I hava an editor template for, let's say, date:
#model DateTime
#section AdditionalJavaScript2
{
/* some js code */
}
#Html.TextBox("", Model.ToString("d.M.yyyy"), new { #class = "date" })
Now, I would like to put some js code into the HEAD section, but this doesn't work.
Of course, I have a this section in my layout.cshtml:
<head>
...
#RenderSection("AdditionalJavaScript2", required: false)
</head>
It works from the plain view, but not from partial view (editor template).
Why?
And, is there a workaround?
Thanks,
Igor
A partial-view does not use a template, it returns "raw" html to be included in your page (by Javascript). It does not have access to anything but the stream it returns itself.
Think of it like this: You typically call a partial view from Javascript/AJAX to get some new html. You get the return, and replace some DIV-tag. How can the system (FireFox, Chrome, ...) know, that there is some extra section of data that needs to replace something in the HEAD tag.
There are some workarounds:
Don't put the script in the HEAD
Add a parameter switch betweed the html and the script. You need to client-side calls, one to get the html, and one for the script. You include the calls to the partial-view on two locations on your page.
Separate the script and the html using some pre-defined tag like <!-- SEPERATOR -->, and let the calling code split the result, and put it in the correct position.
Related
I need to get the headline and the text separately out of a text content element. The reason is, to give the editor a simple way to add a content for a complicated section in my html theme.
I am new to TYPO3 an we run V11.5.16! I read and watched some tutorials and I got most of my site already working! Contents are dynamic and multilinguale so far.
To get contents from backend, I use Backend Layouts and copy the content from styles.content.get inside my setup.typoscript. I think this is the common way to do it, and as I said, it works. I output them using {contentXY->f:transform.html()} or {contentXY->f:format.raw()}.
For a text content element, I get something like:
<div id="c270" class="frame frame-default frame-type-text frame-layout-0">
<header>
<h2 class="">Headline</h2>
</header>
<p>Some Text</p>
</div>
Is it possible to get only "Headline"? And if so, it hopefully works also for getting out separately "Some Text"
Something like: {contentXY->f:transform.html(filterBy('h2'))}
Thanks in Advance!
EDIT:
According to Peter Krause's answer: I know, there is an extra content element for headers. But I need the text content element, because for the places in the html, I need header AND text. And the editors are technically not savy enough to fill in different content elements. Please don't ask in more detail. ):
You can handle header and body of an CE seperately, but not in a page context.
In page context you get the result from rendering the CEs, which is a string (with HTML).
For each CE there is a rendering information, which nowadays is also FLUID.
Depending on your installation it probably is FSC (ext:fluid_styled_content) or a Bootstrap extension.
This means: there are FLUID templates which can be overriden and modified.
In these templates you have access to each field of a CE separately.
Look for the templates stored in the defined paths (in TSOB) and add your own path for overides:
lib.contentElement {
templateRootPaths {
1 = ...
2 = ...
3 = ...your path...
}
partialRootPaths {
1 = ...
2 = ...
3 = ...your path...
}
layoutRootPaths {
1 = ...
2 = ...
3 = ...your path...
}
}
Thanks for all hints! I think, for my requirement, there is no solution out of the box. So i made a custom CE with Mask and edited the template html. For non-technical editors, it is the best solution in terms of data input. I hope this stands for future upgrades...
Actually the question is in the subj...
Is it possible to make handlebars template framework, to recognize templates within a div tag and not in script tag?
For example I would like to create template with this markup:
<style>
div.text-x-handlebars {display:none;}
</style>
<div class="text-x-handlebars-template">
<h2>I'm template</h2>
<p>{{welcomeMessage}}</p>
</div>
Yes you can put your templates in <div>s rather than <script>s, for example:
http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/RucqP/
However, doing so is fraught with danger. If you put your template inside a <div> then the browser will interpret it as HTML before you've filled it in; so, if your template's HTML isn't valid until after it has been filled in, the browser may attempt to correct it and make a mess of things. Also, if you have id attributes in your templates, then you will end up with duplicate ids (one in the template <div> and a repeat in the filled in template that you put in the DOM) and that will cause all sorts of strange and interesting bugs. The browser will also try to download any images inside the templates in a <div>, this may or may not be a problem (if might even be desirable but probably not desirable if the image uses a template variable in its src attribute).
Basically, you can do it but you shouldn't, you should put your templates in <script id="..." type="text/x-handlebars-template"> elements instead.
I want to create a reusable ajax control in MVC .NET using RAZOR.
my example is a simple ajax text box and list where the user filters the list by typing in the text box. on the first call i would render both the text box and the list using my razor view. on subsequent AJAX calls i would want to ONLY render the (now filtered) list.
idea 1: use #if statement to conditionally render code.
problem: razor does not seem to like conditionally written html. for example it errors when a <div> tag is not followed by a closing </div>.
idea 2: use #section tokens to create portions of my control and then call RenderSection within the same file as needed.
problem: razor does not allow RenderSection to call sections in the same page
i know i can conditionally render html as strings, but i wanted to take advantage of the legibility of the razor markup and keep with development protocols.
You should be able to output <div> tags in a Razor block without the corresponding </div> tag by surrounding it with <text>. The reason is that Razor uses the closing tag to know when to drag back into code-parsing mode:
#if (myCondition)
{
<text>
<div>
</text>
}
As for the Section stuff, you might be able to achieve what you want using Templated Razor Delegates, like this:
#{
Func<dynamic, object> b = #<strong>#item</strong>;
}
// ...
<span>This sentence is #b("In Bold").</span>
See Phil Haack's blog for a little more on this.
Just wanted to add a class="myClass" in body tag. Is there any html helper or something else can do this in MVC3 view page? Please advise, thanks.
This is very similar to Aaron's solution, but doesn't have the weight of a section (which at least in my mind, are for larger blocks of content than a single string). The simplest way is to pass a variable with the ViewBag.
In your layout, just print out the class for the body tag, plus any other page specific variables (page title, extra css/js scripts, etc...)
_Layout.cshtml:
<html>
<title>#ViewBag.Title</title>#* Can easily add in per page titles too *#
<body class="#ViewBag.BodyClass">
#RenderBody()
</body>
</html>
Then, variables set in your view get passed upwards to the layout:
Index.cshtml:
#model MyViewModel
#{
ViewBag.Title = "This page title!";
ViewBag.BodyClass = "...";
}
While you may have full control of the HTML a solution was what was needed so here is one ;-)
In the _layout.cshtml page
<body class="#RenderSection("BodyClass", false)">
This will look for a section in all the child pages but says don't worry if it can't find one
Then in your child views just do this
#section BodyClass {productList}
Keep it on one line and then the outputted HTML will look fine, also you can then build up the class names as well.
#section BodyClass {productList generic}
This idea goes perfect with DOM-Ready page specific code, why not checkout
http://paulirish.com/2009/markup-based-unobtrusive-comprehensive-dom-ready-execution/
Or my extended version here
https://github.com/AaronLayton/H5BP-Core
My way lets you do page specific code, but allows you to keep all of the Javascript in separate pages so each page becomes easily manageable. The final step would be to concatenate and minify all the JS into 1 file ;-)
I have an MVC3 site using Razor as its view engine. I want my site to be skinnable. Most of the possible skins are similar enough that they can derive from a shared master layout.
Therefore, I am considering this design:
However, I would like to be able to call RenderSection in the bottom layer, _Common.cshtml, and have it render a section that is defined in the top layer, Detail.cshtml. This doesn't work: RenderSection apparently only renders sections that are defined the next layer up.
Of course, I can define each section in each skin. For instance, if _Common needs to call RenderSection("hd") for a section defined in Detail, I just place this in each _Skin and it works:
#section hd {
#RenderSection("hd")
}
This results in some duplication of code (since each skin must now have this same section) and generally feels messy. I'm still new to Razor, and it seems like I might be missing something obvious.
When debugging, I can see the complete list of defined sections in WebViewPage.SectionWritersStack. If I could just tell RenderSection to look through the entire list before giving up, it would find the section I need. Alas, SectionWritersStack is non-public.
Alternatively, if I could access the hierarchy of layout pages and attempt execution of RenderSection in each different context, I could locate the section I need. I'm probably missing something, but I don't see any way to do this.
Is there some way to accomplish this goal, other than the method I've already outlined?
This is in fact not possible today using the public API (other than using the section redefinition approach). You might have some luck using private reflection but that of course is a fragile approach. We will look into making this scenario easier in the next version of Razor.
In the meantime, here's a couple of blog posts I've written on the subject:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/marcinon/archive/2010/12/08/optional-razor-sections-with-default-content.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/marcinon/archive/2010/12/15/razor-nested-layouts-and-redefined-sections.aspx
#helper ForwardSection( string section )
{
if (IsSectionDefined(section))
{
DefineSection(section, () => Write(RenderSection(section)));
}
}
Would this do the job ?
I'm not sure if this is possible in MVC 3 but in MVC 5 I am able to successfully do this using the following trick:
In ~/Views/Shared/_Common.cshtml write your common HTML code like:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="fa">
<head>
<title>Skinnable - #ViewBag.Title</title>
</head>
<body>
#RenderBody()
</body>
</html>
In ~/Views/_ViewStart.cshtml:
#{
Layout = "~/Views/Shared/_Common.cshtml";
}
Now all you have to do is to use the _Common.cshtml as the Layout for all the skins. For instance, in ~/Views/Shared/Skin1.cshtml:
#{
Layout = "~/Views/Shared/_Common.cshtml";
}
<p>Something specific to Skin1</p>
#RenderBody()
Now you can set the skin as your layout in controller or view based on your criteria. For example:
public ActionResult Index()
{
//....
if (user.SelectedSkin == Skins.Skin1)
return View("ViewName", "Skin1", model);
}
If you run the code above you should get a HTML page with both the content of Skin1.cshtml and _Common.cshtml
In short, you'll set the layout for the (skin) layout page.
Not sure if this will help you, but I wrote some extension methods to help "bubble up" sections from within partials, which should work for nested layouts as well.
Injecting content into specific sections from a partial view ASP.NET MVC 3 with Razor View Engine
Declare in child layout/view/partial
#using (Html.Delayed()) {
<b>show me multiple times, #Model.Whatever</b>
}
Render in any parent
#Html.RenderDelayed();
See the answer link for more use-cases, like only rendering one delayed block even if declared in a repeating view, rendering specific delayed blocks, etc.