I have the following data in one MSSQL Table column
2011-06-20 11:53:32.000
2011-06-20 11:54:24.000
2011-06-20 11:55:45.000
2011-08-05 10:24:12.000
2011-08-05 10:25:28.000
2011-08-05 10:26:20.000
2011-08-05 10:27:12.000
2011-08-05 10:28:04.000
2011-08-05 10:28:55.000
Using LINQ, I would like to get the following data from the column
2011-06-20
2011-08-05
So I can put into a List<>
What's the best way to do this? I already have the context stuff setup, so I don't need details on that. I just need an idea of the best "query" and logic I can use to get this data. Thanks!
You are looking for all of the Distinct dates in a range of DateTimes, the following will show examples to get what you need, given you already have them in a string or by querying your database:
Example (with list of strings):
var list; //Contains your dates
var result = list.Select(x => x.Date.ToShortDateString()).Distinct();
Example (from database table):
List<String> dates = (FROM d in datesTable
SELECT d.date.ToShortDateString()).Distinct().ToList();
Console Example to demonstrate functionality:
List<DateTime> list = new List<DateTime>();
list.Add(DateTime.Parse("2011-06-20 11:53:32.000"));
list.Add(DateTime.Parse("2011-05-20 11:53:32.000"));
list.Add(DateTime.Parse("2011-05-20 11:44:32.000"));
list.Add(DateTime.Parse("2011-04-20 11:53:32.000"));
var result = list.Select(x => x.Date.ToShortDateString()).Distinct();
foreach (string date in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(date);
}
Console.Read();
var q = from t in mydates select distinct ( t.Date.ToShortDateString());
To select distinct dates into a list try this:
List<String> myDates = (from t in myTable
select t.myDate.ToShortDateString()
).Distinct().ToList()
Related
I have some errors using Linq on DataTable and I couldn't figure it out how to solve it. I have to admit that i am pretty new to Linq and I searched the forum and Internet and couldn't figure it out. hope you can help.
I have a DataTable called campaign with three columns: ID (int), Product (string), Channel (string). The DataTable is already filled with data. I am trying to select a subset of the campaign records which satisfied the conditions selected by the end user. For example, the user want to list only if the Product is either 'EWH' or 'HEC'. The selection criteria is dynaically determined by the end user.
I have the following C# code:
private void btnClick()
{
IEnumerable<DataRow> query =
from zz in campaign.AsEnumerable()
orderby zz.Field<string>("ID")
select zz;
string whereClause = "zz.Field<string>(\"Product\") in ('EWH','HEC')";
query = query.Where(whereClause);
DataTable sublist = query.CopyToDataTable<DataRow>();
}
But it gives me an error on line: query = query.Where(whereClause), saying
No property or field 'zz' exists in type 'DataRow'".
If I changed to:
string whereClause = "Product in ('EWH','HEC')"; it will say:
No property or field 'Product' exists in type 'DataRow'
Can anyone help me on how to solve this problem? I feel it could be a pretty simple syntax change, but I just don't know at this time.
First, this line has an error
orderby zz.Field<string>("ID")
because as you said, your ID column is of type int.
Second, you need to learn LINQ query syntax. Forget about strings, the same way you used from, orderby, select in the query, you can also use where and many other operators. Also you'll need to learn the equivalent LINQ constructs for SQL-ish things, like for instance IN (...) is mapped to Enumerable.Contains etc.
With all that being said, here is your query
var productFilter = new[] { "EWH", "HEC" };
var query =
from zz in campaign.AsEnumerable()
where productFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Product"))
orderby zz.Field<int>("ID")
select zz;
Update As per your comment, if you want to make this dynamic, then you need to switch to lambda syntax. Multiple and criteria can be composed by chaining multiple Where clauses like this
List<string> productFilter = ...; // coming from outside
List<string> channelFilter = ...; // coming from outside
var query = campaign.AsEnumerable();
// Apply filters if needed
if (productFilter != null && productFilter.Count > 0)
query = query.Where(zz => productFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Product")));
if (channelFilter != null && channelFilter.Count > 0)
query = query.Where(zz => channelFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Channel")));
// Once finished with filtering, do the ordering
query = query.OrderBy(zz => zz.Field<int>("ID"));
This question already has answers here:
EntityFramework - contains query of composite key
(12 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have a table as follows:
PersonalDetails
Columns are:
Name
BankName
BranchName
AccountNo
Address
I have another list that contains 'Name' and 'AccountNo'.
I have to find all the records from table that whose respective 'Name' and 'AccountNo' are present in given list.
Any suggestion will be helpful.
I have done following but not of much use:
var duplicationhecklist = dataAccessdup.MST_FarmerProfile
.Join(lstFarmerProfiles,
t => new { t.Name,t.AccountNo},
t1 => new { t1.Name, t1.AccountNo},
(t, t1) => new { t, t1 })
.Select(x => new {
x.t1.Name,
x.t1.BankName,
x.t1.BranchName,
x.t1.AccountNo
}).ToList();
where lstFarmerProfiles is a list.
You probably found out that you can't join an Entity Framework LINQ query with a local list of entity objects, because it can't be translated into SQL. I would preselect the database data on the account numbers only and then join in memory.
var accountNumbers = lstFarmerProfiles.Select(x => x.AccountNo).ToArray();
var duplicationChecklist =
from profile in dataAccessdup.MST_FarmerProfile
.Where(p => accountNumbers
.Contains(p.AccountNo))
.AsEnumerable() // Continue in memory
join param in lstFarmerProfiles on
new { profile.Name, profile.AccountNo} equals
new { param.Name, param.AccountNo}
select profile
So you will never pull the bulk data into memory but the smallest selection you can probably get to proceed with.
If accountNumbers contains thousands of items, you may consider using a better scalable chunky Contains method.
Since you have the lists in .net of values you want to find, try to use the Contains method, for sample:
List<string> names = /* list of names */;
List<string> accounts = /* list of account */;
var result = db.PersonalDetails.Where(x => names.Contains(x.Name) && accounts.Contains(x.AccountNo))
.ToList();
If MST_FarmerProfile is not super large I think you best option is to bring it into memory using AsEnumerable() and do the joining there.
var duplicationhecklist =
(from x in dataAccessdup.MST_FarmerProfile
.Select(z => new {
z.Name,
z.BankName,
z.BranchName,
z.AccountNo
}).AsEnumerable()
join y in lstFarmerProfiles
on new { x.Name, x.AccountNo} equals new { y.Name, y.AccountNo}
select x).ToList();
Since data is usually located on different machines or in separate processes at least: DB - is one and your in-memory list is your app, there is just 2 ways to do it.
Download as small data part from DB to local as possible and join locally (usually using AsEnumerable() or basically ToList()). You got many good thoughts on this in other answers.
Another one is different - upload your local data to server somehow and perform query on DB side. Uploading can be done differently: using some temp tables OR using VALUES. Fortunately there is a small extension for EF now (for both EF6 and EF Core) which you could try. It is EntityFrameworkCore.MemoryJoin (name might be confusing, but it supports both EF6 and EF Core). As stated in author's article it modifies SQL query passed to server and injects VALUES construction with data from your local list. And query is executed on DB server.
If accountNo identifies the record then you could use:
var duplicationCheck = from farmerProfile in dataAccessdup.MST_FarmerProfile
join farmerFromList in lstFarmerProfiles
on farmerProfile.AccountNo equals farmerFromList.AccountNo
select new {
farmerProfile.Name,
farmerProfile.BankName,
farmerProfile.BranchName,
farmerProfile.AccountNo
};
If you need to join on name and account then this should work:
var duplicationCheck = from farmerProfile in dataAccessdup.MST_FarmerProfile
join farmerFromList in lstFarmerProfiles
on new
{
accountNo = farmerProfile.AccountNo,
name = farmerProfile.Name
}
equals new
{
accountNo = farmerFromList.AccountNo,
name = farmerFromList.Name
}
select new
{
farmerProfile.Name,
farmerProfile.BankName,
farmerProfile.BranchName,
farmerProfile.AccountNo
};
If you are only going to go through duplicateChecklist once then leaving .ToList() out will be better for performance.
Suppose my datatable is filled with data.
After filling data can we again put some condition on datatable with linq to extract data.
Suppose my datatable has 10 employee record.
So can we extract only those employee whose salary is greater than 5000 with linq query.
I know that we can achieve it datatable.select(). How can you achieve this with linq?
You can get a filtered set of rows, yes:
var query = table.AsEnumerable()
.Where(row => row.Field<decimal>("salary") > 5000m);
This uses the AsEnumerable and Field extension methods in DataTableExtensions and DataRowExtensions respectively.
Try this:
var query = (from t0 in dtDataTable.AsEnumerable()
where t0.Field<string>("FieldName") == Filter
select new
{
FieldName = t0.Field<string>("FieldName"),
FieldName2 = t0.Field<string>("FieldName2"),
});
How I can use Like query in LINQ ....
in sql for eg..
name like='apple';
thanks..
Use normal .NET methods. For example:
var query = from person in people
where person.Name.StartsWith("apple") // equivalent to LIKE 'apple%'
select person;
(Or EndsWith, or Contains.) LINQ to SQL will translate these into the appropriate SQL.
This will work in dot notation as well - there's nothing magic about query expressions:
// Will find New York
var query = cities.Where(city => city.Name.EndsWith("York"));
You need to use StartsWith, Contains or EndsWith depending on where your string can appear. For example:
var query = from c in ctx.Customers
where c.City.StartsWith("Lo")
select c;
will find all cities that start with "Lo" (e.g. London).
var query = from c in ctx.Customers
where c.City.Contains("York")
select c;
will find all cities that contain "York" (e.g. New York, Yorktown)
Source
name.contains("apple");
I use item.Contains("criteria"), but, it works efficiently only if you convert to lower both, criteria and item like this:
string criteria = txtSearchItemCriteria.Text.ToLower();
IEnumerable<Item> result = items.Where(x => x.Name.ToLower().Contains(criteria));
I have an entity object (Company) which has 1 or more subobjects (CompanyRevision) represented as a non-null FK relationship in the database.
Using LINQ, I want to get all the Companies from the database, but I also only want the latest CompanyRevision for each company.
This is how I do it today, but I have a feeling this could be done using one query.
IEnumerable<Company> companyList = from p in ctx.Company.Include("CompanyRevisions")
select p;
foreach(Company c in companyList)
{
CompanyRevision cr = (from p in c.CompanyRevisions
orderby p.Timestamp descending
select p).First();
// Do something with c and cr...
}
As you can see, I would like to add this second LINQ query (the one that gets the latest CompanyRevision) into the first one, so that companyList[i].CompanyRevisions is basicly a list with just one entry (the latest one). I can't for the life of my figure out how to do this. Please help!
Thanks in advance
how about this: mixing the linq language and extension methods:
var results = from p in ctx.Company.Include("CompanyRevisions")
select new {Company = p,
Revision = p.CompanyRevisions.OrderByDescending(cr => cr.Timestamp).First()
}
Each result now has a Company and Revision member.
It's possible that you could also do this -
var results = from p in ctx.Company.Include("CompanyRevisions")
select new {Company = p,
Revision = (from pcr in p.CompanyRevisions
orderby pcr.Timestamp descending
select pcr).First()
}
To give the same results.
Although that's a guess - I haven't labbed that one out; but it's how I would try it first.