I'm setting up Hudson as an integration server that I expect other developers and stackholders to access. Rather than have to pass around urls with a specific port, I'd like to configure Hudson to listen on port 80.
The default port from installing Hudson as a service is 8080. I'd like to change this to 80, on a Server 2008 R2 or windows 7 machine that isn't running IIS or Apache.
Do the following to reconfigure the port :
Edit hudson.xml (found in your hudson installation directory)
change the parameter string on line 44 to reference port 80 (--httpPort=8080 to --httpPort 80)
Depending on what plugins you may have set up, there may be other references to the hudson url. Find these by doing a text search in the hudson directory on ':8080' and removing the port number.
Disable the 'World Wide Web Publishing Service' service. By default, this service consumes port 80, which is the port we want to use.
Verify that your machine is configured to accept an external connection on port 80 (ie, open a firewall port)
Restart the Hudson service.
Related
I have a Linux VM running with a Jenkins, Nexus and SonarQube server on it. The IP for the VM is 192.168.56.2 and I have no trouble accessing both Jenkins and Nexus on ports 8080 and 8081 respectively. However, when I try to access 192.168.56.2:9000 for SonarQube it just says 192.168.56.2 refused to connect.
When I run systemctl status sonar in the terminal it shows that SonarQube is active and running. I have opened the firewall to port 9000 and I have not changed any of the default settings. Does anyone have any idea what might be the issue?
SonarQube will only be listening on 'loopback' rather than on all inbound IP addresses. In your server's sonar.properties file, you'll need to set the Web information in order to access the server remotely, specifically the following values:
sonar.web.host: 192.168.56.2
sonar.web.port: 80 # if you want to use a port other than 9000
Also, in the web UI's Settings, under the "General" section, set the "Server base URL" value so that links and redirects issued by SonarQube target the correct location.
I've installed Mule CE runtime on an AWS EC2 Lynx server and dropped my Anypoint Studio project into into the app folder, Mule starts fine and says my app is deployed but it appears Mule is not listening on port 80 as expected, what am I missing?
Mule CE runtime default port is not 80. Hope you have configured port 80 for mule soft CE.
For port configuration you can check configuration Here.
To check which port is being used by mule CE :
On Unix machine : netstat -tulpn | grep <port> (i.e 80 in your case, check for 7777 as well.)
On Windows machine :
Open Run prompt on Windows
Type perfmon /res ,press OK
On Resource Monitor, on Network tab, search for the port under Listening Ports
Great I can see port 80 & 8081 in use by Java now, my issue was two fold I was dropping my project folder onto apps once I changed to drop the Anypoint zip deployment file I saw a Java version error, rebuilt on 1.7, redeployed and it's working, thanks for your help
I am trying to connect teamcity server running in Ubuntu, from windows but its not working.
I changed firewall settings and opened up port 9090 and 8111.
I got these logs from windows agent
Call http://my.domain.com:8111/RPC2 buildServer.registerAgent3:
org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException:
jetbrains.buildServer.CannotPingAgentException: Unable to ping agent .
Check firewall and/or try to specify 'ownAddress' in the agent
configuration. Details: Agent '' cannot be accessed by any of the
addresses: [183.83.50.68, 192.168.1.146], (port 9090)
It means that TeamCity server can't access TeamCity agent by the specified addresses and port.
Ensure that your agent IP address is 183.83.50.68 and that incoming connections to the 9090 port are not blocked by not only firewall, but also by antivirus or similar software.
Or you can update to the TeamCity 9.1 or later - in these versions server doesn't have to be able to connect to the agent, only agent-to-server connection is necessary.
I have a Windows Server 2016 TP5 machine that I use as a container host.
I have a Windows Container running that I manage with Docker. Inside this container I have an Apache httpd running on port 88.
The port mapping when I start the container is: 0.0.0.0:80->88/tcp, so I map port 80 of my container host to port 88 of the container.
This is the output from docker inspect: http://pastebin.com/AVem1eGV
I can now reach the Apache http start page from any other computer in the network through the DNS or IP.
In my case:
http://10.10.1.162/
http://documents.test2016-3.company.com/
But the same does not work when I try to call the same from the host system itself or from inside the container. So, on the host system, I try to access the same URL via browser or wget, and getting:
C:\> wget -UseBasicParsing http://documents.test2016-3.company.com/
wget : Unable to connect to the remote server
in both cases.
But I can ping the host from both the host itself as well as the container.
From the host:
C:\>ping test2016-3.company.com
Ping wird ausgeführt für TEST2016-3.company.com [fe80::847a:1430:8a10:b120%4] mit 32 Bytes Daten:
From the container:
PS C:\> ping documents.test2016-3.company.com
Pinging documents.test2016-3.company.com [10.10.1.162] with 32 bytes of data:
which seems to be able to resolve the name just fine.
What does work though is to call the Apache default page via the container hostname (which is win-de6u4068naf) and its running port directly (not through the port mapping), both from the host as well as inside the container:
http://win-de6u4068naf:88/
Just going the route through the container host hostname and mapped port from the host or container itself does not work properly!
Firewall rules allow everything on port 80 from any remote address or to port 80 (=inbound and outbound rules are both set to "allow" for "any").
I know that Microsoft/Docker changed the networking code base of the container/docker support from Windows Server 2016 TP4 to TP5. Not sure if that's related, or whether this is a bug or I'm having something not configured correctly yet.
I made a test and left Docker/Container out of the picture above and installed a plain Apache httpd itself on the container host system on port 80 (and no Docker running at all) just to check whether such setup works or not, in order to be sure that it is actually somehow Docker/Container related and not a problem with my network/host configuration in general. And this works fine, I can reach the Apache from outside as well as from the host itself, thus it must be a Docker/Container related problem.
Environment:
Windows Server 2016 TP5
Docker version 1.12.0-dev, build 2b97201
Got a reply on Microsoft's Github:
https://github.com/Microsoft/Virtualization-Documentation/issues/253#issuecomment-217975932
This is a known limitation in our Windows NAT implementation (WinNAT)
that you cannot access the external port in a static port mapping
directly from the container (NAT) host.
I have installed wakanda server on an Amazon EC2 server running ubuntu by following this utube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSQODnB7wRU .
Now the video is for an older version but I have followed along successfully until I actually launch wakanda on the server. This is what I get in the console:
Welcome to Wakanda Server 10 build 10.187175
Publishing "DefaultSolution" solution
The solution's log file will be stored in the "/home/ubuntu/.Wakanda Server/UserCache/Wakanda Server/DefaultSolution-1882/Logs/" folder
The Administration Web Server cannot listen for connections on port 8080 or secure port 4433 on all IP addresses
You can customize the Administration Web Server's ports with the "--admin-port" and "--admin-ssl-port" options
, then when I try to log into it via the browser it says the connection dropped! Any help would be much appreciated, it seams I need to restrict the IP addresses which can access, but how?
Your wakanda server tried and failed to listen on 8080 and/or 4433
Check the following things:
Are the ports 8080 and/or 4433 used by other processes? (sudo netstat -tapen | grep :8080, if a result is found, then yes another process uses 8080. Check 4433 also)
You may found that wakanda server is already running as a service:
yes you should use this service (create and edit /etc/default/wakanda, add WAKANDA_SOLUTION_AT_STARTUP=your_path and restart with sudo /etc/init.d/wakanda restart)
or to continue starting it manually, stop the service first (sudo /etc/init.d/wakanda stop)
Has the current user the right to listen on those ports? (try running the server with sudo just to check, then use authbind or equivalent)
Can you use alternative ports? (use --admin-port and --admin-ssl-port wakanda server options)
wakanda-server --help will give you the list of options available, especially --solution=VALUE to provide the path to your solution.