Construct the largest possible rectangle out of line segments of given lengths - algorithm

Question

I recently participated in a competition where I was asked this question. Given an array with lengths what is the area of the biggest rectangle that can be made using ALL the lengths. The lengths can be added but not broken in between.
Example:
[ 4,2,4,4,6,8 ] given this array the best we can do is make a rectangle of sides 8 and 6 like this.
giving an area of 8 * 6 = 48.
I am a beginner and even after a long hard think about how to do it I am unable to get anywhere. I am not looking for a solution but any clue to nudge me in the right direction would be appreciated.
TIA
Edit: Somebody pointed out(comment deleted now) that its difficult to explain the solution with just hints and not posting some code. Kindly post code if necessary.

Answer 1

The problem is NP-Hard, thus the backtracking solution [or other exponential solution as suggested by #vhallac] will be your best shot, since there is not known [and if P!=NP, there is no existing] polynomial solution for this kind of problem.
NP-Hardness proof:
First, we know that a rectangle consists of 4 edges, that are equal in pairs [e1=e2,e3=e4].
We will show that if there is a polynomial algorithm A to this problem, we can also solve the Partition Problem, by the following algorithm:
input: a group of numbers S=a1,a2,...,an
output: true if and only if the numbers can be partitioned
algorithm:
sum <- a1 + a2 + .. + an
lengths <- a1, a2 , ... , an , (sum*5), (sum*5)
activate A with lengths.
if A answered there is any rectangle [solution is not 0], answer True
else answer False
Correctness:
(1) if there is a partition to S, let it be S1,S2, there is also a rectangle with edges: (sum*5),(sum*5),S1,S2, and the algorithm will yield True.
(2) if the algorithm yields True, there is a rectangle available in lengths, since a1 + a2 + ... + an < sum*5, there are 2 edges with length sum*5, since the 2 other edges must be made using all remaining lengths [as the question specified], each other edge is actually of length (a1 + a2 + ... + an)/2, and thus there is a legal partition to the problem.
Conclusion: There is a reduction PARTITION<=(p) this problem, and thus, this problem is NP-Hard
EDIT:
the backtracking solution is pretty simple, get all possible rectangles, and check each of them to see which is the best.
backtracking solution: pseudo-code:
getAllRectangles(S,e1,e2,e3,e4,sol):
if S == {}:
if legalRectangle(e1,e2,e3,e4):
sol.add((e1,e2,e3,e4))
else: //S is not empty
elem <- S[0]
getAllRectangles(S-elem,e1+elem,e2,e3,e4,sol)
getAllRectangles(S-elem,e1,e2+elem,e3,e4,sol)
getAllRectangles(S-elem,e1,e2,e3+elem,e4,sol)
getAllRectangles(S-elem,e1,e2,e3,e4+elem,sol)
getRectangle(S):
RECS <- new Set
getAllRectangles(S,{},{},{},{},RECS)
getBest(RECS)
EDIT2:
As discussed in the comments, this answer shows not only this is hard to find the BEST rectangle, it is also hard to find ANY rectangle, making this problem hard for heuristic solutions as well.

Answer 2

Here is one solution to the problem in Python. It is not optimized at all. I even check 2, 4 after I check 4,2, for example. But for showing how you can find a solution, I think it is good enough.
def all_but(lst, pos):
return lst[0:pos]+lst[pos+1:]
def find_sets_with_len(segs, l):
for i in range(0, len(segs)):
val = segs[i]
if (val == l):
yield [val], all_but(segs, i)
if (val < l):
for soln, rest in find_sets_with_len(all_but(segs, i), l - val):
yield [val]+soln, rest
def find_rect(segs, l1, l2):
for side1, rest1 in find_sets_with_len(segs, l1):
for side2, rest2 in find_sets_with_len(rest1, l1):
for side3, rest3 in find_sets_with_len(rest2, l2):
return [side1, side2, side3, rest3]
def make_rect(segs):
tot_len = sum(segs)
if (tot_len %2) == 0:
opt_len=tot_len/4
for l in range(opt_len, 0, -1):
sides = find_rect(segs, l, tot_len/2-l)
if sides is not None:
print(sides)
return sides
print("Can't find any solution")
make_rect([4,2,4,4,6,8])
The idea is simple: first, calculate the optimal length (that is, the length to make a square), then search everything starting off with the optimal length, and go down to 1 for one side. For each length, enumerate all sets for one side of the claculated length, then enumerate all sets for the opposite side (of the same length), then if I can find one more set of the remaining length (that is total_len/2 minus the side length I am looking at), then I've got the best solution. This happens in find_rect() function.

Answer 3

Well, I get little bit bored so play around with Java to have some experience, can be poorly coded and without tuning, as I am trying to increase my coding skill, comments are welcome. My computer able to answer me for small arrays:)
Output looks like:
Largest rectangle range is ; 48
-------------------------------------------------
input values; [ 4,2,4,4,6,8,9 ]
-------------------------------------------------
Array details of the rectangle:
A1: [ 6 ]
B1: [ 8 ]
A2: [ 2,4 ]
B2: [ 4,4 ]
combination.class using Kenneth algorithm;
import java.math.BigInteger;
public class Combination {
/**
* Burak
*/
private int[] a;
private int n;
private int r;
private BigInteger numLeft;
private BigInteger total;
public Combination (int n, int r) {
if (r > n) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException ();
}
if (n < 1) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException ();
}
this.n = n;
this.r = r;
a = new int[r];
BigInteger nFact = getFactorial (n);
BigInteger rFact = getFactorial (r);
BigInteger nminusrFact = getFactorial (n - r);
total = nFact.divide (rFact.multiply (nminusrFact));
reset ();
}
//------
// Reset
//------
public void reset () {
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
a[i] = i;
}
numLeft = new BigInteger (total.toString ());
}
//------------------------------------------------
// Return number of combinations not yet generated
//------------------------------------------------
public BigInteger getNumLeft () {
return numLeft;
}
//-----------------------------
// Are there more combinations?
//-----------------------------
public boolean hasMore () {
return numLeft.compareTo (BigInteger.ZERO) == 1;
}
//------------------------------------
// Return total number of combinations
//------------------------------------
public BigInteger getTotal () {
return total;
}
//------------------
// Compute factorial
//------------------
private static BigInteger getFactorial (int n) {
BigInteger fact = BigInteger.ONE;
for (int i = n; i > 1; i--) {
fact = fact.multiply (new BigInteger (Integer.toString (i)));
}
return fact;
}
//--------------------------------------------------------
// Generate next combination (algorithm from Rosen p. 286)
//--------------------------------------------------------
public int[] getNext () {
if (numLeft.equals (total)) {
numLeft = numLeft.subtract (BigInteger.ONE);
return a;
}
int i = r - 1;
while (a[i] == n - r + i) {
i--;
}
a[i] = a[i] + 1;
for (int j = i + 1; j < r; j++) {
a[j] = a[i] + j - i;
}
numLeft = numLeft.subtract (BigInteger.ONE);
return a;
}
}
And main Combinator.class;
import java.util.*;
public class Combinator {
/**
* #param args
*/
private static int[] ad;
private static int[] bd;
private static String a1;
private static String a2;
private static String b1;
private static String b2;
private static int bestTotal =0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] array={4,2,4,4,6,8,9};
getBestCombination(array, 1);
if(bestTotal <= 0){
System.out.println("System couldnt create any rectangle.");
}else{
System.out.println("Largest rectangle range is ; " + bestTotal);
System.out.println("-------------------------------------------------");
System.out.println("input values; " + parseArrayToString(array));
System.out.println("-------------------------------------------------");
System.out.println("Array details of the rectangle:");
System.out.println("A1: " + a1);
System.out.println("B1: " + b1);
System.out.println("A2: " + a2);
System.out.println("B2: " + b2);
}
}
private static void getBestCombination(int[] array, int level){
int[] a;
int[] b;
int bestPerimeter = getTotal(array,true);
Vector<Vector<Integer>> results = null;
for(int o=array.length-1;o>=1;o--){
for(int u=bestPerimeter;u>=1;u--){
results = Combinator.compute (array, o, u);
if(results.size() > 0){
for(int i=0;i<results.size();i++){
a = new int[results.elementAt(i).size()];
for(int j = 0;j<results.elementAt(i).size();j++){
a[j] = results.elementAt(i).elementAt(j);
}
b = removeItems(array, results.elementAt(i));
if(level == 1){
getBestCombination(a,2);
getBestCombination(b,3);
}else if(level == 2){
ad = a;
bd = b;
}else{
getBestCombination(a,4);
getBestCombination(b,4);
if(getTotal(ad, false) == getTotal(a, false) && getTotal(bd, false) == getTotal(b, false)){
if(bestTotal<(getTotal(ad, false)*getTotal(bd, false))){
bestTotal = getTotal(ad, false)*getTotal(bd, false);
a1 = parseArrayToString(ad);
a2 = parseArrayToString(a);
b1 = parseArrayToString(bd);
b2 = parseArrayToString(b);
}
}else if(getTotal(ad, false) == getTotal(b, false) && getTotal(bd, false) == getTotal(a, false)){
if(bestTotal<(getTotal(ad, false)*getTotal(bd, false))){
bestTotal = getTotal(ad, false)*getTotal(bd, false);
a1 = parseArrayToString(ad);
a2 = parseArrayToString(b);
b1 = parseArrayToString(bd);
b2 = parseArrayToString(a);
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
private static String parseArrayToString(int[] items){
String s = "[ ";
for(int i=0;i<items.length;i++){
if(i!=items.length-1){
s = s + items[i] + ",";
}else{
s = s + items[i];
}
}
s = s + " ]";
return s;
}
#SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
private static int[] removeItems(int[] array, Vector items){
ArrayList<Integer> res = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for(int i=0;i<array.length;i++){
res.add(array[i]);
}
for(int u = 0;u<items.size();u++){
res.remove(items.elementAt(u));
}
int[] results = new int[res.size()];
for(int o=0;o<res.size();o++){
results[o] = res.get(o);
}
return results;
}
private static int getTotal(int[] array,boolean bestPerimeter){
int sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
sum += array[i];
}
if(bestPerimeter == true){
if(sum%2!=0){
sum = sum -1;
}
sum = sum/2;
}
//System.out.println(sum);
return sum;
}
#SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
private static int getSum (Vector v) {
int sum = 0;
Integer n;
for (int i = 0; i < v.size (); i++) {
n = (Integer) v.elementAt(i);
sum += n.intValue ();
}
return sum;
}
#SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
public static Vector<Vector<Integer>> compute (int[] array, int atATime, int desiredTotal) {
int[] indices;
Combination gen = new Combination (array.length, atATime);
Vector results = new Vector ();
Vector combination;
int sum;
Integer intObj;
while (gen.hasMore ()) {
combination = new Vector ();
indices = gen.getNext ();
for (int i = 0; i < indices.length; i++) {
intObj = new Integer (array[indices[i]]);
combination.addElement (intObj);
}
sum = getSum (combination);
if (sum == desiredTotal) {
Collections.sort (combination);
if (!results.contains (combination)) {
results.addElement (combination);
}
}
}
return results;
}
}