I want to create an application using AjaxAjaxControlToolKit in ASP.Net 2.0
How to use AjaxControlToolKit with ASP.Net 2.0
http://ajaxcontroltoolkit.codeplex.com/releases/view/11121
This version should work for .NET 2.0
Related
I tried the application framework for a while using version 2.3
Now I'm planning the development of 2 web applications (MPA with ASP.NET MVC 5.x
)
What's the differences between version 2.3 and 3.0 version?
I didn't found any changelog files
Changelog
The release notes for the framework (ABP) can be found here: https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/releases
The release notes for the template (MPA with ASP.NET MVC 5.x) can be found here: https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/module-zero-template/releases
Notable differences
Most importantly, ABP v3.0.0 is based on .NET Standard 2.0.
This concerns you regardless if you are on MVC 5.x, .NET Framework 4.x or .NET Core 2.x.
You should use VS2017 15.3.3+.
For VS2015, you may try installing NuGet client 3.6 or higher but that may no longer work.
I have a swagger specification file that I would like to use to generate stubs for a WebAPI that runs over the .NET Framework 4.5. I already have a project using that framework and I can't change it entirely to use asp net core right now, that is the why I would like to generate the stubs for the 4.5 framework.
We have an ASP.NET Core 1.0 RC1 application and we want to incorporate SignalR in it. However, SignalR is not yet a part of ASP.NET Core 1.0.
Is there a way to still incorporate SignalR in our existing app or will we have to look into some other web sockets library such as socket.io?
I had the same issue with SignalR and the upgrade to core 1.0 rtm.
The answer from above does not work anymore so I did the following:
I use this nugget feed:
https://www.myget.org/F/aspnetcirelease/api/v3/index.json
and this nuget package:
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Server": "0.1.0-rtm-21431"
This should help until the first release of SignalR 3
Although SignalR 3 won't be a part of the 1.0 release of ASP.NET Core, you can still use SignalR in an ASP.NET Core web app project.
In fact, check out this SignalR project on the official "aspnet" account on Github:
https://github.com/aspnet/SignalR-Server
I download the source code, and here's what it looks like in VS2015 (see screenshot below):
Hope that helps! :)
Does ASP.Net Core 1.0 support .Net WebForm projects? Or it is an MVC only environment? Also can I create classic web services(asmx) there?
Short answer: No, ASP.NET Core does not contain Web Forms or Web Services.
Long answer:
Depends on your meaning of "support". If you aim to run ASP.NET Core project on top of CoreCLR and CoreFX, then the answer is no: ASP.NET Core will contain support only for MVC ja Web API -projects (which are the same thing in ASP.NET Core).
If you can run on full .NET Framework, then ASP.NET Web Forms can co-exist with ASP.NET Core. The Web Forms will be the same Web Forms they are today on System.Web. In this scenario you would host your web forms in a different project (normal ASP.NET 4.x application) on IIS and ASP.NET Core would live in it's own application on Kestrel.
A need to use .NET technologies not available for .NET Core
Some .NET Framework technologies are not available in .NET Core. Some of them will be available in later .NET Core releases, but others don’t apply to the new application patterns targeted by .NET Core and may never be available. The following list shows the most common technologies not found in .NET Core 1.0:
ASP.NET Web Forms applications: ASP.NET Web Forms is only available on the .NET Framework, so you cannot use ASP.NET Core / .NET Core for this scenario. Currently there are no plans to bring ASP.NET Web Forms to .NET Core.
ASP.NET Web Pages applications: ASP.NET Web Pages are not included in ASP.NET Core 1.0, although it is planned to be included in a future release as explained in the .NET Core roadmap.
ASP.NET SignalR server/client implementation. At .NET Core 1.0 release timeframe (June 2016), ASP.NET SignalR is not available for ASP.NET Core (neither client or server), although it is planned to be included in a future release as explained in the .NET Core roadmap. Preview state is available at the Server-side and Client Library GitHub repositories.
WCF services implementation. Even when there’s a WCF-Client library to consume WCF services from .NET Core, as of June 2016, WCF server implementation is only available on the .NET Framework. This scenario is not part of the current plan for .NET Core but it’s being considered for the future.
Workflow related services: Windows Workflow Foundation (WF), Workflow Services (WCF + WF in a single service) and WCF Data Services (formerly known as “ADO.NET Data Services”) are only available on the .NET Framework and there are no plans to bring them to .NET Core.
Language support: Visual Basic and F# don’t currently have tooling support .NET Core, but both will be supported in Visual Studio 2017 and later versions of Visual Studio.
source Choosing between .net Core and .net Framework
We are maintaining an internal organizational administration system written (sadly) in ASP.NET 3.5. We have recently been asked to add password management capabilities to the system, which seemed like a perfect fit for the password management features of ASP.NET Identity.
My question is, can we use ASP.NET Identity in our system, having it being written in ASP.NET 3.5?
If so, what is required to do it?
If not, are there any alternatives? We only need the password-related stuff, like length, special characters, prevent reuse of previous, say, 3 password etc.
Cheers,
ashilon
ASP.NET Identity framework is collection of nuget packages (DLL's) and the Runtime Version (minimum supporting .NET Framework) is v4.0.30319.
So that you could not be able to use ASP.NET identity framework on ASP.NET 3.5 which is .NET Framework 3.5.
Following packages using Runtime Version v4.0.30319
Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Core
Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework
Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Owin
You could upgrade your project to support .NET Framework 4.0 or above and then you could be able to use asp.net identity framework.