As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
I'm after a Any free documentation tool for Visual Stusio 2010?
Any good ones with sample demo?
Cheers
You can take a look at sandcastle for generating documentation.
Atomineer Utils
Visual Assist X
Both have 30-day free trials, neither work for Express Editions, after the free trial ends, the cost is minimal (VAX is 40 for students)
Related
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
I have been asked to create a sandboxed SharePoint application/site; multiple developers will be working on this. All the team members are .Net developers. Which is the best/maintainable/professional approach?
Approach 1 - Create pages, lists, workflows etc. in SharePoint and SharePoint designer. Then export the wsp file and import it into visual studio. e.g. do most of the work in the SharePoint ui.
Approach 2 - Build it up using visual studio e.g. modules, elements, feature receivers.
It really depends on how much you want to do with the sharepoint application.
Sharepoint Designer has slightly more functionality than the SPS web admin interface, and this connects directly to your SPS instance.
VS will give you far more flixibility but requires greater programming knowledge and (if memory serves me) you will require an instance of SPS installed on your development machine.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
Would you consider it a reasonable idea to implement a Visual Studio 2010 add-in in C++ because it's the language you know best/that's normally used in-house/that gives you the full power to do even rare things? Today C++ seems quite unpopular in this area.
AFAICT writing Visual Studio add-ins in C++ means dealing with COM, at that is cumbersome in C++. I, for one, would avoid writing add-ins in C++ for this reason alone.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
Is there a list of all the source control systems that have visual studio plugins? If not, we can make one here...
Subversion
AnkhSVN
VisualSVN
Git
Git Extensions
Git Source Control Provider
Team Foundation Server
Visual Source Safe
CVS
IBM Rational ClearCase
Plastic SCM
Mercurial
VisualHG
Visual SVN with Tortoise and ankhsvn plugin works like a charm. Very easy to install and administrate.
There's also Git Source Control Provider for Visual Studio:
http://gitscc.codeplex.com/
This one actually works with VS2010 for me. Git Extensions does not.
AccuRev's Microsoft Visual Studio Plug-in
Team Foundation Server
IBM Rational ClearCase
SourceGear's Vault has a Visual Studio plugin. Some of Vault's great features are:
free for single users
SQL Server backend
atomic checkins / changesets
Screenshots of Vault
IBM Rational Team Concert
This client integration supports Jazz Source Control, Work Items and Build Engine.
Visual SourceSafe
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
I've seen ReSharper recommended a lot Unfortunately, it doesn't support C++ in Visual Studio. Is there anything out there you can recommend? I already use Visual Assist, and it does its job very well, but it's quite limited in comparison with ReSharper.
Any suggestions?
IMHO - Visual Assist X is best but expensive code completion/refactoring tool for C++.
VAX has not so much features as ReSharper for C#, but it makes your C++ programming easier and faster... Just looked on CodeRush - it su%% as most of DevExpress libs & tools.
Refactor Pro is available for Visual C++, this will give you some functionality. Also check out CodeRush, I think it also supports C++.
I tried both Refactor Pro and Visual Assist/X. Neither of them thrilled me in the same way that ReSharper does. I guess that mostly, this is because C++ is such a hard language to write automatic refactorings for.
The solution is to code in Eclipse or NetBeans, but such IDEs are not Visual Studio.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
I currently use AnkhSVN to integrate subversion into Visual Studio. Is there any reason I should switch to VisualSVN?
AnkhSVN is free (in more than one sense of the word) while VisualSVN costs $50. So right there unless I'm missing some great feature of VisualSVN I don't see any reason to switch.
I used VisualSVN until Ankh hit 2.0, and ever since, I've abandoned VisualSVN. Ankh has surpassed VisualSVN in functionality, in my mind, and all the 1.x perf and integration issues are gone.
I recently tried Ankh but quickly switched back to VisualSVN. Because:
Better commit dialog (use UI of tortoise)
No refresh problems (which i had using ankh)
Imho visual svn is easilty worth its money
For me, VisualSVN is pretty, but useless. AnkhSvn on the other hand, after it came in v2 as an scc provider, it works very good.
VisualSVN tries to think for you, which is not an good thing, the user should be the controller, not the software.
The main thing is that VisualSVN uses TortoiseSVN for nearly all of its UI. So you only really have to set up one client (preferred diff viewer, etc), and you can take advantage of things like the same "Previous messages" button on the Commit dialog, whether you're committing from Explorer or Visual Studio.