I invoke Rake tasks in another Rake task like following:
namespace :test do
task :migrate do
Rake::Task['A:migrate'].invoke
Rake::Task['B:migrate'].invoke
end
end
What I want to know is whether I can continue to the next Rake task even if the earlier one fails. For instance, there is an error in A:migrate, I want to catch it and log it but move ahead with B:migrate. How can I do this?
Rake is just Ruby, so you can use Ruby's error handling feature.
namespace :test do
task :migrate do
begin
Rake::Task['A:migrate'].invoke
rescue => e
log(e)
end
Rake::Task['B:migrate'].invoke
end
end
I have a Rake task which looks something like the following. What I’m trying to do run a system command, and return its error-value. Before returning I’d like to display a message saying something like “[OK]” or “[FAILED]".
With this code, Rake returns success every time.
How do I get the Rake task to return the correct error value?
task :build do
status = system BUILD_SHELL_COMMAND
puts status ? "[OK]" : "[FAILED]"
status
end
It appears there isn’t a way to specify a “return value” from a rake task. The task should fail if the system() method fails.
The standard way to do this would be to use Rake’s sh utility method:
task :build do
sh BUILD_SHELL_COMMAND
end
To display an error/success message however, for the case in question, the following would not work:
task :build do
sh BUILD_SHELL_COMMAND or fail “[FAILED]”
puts “[OK]"
end
because as soon as the shell command fails, it would not display the failure message (which in reality would be a longer non-trivial message :), which is what we want.
This works:
task :build do
system BUILD_SHELL_COMMAND or fail “[FAILED]”
puts “[OK]"
end
I have rake tasks which i want to run in proper sequence.
I want to run one rake task which run other rake tasks in proper sequence.
How may i do that?
you should consider defining dependencies between your tasks like this
task :primary => [:secondary]
task :secondary do
puts "Doing Secondary Task"
end
But if you really, really need to call the tasks directly you can use invoke to call another task
task :primary do
Rake::Task[:secondary].invoke
end
task :secondary do
puts "Doing Secondary Task"
end
see also here
I have a rake task where I do some checks at the beginning, if one of the checks fails I would like to return early from the rake task, I don't want to execute any of the remaining code.
I thought the solution would be to place a return where I wanted to return from the code but I get the following error
unexpected return
A Rake task is basically a block. A block, except lambdas, doesn't support return but you can skip to the next statement using next which in a rake task has the same effect of using return in a method.
task :foo do
puts "printed"
next
puts "never printed"
end
Or you can move the code in a method and use return in the method.
task :foo do
do_something
end
def do_something
puts "startd"
return
puts "end"
end
I prefer the second choice.
You can use abort(message) from inside the task to abort that task with a message.
Return with an Error ❌
If you're returning with an error (i.e. an exit code of 1) you'll want to use abort, which also takes an optional string param that will get outputted on exit:
task :check do
# If any of your checks fail, you can exit early like this.
abort( "One of the checks has failed!" ) if check_failed?
end
On the command line:
$ rake check && echo "All good"
#=> One of the checks has failed!
Return with Success ✅
If you're returning without an error (i.e. an exit code of 0) you'll want to use exit, which does not take a string param.
task :check do
# If any of your checks fail, you can exit early like this.
exit if check_failed?
end
On the command line:
$ rake check && echo "All good"
#=> All good
This is important if you're using this in a cron job or something that needs to do something afterwards based on whether the rake task was successful or not.
Bonus: Return with an Error from a rescue block without the stacktrace.
By default, if you use abort inside of a rescue block, it will output the entire stack trace, even if you just use abort without re-raising the error.
To get around this, you can supply a non-zero exit code to the exit command, like:
task :check do
begin
do_the_thing_that_raises_an_exception
rescue => error
puts error.message
exit( 1 )
end
end
I tend to use abort which is a better alternative in such situations, for example:
task :foo do
something = false
abort 'Failed to proceed' unless something
end
If you need to break out of multiple block levels, you can use fail.
For example
task :something do
[1,2,3].each do |i|
...
fail "some error" if ...
end
end
(See https://stackoverflow.com/a/3753955/11543.)
If you meant exiting from a rake task without causing the "rake aborted!" message to be printed, then you can use either "abort" or "exit". But "abort", when used in a rescue block, terminates the task as well as prints the whole error (even without using --trace). So "exit" is what I use.
I used next approach suggested by Simone Carletti, since when testing rake task, abort, which in fact is just a wrapper for exit, is not the desired behavior.
Example:
task auto_invoice: :environment do
if Application.feature_disabled?(:auto_invoice)
$stderr.puts 'Feature is disabled, aborting.'
next
end
I have a custom Rakefile which calls different file tasks. Sometimes a file that is expected doesn't exist, and rake throws a RuntimeError and fails. However, I'd like to do a few things before it fails. So is there any way I could rescue a RuntimeError? Or is there some sort of a magic task which gets called before a complete fail?
I haven't run into this issue with rake myself, but you could try simply wrapping your call to the file tasks in a begin-rescue block, i.e.
begin
file_task
rescue RuntimeError => e
puts e
end
and then do your rescuing in the rescue block.