would be more suitable:
var query = ctx.Event.Include("EventDoc.Docs.DocUsage")
.Select(x => new
{
EventDate = x.EventDate,
DocsForEvent = x.EventDocs.Docs
}).ToList();
And for that you work you need to fix up your model. Im surprised it even validates/compiles.
Either your model is wrong or your description of the database cardinalities in your question is. :)
Of course, i could be completely misunderstanding your database and/or model - so if i am let me know and i'll remove this answer.
Based on this question:
What is difference between Where and Join in linq?
My question is following:
Is there a performance difference in the following two statements:
from order in myDB.OrdersSet
from person in myDB.PersonSet
from product in myDB.ProductSet
where order.Persons_Id==person.Id && order.Products_Id==product.Id
select new { order.Id, person.Name, person.SurName, product.Model,UrunAdı=product.Name };
and
from order in myDB.OrdersSet
join person in myDB.PersonSet on order.Persons_Id equals person.Id
join product in myDB.ProductSet on order.Products_Id equals product.Id
select new { order.Id, person.Name, person.SurName, product.Model,UrunAdı=product.Name };
I would always use the second one just because it´s more clear.
My question is now, is the first one slower than the second one?
Does it build a cartesic product and filters it afterwards with the where clauses ?
Thank you.
It entirely depends on the provider you're using.
With LINQ to Objects, it will absolutely build the Cartesian product and filter afterwards.
For out-of-process query providers such as LINQ to SQL, it depends on whether it's smart enough to realise that it can translate it into a SQL join. Even if LINQ to SQL doesn't, it's likely that the query engine actually performing the query will do so - you'd have to check with the relevant query plan tool for your database to see what's actually going to happen.
Side-note: multiple "from" clauses don't always result in a Cartesian product - the contents of one "from" can depend on the current element of earlier ones, e.g.
from file in files
from line in ReadLines(file)
...
My question is now, is the first one slower than the second one? Does it build a cartesic product and filters it afterwards with the where clauses ?
If the collections are in memory, then yes. There is no query optimizer for LinqToObjects - it simply does what the programmer asks in the order that is asked.
If the collections are in a database (which is suspected due to the myDB variable), then no. The query is translated into sql and sent off to the database where there is a query optimizer. This optimizer will generate an execution plan. Since both queries are asking for the same logical result, it is reasonable to expect the same efficient plan will be generated for both. The only ways to be certain are to
inspect the execution plans
or measure the IO (SET STATISTICS IO ON).
Is there a performance difference
If you find yourself in a scenario where you have to ask, you should cultivate tools with which to measure and discover the truth for yourself. Measure - not ask.
So I'm extremely new to Linq in .Net 3.5 and have a question. I use to use a custom class that would handle the following results from a store procedure:
Set 1: ID Name Age
Set 2: ID Address City
Set 3: ID Product Price
With my custom class, I would have received back from the database a single DataSet with 3 DataTables inside of it with columns based on what was returned from the DB.
My question is how to I achive this with LINQ? I'm going to need to hit the database 1 time and return multiple sets with different types of data in it.
Also, how would I use LINQ to return a dynamic amount of sets depending on the parameters (could get 1 set back, could get N amount back)?
I've looked at this article, but didn't find anything explaining multiple sets (just a single set that could be dynamic or a single scalar value and a single set).
Any articles/comments will help.
Thanks
I believe this is what you're looking for
Linq to SQL Stored Procedures with Multiple Results - IMultipleResults
I'm not very familiar with LINQ myself but here is MSDN's site on LINQ Samples that might be able to help you out.
EDIT: I apologize, I somehow missed the title where you mentioned you wanted help using LINQ with Stored Procedures, my below answer does not address that at all and unfortunately I haven't had the need to use sprocs with LINQ so I'm unsure if my below answer will help.
LINQ to SQL is able hydrate multiple sets of data into a object graph while hitting the database once. However, I don't think LINQ is going to achieve what you ultimately want -- which as far as I can tell is a completely dynamic set of data that is defined outside of the query itself. Perhaps I am misunderstanding the question, maybe it would help if you provide some sample code that your existing application is using?
Here is a quick example of how I could hydrate a anonymous type with a single database call, maybe it will help:
var query = from p in db.Products
select new
{
Product = p,
NumberOfOrders = p.Orders.Count(),
LastOrderDate = p.Orders.OrderByDescending().Take(1).Select(o => o.OrderDate),
Orders = p.Orders
};