I am trying to configure clustered JMS on Weblogic 10.3.4.
I have a 4 node cluster plus my AdminServer already configured. I also have my JMS already configured and targeted to AdminServer. From reading the Weblogic documentation, I am not clear as how to cluster the JMS server. Could someone please explain how?
There is no 'clustered JMS server'. There are WebLogic clusters, the Admin Server & Managed Servers and then JMS Servers. JMS Servers are a configuration construct within a Managed Server.
In order to cluster JMS in WebLogic each managed server in the cluster needs a JMS server. Then, when you create JMS resources you can either use default targeting or subdeployments. If you use default targeting then it will implicitly target the resource to the JMS server for each managed server in the cluster. If you have more than one JMS server per managed server, the behavior can be different, but you likely don't need that. Alternatively, you can use subdeployments to target specific managed servers or JMS servers, but not likely needed for your purposes.
Related
I'm looking for the easiest way to build a Wildfly cluster with JMS load balancing for a development platform. Messages will be produced by the Wildfly servers themselves.
I wonder how works the ActiveMQ Artemis JMS server embedded in Wildfly in a cluster deployment. I see on this site that a Wildfly node can declare its JMS server as master or slave.
I also read here that a MDB can use an "in-vm-connector" connector.
I'm not sure that I understand how a JMS cluster works with a master and a slave JMS server with "in-vm-connector". Will the MDB instances in the Wildfly node with the slave JMS server receive messages? Will the JMS cluster provide load balancing or will there be only one active JMS server at the same time?
In ActiveMQ Artemis (i.e. the JMS broker embedded into WildFly) clustering (which provides things like message load balancing) and high-availability (which provides redundancy for the integrity of the message data) are separate concepts. The master/slave configuration you mentioned is for high-availability. This configuration doesn't provide message load balancing since only one of the brokers is alive at any given point in time.
If you want configure a master/slave pair it's recommended that you separate those servers from the servers that actually process the messages since it doesn't make sense to have MDBs running on a server which doesn't have a live broker (i.e. a slave) since they won't receive any messages.
We have a requirement for one standalone Java application that can push JMS message to a JMS queue configured on Weblogic, Websphere and JBoss application server.
Is there any generic JMS client library available, that we can use in our application for pushing the messages to any or all of these servers?
As we understand, there is a specific JMS client for each server (for e.g. wljmsclient.jar required for Weblogic target server, as we would need weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory to be available as Initial Context factory class, similarly for Websphere and JBoss). And we would like to avoid having 3 different JMS client libraries (1 each for server) in the same application.
However, the catch here is, destination server is not known during compilation time. Only during runtime, it will be known whether the given message is to be pushed to Weblogic, Websphere or JBoss server or all of them. Hence, there is a need for a deployed application to support all 3 servers during runtime.
Is there any alternative generic JMS client library?
You can develop your own client that supports the 3 servers.
Basically you need to have for your standalone application :
The different JMS provider jar on the classpath
For example a jms_config.properties file which stores the configuration for each server (initial context factory, etc.)
Then from a generic code you can build the InitialContext, JMS Queues, etc. depending on the target server.
I am developing a service for JMS messaging using IBM WMQ version 7.5 as Message oriented middleware. I am in a dilemma. The IBM specification says to use WebSphere MQ JMS API in JAVA EE environment. My sender and receivers will be in remote JBoss deployments. IBM provides a resource adapter to connect via JCA. This connection requires static administration of components such as Queue managers, queue channels, queue names.
Is JCA the best I can do ? Is there any other way where I can dynamically create the queues provided that I know other configuration details ? There will be multiple applications using this setup running on their own servers. If I use JCA, all have to make their own configurations. Can I make dynamic configurations ?
Typically within the application server environment resources would be created in some JNDI context. These would be Connection Factories and Destinations.
Depending on the app server, it may be possible to share this configuration across a network of individual servers. So typically there would be some set of static definitions.
However within say a servlet the MQConnectionFactory can be dynamically created.
In all cases the backing WMQ Resources do need to exist; though it is possible to send administrative command messages to WMQ to create queues and do other admin. The only exception is topics, accessing a topic string brings it into existence. Though this has default security properties that you might not want.
I am fairly to new to JMS configuration in JMS.
Here is what i am trying to do.
We have multile JVMs of our applications in a single weblogic domain. We want to have JMS server installed on say one JVM and rest of the JVMs refer to the first JMS Server.
So, the configuration is:
JVM1: JMS Server is installed
JVM2: JMS Module installed
Now I need to configure JVM2 to talk to JMS server on JVM1. How do i do that?
This is on weblogic 11g
I suggest going through the basics of WebLogic 11 JMS configuration and then taking a look into this good guide from Oracle documentation. I know there is a lot of info over there, but in the long run it is better to know what you are doing rather than just copying someone else's configurations.
Currently I am working on a JMS application. But I use plain JMS API and Property file for configurations. My application is running in Weblogic and connects to MQ series server of my client.
Recently I got to know I can use Weblogic for JMS configurations.
Please explain.
What is "Foreign JMS provider"?
Is Weblogic also a JMS server or Foreign JMS provider or Both?
Weblogic provides the JMS Server features fully compliant with all JMS spec elements such as ConnectionFactory and Destinations. On this JMS Server you can connect and send messages to the client's Messaging Server via a configured Destination.
In addition using Weblogic as the JMS Server gives you lot many features such as Message Retry in case of failure, setting message quotas as well as enhanced monitoring of the JMS Server to track errors. The idea is to have more configuration driven settings for performance, deadlocks, tuning, filestore or database store etc.
A full list of such features is given at http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/jms/fund.html#wp1071787
A Foreign JMS Provider in Weblogic is the term used to define JMS implementations other than Weblogic JMS. An example is IBM MQ in your case.
Once the Foreign Provider is configured within Weblogic, for all practical purposes within the code - it can be called as if it was on local JNDI lookup. Weblogic will make the remote calls transparent to your code. This allows you to change your destination via configuration on the Weblogic console.
You will need a Messaging Bridge within Weblogic JMS Server to connect a source destination from which messages are received, and a target destination to which messages are sent.
Some essential reading on this is at: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/jms_admin/advance_config.html#wp1075917
and an example of configuring IBM MQ as a Foreign Provider is at http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0604_kesavan/0604_kesavan.html#N1011D