Pivoting in Linq [duplicate] - linq

Question

This question already has answers here:
Pivot data using LINQ
(5 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I am using LINQ-to-Entities, and would like to perform a pivot.
For exampe, I have this table:
| data1 | data2 |
+-------+-------+
| 1 | A |
| 1 | B |
| 2 | P |
| 2 | Q |
| 2 | R |
+---------------+
And I want to pivot it into the following results:
| data1 | first | second | third |
+-------+-------+--------+-------+
| 1 | A | B | NULL |
| 2 | P | Q | R |
+--------------------------------+
I would like to do this in LINQ, without needing to do client-side processing.
I have seen these SO posts, but they do not quite address the above situation (as far as I can tell).
Pivot data using LINQ
Is it possible to Pivot data using LINQ?
Note
I have tried the below, but it complains that I cannot use Skip() on an unordered collection, and I don't see a way to get the group's collapsed 'data2' info sorted.
from item in MyTable
group item by item.data1 into g
select new
{
data1 = g.Key,
first = g.Skip(0).FirstOrDefault().data2,
second = g.Skip(1).FirstOrDefault().data2,
third = g.Skip(2).FirstOrDefault().data2,
};

Answer 1

I assume that you could have more than three columns from the data2 field?
If so there's no way to do you query that returns an anonymous type with a variable number of properties. You need to return an array or some sort of list for the data2 set of values.
I think this is the kind of thing that you can do:
var query =
from mt in MyTable
group mt.data2 by mt.data1 into gmts
let d2 = gmts.ToArray()
select new
{
data1 = gmts.Key,
data2 = d2,
length = d2.Length,
};
var pending = query.ToArray();
var maxLength = pending.Max(p => p.length);
Func<string[], string[]> extend = xs =>
{
var r = new string[maxLength];
xs.CopyTo(r, 0);
return r;
};
var results =
from p in pending
select new
{
p.data1,
data2 = extend(p.data2),
};
This produces a series of anonymous type with the data2 array all being the same size to fit the maximum number of results for any of the data1 fields.
The query is still executed as a single SQL query. And the in-memory processing is fast.
Does this work for you?
EDIT
Since you know you have a fixed number of columns (as per comment) you can easily change my results query to meet your requirements:
var results =
from p in pending
let d2s = extend(p.data2)
select new
{
p.data1,
first = d2s[0],
second = d2s[1],
third = d2s[2],
};

Answer 2

Hmm, this seems to work, though I wonder how efficient it is.
from item in MyTable
group item by item.data1 into g
select new
{
data1 = g.Key,
first = g.OrderBy(x => x.data2).Skip(0).FirstOrDefault().data2,
second = g.OrderBy(x => x.data2).Skip(1).FirstOrDefault().data2,
third = g.OrderBy(x => x.data2).Skip(2).FirstOrDefault().data2,
};
The corresponding SQL generated (from LINQPad) is:
SELECT [t1].[data1], (
SELECT [t5].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT TOP (1) [t4].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT [t3].[data2], [t3].[ROW_NUMBER]
FROM (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [t2].[data2]) AS [ROW_NUMBER], [t2].[data2]
FROM [MyTable] AS [t2]
WHERE [t1].[data1] = [t2].[data1]
) AS [t3]
WHERE [t3].[ROW_NUMBER] > #p0
) AS [t4]
ORDER BY [t4].[ROW_NUMBER]
) AS [t5]
) AS [first], (
SELECT [t10].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT TOP (1) [t9].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT [t8].[data2], [t8].[ROW_NUMBER]
FROM (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [t7].[data2]) AS [ROW_NUMBER], [t7].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT [t6].[data2]
FROM [MyTable] AS [t6]
WHERE [t1].[data1] = [t6].[data1]
) AS [t7]
) AS [t8]
WHERE [t8].[ROW_NUMBER] > #p1
) AS [t9]
ORDER BY [t9].[ROW_NUMBER]
) AS [t10]
) AS [second], (
SELECT [t15].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT TOP (1) [t14].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT [t13].[data2], [t13].[ROW_NUMBER]
FROM (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [t12].[data2]) AS [ROW_NUMBER], [t12].[data2]
FROM (
SELECT [t11].[data2]
FROM [MyTable] AS [t11]
WHERE [t1].[data1] = [t11].[data1]
) AS [t12]
) AS [t13]
WHERE [t13].[ROW_NUMBER] > #p2
) AS [t14]
ORDER BY [t14].[ROW_NUMBER]
) AS [t15]
) AS [third]
FROM (
SELECT [t0].[data1]
FROM [MyTable] AS [t0]
GROUP BY [t0].[data1]
) AS [t1]